Spiritual Bondage Brings
Political, Economic Bondage – Judges 3:8-9
We
continue out study of what takes place in the nation Israel during this time of
spiritual apostasy and political decline and military collapse. We are in the first of several cycles; in
terms of large cycles there are six major cycles of disobedience, discipline
and deliverance in the book of Judges and we are looking at the very first one
which has to do with the deliverance from the judge, the Hebrew term shaphat, refers to a deliverer, not a
judge in the sense of a magistrate in the judicial system such as we are
familiar with in our system, but it has to do with someone who is a deliverer,
a leader. And in some cases that took
the course of action of rendering some judgments judicially in the case of
Deborah, which we will cover in Judges 5, but it often took the course of
military leadership, recognizing the principle that freedom comes through
military victory.
We
have seen that one of the reasons they are going through this is because the
nation failed to carry out God’s mandate to completely annihilate the Canaanite
population in the land. They reached a
point where they were indeed just living, compromising, assimilating with them
to the point that they were intermarrying, and that signifies the fact that
they had become so comfortable with the pagan way of thinking, the pagan way of
life, the human viewpoint thinking of the culture surrounding them they were no
longer concerned with the spiritual priorities as laid out by the Mosaic
Covenant, as laid out by God, doctrine was no longer number one in their life
and they began to just easily slip into the way of thinking of the people that
surrounded them.
Judges
3:5-6 tells us that “the sons of Israel lived among the Canaanites, the
Hittites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites,” and
we’ve seen that this is a standard listing of the various ethnic groups that
was sort of a melting pot in the land known as Canaan at that time and was
promised to Israel, and that they really formed one cultural group. They perhaps lived in different areas,
Canaanites more toward the south, more of the lowlands; the Hittites lived more
to the north, the Perizzites lived in the highlands and certain villages, and
the Jebusites lived in Jerusalem.
Judges
3:6, “And they took their daughters for themselves as wives, and gave their own
daughters to their sons,” so the national distinction of Israel as a unique
entity unto God, a unique ethnic entity unto God is starting to break down
through intermarriage with the pagans.
And that leads to religious apostasy, “and they served their gods.” And what we see is that this begins a cycle
of deterioration of positive volition throughout this period of the
Judges. And the first cycle deals with
deliverance by Othniel; he is the first of the judges and when we study Othniel
we need to remember that Scripture never says anything negative about Othniel
and that means that he is set up for us as sort of a standard by which to
evaluate all of the subsequent judges, he and his wife Achsah are a model of
the lifestyle of what the believer should be in that generation and in that
culture. And as we go through the book
of Judges we will see a steady and consistent decline from one age or one
judgeship to the next.
The
next judge is Ehud; Ehud certainly has certain problems in the way he conducts
his lifestyle, showing that he has adopted pagan methodology and the
methodology of the Canaanites around him in order to accomplish his task, sort
of the end justifies the means approach, which is not uncommon in our own
generation.
Then
we come to Deborah and this is the second time we’ve seen the emphasis on a
woman in the book of Judges. The first
is, of course, Othniel wife, Achsah, who demonstrates all of the proper
attitudes of respect and deference in authority to her father and to her
husband and she demonstrates that she understands the proper role and position
of a wife in a marriage situation under the Mosaic Law and as God has ordained
the distinct roles of husband and wife and she is a model; she and Othniel
become a model of the male/female relationships in society. And what happens by the time we get to
Deborah in the third cycle, she goes to Barak and she says you are appointed by
God to be the general, the commander in chief and lead the armies against the
enemies of Israel. And he says well,
I’ll go if you go, and we see the feminization of the male and this is typical
in pagan societies, the breakdown of male/female distinctions and role
distinctions.
This
is because once they begin to break down, marriage begins to break down,
families begin to break down, and it is a direct assault through human
viewpoint thinking on the stability of a nation and the divine
institutions. So you see that the male
becomes more feminized and the female, in order to pick up the slack has to
take on masculine roles in order to bring deliverance to the nation. This is not something positive; you will
always run into somebody who doesn’t have a clue what the Bible is about,
doesn’t have a clue about Old Testament theology, and as soon as you bring up
the issue from the New Testament that women are not supposed to be
pastor-teachers and the women do not have the gift of pastor-teacher, and not
supposed to be leaders in the local church, you’ll always hear somebody say
well what about Deborah in the Old Testament?
