Deborah: Women and Spiritual
Leadership – Judges 4:1-4
So
often in our nation we do indeed take for granted the freedoms that we have in
our nation and Veteran’s Day, Memorial Day, 4th of July, times like that,
we specifically honor and remember the military because they have won and
preserved our freedoms. And I don’t
think we really understand how much that has changed the way we live as
individuals. Take some time to travel
in a third world country somewhere, as I have, gone to the former Soviet Union
and realize, just trying to teach basic concepts of doctrine, things that I
don’t know about today, I think we’ve lost so much of our Judeo-Christian
heritage, it’s been legally and wrongly removed from the classroom. One thing, you always run into people who
say what religion do you want taught in the classroom if you don’t allow the
faith taught, some people argue that you shouldn’t have faith taught because
you don’t teachers teaching doctrine and of course that’s true. But you know you always teach somebody’s
values in a classroom. They’re either
going to be Biblical values or they’re going to be pagan values and the question
is, whose values are going to be taught.
And
the idea that because the Supreme Court has removed the mention of God or any
mention of prayer from the classroom is a tragedy in our nation because it is
both a result and a contributing factor of the ongoing paganization of our
nation because people are taught to compartmentalize, that they can learn all
of these academic disciplines apart from God and that somehow their
Christianity or their religious belief is just segmented out here in some other
thing, that’s what I do on Sunday morning if I do it at all, it apparently
isn’t relevant to anything else that I do in life, whether my work, or my
hobbies, or my academic life. And
that’s a tragedy but there is some truth to the fact that we wouldn’t want just
anybody referencing God in a classroom because in a pluralistic society where
you have places that are more urban you have an increasing number of mixed
faith, Buddhist, Moslems, whatever in the classroom teaching, so it’s indeed a
crisis that our nation faces because what is in jeopardy is the entire
Judeo-Christian heritage that our country was founded upon.
So
the average school person today has very little understanding of Biblical
concepts, which is really sad because it impoverishes them intellectually. One can hardly read a 19th
century English or American poet or earlier and even many 20th
century poets without understanding some of the Biblical illusions that are
present in the literature. I was
reading just a modern writer the other day, a fiction writer, a mystery novel,
and there was just the allusion in there to the sufferings of Lot and I wonder
how many people reading that today for a little entertainment would even
understand what that allusion was to, because we’re not allowed to even teach
the Bible as literature in the secular classroom. And that continues to feed the decline. When I was over in Kazakhstan this last summer I realized just
how difficult it is to communicate to teach across that cultural barrier where
there is no frame of reference at all for many of the fundamental concepts that
all of us understand and hold dear in relation to freedom in relation to
government, in relation to moral absolutes.
And when you get into a situation like that you suddenly realize how
deeply indebted we are to a free society, where this an open expression and
teaching of Biblical thought and Biblical ideas and that’s what this nation is
grounded upon. But as we see today our
nation, our freedoms, are gradually being eroded and that is not because a
certain political party or another political party is in power, it’s not even
due to the failures or successes of one or two or a group of individuals who
are serving in a political sphere.
It
is due to the negative volition and apostasy of our nation as a whole and we
see parallels in the book of Judges, which is what we are studying, and we come
to Judges 4 and we are focusing on the concept of leadership because the real
subject of the entire midsection of the book, from Judges 3:7 through the end
of Judges 17 is all related to the failure of leadership in Israel and there’s
a steady decline and deterioration and the first time this really comes into
focus is in this shift into chapter 4 and we begin to see an interesting
development in the theme of leadership.
We
must remember that the writer of Judges is critiquing the society of Israel
that existed subsequent to the conquest.
He is writing from a historical vantage point, several hundred years
later, probably not more than 300 years later, but he is writing under the
kingship of Saul and he is demonstrating a principle and that is that the
nation had a high level of freedom prior to the kingship, but when there was no
physical king in Israel the people could not handle their freedoms. See, in order to handle freedom you have to
have a sense of responsibility; they go hand in hand. When you have freedom without responsibility it’s the same as
freedom without authority because authority and responsibility go hand in hand
together. And so what happened was the
rejection of God as the authority in Israel led to a misunderstanding of the
whole principle of leadership and responsibility that went along with that, and
so the nation, having rejected God as the king, and not having a physical king
who would impose a rigid order on the nation, the people deteriorated, not only
into apostasy but also into spiritual anarchy and moral anarchy and the theme
of Judges is that “everyone did what was right in their own eyes.”
They
rejected the rule of law which for them was instantiated in the Mosaic Law, and
each person became a law unto themselves and we can certainly see parallels to
that in our own contemporary culture.
And as a result of that what happens when man in autonomy rejects the
absolutes given by God in his arrogance he seeks to redefine the nature of
creation. He seeks to redefine social
order; he seeks to redefine key concepts such as law, such as authority and
leadership, and this begins to have its impact throughout all of society
because these things are integral to God’s created order and as we have studied
under the doctrine of leadership, leadership, authority and responsibility were
all inaugurated before sin ever entered into human experience.
So
it is not something that God put into the creative order or put into human
society in order to control sin. It was
there beforehand and man as a creature needs to function within the framework
of leadership, authority and responsibility and that was all part of the first
divine institution, and once paganism, which I define very technically as
non-Biblical thinking…in all of us, everybody has a certain degree of pagan
thinking in their soul because we have been brought up in a pagan society, we
have inculcated pagan values through the movies we watch, through the
literature we read, we’re influenced even through the art that we appreciate
and enjoy and through the music we listen to.
