Women in Ministry; Defeat of Sisera
We are Judges 4 and I have been going through the doctrine of
leadership the last few weeks because this is one of those situations that is
usually brought up in the context today when a discussion arises concerning
women in ministry; this is a major pressure that has come from the cosmic
system, from the world because of certain pressures brought by the radical
feminist movement. That is not to say
that there are not elements within that agenda that weren’t needed or necessary
in terms of things like equal pay for the same job, things of that nature, but
that’s not the ultimate agenda in the feminist movement and if you haven’t
figured that out by now I don’t have time to straighten you out on the
subject. It has radically shifted our
whole cultural perception of the role of men and women and in a very few areas
has that been good but in a majority of areas it has been bad; it is in a large
sense also related to a lot of other things going on in our culture, related to
sex and sex roles, immorality, homosexuality, all of these things.
In fact, something came across my desk this last week related to a
decision, it hasn’t been made official yet but a proposal that has been brought
the California Board of Education that a redefinition of sex and gender is real
and perceived sexual identification; that means that if you perceive yourself
to be a woman one day you can be Miss Smith and the next day you’re Mr. Smith,
depending on how you feel that day, how you perceive your sexual role. So our culture is operating on the concept
that these things are fluid and they don’t make any difference, that is of
course 180 degrees opposite from the Word of God and the Word of God clearly
defines certain roles for men and certain roles for women in certain
circumstances.
For example, in the home the man, the husband is the head of the
home; he is the spiritual leader and he is the one responsible for the welfare,
the spiritual welfare of the home. That
does not mean the woman, the wife, does not have a role to play but that he is
the one who is ultimately answerable and that is the man’s responsibility. There is also a situation in the Church
where women are not given the gift of pastor-teacher and they are restricted
from exercising a teaching responsibility in the local church where the
handling of the Word of God is at issue.
This does not mean that women cannot function in secular jobs and
leadership roles in secular jobs or careers or in other arenas but it does mean
that as far as the Word of God is concerned, as far as the local church is
concerned, as far as the local church is concerned that women are excluded from
the pastoral ministry and from teaching men.
And there are Biblical reasons for that and it’s clearly taught in
Scripture and we went through that.
Deborah is a remarkable woman and is presented as such because of
her leadership but here leadership as a prophetess and as a judge does not
involve the explanation or teaching of the Word of God. As a prophetess her role is simply to
articulate as a mouthpiece what God has revealed to her. That is the role of a prophet and as a judge
she did not function as the term “judge”, as we have seen, shaphat is a word that has a broad meaning and it’s not equivalent
to the English concept of a judge or a magistrate, although that was part of
it. Sometimes the judge served as a
military leader; sometimes as a political leader; sometimes as simply a
magistrate, someone who adjudicated conflicts between members of the society
and that appears to have been her role.
As we get into Judges we see that there have been various cycles
that take place in this book, cycles of disobedience and as we proceed from one
judgeship to the next we see a deterioration that takes place. I want you to notice something, a way in
which the writer emphasizes his points here.
Turn back to Judges 3:7; we have one verse here that describes the
apostasy of Israel. In verses 8-9 we
have two verses that describe God’s discipline of the nation under
Cushan-rishathaim, and then two verses, verses 10-11 describe the deliverance
that God provided, really it could be two and a half verses, back into verse 9
for God’s deliverance.
Then we look down to the second cycle which is Ehud. I verse 12 we have half of a verse
describing the apostasy of Israel, Judges 3:12a, “And the sons of Israel did
evil again in the sight of the LORD,” the author doesn’t belabor the point,
he’s already done that describing the facets of it back in Judges 2 and so he
simply states the point that once again they have succumb to idolatry and
apostasy in the land. And then from 21b
down through verse 14 we have a description of God’s discipline on the nation
through the military occupation from Moab under Eglon. Then starting in verse 15 down through verse
30 there are 16 verses. I want you to
notice the emphasis here, the proportion.
One of the rules of Bible study is proportion. Notice the relative emphases that the Holy Spirit gives to
certain episodes. So in the first cycle
there were two verses or a verse and a half related to chastening, and two and
a half verses related to deliverance.
In the second there is two verses related to the discipline and then 16
verse related to deliverance.
Then we come to the third cycle with Deborah in Judges 4, and once
again there’s only one verse given to the apostasy, Judges 4:1, “Then the sons
of Israel again did evil in the sight of the LORD, after Ehud died.” Then we have two verses related to the
discipline, verses 2-3 and then starting in verse 4 down to the end of the
chapter we have 21 verses related to divine deliverance, and then chapter 5 is
a praise hymn describing…once again as a praise psalm describing how God gave
them victory and delivered them once again from the oppression of the army of
Sisera. So there is clearly in this
particular emphasis a much expanded description and emphasis on God’s
deliverance and the importance and significance of it.
Now one thing I want you to pay attention to here, we’ve got a lot
of geographical detail in this chapter, a lot of historical detail and
sometimes we can lose the forest for the trees. You get so involved trying out to figure out the geographical
facets and the historical facets that you lose sight of the fact that this is
not recorded for us simply to give us a nice little history lesson on Israel
but this is designed by God and God the Holy Spirit in the process of
inspiration to give us an example that relates to spiritual life. When I teach this I want to say once again
that this is not allegory; allegory means that the events that you use in the
story did not actually take place in history.
