Spiritual Circumcision. Romans 2:25-29
What does Paul mean when he
uses the term “Jew”? What is a Jew? If we go through the New Testament the term
“Jew” is used with several different meanings and it is important to understand
the different senses and the different meanings that we find. Here are several
terms that are used in the Scripture that are used to the Jewish people. They
are referred to as Hebrews, as Israelites, and as a Jew—ioudaios [I)oudaioj]. The term ioudaios in the Greek has its
etymological derivation from the name of the founder of the tribe of
Today we have a number of
different terms that derive from that and they have to be distinguished. We
have the terms “Jew, Jewish, Jewry, Judaic, and the Judaism.” Judaism is really
an interesting thing to get our hands on because what is going on with the
Pharisees and Sadducees who believed different things at the time of Christ is
not the same as modern Judaism. Pharisaism is a sort of Granddaddy of modern
Judaism but it is not quite the same. Everything shifted with the destruction
of the temple in AD 70. The Sadducees, because they are really the
religious liberals, are a lot like modern liberals; they really don’t believe
that God is i9nvolved in human affairs or human history, they are just the religious
rationalists of that era. They don’t have anything in their theology or beliefs
that enable them to survive the destruction of the temple. But the Pharisees
do, and it is the Pharisees who come together in the AD 90s at the
Council of Jamnia to answer the question: How are we going to survive in terms
of our religious beliefs in an era when we don’t have an ark of the covenant,
an altar on which to sacrifice, or a temple to worship God? They restructured
their beliefs so that the Jews in the diaspora
could survive and go forward, and that is the groundwork that is laid for
modern Judaism. The survivors of the Jewish rebellion are the Pharisees and
their theology.
Historic Orthodox Judaism dominated
from the Council of Jamnia up to the mid to late 1700s and it is at that point
when there was the first break-out away from Orthodoxy in Judaism, and that
becomes known as Reformed Judaism. Reformed Judaism is equivalent to liberal
Protestantism, it is a rejection of the idea that God could speak to man, a
rejection of objective truth, and completely influenced by Enlightenment
rationalism. So it rejects the historic traditions of the Jews, rejects
Orthodoxy, and they go all the way to the left hand of the spectrum. There were
some in the early 1800s who weren’t happy with Orthodoxy but they didn’t want to
be as liberal as Reformed Judaism. They come back about halfway and are called “conservative.”
They are not conservative in relation to Orthodoxy, they are conservative in
relation to Reformed; they are not as liberal as Reformed. When we look at
these terms like “Orthodox, conservative and Reformed” in terms of how they are
used in an evangelical Protestant tradition they have a completely different meaning.
Conservative Protestantism holds rigorously to the inspiration and
infallibility of the text. When we use the term “Reformed” in Christianity we
refer to those who followed the thinking of Calvin, Zwingli, of the
Reformation, especially as it played itself out in Presbyterianism, Congregationalism,
etc., so that is still a very biblically orthodox tradition. So these terms
have completely different nuances when applied to Judaism.
In the first century it is a
conservative view of the text but it is one that is somewhat similar to what we
see in Roman Catholicism—the Scripture plus tradition. Whenever we look at the
authority of Scripture and add something to it, whatever we add to it
ultimately dominates and takes over and controls Scripture. So when we say it
is Scripture plus some sort of mysticism, Scripture plus tradition, Scripture
plus reason, whatever is plus takes over and ultimately changes Scripture
alone. That is why in the Reformation one of the slogans was Sola Scriptura, meaning by the Scripture
alone. It rejected the Roman Catholic view that the tradition of the early church
fathers gave an oral tradition that had equal authority to the written teaching
of the Scripture and that the written teaching of the Scripture, that authority
and revelation from God, continued through the papacy and through the church
fathers so that their traditions could be used to reinterpret what the
Scriptures said.
That was the same kind of
thing that they had in Judaism in the first century. They had tradition that
had built up after the return from the captivity in
In the Bible the term “
Each Gospel writer gives us
the term a little differently. Mark and Luke don’t really use it much, other
than the title for Jesus as the King of the Jews. Matthew is more consistent
with a rabbinic preference, using the term “
In some cases the term “Jews”
is also used for the Jewish people as a whole but in other contexts only those
Jews who did not accept Jesus as the Messiah. It was not just simply an ethnic
or regional term, it also was used to refer those of Israelite descent who had
rejected Jesus. John is the one who uses it most. Thus that term becomes associated
with
The term “the Jews” is also
used to refer to the religious leadership of the Jewish people who are steadfastly
committed to the Pharisaical traditions of the people. John refers to it that
way a number of times and it is not used in an ethnic sense at all.