All of that are expressions of the overall cultural worldview which is
expressed in the Bible in terms of worldliness. This is from the Greek word kosmos
which means an orderly system of thinking and it is antithetical to everything
that God teaches. So we use terms like
divine viewpoint versus human viewpoint, paganism versus Biblical
thinking. There are all parallel
concepts. So the Word of God clearly
expresses God’s view on human society and human relationships and how they
should be ordered because they were built-in by virtue of the way He created us
and in the initial creation prior to any sin.
And we are going to focus on some of these problems, specifically in
Judges because this chapter is…if not at the heart of a contemporary crisis it
is certainly used as a source of support for a pagan concept in a contemporary
situation.
So
we need to look at this in some detail and fit that into a contemporary
setting. First let’s look at the first
four verses. Judges 4:1, “Then the sons
of Israel again did evil in the sight of the LORD, after Ehud died.”
Ehud was the previous judge; the use of the word LORD in all caps indicates that
this is talking about Yahweh, YHWH is
the Tetragrammaton, the sacred personal name of God in the Old Testament and
it’s always associated with the Mosaic Covenant that God initiated between
Himself and the Jews and gave the Law to Israel at Mount Sinai, mediated
through angels and given to Moses. So
whenever you see this there is something in the background that reminds us that
God has entered into a legal contractual relationship with Israel and that that
is at stake. So they have violated
that.
Notice
that evil is defined contextually in terms of an absolute. It is not a relative; evil is not determined
by social consensus. The majority rule
does not determine what is right and what is wrong. There is no elite in society that comes along and determines what
is right and wrong; there are absolutes and those are grounded in the person
and character of God. So evil is always
defined in terms of the absolutes of God.
So “the sons of Israel,” that is the Jews, “again did evil in the sight
of the LORD,” and in context we have seen that what this means is that they
have gone into the idolatry of the Canaanites; they have gotten involved again
in this third cycle with the idolatry of Baal worship which was the ancient
fertility religions all associated with the Phallic cult and is comparable to
today’s health and wealth gospel, the prosperity thinking of modern society
that is driven by a materialistic lust because what under girded the entire
fertility worship in the ancient world, since it was an agricultural society,
the idea was that somehow I’m going to manipulate and massage the gods so that
they will give me good crops and I will have success every year and plenty of
food and extra money and I will have prosperity. So it was just the ancient form of the prosperity type of
thinking that is prevalent today, both in a secular world and has infiltrated
Christianity under many forms, mostly within the charismatic camp.
Judges
4:2 says, “And the LORD sold them,” and once again I want to remind you that
when we looked at this in its context back in Judges 3 in the first cycle that
the word for “sold” in the Hebrew is the same word used for selling someone
into slavery. And back there we saw
that the comment, several times by the writer of Judges, was that the Jews
“served the Baalim and the Asherah” and that word for “serve” is also a word
for slavery. Once you give yourselves
over to sin you become a slave in your thinking and this is the same point that
Paul explains so vividly in Romans 6 and that is that as a believer you are
either serving the sin nature or you are a servant of righteousness. There’s no neutrality, there’s no middle
line. And that when we sin as a
believer we immediately make ourselves slaves of the sin nature.
But
the unbeliever is born a slave of the sin nature, this was the point that Jesus
was making to the Pharisees in his encounter in John 8, “You will know the
truth and the truth will set you free.”
And they said but we’re children of Abraham, we’re already free. But they were in such arrogance that the
Pharisees didn’t realize that they were not only enslaved to their legalistic
observation but they were enslaved to the Roman Empire, they were enslaved to
their sin nature and Jesus was talking about the fact that it’s only on the
basis of truth that you can break the bonds of slavery to the sin nature and
that begins at the cross by putting your faith alone in Christ alone, because
Jesus Christ paid the penalty for our sins.
And that’s Paul’s argument in the first four verses of Romans 6. There he states that because we have been
identified as believers with the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus
Christ, then that autocratic bondage, that tyranny of the sin nature, those
chains have been broken. But you see,
what happens in a pagan society is that the vast majority of the citizens of
that culture are unbelievers and they are all in bondage to the sin
nature.
So
what happens in any culture, whether it’s 17th century America or 20th
century America, the point is whether it’s now or an earlier society there’s always
a certain percentage of unbelievers.
But what happens is when you have a certain critical mass of believers
who are operating on doctrine they have not only broken the bondage of the sin
nature positionally at salvation but as they pursue spiritual growth they are
developing the thinking of free people.
They understand the principole of Galatians 5:1 that it is for freedom
that Christ has set us free and so they can have real freedom in the soul and
you can’t have freedom in a political environment or a social environment or a
family environment or any environment whatever if you don’t have capacity for
freedom in the soul. So freedom
essentially is a spiritual issue, it is not a political issue and it is not
necessarily a military issue. Those are
merely symptoms of the underlying condition.
Now
in the Old Testament in Israel what you had was a term called the remnant and
when the remnant was of sufficient size and that refers to the believers who
are advancing to spiritual maturity in the Old Testament, then there would be
freedom and prosperity in the nation, even though there might be 50, 60, 70% of
the nation might all be involved in paganism there was a large enough remnant
that by virtue of their spiritual growth there was blessing by association for
the remainder of the nation.
