God rules over
life and death. 1 Samuel 2:5-10 & Psalm 2
ÒFather,
weÕre thankful that we have this opportunity to come together to reflect upon
You, to study Your Word, to be strengthened and encouraged, to be reminded of
Your faithfulness, to be reminded of who You are in terms of Your essence; and
that You can be relied upon to handle any and every situation and circumstances
in our lives - from that which is personal to that which is national; that
which is much larger than us, that which involves the historical trends and
where we are headed as a nation, that we may relax and trust in You,
remembering that our mission is to reflect Your character to the culture that
we may shine as lights in the midst of a wicked and perverse generation, and
that we may be a witness verbally to those around us as to Your grace, and
understand the transforming power of Your grace. Father, we pray that You would
strengthen us as we study Your Word this evening in ChristÕs name. Amen.Ó
While
you are turning in your Bibles to 1 Samuel 2 I thought I would give a little
report on the trip last week to Gulfport, Mississippi. I was going to do this
on Sunday, and we just didnÕt quite have enough time. So I thought I would just
do it tonight. The conference that I spoke at is called the Coast Bible
Conference. This conference began in 1941.
For
those of you who donÕt have a whole lot of historical frame of reference on
Bible conferences, the Bible Conference Movement or what became to be known as
the Bible Conference Movement started in the late 1800s. It was probably an
outgrowth of the old tent revivals that would take place along the American
frontier. During the early mid-part of the 1800s you would go to areas that
were sparsely populated.
I
remember reading a biography of Davey Crockett when I was a kid in elementary
school. At one point his father decided they should move to the next location
because the neighbors were too close. They were twenty miles away. People lived
very spread out in the time of the American frontier, and these frontier
revivalist, these itinerate preachers would come. Many of them were Methodists
back in the day and some were itinerate Baptists.
The
way you could tell the difference between a Baptist and a Methodist was—what?
Does anybody have any idea? The Baptist had a whiskey flask in his saddlebag.
ThatÕs not the way we normally think of Baptists and Methodists today. I always
thought that was an amusing antidote.
There
was a professor of religion at Rice University who wrote a book some years ago.
I think it was called Bible in His Hand, Gun in His Pocket. It was the story of frontier
preachers. He did a pretty good job of telling a lot of interesting stories
about frontier preachers.
But
people would come together in these revivals. They would come from 30-50 miles
away and have a week of meetings. A lot of times they didnÕt even have a local
church. Some of these meetings got pretty emotional and out of hand because the
people just werenÕt used to being around other people at that time.
That
was the old revival movement in the mid-1800s. By the end of the 1800s, as
people were more settled, they would have Bible conferences, especially
prophecy conferences, like the Niagara Bible Conferences that took place up in
New York. There were a number of others that took place in the northeast and
around the country.
This
Coast Bible Conference started just before WWII.
TheyÕve had it every single year up until about 6-8 years ago when hurricane
Katrina came in. That really had a devastating impact on the coast. Up until
that point they would have around 200 people that would come. The conference
itself was all week long. People would come. About a third of the attendees
were out of the area. They would come and would go to the beach. They would have
various activities in the area. Then Katrina hit and just wiped out so much. A
lot of the locals that came probably were displaced. Since Katrina their
attendance has dropped to about 80-90. They continue to meet, but they shrunk
the length of the conference down to a couple of days, from noon on Thursday to
noon on Saturday. But they still had as many sessions as they had before.
ThatÕs
kind of like the Chafer Conference. When we first started that pastorÕs
conference, it started on Monday and went to Friday, but they didnÕt meet in
the afternoon. Now weÕve shrunk it down to three days, but we still have just
as many sessions as we did before. That helps people who are travelling and
have a long way to go. They donÕt have to spend as much on hotels and that sort
of thing.
The
Coast Conference was a good conference, and there have been a lot of speakers
there over the years whose names you would recognize. People like Charles Ryrie,
Stan Toussaint, John Walvoord, Wayne House, Chris Cone, who just a couple of
years ago left his position as President of Tyndale Seminary, but theyÕve had
quite a number of speakers. They have different speakers every year. They have
two speakers, and each speaker speaks six times. This year they met at a church
in the area. There are two or three different churches that are in the area
that are Bible churches. This particular church was a Bible Fellowship Church
in Pass Christian, Mississippi, which is right along Gulfport and Long Beach
and all these little communities over there.
The
pastor there did his undergraduate at Southeastern Bible College. He did his
MasterÕs and Doctorial work at Tyndale. He was pretty solid, although I didnÕt
get to hear three of his sessions because I had to leave early. He did a good
job. His name was Don Trest. He was speaking on the Gospel of John and did a
good job as far as I could tell from the three sessions I heard. I taught on
the spiritual life.
My
name had been recommended to them two or three years ago by a black pastor in
the area, who had been one of my students with WHW. I had not seen that
individual since 2000. He and a couple of other black pastors in the area, who
had come to WHW back in 1999-2000, continue to listen. They have also shared
the ministry with four or five other of black pastors in the area who regularly
listen. He has recommended me. They invited me to come and speak. We set that
up, and when he found out about it he wanted to know if I could come a couple
of days early and speak to a group of pastors there, as well as speak at maybe
one or two black churches while I was out there.