Paul uses the term to refer sometimes
to the ethnic descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, e.g. in Romans chapter
one, “to the Jew first and also to the Greek.” In that sense he is using it as
an ethnic term but in other places he uses it simply to refer to those who hold
to the religious viewpoint of those who rejected Jesus as the Messiah by emphasizing
the traditions of Pharisees as the means of salvation and acceptance with God. That
is how he begins to use the term in Romans 2:17ff.
In Romans
The
context of Mark 7:10-13 is one of conflict over authority with the Pharisees. Starting
in verse 6 NASB “And He said to them, ‘Rightly did
Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: ‘THIS PEOPLE HONORS
ME WITH THEIR LIPS, BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR AWAY FROM ME.’” Hypocrisy is when we
have an external standard that we don’t ever apply internally, and that is our
official position. It is lip service. It is going to a worship service and reading
through the Scripture without ever thinking about what it means or thinking
yes, I really believe that; it is just going through the motions. [7]
“BUT
IN VAIN DO THEY WORSHIP ME, TEACHING AS DOCTRINES THE PRECEPTS OF MEN.”
We can think of numerous Christian denominations that fall under the category
of hypocrisy because what they teach as commandments is the tradition of men;
they are no longer teaching Scripture; they are no longer teaching the Word of
God as the ultimate authority; they have fell into the same authority trap that
the Pharisees fell into, i.e. they are putting their authority on human
tradition, not the Word of God. [8] “Neglecting the commandment of God, you
hold to the tradition of men. [9] He was also saying to them, ‘You are experts
at setting aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition.’”
Jesus sets this up: it is either the Word of God or tradition, it is not both.
Mark 7:10
“For Moses said, ‘HONOR YOUR FATHER AND YOUR MOTHER’; and, ‘HE WHO SPEAKS EVIL OF FATHER OR MOTHER, IS
TO BE PUT TO DEATH’; [11] but
you say, ‘If a man says to {his} father or {his} mother, whatever I have that
would help you is Corban (that is to say, given {to God}),’ [12] you no longer
permit him to do anything for {his} father or {his} mother; [13] {thus}
invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down; and
you do many things such as that.” Jesus cites from these two mandates to point
out the Scriptures are extremely serious about the command to honor and respect
parents and to take care of them as they get older. Notice how Jesus goes back
and forth” “You say,” but “Moses said”—the contrast between the Scripture and
tradition.
Corban was a
loophole. The Pharisees developed all kinds of loopholes in the way they
interpreted the law. Let’s say you have money and your parents are really going
to suck up a lot of that money if you have to take care of their medical bills.
You could say you had promised my estate to the church, so you really can’t
help them. That was the idea here. They would dedicate all of their money to
God and say they really couldn’t touch that money to help their parents. So
Jesus said they no longer permitted that person to do anything for his parents.
They basically undercut the Law and were making the law of God of no effect
through their tradition which they handed down. Because of this the Word of God
is really being blasphemed because people think that tradition is what the
Bible says. It’s not but that is what they think because your claim is that
this is biblical. That is Paul’s conclusion. Romans
He is going
to give an explanation of this. Romans
He is talking about circumcision because in Pharisaic Judaism
circumcision as a ritual had been identified as that which was a sine qua non (without which nothing) for
getting into heaven. If you weren’t circumcised you couldn’t get into heaven. So
if you just go through the external ritual you are okay. It is not any
different from people who say that if you just get baptized you’ll make it into
heaven, and that it is just that external ritual that gets you into heaven. Circumcision
was a sign of the Abrahamic covenant, and it was a ritual that had a spiritual
teaching point. The spiritual teaching point was that in terms of justification
and our relationship to God there is a severing of our relationship with the
flesh. So the severing of the foreskin from the flesh is a picture that Paul
develops in Romans chapter six that when we are saved we are no longer under
bondage to the sin nature; we are set free. That is the spiritual implication.
The ritual has no meaning unless there is a spiritual reality.
Leviticus
26:41 NASB “I also was acting with hostility against them, to bring
them into the land of their enemies—or if their uncircumcised heart becomes
humbled so that they then make amends for their iniquity…” Circumcision
represents a spiritual reality, something that has to do with the soul,
something that is removed; and it is related here to humility and accepting guilt,
recognizing personal sin. There is a command in Deuteronomy 10:16 NASB
“So circumcise your heart
[your soul], and stiffen your neck no longer.” When God commands the Jews to be
circumcised He recognizes that every one of them needs this. (Modern Judaism
says there is no such thing as total depravity) In Deuteronomy 30:6 NASB
“Moreover the LORD your God will circumcise your heart and
the heart of your descendants, to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all
your soul, so that you may live,” that is, before the kingdom comes, before God
establishes the kingdom and restores the Jews to the