And Deborah was never a pastor, Deborah never handled the Word of God,
she was never placed in that sort of authoritative role; she doesn’t serve as a
prophet or a priest, she is simply a civil leader that functions because the
male leadership has broken down and is in apostasy and in failure.
That
leads to Gideon; Gideon is sort of the center point of the book. Up to that point the judges are more
positive than they are negative; from Gideon on they’re more negative than they
are positive. Gideon is afraid to trust
God, afraid to follow God’s will, but he finally does trust God.
He’s
followed by Jephthah; his thinking is so muddled with human viewpoint type
thinking about God that despite the fact that he is empowered by the Holy
Spirit to bring the nation to military victory, after God promises him that
Jephthah comes along and says well Lord, if you give me victory I’ll sacrifice
whatever comes out of the door of my house first to greet me when I
return. That’s typical of the kind of
bargaining that goes on in any kind of pagan approach to religion. You see it today in the health and wealth gospel
that is promoted in many denominations, that God if I give You ten bucks You’ll
return it a hundredfold the Scripture says, so the pastors try to fleece the
sheep by telling them whatever you give to the church God will restore it to
you tenfold so that’s the best investment procedure you can ever get in, so
everybody give around $10,000 and God will restore it to you a hundredfold so
you’ll have a million dollars. It’s
just bargaining with God, God I’ll do this is You do that. And that has nothing to do with prayer or
spiritual life and Jephthah shows the extreme.
And when he returns home his daughter joyfully ran out of the house to
greet him and he was therefore by virtue of his oath, and he followed through
with his oath and offered her as a burnt offering, the Hebrew word always means
a burnt offering in Scripture and he offered her us as a burnt offering, a
sacrifice to God which show how pagan the leadership has become because of
their adoption of human viewpoint thinking.
And
then the last judge is Samson who is caught up in all sorts of sexual sin and
he can’t control his own passions, his own sin nature, shows very little
spiritual interest and yet he still at one point in time does trust God. Now the thing that we learn from this of a positive
view is that all of these judges are mentioned in Hebrews 11 as heroes of
faith. What that tells us is that God
understands our weaknesses so much that when we just show a little bit of faith
and trust God at that critical moment then that has a tremendous impact in
history and in the angelic conflict. So
too often we get the idea that God expects us to be perfect and yet we look at
the heroes that God mentions in the Scripture and He paints them not only warts
and all but He shows how warty they really are. And we’re no better and I’ve always found that a great sense of
encouragement that when I fail that I’m not the first person in the history of
Christianity or in the history of the human race to fail in the spiritual life
because we all still have a sin nature and God is a God of grace who still
deals with us in grace. So this is the
outline of the book.
Now
the next stage is given in Judges 3:7, “And the sons of Israel did what was
evil in the sight of the LORD, and they forgot the LORD their God, and they
served the Baals and the Ashtaroth.”
What we see in this verse that is so important that I took a lot of time
to dwell on is the concept of forgetting the Lord. We have to understand that in the framework of the book of Judges
the argument is that as the nation became apostate they basically abdicated
their personal freedom and they became more and more enslaved, not only to
their own sin nature but in divine discipline, God had to bring them under the
dominion of foreign powers and foreign armies.
What we see from this is that the political collapse and political
failure and military defeat was not the result of a poor military policy from
the administration of Israel. Remember
the executive branch in Israel is God; it is Yahweh, the covenant God of the
Mosaic Covenant.
So
it’s not the fault of a poor military policy, it’s not the fault of a poor
economic policy or lack of an oil policy or all of these other things that we
hear so much about in the news, that if we just fix this or fix that that we
will solve the problem. Those are
symptoms; those are merely symptoms of the real problem and if we don’t fix the
real problem then all of the other things, it doesn’t matter how conservative,
it doesn’t matter how liberal, it doesn’t matter how socialist or how communist
your policy is, if you don’t have it right spiritually you’re going to fail
always. And that’s what this is
pointing out is that the underlying causative issue in history is not political
philosophy, it is not economic theory, it is not military might. The underlying issue in history is always
positive volition and when a culture has negative volition the consequences
ultimately are national collapse and failure.