We
left after church on that Sunday and went out there and had a day of rest on
Monday. Then on Tuesday I met with this group of pastors. By the time that came
together, they wanted me to talk about this same sex marriage issue and how
that was going to impact churches, ministries, 501,c(3)s, tax exemption, and
all these other things. I talked for about two and half hours to that group of
pastors, and then there were another 10-15 people that came from several
different churches to find out more about those issues. That was on Tuesday
afternoon, and then there were three or four pastors who couldnÕt make that, so
we went to lunch on Wednesday afternoon.
Then
on Wednesday night I spoke at Pastor Mark TurnerÕs church. The conference began
on Thursday. I taught twice, Thursday afternoon and four times on Friday
because I had to trade off with the other speaker on Saturday morning, so that
I could get back for Gene HannuschÕs memorial service.
What
was really great was to find a pastor there, Don Trest, and another pastor,
Loren Faul who was a Dallas Seminary graduate from 1982 or 1983. He started two
years after I did. I think he took a little longer to get through the program.
He is free grace and also dispensational. They said that nobody knows we exist
out there. But now weÕve connected with them and theyÕre connecting with Chafer
Seminary. They knew a little bit about Chafer Seminary. Loren had read in the
Chafer Journal some things, and that was about it. It was good to make those
connections. Loren told me, after about the fourth session, it is so nice to
listen to a pastor with whom you donÕt disagree, because he said so may people,
and we talked about all these icks, acts, and spasms that are going on in
Christianity and Evangelicalism today. I used to be the guy that was on the
cutting edge and knew all of this stuff, but I donÕt get out there and get
around as much as I used to. I donÕt hear; I hear little bits and pieces. ItÕs
horrible out there. Very few people really do talk about the Bible.
There
are a lot of people who talk about what they are doing -are teaching the Bible. But Tommy, Dr.
Ice, told me on several occasions that heÕs gone to some prophecy conferences
where heÕs been invited, and there may be 10-12 speakers, and heÕs the only one
that pulls out the Bible and starts doing verse-by-verse exposition.
People
are just involved in all kinds of speculation. They get into lots of what I
call Òpop religionÓ which is loosely based on the Bible, but it really isnÕt.
They are not going through the Word. This is really sad today because we have
the son of a very well known Baptist pastor out of Atlanta. The son is a Dallas
Seminary graduate, but he has taken some terrible wrong turns. HeÕs become
pro-Palestinian-Christian. HeÕs become just a lot of different things. He
apparently, I canÕt remember whether he wrote it or had a sermon on it, but it
was insulting to pastors who taught verse by verse and just went through the
Scripture. He says thatÕs the laziest, most incompetent way to study the Bible.
This sermon made it all the way around on the Internet about four or five
months ago.
ThatÕs
what is happening today. You donÕt find verse-by-verse exposition, but thatÕs
the only way you learn the Bible. ThatÕs the only way a pastor can really learn
the text – it is to study it verse by verse. As a pastor studies it
verse-by-verse, after youÕve been doing verse by verse exposition for maybe
10-15 years, then youÕve got enough time and grade and enough study to where
you can do more accurate topical messages because youÕve worked through the
exegesis of all those key passages. You understand what they are saying.
So
often what you hear in topical messages is they are just proof texting. They
are just pulling out this verse and that verse and this other verse to try to
prove what they are saying. If you really study those verses in context they
donÕt any more prove what they are saying nor have anything to do with the
topic they are preaching on, than the man in the moon.
This
is what passes for Christianity today. This country is in a terrible situation.
IÕve said, and weÕve heard from others: as goes the Christian, so goes the
nation. The way the Christians are going in this nation is terrible! It is
absolutely awful! Because theyÕve gotten away from the Word of God and they donÕt
know what they give the Word of God is lip service, but they donÕt spend time
in it.
There
ought to not be an empty seat in this building whenever IÕm teaching. The fact
that there are empty seats is a testimony to the fact that people donÕt want to
know the Bible anymore. Pastors donÕt want to.
Every
now and then Tommy and I get off on tangents when weÕre on the phone, and we
have our rants about the fact that back when we went to seminary you could talk
to anybody you met at Dallas – well why did you come to Dallas Seminary?
I wanted to teach the Bible. But thatÕs not the answer you get anymore. IsnÕt
that right, John? They donÕt want to teach the Bible. They go for all kinds of
other reasons.
I
donÕt know why they get into so much debt if they are not going to spend their
money to learn how to teach the Bible. The Bible, it is the Word of God that is
alive and powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword, and it is not human
opinion. It is not motivational speaking. It is not making people feel good as
your primary purpose.
Having
said that it was a good conference, the people were very responsive. The people
are a group of people who come. Some of those people have been coming 30-50
years. There was one lady we went out to lunch with on Tuesday. She had been
coming almost since the beginning. She was 86 years old. SheÕd been coming
almost since the beginning of this conference in 1941, when she was a teenager.