That’s the difference between allegory and the way the writers of Scripture
are using history. The writer of
Scripture under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit is picking and choosing, he
is selecting key events in the history of Israel; there are many things that
took place and many more things that he could say but he is being highly
selective and he is choosing these events in order to properly interpret, give
God’s interpretation of human history and also to give for us an example
related to the spiritual life in the Church Age. So the there is a double facet working here; one is the divine
interpretation of history and one is that this is designed to teach something,
it is not just interesting incidents in history, it’s designed for a
purpose. And we know this from a couple
of passages in the New Testament.
For example, in Acts 17:11 when Paul was on his second missionary
journey and he was traveling in the northern part of Greece, he had gone from
the city of Thessalonica to Berea and in Luke records, “Now these were more
noble-minded than those in Thessalonica,” and of course when Paul went into a
new area he always went to the Jews first, he went to the synagogue and so he
goes to the synagogue and he begins to explain how Jesus of Nazareth fulfills
all of the Old Testament prophecies related to the Messiah and that Jesus is
indeed the Messiah who died on the cross as a substitute for their sins. So they had a knowledge of Old Testament
Scripture, but they didn’t just take Paul’s word for it, they got involved in a
little personal Bible study on their own to make sure that what he was saying
was correct. So we read, “These were
more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica for they received the Word,” that
is the gospel message, “with great eagerness,” positive volition, “examining
the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.”
It’s not that they rejected or didn’t accept Paul’s authority as
an apostle but no human being, apostolic or otherwise is infallible and
inerrant. The only time the apostles
can be associated with anything infallible or inerrant is when they were
inspired by God the Holy Spirit in the writing of Scripture. That was it. So that does not mean that every time Paul spoke that he was
absolutely correct; that does not mean that Paul was sinless. It means that only in certain circumstances
was that true and the rest of the time even under the Apostle Paul the people
got into the Word. That’s why it’s
always important for believers to be in the Word, to constantly be reading the
Word.
Now there are going to be problems, you’re going into things that
confuse you and you’re going to run into things that perhaps you don’t
understand and there are bad translations and translation problems and so you
need to be able to look at things and say well I don’t understand that, I’m
just going to go past it or maybe I’ll ask the pastor about it some other time,
but don’t let those things trap you.
It’s important to get into the Word on a daily basis just to remind
ourselves and to discover promises. It’s
important for a believer to memorize promises.
How in the world can we exercise the faith rest drill and mix faith with
the promises of God if you don’t have any promises memorized and stored in your
soul that you can call on in times of trouble and adversity. When those times come you can’t say now wait
a minute, wait a minute, I’ve got to run home and get my notebook and open it
up and look for some promise that relates to this. By then it’s too late.
You have to have it in your soul.
So when it says that they “examined the Scriptures daily” they
were getting into the Word for themselves.
But what was the Word, what were the Scriptures that they got into? It’s the Old Testament; they were searching
Old Testament Scriptures to back up and supplement what the Apostle Paul was
teaching them. At that time there was
no New Testament canon. If we’re right
in our understanding of how the New Testament canon was formed there were
perhaps at that point maybe two epistles, or at the most three, that had been
written. It’s possible that Matthew’s
Gospel had been written. I take the
view that Matthew’s Gospel was the first written under the principle, “to the
Jew first and then to the Gentile,” and I think that possibly Galatians had
been written at this time, and maybe James, but probably nothing more. So there’s no canon or New Testament
Scripture, whatever had been already written was still probably localized in
Galatia or in Turkey from James writing to the scattered believers there,
scattered Jewish believers, so there’s no collection of New Testament books at
this point. They are getting into the
Old Testament in order to document and supplement what Paul is teaching them
and Paul is clearly teaching them about Church Age spiritual life
principles.
And where were they getting it?
From the Old Testament Scriptures.
In Timothy we learn the same thing.
2 Timothy 3:16 is a well-known verse in this congregation, “All
Scripture is God-breathed and is profitable for teaching, reproof, correction
and training in righteousness.” But the
verse prior to that Paul is talking to Timothy about his own upbringing and
states, “from childhood you have known the sacred writings, which are able to
give you the wisdom that leads to salvation through faith which is in Christ
Jesus.” What were those “sacred
writings? The Old Testament. There was
no New Testament at that point; in fact, when Timothy was a child it was
probably the same time that Jesus Christ was on the earth during the
incarnation; it might have even before Jesus three years of public ministry. So the only doctrine he had was from the Old
Testament.
So the thing we need to remember is that this is not simply a
description of historical events but is to give us some doctrinal insights into
problem solving. And they, of course,
have a major problem of adversity brought on by their own sinfulness. This gets us back into the doctrine of
suffering. Why is it that we
suffer? There are two reasons we
suffer; we suffer first of all because we live in a fallen world, and because
of that we are associated with fallen institutions and fallen people and we are
under a curse from Genesis 3:13 and following which indicates that we are
always going to have suffering in this life and it is perhaps undeserved in a
general sense, that it is not a direct result of any bad decisions which we have
made. The second reason… and all of
this is under the category of undeserved suffering.
