What is the Sign of Your
Coming? Matthew 24:3
Open your Bibles with me this morning
to Matthew chapter 24. Last time I
gave somewhat of a flyover of Matthew 24 and 25, which is one sermon, one
message of the Lord Jesus Christ.
This is the fifth discourse in Matthew; it is the only one that focuses
on prophetic themes or eschatology. Eschatology is a term that comes from two
Greek words, ESCHATOS, meaning last, and LOGOS meaning things are words or the study of something; so it
is the study of the last days, the study of end times. This is Jesus' longest
message about the about prophetic events, about the end times, and it is second
only in length to the Sermon on the Mount. That's important. Whenever we look
at any portion of Scripture that we always asked certain basic questions and
those are, who is talking, to whom are they speaking, and are they speaking
with reference to only that person are they speaking through that person to a
broader audience. That is important when we come to each of these discourses in
Matthew and as we have seen in our study of Matthew that the reason Matthew
wrote the gospel of Matthew is to teach about the coming of the Messiah and his
presentation and offer of the kingdom to Israel. That's a primary theme. Kingdom is the big idea.
And so you have to understand what
kingdom means, and what kingdom means from an Old Testament perspective is the
messianic rule on the earth of the son of David, the greater son of David, that
he would rule from the throne of David in Jerusalem and rule over Israel and
rule over all the nations, and that this would be a time of unprecedented peace
and prosperity upon the earth as we have a perfect God-Man ruler. When Jesus
came at the first coming He came to offer the kingdom. He was preceded by John
the Baptist's message was, Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. Jesus
came had the same message repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. He sent
his disciples to the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not to the
Gentiles and state their message was, you guessed it, Repent, for the king of
heaven is at hand. That's the gospel of the kingdom.
That's can be important because when we
get into a little bit into this message, Jesus talks about the gospel of the
kingdom being preached to all the world. The gospel of the kingdom, as we will
see, is not the gospel that we proclaim today. The gospel that we proclaim
today is related to the description of first Corinthians 15, which focuses on
the death, burial, resurrection of Christ is substitutionary payment on the
cross. That is the gospel we
preach today. It is part of the gospel of the kingdom, but we are not preaching
the gospel of the kingdom. Today
the gospel kingdom is defined by Matthew as be ready for the coming king and
the establishment of the kingdom, that that is about to happen. Because Jesus
was rejected, He ascended to heaven; the kingdom plan was put on hold as a
pause button God the father hit. And only at the end of the Tribulation after
God the Father, according to Daniel seven, the ancient of days gives the
kingdom to His Son. Jesus takes the scroll, Revelation chapter 5, and begins to
open the seals. Those are the judgments and we will have to review all of this,
those are the judgments that that enable Him to open the scroll, which is the
title deed to the earth; and then He will return and at that point, establish
his kingdom.
Once the Rapture occurs and the church
is out of here, then we go back to the offer of the kingdom because that's what
comes at the end of the seven-year Tribulation. The emphasis then goes back to
the gospel of the kingdom. The kingdom includes the gospel of justification. They
are not two opposite gospels, it's that the gospel of the kingdom offers more
then, it deals with something in addition to the gospel of justification by
faith alone.
All of that sort of summarizes a little
bit of the framework of why Matthew has been written. Now we have to bring that
to bear on our understanding of Matthew chapters 24 and 25, because Matthew is
including what his part of the answer is to these questions from the perspective
of what he is talking about. He's addressing church age believers, of course,
probably in the early 40s. I believe that Matthew was the first Gospel that was
written following the principle laid down by Paul's trips to the Jew first and
also to the Greek, that in the early church the church is primarily Jewish and
Matthew is answering a critical question, which is, why didn't the kingdom
come, what is going on here and how does that relate to our mission today
because the kingdom didn't come?
That's why it ends with an emphasis on Jesus mandate to the church,
which is to go to the disciples to go into all the world and make disciples by
baptizing and by teaching. That is what deals with the inner advent age. But as we'll see, there is very little
in Matthew that talks about the inter-advent age.