It was good to see that there are people who come, and they sat through all 12
sessions. They took it in. They asked good questions.
ThereÕs
an US Armed Forces retirement
center right there on the beach in Gulfport. The first day I was there we had a
break and I went to a table and sat down in the fellowship hall. There were
about six or seven guys all there, and probably two-thirds of them had come
over from that retirement center. They were asking good questions, intelligent
questions, showing that they had been taught the Word of God. ThatÕs what is
important.
LetÕs
look at our passage here in 1 Samuel 2. Going back, we havenÕt been here for
three weeks due to other studies, other things, but weÕre looking at this great
exposition. WeÕll cover from probably 1 Samuel 2:5 on in this session because
what we have here in this section primarily are different examples of GodÕs rule
over life and death and all of the issues of life and death.
The
real focal point of this passage is on the sovereign rule of God over history.
Yesterday I heard a great example of this. For those of you who are a little
discouraged and might be a little down and feel a little defeated because over
the last year or so, counting some local city problems and elections and
things, and the Supreme Court rule, this horrible disaster of a nuclear
agreement with Iran which is not going to limit anything. It has emboldened the
Iranians. IÕll talk about this later, but this is setting the stage for another
holocaust, just as Neville Chamberlain set the stage for the last holocaust in WWII
by thinking that heÕd entered into a peace deal with Hitler. But we know that
ultimately the Iranians are not going to drop a nuclear weapon on Israel. We
know that because that would render the land uninhabitable. It is going to be
inhabitable for the Tribulation to take place. Whatever gloom and doom we may
think of we are confident GodÕs plan is not going to be thwarted by the
craziness of the Ayatollahs of Iran. That doesnÕt mean they wonÕt try to launch
a nuclear weapon at the United States. It doesnÕt mean they wonÕt try to launch
a nuclear weapon at Europe.
Yesterday
I had the privilege of going to a meeting with a number of other people with
Senator Ted Cruz. He made an excellent point that there are so many parallels
with what is going on today and what was going on at the end of the 1970s when
we had Jimmy Carter, who was sort of an Obama light. Probably Jimmy Carter
thinks the world of Obama, primarily because it keeps him off the bottom; heÕs
no longer the worst president.
But
if you were alive then, you know that we had double-digit inflation and
interest rates on homes and mortgages. People were paying 14-18% interest rate
on mortgages. The economy was terrible. Gas prices – we had gas lines. It
was absolutely horrendous. People felt defeated. Then we had the whole
situation with the Americans that were taken hostage by the Iranians. But we
nominated a candidate for president to run in 1980 by the name of Ronald
Reagan. He was solid on foreign policy. He was solid on defense. People knew
where he stood. The Iranians knew where he stood. The very day that he was sworn
into office the Iranians released the hostages, and from that point on things
began to recover because we had a leader who was focused and understood
absolutes.
ThatÕs
what we need. It is not impossible. God can change anything. Just as Hannah was
being ridiculed and opposed by Peninnah.
And
we see Christians in a world today that are being attacked by many people in
our culture, that are under assault from the homosexual lobby, that are under
assault form liberal groups that want to take Christianity completely out of
the public marketplace. Nevertheless, we know that God can change things.
Just
as He changed things for Hannah He can change things for us, because thatÕs
what God can do because He is God. The emphasis in this section is on GodÕs
sovereignty and how He overrides the plans and the dreams and the hopes of
mankind. It is GodÕs plan that works out in history, not the plans of the
wicked. Hannah emphasizes this in her psalm of praise, this victory psalm,
because God has given her this victory by giving her a son. LetÕs review a
couple of things real quickly:
1.
The first thing we see here in terms of her emphasis is an emphasis that YHWH
is the unique, incomparable, transcendent sovereign of the universe.
One
of the things I want to bring out tonight that I havenÕt brought out before is
that this Psalm also stands as a polemic against the false religions of the
Canaanites that had taken a hold of the Israelites during the period of the
Judges. They were worshiping Baal and the fertility religions. They were worshiping the Asherah.
All of these had become dominate in the paganization of Israel. God is going to
turn everything around through this one child He gives to Hannah. Often we see
this in Scripture.
A
polemic is an attack on another position. It is an argument that is given.
Sometimes it is embedded within the structure to show the inadequacy and the
inability of another view. So often we find in a lot of different events of
Scripture that this emphasis on the uniqueness of God—as over against all
of these gods and goddesses that are being worshipped by people—is that
God alone (YHWH) is able to accomplish
things. These other gods and goddesses canÕt do anything. That is what we see
here.
Hannah
is emphasizing YHWH as the unique and incomparable
transcendent sovereign of the universe, and that He has no rival. In 1 Samuel
2:2 she says, ÒÉ there is none beside You.Ó
When
you look at the myths, for example, thereÕs a Canaanite town by the name of
Ugarit that was discovered back about 50 years ago. We discovered a lot of
writing there. In the Ugaritic myths (Ugarit was a northwestern Canaanite city)
there were the assembly of the gods. They met on Mt. Siphon, the mountain of
the north in Syria comparable to Olympus. The gods were all referred to as the
sons of the holy one who is El. ThatÕs where we get in Hebrew, Elohim. El was
just a generic name for God. El was comparable to Saturn or Uranus, and his
son, Baal,
would be comparable to Zeus. Baal was the god of thunder and lightening, pictured as throwing a
bolt of lighting. El was viewed as the head of the assembly of the gods, but Baal was the
one that came to dominate the pantheon.