Now
in the New Testament you have a similar concept and one which we call a pivot
because a pivot is that fulcrum upon which the issues turn, and the pivot in
the New Testament, it’s also a military concept that on a line of protection,
or a defensive line or offensive line, it may even happen in football as well,
there is one person or one place that the entire movement shifts or turns and
when that pivot breaks down then everything breaks down. So we use a term pivot because we’re not a
theocracy in the New Testament, in the Church Age, there is not a remnant
concept because that is specifically related to an Old Testament concept, but
there is still the principle that as goes the believer so goes the nation and
there is blessing by association in any nation when there is a certain critical
mass of positive believers who are advancing to spiritual maturity.
And
they are going to impact their culture in a number of ways but it begins
spiritually. It doesn’t begin with how
they go and vote at the voting booth although eventually that will be impacted
as they go through spiritual reformation, as their mind is renovated eventually
that means that they are going to start looking at all of the issues that come
up before government, issues involving taxation, legislation, business,
economics, they’re going to learn to think about those things in Biblical terms
and not just in terms of the culture surrounding them, and the will find
themselves more and more at odds with the culture around them when that culture
plunges deeper and deeper into paganism.
And the result eventually is that when you get a culture where it is
99.9% pagan and only .01% less advancing believer there will be head-on clashes
and it will start getting pretty nasty because the difference between the way a
believer thinks and the way the culture around him thinks is going to be so
antithetical that the unbelievers are going to be both convicted and challenged
by the believer and react in arrogance, thinking they’re self-righteousness but
the believer will no longer be able to just accept or tolerate certain
conditions and situations within that culture around them and so there will be
harsh clashes. And that is eventually,
I think, where our country is headed unless there is a shift in terms of
positive volition.
Paganism
is a very subtle sort of disease, if we might use that analogy; it is more than
a disease really because it comes from the sin nature, it’s a constitutional problem,
but we’ll use the analogy of a disease.
And any disease, for example, some of you have already enjoyed this
season’s bout with the flu, others have that thrill to look forward to, but
despite your situation you know that when you start getting sick some of you
will manifest certain symptoms. Others
of you will have the same disease and manifest other symptoms. So just because you have the flu doesn’t
mean that you’re necessarily going to manifest every single symptom. It’s going to be different. So you can have paganism in Africa and it
will manifest itself with certain symptoms.
You can have paganism in ancient Greece and that manifested itself
differently but there were certain similarities and parallels. You can have paganism in Asia and that is
going to be different from that in Africa or in Western Europe but it will
still have certain similarities and parallels but yet the symptoms may
differ. So when I start talking about
symptoms, certain symptoms, I’m not necessarily saying that some of those
things are evil in and of themselves, they are simply manifestations of the
culture’s orientation away from God.
Now
all of this is by way of just introduction to help you understand, give you
some framework for what we are going to address in these first four verses of
Judges. So the Israelites, by virtue of
the fact that they have started serving, enslaving themselves to the sin nature
and this is exemplified in idolatry and rejection of God, that God in turn
sells them to military conquest.
Judges 4:2, “And the LORD sold them into the hand of
Jabin, king of Canaan, who reigned in Hazor,” this is up in the north of the
land, “and the commander of his army was Sisera, who lived in Harosheth-hagoyim.
[3] The sons of Israel cried to the LORD; for he” that is Sisera, “had
nine hundred iron chariots,” just a side point, the Jews did not have iron at
this time because apparently there was a bit of a policy by the surrounding
Canaanite nations to keep Israel disarmed.
It sort of has a modern ring to it, the whole concept of
disarmament. The way in which you
exercise tyranny over the citizens in a nation or over surrounding nations is
to prevent them from having the latest technological weaponry for personal
protection. See, this means that…granted
there are many problems that may ensue from people in a society having access,
free and easy access to Uzi submachine guns, but the criminal element always
has access to the latest technology, and when you prevent the every day citizen
from having access to that technology then what you are saying is that you are
putting them in a position where they can become tyrannized by those who do
have access to the latest technology.
That happens not only within a nation
but outside of a nation when another nation does not have a strong military,
does not have and access the latest technological advances for weaponry, then
they will be subservient to whoever does.
This is why it’s necessary for a nation to preserve its integrity and to
preserve its freedom, that it must have a strong army that has the latest
technological advances. You don’t go
through disarmament, you don’t sit around like we’ve done the last 7 or 8 years
and say well, since the cold war is over we can stop spending money on military
weaponry because what’s happened is we don’t just have one enemy now we have a
whole number of enemies ranged against of who are committing acts of war that
we are afraid to call acts of war such as the attack on the Cole recently and
the result of that is that we become weaker and weaker as a nation. And in fact the term I would use is that we
become more and more effeminate as a nation and I use that word specifically
because of the underlying themes that are going on in this particular
passage.
Now immediately if you are here and you
don’t have a Biblical frame of reference you immediately are vibrating in your
seat because you’ve absorbed a lot of postmodern thought about the roles of men
and woman and if you’re vibrating already, well I apologize, you’re really going to be vibrating before
we’re done because what all of Judges indicates is that part of paganism is
that there is man on his own starts to redefine roles and sex roles and the
roles of men and of women and what happens in a pagan environment is that there
is a rise of effeminacy and there is a rise of masculinity in women. So that men fail to exercise their God-given
roles and responsibilities as leaders and women step into the gap.