Then we have the category of deserved suffering and deserved
suffering comes under 2 categories, first of all under the principle of we reap
what we sow, which is the natural consequences of bad decisions. And then sometimes the Lord intensifies
those natural consequences under the category of divine discipline. Now natural consequences are also a part of
divine discipline, and sometimes in grace God somehow mitigates those
circumstances or we really don’t reap what we sow and that’s just an act of
grace and sometimes in arrogance we forget that and think we actually got away
with something and we continue in our carnality and it eventually comes back to
haunt us and God lowers the boom in divine discipline.
Now the situation we have here in Israel is this last category,
they are under suffering, the oppression from a foreign power, as a result of
divine discipline on the nation in light of God’s promises to discipline the
nation for their disobedience based on the Mosaic Law. This is what happened starting in Judges
4:1, so let’s start off there.
Judges 4:1, “Then the sons of Israel again did evil in the sight
of the LORD,” and we continue to be reminded of the fact, this is repeated
each time all the way through the book, that evil is “in the sight of the LORD,” there is an
absolute standard. Evil is not
relative, it’s not based on a consensus, it’s not based on a vote, it’s not
based on a majority opinion, it’s not even based on people who can accurately
punch a hole in a punch card. It is
based exclusively on God’s righteous character and that is the standard. Evil in the sight of the Lord also has a
technical use in the Old Testament; it’s not just any category of sin. So often when we think about evil we think
of particular types of sin, everybody has their own list. If you’re a modern American divorced from
any concept of doctrine then your concept of personal sin is usually related to
some sort of safety issue, some sort of issue that you can take into court and
sue somebody over, it’s related to smoking or health or something that may
shorten your physical life. But if
you’re a believer sin has a totally different sense.
There are three categories of sin in the Scripture. There are personal sins, there are sins of
the tongue and there are mental attitude sins.
But the concept, “evil in the sight of the LORD” does not
really refer to any or most of those.
This is not talking about lying, this is not talking about gossip, this
is not talking about fornication or violence or murder. That is not what is entailed in the concept
of “evil in the sight of the LORD.” If you analyze
this phrase throughout the Old Testament it always relates to idolatry, which
is a violation of the first two commandments of the Mosaic Code, that they have
departed, they have forgotten, they have abandoned God and in place of that
they have substituted the worship of the idols, in this case the fertility gods
and the fertility religions of the Canaanites, the Baals and the Asherah.
So the sons of Israel once again succumbed to the inside pressure
in Canaan. Now this is the model I want
you to keep in mind. For understanding
the spiritual life here we have to remember that Israel… draw a circle here and
this represents Israel and the believer, the New Testament Church Age
believer. Back in the third chapter
Israel had failed to obey God so God said I’m going to leave these nations in
the land to test you, the Canaanite, the Perizzite, the Hivite, all these are
going to be inside the land. So the
Canaanites and the other groups all represent inside pressure on Israel to
succumb to the Canaanite way of doing things.
This is analogous to sin nature pressure and sin nature control of the
soul.
We go back to our study on adversity and stress, that adversity is
the outside pressure on the soul and stress is the inside pressure. Adversity is what circumstances do to us;
stress is what we do to ourselves.
Adversity is inevitable; stress is optional. Adversity is outside pressure and is tantamount to the pressure
of the cosmic system and inside pressure from the soul or stress is tantamount
to sin nature control. When we try to
solve the problems in our life by adopting human viewpoint techniques and human
viewpoint strategies, whether they involve direct sin, I’m going to solve this
problem by getting angry at that person, I’m going to get back at them by
character assassination, gossip, maligning, running them down, something like
that, then that is handling our problems through overt sin. But we can also try to handle our problems
through relatively “good” techniques, techniques of psychotherapy, techniques
of visualization, techniques of New Age.
I just ran across a new one this past week that someone told me
about that’s a resurrection of a system, it’s called theophostic therapy and it
reminds me of some stuff that came out in the mid 80s where you visualize Jesus
coming to heal you and it’s kind of a mix of inner healing and creative
visualization, New Age meditation, all wrapped up in the garb of Christian
verbiage and terminology. And this is
taking several Christian groups by storm.
It’s amazing how few Christian organizations have anybody in leadership
any more who is dedicated to the principle of the sufficiency of Scripture and
that God’s grace is sufficient for all of our problems, and so they get out and
constantly go to the world to find some new psychotherapeutic gimmick and then
they try to baptize it and rehash it and bring it into the church and it just
creates more problems.
So the sin nature takes over, when we reject God the sin nature
takes over and puts inside pressure on the soul and outside pressure comes from
adversity. And there is also the
outside pressure of the cosmic thinking or what the Bible calls worldliness of
human viewpoint thinking to solve problems.