One
of BaalÕs consorts was the goddess Anat, and in the writings of Ugarit, the mythology,
Anat declares mightiest Baal as our king, our judge, over whom there is none. But against
that backdrop, where there are many other gods, Hannah states that there is
only one God, YHWH, and there is none like
Him.
Let
me just put those first four verses up on the screen. These are the ones that
we looked at. 1 Samuel 2:1-4, ÒÉ My heart rejoices in the Lord; my horn is
exalted in the Lord. I smile at my enemies, because I rejoice in Your
salvation. No one is holy like the Lord,Ó like YHWH.
ÒFor there is none beside You, nor is there any rock like our God. Talk no more
so very proudly; let no arrogance come from your mouth, for YHWH
is the God of knowledge; and by Him actions are weighted. The bows of the
mighty men are broken, and those who stumbled are girded with strength.Ó The
first thing we see is that YHWH
is the unique, incomparable, transcendent sovereign of the universe.
2.
The second thing is that the omnipotent YHWH
protects his people like no other. He is a Rock. This picture weÕve seen, and
weÕve studied that, was that God was called Òthe Rock.Ó That was a metaphorical
title for God. HeÕs the Rock. HeÕs immovable. HeÕs unshakable. A rock was a
perfect place to hide for protection. It emphasizes the power of God and His
omnipotence.
3.
The third thing we saw from this is that God is a God of justice. YHWH dispenses
justice by elevating the oppressed and humiliating the proud. This is developed
in 1 Samuel 2:3 at the end where it says, Òand by Him actions are weighed.Ó He
is the ultimate and final judge in the universe, and His judgments are
righteous. They are therefore absolute and perfect. So YHWH dispenses
justice by elevating the oppressed and humiliating the proud. This is developed
in 1 Samuel 2:3. It is going to be illustrated through the examples of 1 Samuel
2:5-10.
4.
The fourth thing we see is that YHWH
is the sovereign over life and death. God rules history. YHWH
rules history. Men can do many things, but ultimately God is the one who shapes
and directs history. HeÕs the one Who brings human plans to fruition, or He
completely reverses them, or He destroys them. YHWH
is pictured as the sovereign over life and death. He can send to the grave and
He can raise up. WeÕll have to study those metaphors as we go along. This is an
allusion to resurrection, to send to the grave or raise up, though what weÕll
see is that many modern scholars donÕt think resurrection. There was no
knowledge of resurrection at that time in IsraelÕs history. That is because
they were influenced by a lot of human viewpoint.
5.
The fifth point that we see in this section is that YHWH, not
Baal or
any other god is the one who makes barren women fertile. This is what we see. Baal is the god
of rain that brings productivity. It brings water to the crops. It brings forth
life. You have a reenactment of various sexual actions between Baal and the Asherah. This
was to indicate fertility and prosperity. It is just an early form of what we
call a prosperity gospel or the health and wealth gospel. YHWH
is the one who is omnipotent, not these other gods. HeÕs all-powerful. He never
changes.
In
the Baal
myth, at least once a year he had to succumb to death. The god of death was Muth. Once a
year he had to succumb to death and he would be taken down to place of the
dead. Then he would be raised to life again a little later on. But what we see
in this picture is God does not succumb to death. He is the one who in 2 Samuel
2:6, ÒThe Lord kills and makes alive.Ó
He is the one who oversees who lives and who dies.
What
weÕve seen here is an emphasis on a number of these attributes of God. IÕve
said this many times, that when you are thinking through lifeÕs problems, what
you need to do is to have a firm image in your mind of this essence chart, of
the essence box, and think through these attributes and the role that these
attributes have to play in the circumstances of your life.
God
is sovereign. That means He has a plan and what is happening in your life might
not be your plan. It might not be what you wanted to take place, but this is
GodÕs plan. He is working something out. ThatÕs why Romans 8:28 says that, ÒWe
know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who
are called according to His purpose.Ó He rules in the affairs of men.
He
is righteous. That means that this represents the standard of His character,
absolute perfection. He is justice. ThatÕs the outworking of His righteous plan
toward all of His creatures. He deals with His creatures in absolute justice.
He is love. We see that somewhat embedded here in the fact that down further in
1 Samuel 2:9 it says, ÒHe will guard the feet of His saints.Ó He guards the feet of
His saints because He cares about the feet of His saints. GodÕs love is implied
there by that particular statement.
We also see that He is immutable.
