Inheriting the kingdom; Rev. 2:11 and I Corinthians 6:9-11
Grace is one of those concepts that is so poorly understood. There are often people who think that grace is something that we earn, that we deserve, something that is sort of doled out one increment at a time according to how often we participate in certain rituals and rites of the church. Some people think that grace is fine but if you commit certain sins or perform certain acts or think certain thoughts, or of you continue that over a certain amount of time then maybe you weren’t really saved, and that would introduce works in the back door. So grace is constantly being perverted by the introduction of works. That is the trend of the sin nature. We constantly want to try to impress God with something that we have done and constantly want to make our salvation dependent in some way, shape or form upon something we do.
At the judgment seat of Christ we have the destruction of those rewards that are not distributed to loser believers. This raises another question. Revelation 21:8 gives a list of sins, and obviously it is talking about inheritance. Even though it does not use the precise terminology, “shall not inherit the kingdom,” there are other passages in the New Testament that do talk about not inheriting the kingdom. This raises a lot of questions in the minds of many people because if grace is grace and Jesus Christ paid for all the sins then it looks at first glance that these verses teach that if you continue to sin these sins then you won’t be saved. You will either lose salvation, which is how one group of people take this, and that comes under the classification of Arminianism—basically the idea that you can lose your salvation, or at the other end of the spectrum is the extreme Calvinists who we identify as “perseverance Calvinists,” who believe that if you don’t persevere in good works then you weren’t really saved to begin with. The terminology that has been used today to identify people who teach that is “Lordship salvation,” that if you are truly saved then there is a change in your internal nature so that you just can’t commit certain sins, or if you do you won’t do it for a lengthy period of time; you may stumble but you won’t fall. So they have to do a little two-step to get around grace, because what grace really teaches is that Jesus Christ paid the penalty for every sin so that sin is no longer the issue when it comes to your eternal relationship with God. It may affect other things. Continual sin in the post-salvation life of the believer represents a failure to grow. So there are consequences if the believer is living out of fellowship for the majority of the time.
1 Corinthians 6:9, 10, “Do you not know
that the unrighteous will not inherit the
1) The concept of inheriting the kingdom is understood in two radically different ways. This is a major division among evangelicals today. Most evangelicals don’t understand grace, they just want to slip works right into the back door. One group will interpret inheriting the kingdom as entering the kingdom. In other words, if you commit any of these sins you aren’t going to get in. Somehow you either forfeit the salvation that you had or you weren’t really saved. The other group (the view that we hold) it is not that you won’t enter the kingdom but you will not have a share or a portion or an inheritance and the privileges and possessions in the kingdom. These are the two ways that are offered in handling these passages.
2)
The phrase “inherit the kingdom” is used in six
passages: Matthew 25:34; 1 Corinthians 6:9, 10;
1 Corinthians 6:9 says, “Do you not know that the
unrighteous will not inherit the
The context of 1 Corinthians 6 is
Is ADIKOS talking about being positionally unrighteous or is it talking about being experientially unrighteous? If it is positionally unrighteous then that means they are not saved; if it means experientially unrighteous, it means they are saved but are living as if they are not saved. The second word KLERONOMIA [klhronomia] has the idea of inheriting or possessing. ADIKOS is used in Romans 3:5, “But if our unrighteousness [ADIKOS] brings out God's righteousness more clearly, what shall we say? That God is unjust in bringing his wrath on us? (I am using a human argument.)” Paul is using this word in this context to refer to God. “Our unrighteousness” here is talking about something which is experiential. If we said “if our wrongdoing” it would probably be a better translation: “If our wrongdoing demonstrates the righteousness of God,” because the basic meaning of ADIKOS means to do something that violates a standard. If we look at the word as it is outlined in the dictionaries we get the meaning that ADIKOS means someone who violates the law, that which is against law, or someone who is doing wrong. The lexicons clearly outline the two options: it could be positional or experiential. So we have to look at the context. The problem is how it is laid out in 1 Corinthians 6:1, “If any of you has a dispute with another, dare he take it before the unrighteous for judgment instead of before the saints?” So the contrast is between the ADIKOS and the saints, the HAGIOS [a(gioj]. HAGIOS here is clearly talking about those who are positionally righteous, so ADIKOS is referring to those who are positionally unrighteous or unbelievers. What Paul is talking about in context is that in their licentiousness every time one believer gets offended by another believer in the local church he is dragging him off in some law suit. This is the background issue. Paul is asking, “Do you think you are going to get justice by going to some unbeliever who doesn’t have a biblical frame of reference or biblical scale of values, and you are having to believers going before some unbelieving judge for righteousness? Forget it, this is an unrighteous judge.”
Many come to this verse 9 and see that back in verse one
this word “unrighteous” refers to unbelievers who are positionally
unrighteous, so we have to have that same interpretation in verse 9 and say
Paul is asking: Do you not know that the unbeliever will not inherit the
“…the phrase in v.
9 is not the same as “the wicked” in v. 1. In v. 1 the noun has the article,
and it is definite, referring to a class. But in v. 9 it is without the article.
“The articular construction emphasizes identity; the anarthrous construction
emphasizes character.” Because the same word is used twice, once with the article (v.
1) and then without it (v. 9), it may be justifiable to press for this standard
grammatical distinction here. If so, then the ADIKOI of v. 9 are not “the wicked” of v. 1. They are not of that definite
class of people who are non-Christians. Rather, as to their behavior
traits they are behaving in an unrighteous manner or character. In other words,
the use of “the wicked” in v. 1 signifies “being,” but the use of “wicked” in
v. 9 signifies not being but “doing,” and that was their problem. According to the ADIKEO of v. 8, they continued to walk as “mere men” (1 Cor.
3:4).”
In a nutshell what
we are saying is that the presence of the article indicates a classification of
people, the unbelievers. The absence of the article is going to bring it down
to character quality. So there is a shift that takes place between these two
verses, and so down in verse 9 it is not talking about position anymore, their
general categorization, but their behavior. So it is
experiential righteousness. What this verse is saying is that believers who
continue in carnality are not going to be logging any time walking by the Spirit, therefore they are not going to have any divine good
at the judgment seat of Christ.
Verse 11 makes it a little more
clear. “And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were
sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the
Spirit of our God.” What is important to note here is that verse 11 says “some
of you.” That is plural: some of you all. Imagine a circle representing the
congregation at
At the judgment seat of Christ He will perfectly evaluate and distinguish between our human good and our divine good produced by walking by the Spirit. Where there is divine good there will be rewards and this is what leads to an inheritance and a possession and a responsibility in the kingdom. So we have to be prepared for it. The warning that we get from these passages is that if we treat grace lightly and there is no advance, no capacity, not maturity in the spiritual life, then there is no preparation for the millennial kingdom and the eternal state and there will be a forfeiture of inheritance. Those who are not overcomers will suffer loss at the judgment seat of Christ, and those rewards that are lost will be burned up in the lake of fire, though the believer enters into heaven, yet as through fire, and has eternal life but without those rewards that were his potentially if he had just gone forward in the Christian life.