Now the interesting thing is that in
this passage there’s no condemnation whatsoever on Deborah for filling the
gap. All the condemnation is on Barak
because he fails to fulfill his role of leadership, and the end of verse 3 says
“and he oppressed the sons of Israel severely for twenty years.” And then Judges 4:4, Now Deborah, a
prophetess, the wife of Lappidoth, was judging Israel at that time.”
By way of introduction I just want to
point out a couple of things that we see in the first four verses. First of all, the cause of their collapse
and their military oppression is their spiritual rejection of the authority of
God in the life of the nation. The
cause it not political, it’s not military, it’s not because they had bad
military policy or they had a poor armament policy but they had an ultimate
spiritual problem. Now the spiritual
problem affected the way they looked at life and so that affects and changes
their decision making and policy making and procedure making. That’s exactly what happens in our nation,
the more we become subject to pagan ways of looking at things the more that is
going to affect the policies of your nation and the politics of our nation
because they are going to start looking at things from a skewed view of
reality.
Point number two, the result is
spiritual slavery which produces a slave mentality which ultimately results in
national enslavement, and a slave mentality is such that you expect someone
else to take care of you. Someone else
is going to provide security for you; someone else is going to take the
responsibility for taking care of you in your senior years; someone else is
going to take responsibility for your medical bills; someone else is going to
take responsibility for your happiness; someone else is going to take
responsibility when you’re engaged in any kind of a misfortune so that you can
take them to court and you can sue them and instead of just saying that the way
life is, bad things happen, people make mistakes.
When I was growing up if you were a kid
and you were swinging on a swing set everyone understood there was inherent
problems with that and if you fell off and you cracked your head on the
sidewalk, well that’s what happens in life sometimes, people have
accidents. But now we sue everybody
because we don’t want to accept responsibility for living in a dangerous
world. It’s someone else’s
responsibility to take care of us and wrap us in a cocoon of safety from cradle
to tomb and that is because an inherent aspect of paganism is that there’s no
understanding of life after death, there’s no security of salvation so its
motivated by fear and we’re afraid to get hurt, we’re afraid to die so we’re
constantly trying to wrap ourselves up in some kind of security system so we’ll
live longer because once we die there’s either nothing or who knows what’s
there but I need to stay alive so this fear motivates everything. All of this is a result of a spiritual
enslavement of the soul. So as we see
in many cases what we do is people go out and when they go to the voting booth
they vote on single issue things. We’re
driven that way and the politicians appeal to the voters to vote on a single
issue, but that’s slave mentality. If
you went to the polls and you pulled the lever on anybody because of one or two
issues then you’re operating like a pagan.
We have to operate on principle and there’s a whole framework in
Scripture that provides the framework for judging and evaluating national
leadership.
The first time I really ran into this
was when I was right out of college and I was a teacher and it was a time when
teachers weren’t paid a whole lot, teachers have never been paid a whole lot
and in Texas back then they were…they’ve always been around 38th or
39th in the nation but they were like that and so one of the
candidates was driving hard on this whole issue of we need to raise teacher’s
salaries. He also had a number of other
policies that were long-range problematic for the state. For one thing, it was going to put the state
in debt in order to raise those salaries because there were some other
infrastructure problems. Rather than
looking at things holistically nearly every teacher I knew was going to pull
the lever on this one candidate simply because I’m going to get a pay raise;
how short-sighted, how self-centered.
We never should vote on that basis.
You have to vote on what’s good for the whole, what’s good long term,
what’s sound economic policy, what is sound political policy, you have to go
vote on the basis of a framework based on principle, not a framework based on
how somebody is going to take care of you personally. And once you get a nation that is going to the polls and pulling
the lever on the basis of how the candidates are going to take care of them
personally, whether it’s providing a prescription drug program or scaring
people with Mediscare, or Mediscare tactics or whatever it might be, it’s
single-issued, driving people to go vote on the basis of a single issue and
that is slave mentality, expecting the government to take care of your needs
and to be the solution for the problems.
That leads to point three, the third
observation, the nation that comes into bondage spiritually because of
idolatry, that this spiritual failure will manifest itself in terms of national
priorities and those priorities then will dictate policies and decisions. That’s how it works. And as a believer what happens is that kind
of goes in reverse and finally as you begin to develop a little doctrine in the
soul and begin to be able to look at things from a Biblical viewpoint, then
that begins to shift your personal priorities, so that God becomes number one
in your life and knowledge of Bible doctrine, application of doctrine becomes a
number one priority in your life and that then begins to shape the decisions
you make and the policies you set in life.
Well, the reverse is true, and when you go into paganism it affects the
policies, the decisions that a nation makes.