And
this is what is happening here is the mechanics are that they forget the Lord
and this means a lot more than simply a momentary lapse of memory; it’s not
just sort of a passive neglect, a temporary amnesia like forgetting where you
put your car keys this morning, or maybe getting so busy one afternoon you forget
that you have to go to Bible class at night and all of a sudden you go I’ll
never make it tonight, I just got too busy.
That happens; this is not what happened in Israel. This word is best understood when it’s
viewed in conjunction with a similar verse in Judges 2:11 which says
that…everything is the same but the verb is different and there it says that
they forsook, they abandoned the God of the covenant, the ‘azav is the word in Hebrew and it means to depart, to abandon, to
forsake. And that’s how it’s translated
in the New American Standard in verse 12, “Then the sons of Israel did evil in
the sight of Yahweh and served the Baals, [12] and they forsook the LORD.” In Judges 3:7 it says “The sons of Israel did
what was evil in the sight of the LORD, and forgot the LORD their God,” so the
term “forgot” and “forsook” are parallel, and that’s what forgot means, the
Hebrew shakach, and it means to set
something aside, to render it to oblivion, to intentionally disregard
something, to disdain it and to reject it.
It is a very strong meaning in this context and it indicates that this
is a volitional decision on the part of Israel.
Now
what happens in this sort of context that we saw before is when you begin to
forget God what you have to do, either in an unsophisticated way or in a
sophisticated manner, you have to rewrite history; you have to get away from
history and you have to become the enemy of history and you have to change
history into myth, otherwise you will be confronted by the historical reality
of God’s work in the past. It’s been
approximately 40-45 years since the nation of Israel crossed the River Jordan
on dry land as God parted it as He had the Red Sea. It’s been about 40-45 years since they conquered Jericho, Ai and
all the various tribes under Joshua.
It’s been 80 years since the Exodus and what they have to do is forget
that God worked in history. See, God
always works in history; history is the arena of God’s work, it’s not
subjective, it is not in the arena of emotions or impressions or intuitions, it
is always in historically verifiable acts in history. And what happens is to get away from this man has to attack
history. And this has happened under liberal
theology since the mid 1700s and has been a concerted attack to try to discredit
the historicity of Genesis 1-11 and the historicity of the gospels. If you can pull that off then Jesus is no
longer a historically objective figure, that salvation is no longer based on a
judicial imputation of sin on Christ on the cross in 33 AD on a Wednesday
afternoon when the Romans crucified Him but it is merely a matter of how it
affects your life. It becomes a
psychological factor rather than a real historical redemptive work in people’s
lives. And it comes about because we
forget history.
Now
one of the things that has happened in the shift in history, and I quoted this
last time as we looked at the doctrine of history, is a statement by Ferdinand
Braudel who is a French historian, and he wrote: “Men do not make history, rather
it is history above all that makes men,” note the last phrase, “and absolves
them of blame.” This is one example of
where modern history is going when you take your kids to school and they sit in
history class and their teachers teach social science; those teachers went to
college somewhere and their college professors were influenced by their college
professors, and they were influenced by men of stature like Braudel and others
and they are teaching from a view of history today that renders man volitionally
negligible.
And
once human volition and human personality is no longer the issue but the
causative factor in history is weather or geography or natural resources or
some other non-human factor other than volition, then man is no longer responsible
for his decisions and what happens in history so you don’t even study
personalities any more; you no longer study the great men of history, you no
longer study the great generals and the great military battles, you no longer
cover the great statesmen of history because they’re just blips on the radar
screen; what really matters is structures that were going on at the time, the
physical structures and other things like that because man is really
irrelevant, he’s just another part of the machine, another element, another cog
in the machine of nature and so man is just a victim of what goes on around
him. Volition no longer matters and
therefore spiritual decisions are no longer relevant to the course of a nation. So then once we adopt that frame of reference
in our society and we come to a political year like this one, in an election,
nobody focuses on spiritual issues because that’s been rendered irrelevant,
that’s merely something subjective. So
in its place you put something within the realm of nature and that is elevated
to the position of the absolute that is the causative factor in history.