What I mean by the inner advantage is
that age between the two advents, between the first coming and the second
coming. The first coming ended with the ascension of Christ to heaven, and so
that period that started 10 days after His ascension on the day of Pentecost, when
the Holy Spirit descended (the first advent of the Holy Spirit), that is the
beginning of the church age, and it ends with the rapture of the church. So what is going on in between here is
not really addressed by Matthew.
This is a critical chapter two chapters
to understand with relation to what happens in the Tribulation period. And that this is not addressing anything
in the church age—that's a fundamental assumption. There are a lot of
disagreements among even dispensationalists. There are six different views on the first part of the
message down through about verse 31. Then there is a second section in chapter
24, starting in verse 32 and going down through the end of chapter 25. I think that is an connected unit. There's
a lot of disagreement, I've identified at least three different positions among
free grace dispensational futurists on that part. So that makes it really
difficult for me as a pastor. Most
the time I can look at two or three different resources and commentaries and everybody's
in pretty much agreement. But when you look at people within our camp and you see all these different views,
and everybody has a lot of different arguments, I have to really spend a
tremendous amount of time, because to be a faithful pastor and teacher to
rightly divide the word you've got to process each argument, outline the
strengths and weaknesses of each person's argument, compare and contrast,
figure out what their backgrounds what is within their framework, their
presuppositions to lead them in this direction to take this particular view,
and who's right and who's wrong. That takes a lot of time.
Now I've gone through in a flyover
manner when we been in Revelation other things, to talk about Matthew 24 and 25,
and I have my views, but I haven't had the opportunity to truly drill down into
the mass of minutia that is in the text. Now I don't want to go too deep to drive
you nuts but it's important to handle some of this, and the reason is, after
30+ years in the ministry I've found that if I say something in a general way
without documenting it I will get five or six questions where people say, well,
why did you say this and why did you say that and what about this, so it's
better for me just to cover the minutia when I'm in the pulpit than have to
answer a lot of questions afterward. To some of you it doesn't really matter
what the details are, you just want somebody to tell you what it means. And
that's fine, but others of you have more profound questions.
So I'm titling this message: What is
the sign of your coming? That is a question that is asked in verse three, and
we won't get beyond that today because we have to look at some other some other
aspects of the what's going on in terms of the context of this discourse. There are seven questions that we need
to address. The first is what's the significance of the temple? Because that's
the backdrop Jesus has just announced that the temple will be destroyed. Why is
that important? Second, we need to answer the question what is the reason for
this judgment that He has announced upon the nation. The third question that
you may not think is important but is one that is addressed in the time and
that is how many questions are the disciples asking? Are they asking for three
two, or possibly even one? How many questions are here? Fourth is the focus of
this prophecy on events that are completely and totally in the future. Are they
on events that are mostly already fulfilled in the past? Or are they being
fulfilled as we go through the church age? That first view is called futurism,
the second view is called preterism, and present is something called
historicism; but understanding those helps us to understand why you run into
some different views along the way. The fifth question is, what did the
disciples know? What did they already understand? What were they bringing to
the table when Jesus starts to talk to them about future things? What is their frame of reference going
to be from the Old Testament? And sixth: The question of what are the signs of
the times? Is this talking about sign singular or signs plural? The seventh
question is the differences between the second coming of Christ and the
Rapture. Understanding that distinction is very important.
The first question is, what is the significance
of the temple? We have seen that at
the conclusion of chapter 23 Jesus announced judgment on the religious leaders
of Israel. In chapters 21 and 22 they are examining him, and they reject him as
their Messiah, and in chapter 23 he announces his rejection of them as his
people. He announces seven—and I said because the textual issue
7+1—woes against the religious leaders, against the Pharisees as
hypocrites, as religious leaders who have led the nation astray, and he
announces a judgment that will come. In Matthew 23:38 He says see your house [the
temple] is left to you desolate, indicating that the temple will be
destroyed.
But as we have always seen when God
announces judgment, there is always grace with judgment. God doesn't just
announce judgment and leave people hanging. There is always a solution, a great solution for deliverance
in the midst of divine judgment. Therefore, there is always hope, no matter
what happens, even when you're living through a time of national disaster
because of divine discipline, there is always hope. And so the solution there is Matthew 23:39: Jesus said you
won't see me again until you say, Blessed is He who comes in the name of the
Lord. The issue is whether or not
you're going to accept, whether or not the Jewish people would accept Jesus as
their Messiah.