So what happens, we see in our own
nation that it has affected policies and decisions in relationship to the
military, being motivated by a lot of fear…see once you forget that Jesus
Christ is in control of history and that Jesus Christ controls the environment,
Colossians 1:16-17, every molecule is held together by Jesus Christ, once you
understand those things then there is no environmental threat because Jesus
Christ is in control and there’s nothing any corporation can do that’s going to
change the ozone layer and wipe out the earth because of too many hydro fluorocarbons
in the upper atmosphere. That’s just
absolutely absurd. There are always
going to be meteorological shifts in the ebb and flow of cooling and warming
but guess what folks, if you don’t have a divine viewpoint framework of flood
geology you can’t understand it because these cycles are still the after
effects of the meteorological consequences of the Noahic flood. But of course if you haven’t studied that
and you’ve rejected what the Bible says about a worldwide universal flood at
the time of Noah, then you don’t have a frame of reference then you go into
science and you operate on an evolutionary frame of reference, then you’re
going to from the get go, because your frame of reference is wrong misinterpret
the scientific data.
We’ve always had these changes, you go
back to about the 14th or 15th century when the Vikings
were sending out their missionaries with Eric the Red and Leif Erickson and
others, and if you didn’t know that that’s what they were doing, they were
involved in foreign missions at the time and they carried a missionary with
them on all of their trips, and when they went out they came to one particular
area, they noticed that it was covered with lush green forests. And they called it Greenland. Now Greenland today is not covered with lush
green forests, so obviously the environment in the 14th-15th
century was a bit warmer up in northern latitudes than it is today. My, my, it must have been all of those
carbon emissions from those diesel engines they had on their Viking war boats.
We let all these things, like this
latest thing that some idiot scientist came up with that in the next 50 years
the average temperature of the earth is going to increase 7 degrees. Folks, if that’s true and you really believe
that’s true then we’d better start evacuating all of our cities because almost
every major city in this country is located within about 30 miles of the ocean
and that means that they’re all going to be under water in 50 years. And the fact that you see them using that
kind of a study to scare everybody to vote for them, for their economic policy,
and yet they don’t get engaged in any kind of serious policy in relationship to
moving people shows that they really don’t even believe their own data, they’re
just using it as a scare tactic to get people to vote for their particular
program. So what we see here is a
nation that comes into spiritual bondage loses touch with reality and no longer
has a frame of reference for evaluating anything so it changes their
perspective on life which then changes their priorities and their policies.
Then the fourth observation is that the
only solution to any problem in life is the divine solution and God has already
provided the divine solution here for Israel in a leader by the name of
Deborah, a woman. This is unique and
the fact that she is a woman is specifically emphasized in the text. Now the question that we have to ask when we
come to this is to address a specific problem and that is to ask the question:
what is the significance of Deborah’s judgeship in relationship to spiritual
leadership? Throughout the Scripture
doesn’t it appear like spiritual leadership is vested in the male, not in the
female and yet here God seems to be giving spiritual leadership to
Deborah.
Furthermore, Deborah judgeship is
frequently used as support in a contemporary argument for the view that women
should be allowed to be pastors and to fill the pulpit. So this is a major issue today. Nearly every major denomination, most of
them liberals, have all fought and lost this battle and they’re all ordaining
women and one of the more conservative denominations down south has made it a
plank of their annual platform to take a stand against the ordination of
women. As a result of that stand their
state denomination body in the great state of Texas, and their state body has
always been a little more wacko liberal than the major denomination, decided
this last week that they weren’t going to give their state money to the
national convention any more because they were not going to allow women to be
ordained. This is a major issue in
many, many situations. And you can see
it when you get out and drive along and you go by some church and they’ll say
Pastors Bill and Suzie Smith, and that is a very subtle way in which they’re
getting around it, oh it’s a team think, you know, we have the husband and
wife, it’s a team, but it’s really a co-pastor and you’re elevating a woman to
a position of leadership and of course what happens in the argument and in the
debate is there is a turning to different examples in Scripture, Deborah being
on of them, that God authorized, elevated a woman to a position of leadership
so why can’t we have a woman pastor and we need to really look at that because
it is a major issue that needs to be addressed.
So in the last two weeks as part of our
framework for that I have taken the time to develop the biblical doctrine or
leadership. I want to review this; I’m
going to fly through this rapidly but I need to bring everybody back to the
same sheet of music. Those of you who
are new can pick up a copy of the tape and get these notes down in more detail
if you’re interested.
First of all, we have to remember in the
overall structure of Judges that there is a deterioration going on from one
cycle to the next and that means that when we come to evaluate these leaders we
must realize that this is less than the ideal.
You can’t elevate Samson, Jephthah, Gideon or Deborah to a position of
ideal leadership and we have to remember that because the theme of the book of negative,
it’s not positive.
So the doctrine of leadership: first of
all we have to remember that it is related to the first divine institution
which is human responsibility.
Responsibility means that a person holds a specific duty, office or
trust. Now I’m going to relate this to
certain duties, offices and trust, i.e. husbands, fathers, pastors, that’s the
office we are going to be relating this to.
A person holds a specific duty, office or trust, and is answerable and
accountable for decisions and actions in relation to that duty, office and
trust. So you may wear three or four
different hats; you may be a mom which makes you a parent so you’ve got one hat
of authority; you may be a wife which means you wear another hat of
subordination; you may be in a position of responsibility at the office which
means you’re in another sphere of leadership and you have to maintain the
distinction. The same thing with men,
everybody is in different spheres.
Everybody is under authority at some place but what I’m getting at here
is when we evaluate this issue we have to look at the authority in terms of its
role and its place within an overall framework. Otherwise we’re going to just get off into all kinds of
tangential issues that are unrelated and distractions.