So we have the outside pressure and the inside pressure, and the inside
pressure is analogous here to the Canaanites who are pressuring the people in
the nation to compromise and to assimilate their value system and solve the
problems in life the way they do. And
they solved the problems, they try to gain prosperity, and they try to gain affluence
and they try to gain success by participation in the fertility rituals of the
phallic cult. When Israel succumbed to
that then it opened them up to the influence from outside pressure and the
result was that they were dominated by adversity which in analogy is external
enemies, the nations that oppressed Israel during this time. That’s the framework that we need to adopt
in understanding a Christian life application from what we are going to study,
that once we succumb to sin nature control of the soul then that makes us
vulnerable to defeat from the outside, and there is only one solution and that
is the divine solution. The human
solution is no solution according to 2 Corinthians 11, the human solution is no
solution; God’s solution is the only solution and we will see how that works out
in the course of this episode here in Judges 4.
Now structurally, one of the things we ought to note, this is an
unusual situation in the Bible. We get
to see something in light of how the Jews wrote poetry because Judges 4 gives
us the narrative, the historical analysis of the battle, and Judges 5 is going
to give us a poetic hymn that uses all sorts of metaphor and simile, various
images in order to express what took place in chapter 4. So we’re going to learn some things by
looking at it from two different perspectives.
We’ll see Judges 4 this time and Judges 5 next time.
Judges 4:1, “Then the sons of Israel again did evil in the sight of the LORD, after Ehud died.” So they went back into idolatry, [2] “And
the LORD sold them” this is the qal
perfect of makar which is the same
word used to sell a slave into slavery.
And so we see once again the principle that once a people succumb to sin
nature control, that is tantamount to soul slavery; once a culture gets
involved in soul slavery it is not long before they are enslaved from the
outside. Once a culture begins to think
as slaves then they make decisions as slaves and this is what happens to
Israel. “And the LORD sold them,” it’s an active
form of the verb which indicates that God makes a specific decision in terms of
divine discipline to put Israel under the oppression of a foreign power. “And the LORD sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan, who reigned in Hazor;
and the commander of his army was Sisera, who lived in Harosheth-hagoyim. [3] The sons of
Israel cried to the LORD; for he had nine hundred iron chariots, and he oppressed
the sons of Israel severely for twenty years.”
Now there are several fascinating lessons that we can take from
these verses but first of all we have to understand a few things that are going
on here so that we can comprehend the historical scenario. We have to look at a map; this is a map of
Israel. To the west is the Mediterranean,
to the north is the Sea of Galilee, you have the Jordan descending, all of this
is below sea level down to the Dead Sea.
Jerusalem is located right about here, to the north is Jericho; over
here in the central hill country are two important towns for this study, Bethel
which is where Abraham had established an altar, Ramah is where the tabernacle
is housed, and it is in between these two towns where Deborah was judging
Israel. We’ll come to that in verse 5,
that she is located “under a palm tree between Ramah and Bethel,” and this is
“in the hill country of Ephraim.” Now
to the north we have the Sea of Galilee and these two tribal areas in the north
pay a critical role in this narrative.
You have the tribal allotment of Naphtali which is to the far north, and
just south and west of there, around the Bethlehem area is the tribe of
Zebulun. We will see that up in the
center part of Naphtali is a town called Kedesh which is referred to in this
episode but there are two towns named Kedesh; there is Kedesh of Naphtali which
is the home of Barak and then there is another Kedesh down here just off the
south shore of the Sea of Galilee. Now
right here, because I want you to pay attention because I’m going to zoom in on
a different looking map so we can have a little more perspective on some things. Here is Mount Tabor, to the southwest of the
Sea of Galilee, it’s at about 1300 feet and it is located to the north
northeast of a major valley, running down through here is the valley of
Esdraelon, also called near Megiddo which is where the great battle of
Armageddon will take place at the end of the tribulation.
Now let’s look at a little more precise map here. We have these towns, Megiddo and Jezreel
focus on that, just to the northwest we have Mount Carmel; to the southeast we
have Mount Gilboa. Now we’re going to
zoom in on a slightly different map here, this is a topographical map of the
Valley of Jezreel, also called the Valley of Esdraelon, and this valley is a
huge valley; on the northwest is Mount Tabor, up here in this area; then Mount
Carmel to the northwest; Mount Gilboa to the southeast, and notice these
shades, from light green to dark green you’re going downhill. The light green is about 100 meters and the
second level of green is right at sea level so you see how the land is getting
lower and lower as you move to the lower right of the map. That means that when you look at this river
here, the Kishon River, which is really a wadi. Now a wadi is a dry river bed except in times of the rainy season. If you’ve ever been to some place like
Arizona, New Mexico or West Texas then you will know what that is; it’s just a
dry river bed but you get a heavy rainstorm and you’ll have a flash flood that
will come through there. And that was
typical during the rainy season in Israel, but this does not take palace in the
rainy season because Sisera is a military commander and he would not be so
foolish as to take his chariot corps into a flooded are or an area prone to
flood in the midst of the rainy season.
That’s what the liberal says but we’re going to see differently as we
look at the text.
Now get this in your mind, we’ll come back to this map again and
again but we have to understand the layout here, the topography here if we’re
going to really grasp the miracle that takes place in God’s deliverance of
Israel in this particular battle.