HeÕs like a Rock. You canÕt shake Him. He is indefatigable. He is always going to provide for us and protect us no matter what the
circumstances are. He is going to provide for us so that we can accomplish His
plan for our life. There may come a time when we may be imprisoned or
persecuted or even martyred like Peter and Paul and Matthew and James and so
many of the early leaders in the Christian church, but thatÕs GodÕs plan. It is
His plan for us to be witnesses to Him and witnesses of His grace.
What we saw last time as
we went through this section in 1 Samuel 2:4-5 is that God intervenes to reverse the plans of fallen humanity. Man proposes, but God disposes.
Tonight I want to look at 1 Samuel 2:5 and begin there. ÒThose who were full have hired
themselves out for bread.Ó LetÕs just catch this context. In 1 Samuel 2:4 it
says, ÒThe bows of the mighty men are broken, and those who stumbled are girded
with strength.Ó
What
weÕre going to see in these examples is on one hand, the people who appear to
be mighty according to human viewpoint. God is going to take them down. Then
the people who are lowly and irrelevant according to human viewpoint are the ones
that God is going to elevate and He is going to bless. It starts off, ÒThe bows
of the mighty men are broken.Ó God is going to break the power of those who are
arrogant. We may not see it in our lifetime. We may not see it in certain
situations, but eventually God is going to bring about that justice in a very
real way in their lives. ÒAnd those who stumble,Ó those who are weak, those who
canÕt walk, those who do not have power in themselves Òare girded with
strength.Ó God is going to strengthen the weak and the weary.
We
have the next set in 1 Samuel 2:5. This verse is made up of two contrasting
statements: The first set has to do with hunger and satisfaction in the first
two lines. The second two lines focus on childbearing and reversing barrenness.
In both of these lines we see concrete examples of the principle from Matthew
19:30 that the first will be last and the last will be first. God is taking
those who seem to be first. They are full, but now they are going to have to
hire themselves out for bread. They will become the last. In the second set we
have the person who is last; sheÕs barren, but the person who appears to be
first, because sheÕs had children, sheÕs going to find no pleasure from them.
They will not provide for her. They will not take care of her. She will find
her children to be of no value.
As
we look at the first two lines we read, ÒThose who were full have hired
themselves out for bread, and the hungry have ceased to hunger.Ó In this first line
it says, Òthose who were full.Ó This is the word sebea, which means to be full or to be
satisfied—those who were satiated, those who were satisfied, and those
who were full of themselves. They are satisfied with life. TheyÕve accomplished
things, and now they have been rendered destitute. They have to hire themselves
out. They have to beg for bread. They have now become the ones who are
starving. They had plenty of food to begin with, but God has taken them now.
And now they have to look for work or beg for bread in order to be fed.
In
the word Òhave ceasedÓ in the second line, Òand the hungry have ceased to
hunger,Ó this is an interesting word in the Hebrew. It is the word hadal, and
there may be two different words that have the same spelling. We have homonyms
- words that sound alike, like hear and here. They sound the same, but they have two different meanings.
We
also have some words that are spelled the same but have different meanings or
different senses. We have to look at the word to see what it actually means.
One meaning for hadal
is to be fat or to be prosperous. This would have the idea that the hungry have
become prosperous. Or there is a
second root that is suggested which has the idea Òthe hungry have ceased.Ó Both
of those words communicate basically the same thing; that the one who in the
eyes of the world is worthless and has nothing, is the one who will be supplied
and will be wealthy because of the provision of God.
In
the second line we read, ÒEven the barren has borne seven.Ó This is really a
direct allusion to the victory God has given to Hannah. She is the one who like
several others in IsraelÕs history was barren, unable to conceive and unable to
have a child. She is like the mother of Samson. WeÕve seen that parallel
between Samson and Samuel. Here she is said to have had that reversed. When we
read ÒEven the barren have borne seven,Ó when we look at the number of children
Hannah had, it is five. She didnÕt have seven. But seven is a number of
completion.
This
was a Hebrew idiom that when somebody had done something sevenfold it didnÕt
necessarily mean that it was literally sevenfold; it was done to completion or
done to fullness. This word is used that way. This idea is used that way in two
verses. In Jeremiah 15:9, ÒShe languishes who has borne seven.Ó In other words,
this is talking about a woman who has had a number of children. She has
fulfilled her role as a mother but now she is languishing.
A
more precise example is in the second verse, Ruth 4:15. This a blessing from
Naomi to Ruth, Òmay he (her husband Boaz) be to you a restorer of life and a
nourisher of your old age; for your daughter-in-law, who loves you, who is
better to you than seven sons, has borne him.Ó The idea of Òseven sonsÓ is
fullness or completion. This is the idea there that the verse is saying that
God is the one who can intervene even when life seems barren and empty. God is
the one who can make it full and complete because He is the one who rules.
In
that last line, ÒAnd she who has many children has become feebleÓ is a word
that I quoted here from the Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. It is a word that has
the idea of being childless but it also implies or is used to refer to Israel as
a nation that has become spiritually impotent. ÒShe who should be blessedÓ,
which is an allusion to Israel, has become feeble. TheyÕve become childless.
TheyÕve become impotent spiritually because of their carnality.