“Answerable” implies that there is someone
in authority over the person to whom the responsible party is obligated. So leadership is always going to be related
to authority and being answerable to that authority.
Second, “accountability” suggests that
there are positive and negative decisions in relation to that duty or trust
which is the assigned responsibility.
Leadership is going to be in relationship to that sphere of
authority. If you’re a father you have a
leadership responsibility toward your children; you have a leadership responsibility
toward your wife; you have a leadership responsibility in relationship to the
spiritual welfare of the home, that leadership entails, because a leader cannot
function without authority. If you have
a leader and you don’t give him authority, if you have a pastor and you don’t
give that pastor the authority to lead, just forget it. I’ve been in that situation as a pastor and
you can’t go anywhere; leadership demands responsibility and authority to
achieve the task. So accountability
indicates that there are negative consequences. I want to emphasize that.
There are negative consequences for failure in those realms of
leadership.
Third, authority implies a chain of
command but don’t think chain of command means impersonal or that it destroys
personal relationships. Remember there
is a chain of command in the Godhead and yet Jesus says I and the Father are
one. The most intimate relationship in
the universe is also within the frame of a chain of command. So don’t think chain of command, military,
tyranny, somebody just telling me what to do, bossing me around, that’s a false
construct.
And then “obligation” means that there
is the existence of a formal contract, that is we always have some kind of a
covenant with God, in this case we’re operating within the framework of the New
Covenant blessings to the Church and that binds us legally or morally to a
certain realm of action. That’s why
when God comes along and starts telling husbands and wives and pastors what to
do it’s always in the context of the relationship with God. Husbands love your wives as Christ loved the
Church; wives are to be submissive to your husbands as to the Lord; pastors are
under shepherds. I mean, it doesn’t
stop with the pastor; the pastor is under the authority of the chief
shepherd. Every authority relationship,
every leadership relationship is further defined within another authority
relationship. So nobody, no human being
is at the top of the chain, it always comes back to God and it always comes
back to understanding that Trinitarian relationship.
Second, the existence of authority
demands the operation of leadership so if God has given you, delegated to you a
certain responsibility as a parent, as a father, as a husband, as a church
leader, then that means that you have to exercise leadership within that arena
and the exercise of that leadership is going to be related to properly
understanding your biblically defined goal because we’re going to see
leadership means going from point A to point B and you’ve got to know where
point B is, where does God say you’re supposed to be taking those you’re
leading.
The third point is that leadership
always operates within the framework of authority; I think I’ve established
that.
The fourth point was that authority in
the family demands parental leadership.
Authority in marriage demands the leadership of the husband. Authority in the military, business,
government, church and other organizations demands the exercise of
leadership. So if you have anybody over
which you have authority you need to be leading.
Point five, leadership therefore is
directed towards the achievement of some responsibility, goal or obligation
placed upon man by God. So whatever the
sphere is you’d better be defining your leadership in terms of where God says
you’re supposed to be going.
Sixth, we saw the definition, therefore
leadership is the authority, ability and capacity to direct, guide, lead,
motivate in any organization to move the members of that organization, i.e.
your wife, your family, your children, the church, whatever, to move the
members of that organization to their biblically defined goals. See, for a pastor my mandate is to move you
to spiritual maturity. It’s not my job
to make the church grow. Jesus Christ
says I will build My church; He told Peter you feed the sheep. See what happens today is we have pastors
who think somehow God’s going to feed the sheep and my job is to make the
church grow. That’s called the modern
church growth movement and that’s why they have great numbers because they
don’t scare anybody away because they don’t teach the truth, everybody can just
come together and feel good. But that’s
another subject.
Point seven, leadership, therefore, is related
to different goals and responsibilities of the different spheres of
responsibility in life. So different
spheres of responsibility, marriage, family, work, church, different spheres of
responsibility entail different goals and different leaders but everybody is in
some level of authority relationship.
Point eight, crisis occurs when the
fulfillment of that obligation becomes challenged or threatened and we have
challenges or threats to our leadership as parents, husbands, moms, all the
time.
Point nine, leadership is then called
into play in a special way in the midst of that crisis and the only way to have
stability in the midst of that crisis is through doctrine in your soul.
Point ten, it is only doctrine in the
soul that provides capacity for objective thinking, real or genuine
understanding of the issues in life and therefore the basis for making good
decision from a position of strength.
And ultimately that’s what good sound Biblical leadership is all about,
is making decisions from a position of strength which is defined biblically as
under the filling of the Holy Spirit, and in accord with Bible doctrine. We’re not talking about leadership, some
kind of leadership seminar you might go to wherever you work, some real estate
company, advisors, or whatever it might be, because their operating totally
within a secular framework. We’re
bringing in the Biblical viewpoint here.
Point eleven, in contrast human
viewpoint solutions may provide temporary, even long-term temporary solutions
that appear successful. See, the
problem we get into as Americans, we love pragmatism, if it works it must be
right. I have 10,000 members in my
church and 5,000 people walk the aisle every week so what I’m doing must be
right; obviously God’s behind it, right?
Wrong! Noah preached for 120
years and didn’t have a single convert, that didn’t mean God wasn’t behind
it. You can’t judge spiritual things by
the value system of a pagan society that’s operating on numbers as the sign of
quality.