Once
you remove the objective and we have used this chart to demonstrate this, that
the Creator is above the line and there is a Creator/creature distinction according
to Romans 1. And we have seen in our
study of Romans 1 that what happens in pagan cultures is that man rejects the
Creator and he suppresses the truth in unrighteousness. He knows that God exists but he rejects that
in negative volition, and so he substitutes the worship of the creature for the
worship of the Creator. This is in
Romans 1:18-21. That means that man,
once he eliminates the Creator from the picture, all that is left is what is
below the line, human reason, human experience, or empirical investigative
techniques, scientific data, individual historical events, values, feelings,
impressions or intuitions. So therefore
meaning does not come from somewhere outside of that box, meaning must come from
something inside the box, and since there’s no overriding principle by which to
make a universal judgment, your decision or your impressions are no more or
less valid than the other person’s reason or use of scientific data. One culture’s value system is no better or
worse than another culture’s value system.
And that is where we are today in what is called multi-culturalism as a
function of post-modern thought.
And
once you eliminate the top line, you get the Creator/creature distinction
violated, where all you’re left with is that which is in the box in the bottom,
that you can only validate things by something in that box. Some people will validate it through
scientific data and therefore you have the rise of Darwinian evolution and by
rejecting the Creator in any sort of universal criterion all they’re left with
is data but they have to generate the interpretation of that data from within
their own frame of reference. And as a
result of the rejection or reaction to the enlightenment and the rationalistic
empirical approach to life in post-modernism the emphasis is now on feelings,
impressions, and intuitions.
I
had the quote last time from an Oxford professor of history which exemplifies
this. He says: “To me the test of a
good history book is not so much whether the past is verifiable reconstructed,”
in other words its accuracy is irrelevant, facts, then, are unimportant for
him, they’re irrelevant, they’re dull and of course there is no such thing as
absolute truth in his thinking. He goes
on to says: “It doesn’t matter whether it’s verifiably reconstructed and
cogently expounded; it’s whether it is convincingly imagined and vividly
evoked.” In other words, now the point
is that what makes history important is how it makes me feel. And we see the same kind of thing going on
in the church, it doesn’t matter what the Word of God really says, it’s not my
job to come and sit and study the Word of God day in and day out and have my
thinking changed and really force myself to think objectively about life in
terms of God’s values, but what’s important is how I feel. The accuracy of what is taught is not
important; it’s whether I feel like I had an encounter with God when I came to
church this morning. And how many times
I’ve heard that from people; pastor, I felt like I met God this morning. Well, I’m sorry but you should feel that way
all the time, but it’s not even feelings, it’s the study of God’s Word that
matters and you’re using a false criteria, you’re using nothing but
subjectivity to determine truth.
So
what we have seen in our study of history and these particular words in the
text is that once a nation gets away from history and objective historical data
and they have shifted away from that, then they can forget God and rationalize
God out of their thinking and the result is that they go into spiritual
collapse in the nation. This is exactly
what has happened in the nation Israel.
In Judges 3:7 we realize that this generation has forgotten God because
they are anti-history, it really wasn’t God that brought us across the Jordan
River, maybe that really didn’t even happen, that’s just the legend. It really wasn’t God that brought us out of
Egypt, …this shows you the tendency of the fallen human mind to rewrite history
is that within just a few weeks of the Exodus event, when the very people who
saw God part the Red Sea were at Sinai and Moses is up on the mountain they’re
building a calf idol to worship and they’re attributing to that calf idol, that
bull idol which is an idea they had they brought with them from Egypt, they are
already rewriting history, it wasn’t this God, Yahweh, who parted the Red Sea,
it was the golden calf that parted the Red Sea. You see, our tendency is always to get away from the objectivity
of history because that always confronts us with the reality of a personal God
who is righteousness and just and has a standard that we should live up to.
What
happen is that according to Romans 1 as soon as we are rejecting God and
suppressing the truth in unrighteousness, then we are, according to Judges 3:7,
is that we exchange the worship of the creature for the worship of the Creator
and we begin to worship idols. Now they
may be the concrete idols of the ancient world or they may be more
sophisticated idols of our thinking as we have today. For example, in the New Testament it emphasizes that greed or
materialism lust is idolatry. You’re
worshiping money. That’s why Scripture
says that it is the love of money that is the root of all evil, not money but
the love of money. Materialism lust is
the root of all evil, and that’s a form of idolatry. You are looking to something in the realm of the creation, in
this case money or what money can buy, to provide what only God can provide,
which is stability, happiness, peace and prosperity, because prosperity is a
matter of the soul, it is not a matter of physical possessions or a bank
account.