Napoleon in about 1790, late 1790s when Napoleon came up through the
Middle East he stood on the edge of this valley and said, this is the valley of
Esdraelon where Armageddon will take place, he said this valley is so large
that all the armies of the world could meet here and do battle. Now what was happening in this area, we
learn that once again the Canaanites have a superior military force because
they have superior technology. And this
is one of the general principles that you will always find throughout history
is that one way to subjugate and tyrannize another people is to prevent them
from being able to use the latest technological weaponry, the latest technology
to protect themselves.
We live in an age today when technology has made weapons that have
incredible killing power, not just in terms of atomic weapons but also in terms
of personal weapons. You have all sorts
of things that are available in terms of assault weapons and we all know that
there have been a number of unfortunate incidents in the last few years where
people who have gotten hold of these weapons have committed some atrocities,
they’ve shot at school yards, they’ve shot children and so there’s a great move,
from people who do not understand reality, to pass laws prohibiting the
possession and ownership of these kinds of weapons. The problem with that is that once the citizen is unable to
possess, to own and have in his house, the same technology that the armed
forces of a nation or the police forces of a nation have, then it places the
citizenry at a disadvantage because they can no longer protect themselves
against the violent encroachment of a strong government. And that is how a tyrannical government
begins to take over and to exercise power over people and to destroy their
freedoms. And that is why it is
important that a nation always has in its arsenal the latest technology and why
people should have the freedom to own and possess the latest technology for
personal protection.
One never knows when you might get the wrong kind of people in
power in a nation and seek to dominate and tyrannize the citizenry, but if the
citizenry have the weapons then they can protect themselves. They also have to protect themselves against
the criminal element and one of the things that’s happened in Australia and in
Canada in the last couple of years since they both passed laws outlawing the
personal ownership of weapons that the rise of criminality has been
exorbitant. The number of murders, the
number of crimes has gone up astronomically because the criminals know that the
individual citizen is not going to be able to pull out a .45 and blow them away
in the midst of his commission of a crime.
So they feel like they are protected, and then of course the criminal
element is always able to get the latest technology. It always amazes me that whenever one of these incidents take
place, as tragic as they are, people always want to cry for the passage of more
laws and the fact is that if the laws that were on the books were enforced then
it wouldn’t happen, or it probably would happen because people are sinful and
there’s always going to be that criminal element and that laws cannot prevent
everything. But that’s what happened in
recent years is that we see people crying for more and more laws when the fact
is that, for example I think in the incident in Columbine High School there
were about 15 different laws related to firearms possession that were violated
but those laws did not prevent that from happening. So we’re going to pass more laws to try to prevent it from
happening. Well, that won’t work. If you pass more laws all you’re going to do
is keep innocent people from being able to protect themselves and all of this
is extremely dangerous.
We see this principle here because the Jews were forbidden from
having the latest weaponry and the latest weaponry, the latest technology at
that time looked something like this.
Here is a picture of an Egyptian charioteer. We know that they had a possession of iron and iron chariots and
iron weapons whereas the Jews were prevented from having them. We read over in 1 Samuel that the
Philistines prevented the Jews from being able to possess iron weapons; they
kept them from having blacksmiths so that they could not have the latest technology. So they’re overrun and what would happen in
this area is that this huge valley is wide open and flat and so the forces of
Sisera would range to and fro through the valley with their chariots and the
people were forced to go hide up in the mountains and up in the hills. So they just ranged to and fro, wreaking
havoc and virtually, if you look at the map of Israel here, that if you control
the Valley of Esdraelon here, running from Mount Gilboa to Mount Carmel, then
you have split the nation in two and you have prevented them from being able to
unify against a common enemy.
Now I need to say something about the identification of “Jabin,
king of Canaan who reigned in Hazor.”
Hazor was a town located in the area of Naphtali, up here to the north
and if we read over in Joshua 11 we would discover that Joshua’s army had
defeated a coalition headed up by another man by the name of Jabin, not the
same individual and since they’re both named Jabin that indicates that this was
sort of a dynastic title, something like Pharaoh would be, it was a title or
maybe it was just the family name, those last three letter in English, b-i-n,
is etymologically related to either the Arabic “ibn” indicating son of or the analogous Hebrew “bin.” For example, Saudi Arabia is ruled by the
house of Ibn Saud, Ibn meaning the son of or it indicates the family
dynasty. So Jabin very well could
indicate just the family dynasty and it is very possible, we don’t know there’s
not enough extra-Biblical evidence but it seems to suggest, this is the only
time Jabin is mentioned here, that what happened is after Joshua defeated the
kingdom of Hazor and killed that Jabin, that there were descendants of that
Jabin in the family that came up a couple of generations later and they would
probably be living in exile along the coast.
So you had a Canaanite enclave along the coast outside of the land and
they are organizing around this dynastic figure.