Now
we come to 1 Samuel 2:6-7. In these verses Hannah is going to express her
confidence in GodÕs ability to change things. We see this specifically in 1
Samuel 2:6. We read the statement, ÒThe Lord kills and makes alive.Ó Notice you
have these two opposites. ThatÕs a figure of speech called a merism. IÕve
talked about these before when you want to include:
á
ÔEverything from A to Z.Õ
See? I just used an English merism. We talk about the beginning, the first
letter, and the last letter. That means everything in between.
á
ÔAlpha and Omega,Õ the
first and the last letter in the Greek alphabet - that means everything in
between.
á
ÒGod created the Ôheavens
and the earthÕ.Ó Is there anything left out? It is a way of talking about
everything between two opposites.
á
ÒThe Lord kills and He
makes aliveÓ tell us that God is in control of everything. If He can control
life and death, God controls everything. He is omnipotent. ÒThe Lord kills and
He makes alive.Ó Again, a clear statement of GodÕs sovereignty in history.
In
the second line, ÒHe brings down to the grave and brings up.Ó This is an
interesting statement. I think it has another implication here. But it does
imply possibly a statement of resurrection. Some scholars will say resurrection
is a much later doctrine. They didnÕt really understand it then, and I would
say that thatÕs completely fraudulent because you have this in passages like
Hebrews 11:17-19. This is talking about Abraham. One of the things that happen
with scholars are that they get too scholarly. One of the things that you have
in a lot of Old Testament departments in seminaries today is the idea that if
were not told that God told them something in the Old Testament, then they didnÕt
know it. But nothing in the Old Testament says that it records everything that
God told them.
We
donÕt know everything that God told Adam, but Adam certainly knew a lot and
learned a lot from God. He learned about sacrifice. He learned about what clean
animals were and what unclean animals were. There were a lot of things that
were taught by God during that period, roughly 1800 years from Adam to Noah.
When God told Noah to put seven of every clean animal and a pair of every
unclean animal onto the ark, the text does not tell us what were clean animals
and what were unclean animals or how no one knew which were clean and which
were unclean. But obviously Noah already knew, but we never learned that. But
there are a lot of things that they understood.
We
only have 11 chapters in the Bible from creation to Babylon. That covers a
period of about 2000 years. But there is a lot that went on in those 2000 years
that we arenÕt told about. The rest of the Bible from Genesis 12 until Malachi
covers about 1600 years. Look how much of that is in your Old Testament. So
there is a lot that went on in those first 11 chapters about which we are
pretty ignorant.
But
in Hebrews 11:17, we are told that Abraham was tested. This is in Genesis 22
where God told him to take his son, his only son, Isaac, to the mountains of
Moriah and to sacrifice him. ÒBy faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up
Isaac, and he who had received the promises offered up his only begotten son.Ó
God told Abraham, I want you to take Isaac up there and I want you to offer him
as a burnt offering. You are going to sacrifice him. Abraham said, yes. He didnÕt
say, well no IÕm not going to do that because it is wrong. People have said:
See, Abraham was going to commit murder. No, Abraham understood finally that
GodÕs plan was that through his son, the promised son, the seed Isaac, that GodÕs
plan was going to go forward and that nothing could stop that. It was an
ultimate test to see if Abraham was willing to completely give up his hope and
his dream through Isaac knowing that God would fulfill His promise. We read in
Hebrews 11:18-19, Òof whom it was said, ÔIn Isaac your seed shall be called,Õ
concluding that God was able to raise him up.Ó Abraham had a clear
understanding of the doctrine of resurrection. He knew that God could raise him
up from the dead. He was willing to go along and to offer Isaac as a sacrifice.
Abraham had this clear understanding. I think that if that was approximately
400-500 years before Hannah, then Hannah clearly had an understanding of
resurrection. Another thing that we see in this verse, 1 Samuel 2:6, ÒThe Lord
kills and makes alive.Ó
There
are examples of this same kind of language in other verses related to God. We
can see that in verses such as Deuteronomy 32:39, where God is speaking: ÒNow
see that I, even I, am He, and there is no God beside Me.Ó ThatÕs that same
idea that God is exclusive. He is unique. There is no God beside Him. ÒI kill
and I make alive.Ó It is the same language that we have in HannahÕs psalm in 1
Samuel 2:6, ÒI kill and I make alive; I wound and I heal; nor is there any who
can deliver from My hand.Ó IÕm God. Nobody can mess with Me. 2 Kings 5:7, ÒAnd
it happened, when the king of Israel read the letter, that he tore his clothes
and said, ÔAm I God, to kill and make alive?ÕÓ He understood that God is the
one who is the author of life and the author of death.
I
want to go back a couple of verses to this word mawet or muth, depending on how you do the
vowels. This is the word that relates to killing. It comes from the word muth, which
is the Canaanite god for death. Again, we see this understated polemic against Baal. In the Baal story Baal has to
succumb to death to Muth, the god of death, and he goes into the underworld for a
period of time before he is released and he comes back to life.