Point twelve, paganism always attacks
the divine institutions. This is the
point, if you don’t get anything else, it’s going to attack the divine
institutions, it’s going to attack human responsibility. You’re not really, dad, you’re not the one
responsible, the mom is, you know, she’s more sensitive spiritually, so let her
teach the kids. That’s just human
viewpoint hogwash. It’s really worse
than that but I’ll use that word this morning.
You know, it’s the father’s responsibility to train up the children in
the nurture and admonition of the Lord.
It’s not your job to slough it off onto the mom. The Bible puts the spiritual leadership
squarely on the shoulders of the father.
And yet what happens in our society, because of paganism it’s put on the
mom and in my first church I had men who would come and say you know, I never
heard this before, I always thought Christianity was just for women, because
you know my dad never went to church, it was just my mom. That’s the idea, and in my first church,
which was much more of an interdenominational type of church, we had a real
problem because there was a vast number of women there whose husbands didn’t
come, and that’s a feminization of the church, and it’s all a result of just
this overall pagan environment that we live and breathe in.
Point thirteen, when paganism alters the
concepts of leadership in a culture, it changes the nature of leadership in
every sphere, individual, marriage, family, church, government and work and
what happens is that we’re all so immersed in this pagan way of thinking that
we’re swimming in it and we don’t even know we’re surrounded by it because it’s
our environment that what happens is that when we make decisions that we think
are right and we think they’re even Biblical, they’re wrong because we haven’t
really completely reformed our thinking.
You know, when Jephthah sacrificed his daughter, and we’ll get there in
Judges 10, when Jephthah sacrificed his daughter thinking that it honored God,
he wasn’t aware that he was doing something wrong because he was so immersed in
the pagan thought of his culture. And
that’s what happens today, because Christians are afraid to delve very deeply
into the Word and really challenge their thinking because God, I might have to
change everything, I might have been wrong all these years. Yeah, you probably were. You know, we all were. That’s what the Bible says is, we have to
renew our thinking, that’s the challenge of Christianity and it’s only for the
courageous and the brave who are not arrogant.
That sets the context. “Deborah is a prophetess, the wife of
Lapidoth, judging Israel at the time.”
Now what’s interesting is the way the Hebrew text sets this up because
there’s a word left out in the English translation. In the Hebrew starts off with the phrase, “Now Deborah,” it’s
what’s called the Vav disjunctive in the Hebrew which means that we’re setting
up a minor contrast between what went before, and so the contrast is between
the problem of verses 1-3 and the solution of verse 4, which is God’s solution. In the Hebrew, the second word after
“Deborah” is the word “isha,” this
word, “ish” is the word for man, when
you put the feminine ending on it is the word for woman. In the Garden of Eden you have the creation
up till the end of chapter 3 the man was called Adam and the woman was called Isha, it is not until after the fall
that Adam renames her, Chavvah which
means Eve, the mother of life.
So her name initially was Isha; Isha means woman, so it starts off in the Hebrew, “Now Deborah, a
woman,” you don’t have that in your English.
See, the writer of the Hebrew text is emphasizing, now look, this is
what I want you to pay attention to here, that this is a woman. I don’t want you to miss the point here that
we’ve got a woman in this leadership position because… what he’s going to make
the point in contrast is because the men don’t have the guts to step up to the
plate. And that’s a symbol of what’s
happening in pagan society is there is in paganism you always see a move
towards matriarchy away from male leadership.
That has a modern ring to it, doesn’t it? She is a woman, and then it says “a prophetess,” the noun is nebi, the root from prophet, with a
feminine singular ending; she is then called “the wife of Lapidoth,” so in 3
different words, and it says “was judging” and that’s the qal feminine singular
participle, if shaphat, which means
to judge, you have four words there all of which are emphasizing the fact that
this is a woman, pay attention, something different is happening here, we have
a woman judging. In all of the other
passages, and there’s four other passages we’ll see where there is a prophetess
in the Old Testament, they don’t insert that word “isha.” It just talks about
them being a prophetess, but here the writer inserts isha because he wants us to pay attention to the fact that
something unusual is happening here because this is a woman who is functioning
in this role and that is odd or unusual to say the least, and is significant to
the point that he is making in the text.
Now we’re told that she is judging, this
is a qal participle indicating that towards the end of this 20 year period she
is already operating in a judging atmosphere.
Now we saw at the beginning of our study of Judges that the Hebrew word
translated “judge” comes from the root verb, shaphat, and the shaphatim,
that’s the noun form, the judges, functioned in a role that wasn’t like what we
think of as a judge. When we think of a
judge we think of a magistrate who rules in a court and he adjudicates between
decisions or he oversees the prosecution of criminals. That was not, let me put it this way, that
was not the sole function of a shaphatim,
that was a minor part of the shaphatim’s
role, of the judge’s role, but it wasn’t the whole thing. We’ve seen that as part of the judge role
they also have a military function, they’re a commander, they raised an army,
they defeated the enemies of Israel, and they led the nation spiritually. So it’s a broad term and I think the very
best meaning for us is they’re a deliverer.
It’s a deliverer, that’s their function, is to deliver and they did it
in different ways and you have to look at each individual case to see how they
did it.
Now what’s happening here is that it
said that she is judging Israel at the time and there was a palm tree that she
would sit under, and people would come to her, in verse 5, and they would bring
various cases to her to make decisions.