Along with them, somewhere in this area there was a town or a
fortress called Harosheth-hagoyim which was the stronghold, the military base
for this commander, this military commander Sisera. It almost reminds you of some of the things that go on today in
terms of how the Palestinians and Arabs are trying to destroy Israel from bases
outside the land by putting together various coalitions. And this has taken place over the last 40 or
50 years and the same kind of thing was taking place here. So you have, from this base along the coast,
you have this organization of various people groups around this dynastic leader
that they’re going to focus on him and they’re going to invade down here
through Israel. And they’ve been very
successful at this and have brought Israel under control and they’re seeking to
expand their control
Now at the same time we come to verse 4 and we discover that
Deborah is a prophetess during this time.
She does not become a judge as a result of the people crying out, but
she is already a judge. And God uses
here, therefore, to bring about deliverance under the military leadership of
Barak.
One other point I want to make is what changes the situation is
that the Jews used what would be for the Church Age believer 1 John 1:9. They’ve been out of fellowship, they’ve been
disobedient to God and they cry out to the Lord and this term that’s used to
cry out, za’aq, is used later on in
Judges 10:10, it gives us the content of the cry. The writer doesn’t tell us everything in every passage and in
Judges 10:10 he says they cried out and they confessed to God that they had
been serving the Baalim and the Asherah.
So they confessed their idolatry, they’re back in fellowship, and
once they’re back in fellowship …that’s why confession is a problem solving
device, because it moves us from a position of weakness where we’re still under
the control of the sin nature and making bad decisions from a position of
weakness, to a position where under the ministry of God the Holy Spirit we can
make good decisions from a position of strength. And the position of strength of being in fellowship, in the
bottom circle under the filling of the Holy Spirit and led by God in applying
the Word of God. So in the Old
Testament situation by confessing their sin they are now coming back to the
Lord and in effect what happens in confession is we are saying Lord, I need
Your grace, I am incapable of handling the problem on my own, I have done that,
this is what I have done, confession means simply that you admit your sin, this
is what I have done and now I am relying upon the fact that Christ paid the penalty
for my sins on the cross to…[tape turns] …my forgiveness and once I am forgiven
I am in a position where you are going to give me strength and aid because of
your grace. Now that’s basically what
we do whenever we confess our sin.
That’s the underlying mechanic.
Now what happens is they confessed their sin and it’s a
recognition that they need God’s grace.
But notice, God doesn’t just come along and send a ball of fire from
heaven or an earthquake to destroy the army of Jabin. Now God is going to use the natural elements in a supernatural
way to bring about this victory but God does not do it apart from the actions,
the individual actions and responsibilities of Israel. They’re still responsible to go raise an
army and to do what God says to do but God is going to work behind the scenes
to bring about the victory. And this is
what’s important for us to understand.
No matter how overwhelming the circumstances appear, no matter how
superior the enemy forces might be arrayed against us, no matter how impossible
the situation may seem, God says you do what I say to do and while you’re in
that position of obedience doing what I tell you to do, then I’m going to work
behind the scenes to give you victory over that problem, that adversity, that
difficulty in life. It’s a basic
principle that we find in Ephesians 6 when it comes to spiritual warfare.
When you look at passages like Ephesians 6 and 1 Peter 5 and a
couple of passages over in James the issue in the spiritual life is to take up
a defensive position, to stand firm in the strength of the Lord. It doesn’t say to attack in the strength of
the Lord, it says to stand firm in the strength of the Lord and put on the full
armor of God. As the believer does what
God says to do by applying all of the principles of doctrine that he knows and
exercising the faith rest drill under the filling of the Holy Spirit, then God
is going to work behind the scenes to deal with whatever the problem is to
bring about a victorious solution. We
may not know how He’s going to do it; it may appear impossible to us but God
says first of all you trust me by doing X, Y and Z and I will then bring about
the victory, because as Paul noted in 2 Corinthians 11, God said “My strength
is perfected in your weakness, and My grace is sufficient for you.” So God is going to teach them the principle
of His sufficient grace. First He
provides a leader.
Judges
4:4, “Now Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lappidoth,” so this identifies
here both as a prophetess but also in terms of her family relationship, so we
see that she is not portrayed as a woman who is outside of the leadership
umbrella of her husband; that’s the point of bringing out her marital
relationship, that she is under the authority of her husband but she still is used
by God in this particular way as a prophetess and a judge which indicates that
these are not illegitimate functions for here.
She’s “a prophetess, the wife of Lappidoth, was judging Israel at that
time.
Judges
4:5, “She used to sit under the palm tree of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel,”
now the reason he calls it “the palm tree of Deborah” is because of the fact
that she had sat there, by the time the writer writes this this had become the
name of that location, “the palm tree of Deborah,” and it was standard
operating procedure in the ancient world that if you were a judge or if you
were a prophetess then you would usually set up your place of operations in a
grove of trees, a grove of palm trees, a grove of oak trees was typical in the
Canaanite fertility worship so she is in a grove of palm trees and there she is
adjudicating personal conflicts and legal conflicts in the nation. It is “between Ramah and Bethel in the hill
country of Ephraim; and the sons of Israel came up to her for judgment.”