But in the Bible YHWH is completely in control. He holds the power of life and death in His
hands. He cannot die. He does not die. He determines when death and life come
to each one of us. God determines the time, the manner, and the place of our
death, and there is nothing we can do to change that. You may change the
quality of your death by not taking care of yourself. You may go through a
period of time before you die thatÕs not as comfortable as it would have been
as if youÕd made some other good decisions. That may be true that you may go
through negative situations or circumstances related to your death, and they
may have nothing to do with your volition. That is just the way God is working
in your particular life, but God is the one who is in control.
When we look at this language that we find in HannahÕs psalm, it is
similar to the kind of language that we have in the story of Baal and Muth. In that
story the verb that is used to describe BaalÕs descent into the underworld is the same
word that Hannah uses here to describe how YHWH Òbrings down to the grave,Ó brings down to Sheol. Then He brings up. Again, thereÕs
just this allusion by vocabulary. She is sort of twisting the knife a little
bit into the Canaanites and the pagans to show that the God of the Bible is the
God who rules over death.
This line that we have here at the end of 1 Samuel 2:6, ÒHe brings down
to the grave and brings up.Ó I donÕt believe by comparing with other Scripture
that thatÕs what itÕs talking about. ItÕs parallel, but itÕs not identically or
perfectly synonymous to the first line. Bringing down to the grave and bringing
up are used in another sense in Psalm 30:2-3. There David says, ÒO Lord my God,
I cried out to You, and You healed me.Ó HeÕs not talking about being brought
back from the dead. He says, ÒO Lord, You brought my soul up from the grave.Ó
He is using hyperbole here. Life could become so miserable that he wished he
were dead. He thought he was dead. He just couldnÕt image anything being any
worse. He was depressed. He was discouraged. People had deserted him. His
enemies were winning the victory. He felt like he was one step from death. So
David says, I was at the verge of death, but You restored me. You brought me
back to life. You changed the circumstances of my life. You kept me alive that
I should not go down to the pit. That I should not die. This is one way in
which that was used.
ItÕs also a theme that is picked up later on by Mary when she is
praising God after Gabriel has announced that sheÕs going to give birth to the
Messiah. She says in Luke 1:53, ÒHe has filled the hungry with good things, and
the rich He has sent away empty.Ó That is what we see in 1 Samuel 2:7, ÒThe
Lord makes poor and makes rich; He brings low and He lifts up.Ó God is the one who changes
the circumstances and gives us victory. The word that is used there for lifting
up is a word weÕve seen already. ItÕs the word ravam or rum and it means to be high or exalted.
It is used in 1 Samuel 2:7; 1 Samuel 2:8; 1 Samuel 2:10. That tells us that a
major theme here is that God in His sovereignty is the one who can lift us up
from whatever circumstances weÕre in. When things are overwhelming; when things
look like weÕre on the edge of defeat, when things look like everything is
going to be lost, God is the only one who can lift us up. That doesnÕt mean God
always will, but can. And we need
to turn to Him to seek His strength and His guidance to be recovered from those
situations.
1 Samuel 2:8 we read, ÒHe raises the poor from the dustÓ, which
reflects on Psalm 113:7. And he says, ÒHe lifts the beggar from the ash heap,
to set them among princes.Ó That is also picked up in Psalm 113:8. ÒAnd makes
them inherit the throne of glory.Ó Again we see another example. It is God who
takes the one who is poor, and He raises them up. He takes the one who is rich
by human viewpoint standards, and He destroys them. But here in 1 Samuel 2:8a,
in the first part, it is focusing on two examples of those who are elevated to
wealth and to power. The poor are raised from the death, from the dust, which
is parallel to the beggar being lifted up from the dung heap, the manure pile.
HeÕs taken out of the manure pile, given a bath, and elevated to be sat among
the princes. Someone who would be overlooked and would have no value is now
going to be cleaned up by God and sat among the princes, and he will make them
inherit the throne of glory.
All of these examples that you read through here tell us that God is
the one who has the ability and the power to transform our circumstances, that
He is going to bring judgment to the arrogant, that He is going to lift up and
strengthen the humble, and why can He do this?
This is what we see in 1 Samuel 2:8b, the last part of verse 8, ÒFor
the pillars of the earth are the LordÕs.Ó I put a little picture there of Ken
FollettÕs book The
Pillars of the Earth, because this is the verse from which he got that
title. ThatÕs a great book if you like reading about things in the Middle Ages.
It is great. And you learn a lot about the architecture of Cathedrals if you read
that book. It is a great novel. I read it maybe 20 years ago. ÒFor the pillars
of the earth are the LordÕs, and He has set the world upon them.Ó ÒThe pillars of the earth,Ó I think, is
an allusion to the foundation of the earth: that God laid the foundation of the
earth. I think this took place in the first verse of Genesis. ÒIn the beginning
God made the heavens and the earth.Ó ThatÕs when He laid the foundation of the
earth. ThatÕs when he laid the Òpillars of the earth.Ó
Job 38:4-7 tells us that when God laid the foundation of the earth, the
sons of God, all of them united before SatanÕs rebellion, sang with joy. The
foundations and the pillars are the first things you set up as you are
constructing something. This is established at the very beginning. The emphasis
here is God is the one who created out of nothing. Before God created the
heavens and the earth, there was nothing but God for eons and eons, nothing but
God. Out of nothing He created the heavens and the earth. If he can do that,
then He certainly has the power to handle whatever our meagerly little problems
are, because He is the one who created everything and oversees things.