So
what happens in Judges 3:7 is that the Israelites reject the Lord their God and
instead they serve…and the word here is ‘abad
that we have studied; it’s a term that not only means to worship, it also means
to work or to serve, it indicates in some cases even slavery and it indicates
their obeisance to the idols of the Canaanites and what happens according to
Romans 6 is that once you get into carnality you are a slave to your sin and
when you are worshiping idols, in other words, whenever you are out of
fellowship, whenever you are not living according to the standards of God’s
Word, under the filling of the Holy Spirit, you are a slave to the sin nature,
once you become a slave to the sin nature then all other forms of slavery will
sooner or later follow because you have already adopted the mental attitude and
the way of thinking of a slave and not the way of thinking of a free
person. We’ll look at that in detail in
just a little bit.
So
they are basically enslaving themselves from a divine perspective to idol
worship. Now I want you to notice
something about this. It says that
“they served the Baals and the Ashtaroth.”
Now the Baals is a general term, in the Hebrew it’s Baalim, it’s a
plural word and this was the second god in the pantheon of the Canaanites. The high god, comparable to Jupiter in Rome
and Zeus in Greece, was the god El, that’s a generic term for god. It’s brought over and utilized in Hebrew, it’s
just a generic term for God like our word God can refer to just about any kind
of supernatural deity. El has a son by
the name of Baal; now just as Saturn or Uranus has a son named Jupiter or Zeus
in the Greco-Roman system, El has a son, Baal, and sooner or later El
disappears from real significance in the mythical structure. Then Baal is a male god and he is the storm
god and the god of war, and his counterpart who is sometimes said to be the
wife of El is Asherah, but in other literature she becomes the counterpart of
Baal. Now this indicates the sexual
nature of these pagan religions and the way in which sex plays a role in their
ultimate view of reality. In
Christianity there is no sexual distinction in the Godhead; God is not male or
female. God is God.
God
created sex to be part of the created order for animals and for mankind and for
mankind to serve as both pleasure and for the multiplication of the race and
development of the race from one generation to the next. But what happens in pagan religions is they
always start breaking down sexual distinction, because the gods that they
create are basically a reflection of their own thinking and then once you
create this mythology then it serves as self-justification and rationalization
for further perversion. So you have as
your ultimate reality male/female distinctions in the godhead and in all of
your gods. And not only that but there
is rank immorality among the gods; in this case El tends to be supplanted in
many of the myths and Baal takes Asherah as his wife, she is also in some
things his mother and that indicates incestuous perversion that then becomes
justified by your religious system. You
also see in this whole scenario that by using this kind of system you start
breaking down the significance that God established for male/female roles in
Genesis 2:18.
Man
was created in order to serve God and in order to guard and to serve God in the
Garden and the woman was created as his helper; she is not the one in
authority. What we see in the curse is
the woman is going to have a tendency to want to usurp the authority of the
male. But the Scripture teaches that
the male is the one who is responsible and ladies, what’s really tough is when
that male is in your opinion failing, and that’s tough. And it’s not just you, everyone of us is
under authority; guys, we all work for some boss that we can do the job better
and the guy was a loser, but we have to submit, it’s authority orientation, you
have to submit to authority. Everybody
is under authority and the degree to which the authority is able to fulfill
their role is not the issue. The Bible
never says obey whatever the authority is when they’re doing it the way you
think they ought to be doing it, because then you’re setting yourself up as the
absolute authority and God did not allow you to do that; God just says you have
to have authority orientation and so whether or not the authority is behaving
the way you think they should or not your responsibility is to obey and to
submit to that authority.
And
once you start breaking down in this kind of a religious system your
male/female distinctions then it works itself out in the culture in many
different ways. Asherah has about
seventy different children according to the mythology of the Canaanites, and
she is often called the mother of the gods and she has all of these
god-children are produced from different fathers. So you see that the pattern set up by the religious system is
going to be anti-marriage and anti-family.
Now this is going to be very important when we come back to look at this
in a few minutes in terms of some analysis, that the very religious system that
they have is anti-marriage and anti-family and Asherah was called the
procreatress of the gods and she is called also the procreatress of god the
son, who would be Baal, and she was considered the consort of Baal. So you see all of this is really a satanic
counterfeit to destroy and attack the true God of the Bible.