Judges 4:6, “Now she sent and summoned
Barak the son of Abinoam from Kedesh-naphtali, and said to him, ‘Behold, the LORD,’” she uses the
term Yahweh which indicates and reminds Barak of God’s covenant position as the
God who entered into a covenant with Israel, “Behold, Yahweh, the God of
Israel, has commanded, ‘Go and march to Mount Tabor, and take with you ten
thousand men from the sons of Naphtali and from the sons of Zebulun.’” So he’s to take an army of ten thousand to
go against this army of at least 900 charioteers.
And God says, Judges 4:7, “I will draw
out to you Sisera, the commander of Jabin’s army, with his chariots and his
many troops to the river Kishon, and I will give him into your hand.’” Notice, God has already promised him victory;
he doesn’t say figure out how you can do it, he says I will give you
victory. But the problem we see here is
that in an apostacized nation that has been overwhelmed by a human viewpoint
cultural and pagan cultural concepts you see a role shift take place between
men and women. The women here have
risen to a level of leadership; the men have become feminized, as exemplified
in Barak, and he doesn’t want to assume the mantel of leadership and so we see
Barak, the wimp in verse 8.
Judges 4:8, “Then Barak said to her, ‘If
you will go with me,’” see, he’s not trusting God; God has already said you go,
I’m going to give you the victory but he says I’m not going to go unless you go
with me, “’then I will go; but if you will not go with me, I will not go.’” Well, she went along with him but there’s a
penalty that Barak is not going to benefit from the blessing of his victory.
Judges 4:9, “She said, ‘I will surely go
with you; nevertheless, the honor shall not be yours on the journey that you
are about to take, for the LORD will sell Sisera into the hands of a woman.’” Then Deborah
arose and went with Barak to Kedesh.”
And what she is saying is that in that culture it was dishonorable for a
man, it was shameful if the woman stepped in and did something the man would do
and Barak is going to gain the victory but he is not going to gain the honor
that goes with it because he will not be the one to kill Sisera. So they go to Kedesh which is located
somewhere up here, in this sort of northeast quadrant here and that is not the
same Kedesh as his home. Now if we go
back to verse 6 it’s interesting that she summons Barak, “the son of Abinoam,
out of Kedesh-naphtali. You see, his
home town is located up here in the north.
He is chosen because he would have
personal knowledge, he’s right near Hazor, he would have personal knowledge of
the enemy, he would have personal knowledge of their customs, he would have,
over the last several years he would have viewed their activities, and so God
is not just choosing somebody in a vacuum, He’s choosing someone who is
prepared. He is choosing someone who
has taken the time and has been in a situation that has prepared him for this
job. Now the fact that Barak fails and
he doesn’t exercise his leadership fully is a secondary point but God chooses
him because he is someone that God has uniquely prepared for this particular
role by putting him in a situation where he would be familiar, he would have
good intelligence on the operations of Sisera and Jabin.
It sort of reminds me of Norman
Schwarzkopf; I read his autobiography and it’s interesting how God raised up
this man, his father was attached to central Iran during World War II and
attached to the corps to the Shah, and it was during that time that Schwarzkopf
was growing up and after World War II his father was still a military attaché
to the Shah and so Schwarzkopf spent his adolescent years making many contacts
with Arabs in that part of the world, understood the Arab culture, understood
how to deal with the Arabs, and then over the course of his military career was
sent back to that same general area in the Middle East many times. So God uniquely prepared him to understand
the cultural dynamics that were going to take place and I think that because of
that he was able to get past various problem situations that came up during
Desert Storm but it just shows how God can prepare a man for a particular
situation.
So they go down and they engage in
battle and what basically happens is that they come to this situation and God
causes an event to take place upstream here, it’s going to flow downhill which
means the wadi flows this way, and Sisera brings his troops in here, it’s in
the springtime, he doesn’t expect a flood, and he is trapped as he comes this
way to meet the Jewish forces from Mount Tabor, God causes a tremendous
thunderstorm upstream and this is going to wipe out the army of Sisera. [Judges 4:10, “Barak called Zebulun and
Naphtali together to Kedesh, and ten thousand men went up with him; Deborah
also went up with him.”]
In Judges 4:11 we see another scenario
taking place, verse 11 is parenthetical and we’re told about a man named Heber,
the Kenite. Now he’s not Jewish, he’s a
Kenite, he’s a Midianite, from the clan of the Midianites and he’s related to
Moses through Moses’ wife, who was a Midianite. “Now Heber the Kenite had separated himself from the Kenites,
from the sons of Hobab the father-in-law of Moses, and had pitched his tent as
far away as the oak in Zaanannim, which is near Kedesh.” So that’s in the same general area to the
east. And he has allied himself with
Israel, the picture is that he is a worshiper of Yahweh.
Judges 4:12, “Then they” now the “they”
here is not Heber, the “they” here is Sisera’s intelligence team, they “told
Sisera that Barak the son of Abinoam had gone up to Mount Tabor. [13] Sisera called together all his chariots,
nine hundred iron chariots, and all the people who were with him, from
Harosheth-hagoyim to the river Kishon. [14] Deborah said to Barak, ‘Arise! For this is the day in which the LORD has given Sisera into your
hands; behold, the LORD has gone out before you.’” In other words, for the believer God has given us victory, He has
promised victory over any situation in life but the issue is to apply doctrine
in the situation and as we apply doctrine in the situation, no matter
overwhelming the odds, even though you have ten thousand untrained soldiers
with you going up against a trained veteran army God is going to work behind
the scenes to bring about the victory.