We learn also that He continues to sustain things through the Lord
Jesus Christ, Colossians 1:16-17, ÒFor by Him all things were created that are
in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or
dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and
for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.Ó If He can
do that in His omnipotence, He can handle our circumstances and our problems.
Psalm 113:7-9 uses the same language as Hannah uses in 1 Samuel 2. ÒHe
raises the poor out of the dust, and lifts the needy out of the ash heap.Ó The
psalmist borrows from her language, which shows the influence of HannahÕs psalm
down through the centuries. ÒThat He may seat him with princes – with the
princes of His people. He grants the barren woman a home, like a joyful mother
of children. Praise the Lord!Ó This should also be read along with what Mary
says, because she borrows a lot of that language in Luke 1, as she praises God.
Then we come to 1 Samuel 2:9 which says, ÒHe will guard the feet of His
saints.Ó He will watch over us, not just in some general way, but specifically.
ÒBut the wickedÓ in contrast, thatÕs the unbeliever, Òshall be silent in
darkness.Ó And then there is a statement, ÒFor by strength no man shall
prevail.Ó It doesnÕt matter what power the wicked have. It doesnÕt matter how
much money the wicked have, what matters is to have God on your side. The
interesting thing is the word for ÒsaintÓ is the Hebrew word hasid. Have
you heard that word before? Hasid – the Hasidic Jews. ThatÕs the word where this comes from. It is built
off of another word. It is built off of a verb youÕve heard before chesed. It
refers to GodÕs covenant love. A lot of people did not understand this word
until we got into modern times with the help and aid of archeology, but this
idea of chesed
indicates the free acts of grace or deliverance of God for His people. The ones
for whom God acts are the ÒsaintsÓ, the holy ones, the hasid, or the hasidim.
Then we get to 1 Samuel 2:10 and this is the Messianic conclusion of
this psalm. ÒThe adversaries of the Lord shall be broken in pieces.Ó From this
we see that Hannah is looking not only at her own circumstances, but it is the
circumstances of Israel. And sheÕs got the long view on history; that the
adversaries of the Lord are ultimately going to be destroyed. They will be
Òbroken in pieces.Ó As Israel at this time is under the thumb of the
Philistines and under their control, she is saying that that power will be
broken through the one Who comes because of my son. ÒThe adversaries of the
Lord shall be broken in pieces; from heaven He will thunder against them.Ó
Again, this is contra to Baal. Baal was the god of thunder, but it is YHWH who thunders from heaven. ÒYHWH will judge the ends of the earth. He will give strength to His king,
and exalt the horn of His anointed.Ó There we have the word Mashiach, His
anointed, tied to king. She recognizes that the Messiah who comes is going to
be a king. HeÕs going to be a ruler. That Messiah is going to defeat the
enemies of God. This is written about BC 1100.
David probably hasnÕt been born yet. David will probably be born in
another generation or two, 50 or 60 years. David is going to write this psalm,
Psalm 2. Psalm 2 is a psalm weÕve gone to many times. It is a great Messianic
psalm. It starts off with a look at a future battle where the kings of the
earth are in rebellion against God. We read, ÒWhy do the nations rage, and why
do the people plot a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the
rulers take counsel together, against YHWH and against His Mashiach, His anointed. Hannah understands this because she is
going to say the same thing. This sets up the conflict in the future, and what
the kings of the earth are saying are, ÒLet us break their bonds.Ó That is the
bonds that God has put on us. ÒAnd cast away their cords from us.Ó But what is
the Messiah going to do?
Look at Psalm 2:9-11, ÒYou shall break them with a rod of iron.Ó What
does Hannah say? Hannah says, ÒThe adversaries of the Lord shall be broken in
pieces.Ó She is saying the same thing. 1 Samuel 2:10 needs to be connected to
Psalm 2. ÒYou shall break them with a rod of iron; You shall dash them to
pieces like a potterÕs vessel. Now therefore, be wise, O kings; be instructed,
you judges of the earth. Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, and you perish in the way, when His wrath is
kindled but a little. Blessed are all those who trust in Him.Ó
This is what Hannah sees. She understands this. David puts these words
down, pens these words some 100 years later, but he is saying the same thing
that Hannah says in this last verse. It doesnÕt matter what is going on in the
world around us or in our personal details. God is the one who can give us
victory even when it looks like weÕre on the verge of defeat.
ÒFather, thank You for this opportunity to study these things this
evening. We pray that YouÕd help us to understand them and put them into
practice, that we might learn to relax and trust in You because we know that
You care about us, that You oversee the details of our life, and that we are to
relax and rest in You, knowing that You are the unique Creator-God of the
universe. And all these details are in Your control. We pray this in ChristÕs
name. Amen.Ó