Then we read in verse one of chapter 24
that Jesus went out and departed from the temple and his disciples came up to
show him the buildings of the temple. The action in the Greek verb here is
really much more dynamic than the way it talks about; it's the action, you can
picture this is a video. Jesus went out of the temple and is walking away. He
has made this announcement about the destruction, and He leaves and was going. The
disciples are now looking around at these buildings with their mouths hanging
open, they can't believe that He has announced this, and that everything that
they see is going to be destroyed.
This temple was so magnificent that one
of the rabbinical sayings of the time was that if you had never seen the temple
in Jerusalem, you had never seen beauty. It was the eighth wonder of the
ancient world. It was larger than any temple that was built to any god in any
country anywhere in the in the known world at that time. They just couldn't
imagine it, just as before 2001 before the events of 9/11, none of us could
quite imagine that something would completely take down the twin Towers in New
York. It's something that that
they just could not fathom, and so his announcement of the destruction of the
temple just leaves them with their mouth hanging open. They are coming up to
Him. He leaves and is going in the direction of the Mount of olives and they're
standing there for a while looking at the temple, trying to process what He has
said, and then they run after Him to get an answer.
Here's an artist depiction of what the
temple looked like. It was built out of marble. The southern wall was
completely covered in gold.
They were just going over to the other
side to sit specifically on the Mount of Olives because of what Jesus was going
to teach. That's important for understanding the background and the framework.
Now what we see here in verse one are
two words, the words for temple and the word for buildings. As Jesus is leaving
His disciples come up to him and show him the buildings of the temple. The word
for buildings is the word OIKODOME,
which focuses on the buildings, not the external retaining walls. The Western
Wall that we have today, known as the Wailing Wall, was never part of the
buildings of the temple. That was a huge retaining wall built around the temple
mount by Herod the Great in order to support the weight of these huge buildings.
We don't know much about what was going
on on Mount Moriah from the time Genesis 22 until the time at the end of Samuel
when God identifies the location where David will build the temple and a plague
that comes upon Israel. What David does to stop the plague is to offer
sacrifice and God indicates that the place of that is on the threshing floor of
Araunah the Jebusite, and that is the site on Mount Moriah. So this is been a
threshing floor for threshing the wheat and privately owned but was purchased
by David for the location of the temple. In 586 that first temple was destroyed
and then it was rebuilt, starting with the return of the Jews in 536, but they
had a lot of trouble pulling it all together and it wasn't until 516 that the
second temple was consecrated under Zerubbabel who was the governor at the
time, and Joshua the high priest. That is known as the second temple. There are
two periods to the second temple. We might break it down that way. One is the
Zerubbabel temple, and it wasn't very large; not nearly as large as the expanse
of the Herodian temple. Herod expanded it much further south. He expanded the
east wall a little further out to the east, and he expanded the North Wall and
also built a fortification for Roman soldiers located on the northwest corner.
In order to complete this massive
remodeling project Herod had to work closely with the priests, because only
they could build the temple. They were very suspicious of him that he might
want to destroy the temple so he had to build everything before they would
allow him to tear anything down. They had to make sure that the replacements
were there before any of the walls or anything else was taken down. He doubled the area of the temple from
what it was before, increased the length of the Temple Mount from North to
South. He expanded it so that the
average length of the outer side was about 600 cubits or 900 feet.
Originally the Temple Mount was
intended to be 1600 feet wide by 900 feet broad and by nine stories high. This was the original plan for Herod,
but never quite was completed. What he had to do in order to support the weight
was build an enormous foundation. This is such a massive project, and Jesus
announced this destruction with even more detail saying, NASB ÒDo you not see all these things? Truly
I say to you, not one stone here will be left upon another, which will not be
torn down.Ó He is referring to the buildings; He is
not referring to the walls. But of course some of the upper walls were destroyed.