Now
what happens today is that we see something very similar happening as a result
of the feminist movement that really got going again back in the 60s and you
see this in relationship to language, and especially the popularity of the use
of non-gender specific language. And
these new translations that are coming out today where they talk about God as a
woman, or they just use some sort of neutral term to refer to God as the great
person or the great one or some Bibles even go so far as to refer to God as a
she, and it’s an attempt to completely restructure our culture’s thinking in
order to move us to some sort of matriarchy.
Now one of the things that is interesting is that underlying a lot of
this feminist jargon is the idea that there is some sort of matriarchal, ideal
matriarchal society in history. And this
is promoted by a lot of feminists and you’ll hear it in college and university
classrooms.
A
couple of weeks ago in the New York Times book review there is a book reviewed
called The Myth of Matriarchal
Pre-history, Why an Invented Past won’t Give Woman a Future and it is
reviewed by a woman by the name of Natalie Angier [sp?], and she clearly admits
that she’s a feminist but she says look, we have to be honest there is
absolutely no historical information that there ever has been a matriarchal
society that worked, you can’t find evidence of any prehistoric matriarchal
society anywhere and inventing it just doesn’t help the cause. That’s what I’m pointing out with modern
history, is facts don’t matter, just invent something to give yourself a
rationale for your behavior and yet if you go out and poll a lot of people they
would think oh yea, there have been successful matriarchies in society. Never once has there been according to her
review a successful matriarchy anywhere, at anytime in history. It doesn’t work; it doesn’t work because
women were not designed by God to be the leaders and to be the initiators in
society. He did not create their soul
to function in that way and whenever a woman begins to function in that way it
causes a lot of soul damage, it damages marriage as well.
The same thing happens when men refuse to
function as leaders and take initiative in the home, they become feminized and
the result is that when you get most families and most men and most women
functioning that way in a culture then the culture begins to fragment from the
inside. And so what happens in those
pagan cultures is what happened in the ancient world, they start developing
myths that will justify their perversion of the God-ordained roles, and that’s
exactly what we see happening today and it’s being taught to your children and
they’re being brainwashed with it in their social science classes.
In
the next verse what we see is: Judges 3:8-9, “Therefore the anger of the LORD was hot against Israel, and
he sold them into the hand of Cushan-rishathaim, king of Mesopotamia; and the
children of Israel served Cushan-rishathaim eight years.” Now one thing that’s important to note here
is a couple of key words. First of all,
as we have seen, “the anger of the LORD” does not mean that God had an emotional reaction to Israel’s
disobedience. We have seen that this is
a phrase that is an anthropopathism. An
anthropopathism means that this is the attribution to God of a human emotion in
order to give us an analogical frame of reference for understanding the policy
and the procedure of God. It’s based on
an analogy. And some people will say
well, now can you say that? One reason
we can say that is the Hebrew that is used here isn’t even a literal phrase
like anger; it’s also an anthropomorphism which has to do with attributing
human form to God.
Remember
God is a spirit, He does not have legs or arms or eyes or nose, we don’t know
what God looks like because we know that no man has seen God at any time, the only
begotten Lord Jesus Christ is the one who revealed Him. And in the Hebrew the phrase is ’aph charah and it means His nose
burned. It is a Hebrew idiom for anger
because when a man gets angry, a human being gets angry, sometimes their face
turns red or their nose turns red and so that was their idiom for expressing
anger. But this itself is an
anthropomorphism and God does not have a literal nose and it doesn’t turn
red. So we know that since the idiom
itself is an anthropomorphism and not even directly literal it is also an
anthropopathism which indicates the fact that God in His integrity is rejecting
their behavior, His righteousness sets the standard of His integrity; His
justice is the application of that standard.
And when God’s righteous standard is violated then God’s justice must
condemn mankind for his disobedience and this is a function of the justice of
God because now God’s righteousness has been violated by Israel’s apostasy and
consistent disobedience so His standard is laid out in the Mosaic Law that if
they disobey and get into idolatry and engage in this behavior, then God will
discipline them through national collapse and bondage to foreign powers.