So that indicates that her role of judgeship is not in terms of military
and it’s not in terms of spiritual leadership.
She is adjudicating in matters of conflict in the nation, and this
brings to mind Deuteronomy 17:8 which states that if any case where God is part
of the Law, it says to Israel “if any case is too difficult for you to decide
between one kind of homicide or another, between one kind of lawsuit or
another, between one kind of assault or another, being cases of dispute in your
courts, then you shall arise, and go up to the place which the Lord your God
chooses.” So God has elevated, because
of the lack of any alternative, Deborah to the position of judge.
Now I’m not taking anything away from
Deborah. This is not saying well, you
know, she’s operating in an illegitimate manner. God has clearly raised her up and put her in this position. But He’s done that because there’s no
alternative. Remember at the end of
Judges 3:31 God raised up a Gentile by the name of Shamgar, who was a mercenary
in Pharaoh’s army to defeat the southeastern threat of the Philistines. He’s not even a believer. Because there’s a vacuum of leadership God
often utilizes other means to deliver people which are not the standard, not
the ideal. This is not to take away
from Shamgar’s function of military destruction of those 600 Philistines and
it’s not to take away from Deborah’s judgeship and her godly character and her
spiritual maturity. But it is to
recognize the fact that the reason God had to go with both of those leaders was
because there was a lack of male leadership in Israel.
So the people are coming to her and she
is fulfilling her role as a judge. But
there’s also another interesting description of her here that we have to spend
some time looking at, and that is the fact that she is called a prophetess. She is called a prophetess, and we have to
ask several questions which I think we’ll not get to until… we’ll nail them
down briefly but then we’ll come back and look at them again next week.
What exactly is the role and the nature
of the prophet, that’s the first question.
See, the underlying issue is you have some people come along and say
well prophesying is the same as preaching so if they can be a prophet they can
be a preacher. Second, what is the
authority of the prophet? Third, how
many women are there in Scripture who are said to be prophetesses? Fourth, is this a normative role or an
unusual role? Fifth, is there something
negative about Deborah taking the role of the judge? Those are the questions we need to ask and then come back and ask
the last question, what is the implication of this for the role of women in
ministry in the Church Age. That one
we’ll have to save until next time.
So the first one, the role and nature of
the prophet is that first of all we must distinguish between the office of
prophet and the gift of prophecy. The office
of prophet does not begin until Samuel; Samuel is still a couple hundred years
away in terms of our chronology. He
doesn’t come in until the end of the Judges period. So the office of prophet is not established but we do have the
gift of prophecy and we know that that goes back to at least Moses if not
earlier.
We must distinguish between the office
of prophet and the gift of prophecy.
The office of prophet does not take a formal position until the time of
Samuel. So all we have here with Deborah
is the gift of prophecy. Now what is
the gift of prophecy? The gift of
prophecy is merely the reception of divine revelation and the communication of
that divine revelation. God gives a
certain amount of information to the prophet and then the prophet communicates
that to people. In that sense the
prophet is nothing more than a conduit of divine revelation. As Dr. Harold Hohner puts it, “prophecy is
neither skill nor aptitude nor talent; it is the actual speaking forth of words
given by the Spirit in a particular situation and ceases when the word’s
cease.” Now that’s a great
definition. Prophecy, therefore, is
limited to the articulation of a specific message and the words are given by
God. The precise words, it’s not
anything more than that. God makes a
statement and the prophet comes along and merely repeats what God has told
them. Now that’s important, it differs
from priesthood in that the function of the priest is to bring people before
God; the prophet reveals God’s Word to man, the priest brings people before God
and no women were ever priests.
Also it differs from teaching in that
teaching involves the intelligible exposition, interpretation and explanation
of what the revelation of God means.
Therefore the prophet’s authority derives from God; the authority is
God, “Thus saith the Lord,” it’s not me.
The authority of the teacher is that I’m standing up here teaching you
what the Word says and I am explaining it and interpreting it so the authority
lies, it’s still in the Word but it’s also in my position as a teacher and
someone in authority but the prophet is merely a passive mouthpiece to
God. The authority does not reside in
the gift of prophet. You see that in
the New Testament because of the gift of prophet was under that of apostle and
teacher and every prophecy had to be judged on the basis of already canonized
Scripture. A prophecy, even in the New
Testament was not automatically elevated to the same level of Scripture that
had already been revealed. So it has a
secondary level of authority; it is not of the same level as an apostle or a
pastor or a teacher. So that answers
the second question about authority of the prophet and that is it’s not in him
but it’s in the Word whereas with the teacher it’s in his office.
There are four women in the Old Testament who are
prophetesses and there are the sons of Philip and Anna in the New Testament so
this is not a majority function; it seems to be rather unusual but it doesn’t
always indicate a leadership crisis, but it does here because in Isaiah 3:12
God says, “Oh My people, their oppressors are children and women rule over
them.” So in that expression it is
clear that the fact that a woman is in a position of rulership indicates that
the people are spiritually immature or spiritual failures and that this is not
the ideal standard or the Biblical standard for leadership. Now I’m going to say some more things about
these and evaluate it a little more next time but that’s the opening introduction
and next time we’re going to look at what the New Testament says about the role
of women in ministry.