All of this is this important point
because the temple was the dwelling place of God in the midst of his people. Originally,
you had the tabernacle, and the term tabernacle in the Hebrew is from the root
verb from which comes the word Shekinah. It means to dwell. The temple is the
dwelling place of God in the midst of his of his people. That is why the temple
was important. And so the temple signifies something, and the destruction of
the temple signifies something: it signifies divine judgments.
The second thing we want to look at in
terms of understanding this passage is the reason for the divine judgment on
the nation. This had already
happened once before in Israel's history.
In 586 BC Nebuchadnezzar the ruler Babel and invaded Israel for the
third time. He first invaded in 605, then around 593, and now in 586 he invades,
and this time he destroyed the temple.
He just about wiped out the city and he took numerous captives back to
back to Babylon; it was for 70 years. They returned in 536 and then the Jews
rebuilt. In 63 BC Pompeii conquered the Levant area and so Israel and Judea
came under Roman authority and remained under Roman authority, even though
there were many different revolts during the peer that period of time. This
culminated in the great Jewish revolt, which occurred in AD 66, some 33 years after the crucifixion of Christ.
The occasion was of the Roman governor
confiscated 17 talents of gold from the temple treasury, and in reaction Jewish
nationalist seized the temple stopped the daily sacrifices that were being
carried out in violation of the Torah—they were in tribute to the Roman
Emperor—and this led to a four-year revolt. Vespasian was the general at the time and he conquered much
of Judea and surrounded Jerusalem, but then Nero died and he was appointed
Caesar, so he had to go back to Rome. There was a pause in the assault and it was
during that time that all of the Christians left, and that was on the great
causes for hostility between Jews and Jewish Christians. The Christians were
viewed as traitors because they wouldn't stay. As we saw in Luke 21 they left
because Jesus said, "When you see the signs, when you see Jerusalem
surrounded by an army then you are to flee." So they fled because they
knew that judgment was inevitable.
A similar kind of thing had happened
back in 586 BC and maybe earlier in 587. The leaders of the people came to
Jeremiah and said, "We will do whatever God says to do". God said,
"Give up; surrender to Nebuchadnezzar and you will all live. You will
survive and you will go to Babylon and everything will be great; you all have
families and children, and I'll protect you until you return to the land."
And they said, "We won't do that". They stayed there and fought, and hundreds of thousands were
killed by the Babylonians. This time the Christian Jews knew what happened
before they remembered what Jesus said, so they left. They fled to a area
called Pella across the Jordan River and that's where they stayed during the during
the Jewish revolt.
But the reason there's this judgment is
outlined in the Old Testament, and that's part of the background to understand
this. God had established a covenant with Israel. We refer to it as the Mosaic
covenant, or the Sinai covenant and at the end of the covenant there's a list
of covenant blessings and judgments. And that would be true in many contracts
or covenants of this kind. There's an outline of what the king will do for a
vassal. In this case, the king would be God in Israel, the vassal nation. And then
at the end of the document there is a statement that if you're obedient these
are the extra things I'll do for you; if you're disobedient then I'm going to
do these horrible things to you. In the first 13 verses of Leviticus 26 we have
a list of the blessings, and the highest blessing is in Leviticus 26, 11 and 12:
"I will set my tabernacle [dwelling place] among you, and my soul shall
not abhor you." This is God speaking. "I will walk among you and be your God and you shall be
my people." If Israel is obedient God promises that He will dwell with
them and bless them. But then starting in verse 14 He starts to outline five
cycles of judgment or discipline, and the ultimate one comes down in verses 27
to 33. I'm just going to start reading in verse 27. He says, "After all
this, if you do not obey me but walk contrary to me, then I also will walk
contrary to you in fury at judgment, and I, even I, will chastise you seven
times for your sins." Each successive cycle is harder than the
one before, and then in verse 29 He says, "You shall eat the flesh of your
sons and you shall eat the flesh of your daughters because you're surrounded in
a siege. You will not have any food, you will cannibalize your own
children," and that is what happened. It happened in 586 and it happened
in the time of the Jewish revolt.