[“So Barak went down from Mount Tabor with ten thousand men following
him.”]
Look at Judges 4:15, it states, “The LORD routed Sisera
and all his chariots and all his army with the edge of the sword before Barak;
and Sisera alighted from his chariot and fled away on foot.” Now we miss something here by not knowing
the Hebrew. If you look at this word
for rout it’s used in a number of other military type situations with Israel.
For example, in Exodus 14:24, referring
to the destruction of the Egyptian army at the Red Sea we read: “And it came about at the morning watch that
the LORD looked down on the army of the Egyptians through the pillar of fire
and cloud, and brought the army of the Egyptians into confusion,” into
disarray, and then He is going to wipe them out, He is going to cause problems,
the wheels are going to fall off of their chariots as they are coming across
the dry ground through the Red Sea and He’s going to get them trapped at the
Red Sea. So we see that there is a
supernatural element there where God is going to be using natural circumstances
and natural situations in a supernatural way.
By that I mean timing and circumstances in order to bring about victory
for Israel.
It happens again in Exodus 23:37, God is
promising Israel in relationship to their future holy war in the land of
Canaan, “I will send My terror,” this is fear, anxiety, an irrational fear in
the enemy, “I will send My terror ahead of you and through into confusion,”
there’s our word again, “throw into confusion,” it doesn’t mean simply to rout,
it means to, through various means, cause the enemy to become completely disoriented
to the battle scene, to be overwhelmed by fear and anxiety and then to use
natural forces as well in order to bring defeat, “to throw into confusion all
the people among whom you come and I will make all your enemies turn their
backs to you.”
Deuteronomy 2:15, “Moreover, the hand of
the LORD was against
them,” this is in a context of discipline on the Jews, “the hand of the LORD was against
them,” that is the disobedient Jews, “to destroy them form within the camp
until they all perished.” Moses is
talking about the fact that the disobedient generation, the Exodus generation
that disobeyed God would be disciplined by God until all of them were wiped out
and annihilated before the rest of the nation, their descendants could go into
the land.
Joshua 10:10, it’s talking about the
battle in the south around Gibeon, “the LORD confounded them” that is He brought
confusion before the enemies of Israel, and He “slew them with a great
slaughter at Gibeon, and pursued them by the way of Beth-horon, and struck them
as far as Azekah, and unto Makkedah.”
What we see as we can go through all of these various passages is that
God has made it clear that He is going to give this victory using whatever
means necessary. The first part is that
the Jews needed to be in a situation God had defined and then God would bring
about the miraculous victory.
1 Samuel 7:10, “Now Samuel was offering
up the burn offering and the Philistines drew near to battle against Israel,”
this is at the famous battle of Aphek, “but the LORD thundered with
a great thunder on that day against the Philistines and confused them.” So you see, the Lord uses a storm here to
bring confusion and fear on the Philistines so that they were “routed” before
Israel; that’s our word “routed.” So
God uses a supernatural means of a storm to bring a flood to wipe out the
chariot army of Sisera.
Judges 4:16, “But Barak pursued the
chariots and the army as far as Harosheth-hagoyim, and all the army of Sisera
fell by the edge of the sword; not even one was left.” Now Sisera has to flee on foot, Judges 4:17,
“Now Sisera fled away on foot to the tent of Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite,”
and this is one of the most dramatic episodes in the Old Testament because he
comes to her for help and when he comes to her she invites him in. Now she’s in an interesting situation. Some people who get all squeamish about this
situation say well, she lied to him and she committed murder, and they forget
the context. First of all, there is a
war going on. Secondly, if she is seen
aiding and abetting the enemy, the Jews had just had a victory, then she is
going to become an enemy of Israel. She
is involved as a non-combatant but she is put in a particular situation where
she can finalize the victory for Israel.
So there is nothing seen here as negative. And this is a picture of Jael after she has killed Sisera.
Sisera comes in and she feeds him and gives him what
would be yogurt for us, curds and milk and he comes in he goes to sleep because
he’s exhausted after the battle, and so comes up and grabs a tent peg and a
mallet and she drives the tent peg through his head and, I guess this is the
origin of the phrase “he got nailed. So
she is the one who has the final honor and victory and she is praised as “blessed
among women above all women” in the song in Judges 5. Next time we’ll look at that.
Remember the point of this is not simply an
interesting battle story but that it is a story of how God today still gives us
victory over our adversaries. As
believers our responsibility is to learn doctrine and to apply doctrine and it
is God’s responsibility to come in and give us the victory over whatever
problem that may be. We may not
understand how He can do it; it may seem impossible to us, it may seem as if
the circumstances are all arrayed against us, but if we are obedient to God He
is the One who has promised that He will give us peace, He will give us His joy
and He will take care of the problem.
With our heads bowed….