In verse 30 God says, "I will
destroy your high places, because you created an abomination out of all the
worship places, and created your own idolatrous worship places." God said,
"I will destroy your high places cut down your incense altars and cast
your carcasses on the lifeless forms of your idols, and my soul shall abhor you,"—as
opposed to what we read before, "that my soul shall not abhor you". "É I will let your cities waste, I will bring your sanctuaries to
desolation É" That would be the temple. "É and I will not smell the
fragrance of your sweet aromas"—the end of the sacrifices. So this
is announcing this judgment. It happened in 586; it's going to happen again in AD 70. "É I will bring the land to desolation, and your
enemies who dwell in it and shall be astonished at it. I will scatter you among
the nations." This is the fifth cycle discipline. "Not only will I
destroy everything that you have in the land I will take you out of the land".
So Jesus functioning as an Old
Testament prophet has announced those seven woe judgments on Israel. They have their foundation back in the
Torah in the in the Mosaic Law. He
has announced God's judgment against them and so He's functioning like a Moses
like a Mosaic profit. And that is indeed what we would expect because in
Deuteronomy 18 where we have an outline of the roles: how do you tell a true
prophet from a false prophet? There's the prophecy that God is going to send another
prophet like Moses. Deuteronomy
18:15 NASB ÒThe LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among
you, from your countrymen, you shall listen to him." That's the order you listen to him. [17] "The Lord
said to me, 'What they have spoken is good. [18] ÔI will raise up a prophet from among
their countrymen like you, and I will put My words in his mouth, and he shall
speak to them all that I command him. [19]
ÔIt shall come about that whoever will not listen to My words which he shall
speak in My name, I Myself will require {it} of him'. "That's that judgment that will come.
And then He goes on to say in that
passage, "The prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name which I have
not commanded him to speak or speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet
shall die". The death penalty
was for anyone who claim to speak for God, and didn't and the way you would
know it is verse 22 NASB ÒWhen a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the thing does not come about or
come true, that is the thing which the LORD has not spoken. The prophet has spoken
it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him."
What happens in the Olivet Discourse is
that Jesus gives prophecy that has a near fulfillment. It is fulfilled 33 years
later. So if that came true precisely as he predicted, then we know that what He
says about the long-term prophecy, which is the lion's share of what's in the
Matthew Olivet Discourse, will certainly come to pass. So this is the significance of the
temple and the significance of the judgment that Jesus is announcing.
The next thing before we get to the
third point that the disciples understand a couple things and that Jesus is
doing here. First of all, they
know that Jesus is more than a prophet.
They know that He is this prophet that Moses has predicted that He was
God and so they knew that He knew the future and that He could accurately
answer their questions about what would take place in the future, that this
wasn't guesswork. He is the prophet like Moses.
Second, since He is the prophet like Moses
His statements about divine judgment were true and would certainly come to pass.
And then for us by way of application, this means that we can relax and trust
God even when we're in the midst of judgment, just like the disciples could. They
knew this judgment was coming, but they could relax and trust God because God
is still in the control when that happens. And we should understand that no
matter what the crisis is, no matter what happens, whether its personal, whether
its national, whatever it is; our job as believers is to fulfill the mission. What's
the mission? To be a testimony, to be a witness of the Lord, to be a audible
verbal witness of the gospel, for we are to engage in that same mission that
was given to the disciples to go into all the world, making disciples, by
baptizing and teaching. So this is the mission, and we are not to be distracted
by the crises that may occur or that does occur around us. We have to keep
oriented to the mission of the presenting the gospel, and also on personal spiritual
growth.
We only got through two of the seven
questions but these are important because it sets the stage so that we can
understand what Jesus is talking about and what He is not talking about.
Because what happens is so many people come along and say, What are the signs
of the times? Is 'signs' a plural word there? What does the text say? What is the sign? The sign is
one sign what's the sign. There aren't signs of the time any more than the book
of Revelation is the book of revelations.
You often hear people say that. It's sort of like fingernails on a
chalkboard to me when I hear somebody say revelations. Its singular, and sign
is singular; there's one sign. But what we hear here, in this within the
structure of what Jesus is teaching His disciples, is that there's a judgment
coming.
But believers today have a different
mission because, remember, the Olivet Discourse is Jesus last words to the
Jews. He's addressing a Jewish
audience. It's the last word to the Jews. And it's going to be the next night
that He is going to address the church and church age doctrine