So
this is exactly what happens here, that God’s justice and righteousness kicks into
action and so He must bring divine discipline against the apostate nation, so
“He sold them into the hands of Cushan-rishathaim, the king of Mesopotamia; and
the sons of Israel served Cushan-rishathaim for eight years.” The word for sold is the Hebrew word makar, here it’s the qal imperfect and
it means to sell into slavery. It is
the same word that is used over and over again in the Scripture to indicate the
selling of someone into slavery. This
is a free people; remember at this time in human history no culture existed
that was more free than Israel. If you
got down to Egypt the Pharaoh is god, literally he is viewed as god, god
incarnate and everyone in Israel that is not part of the royal family is
virtually a slave; you have those that are formal slaves and those that
weren’t, but virtually everyone in Egypt was subservient to the Pharaoh. If you went to the northwest you would go to
the Assyrian and Mesopotamian cultures and there the king was not viewed as a
god but he was the prophet, he was also the priest, he was the voice of god, he
had that same level of authority. If
you went to the Hittite Empire you would have the same sort of thing. And the kind of authority that these leaders
had in those ancient civilizations was much greater than the Ayatollah Khomeini
or Joseph Stalin or Saddam Hussein would ever dream about having today. They had just absolute authority over
everyone in their society and there was very little revolt against it because
of the religious stature and the religious status that was attributed to
them.
Israel
doesn’t have any of that, when any traveler would come to Israel they would see
that God is their king, there was no autocratic kingdom or empire, they did not
have a heavy taxation upon them like these other countries had and the people
had real freedom. But what happened is
when the people caved into spiritual freedom, God made them political and
economic slaves of oppressors to indicate and to teach that no matter what
happens in your physical life if you are not right spiritually with God it
doesn’t matter. So they are sold into
slavery, not because they had a bad military, that was just a symptom; not
because they had a bad economic policy, that was just a symptom; not because of
any other factor but their religious apostasy.
And
then it says that “the sons of Israel, he cold them into the hand of
Cushan-rishathaim, king of Mesopotamia; and the sons of Israel served
Cushan-rishathaim for eight years.”
That means that they were in subservience to him and it is the word ‘abad and in this context it should be
translated “enslaved,” “they were enslaved to Cushan-rishathaim.” Now at this point we need to stop and look
at the doctrine of spiritual freedom and political freedom.
The
first point; political freedom without spiritual freedom is a thousand times
worse than spiritual freedom without political freedom. That means it doesn’t matter how great the
nation is, how wonderful the constitution, how much freedom there is in a
nation, if you do not have spiritual freedom then you are in the worst system
of slavery ever. That’s what Jesus was
indicating to the Pharisees in John 8 when He said that they were slaves but if
they would know the truth, “the truth would make them free.” Political freedom, therefore, without
spiritual freedom is really useless.
It’s a thousand times worse because the bondage, the domination of your
sin nature is worse than any kind of physical, political, economic slavery you
can ever imagine. That’s the divine
viewpoint framework for looking at freedom.
Point
number two; when we quit living in the light of spiritual freedom based on
Bible doctrine our days of freedom are numbered. And that means that once a nation goes into apostasy unless there
is a true repentance which means a change of mind towards the gospel and
positive volition toward Bible doctrine it will not be long before that nation
goes into economic and political slavery.
And you see, this is the overall rationale for the entire book of
Judges. You see, it culminates in the
argument of 1 Samuel 8, when the people finally came to a point in saying we
don’t want God to be our king any more, we want a king like everybody else, we
want a health care policy like every other nation, we want socialism like very
other nation, we want to have unionized everything like every other
nation. You know, that’s just what
we’re doing today, we want to be like every other nation, we don’t really want
to have freedom any more, we want to sell ourselves into some sort of economic
and political bondage for the sake of security. And this is what happens in 1 Samuel 8 and they say we don’t want
a king that’s absentee, that’s God, we want a physical king like everybody
else.
And
God said okay, this is what’s going to happen.
He’s going to quadruple your taxes; he’s going to put a heavy burden
upon you in order to support his bureaucracy and to support his lifestyle. And as a result of increased taxation you
are going to lose freedom. The founding
fathers of this nation understood that; that’s why they made such an issue
about taxation without representation.
The amount of money that the government takes out of your pocket in
taxes, whether it’s gas taxes, income taxes, no matter what it is, directly
affects your degree of freedom. What
most people don’t realize is you work between six and seven months a year and
100% of what you make from January 1 to somewhere between July 1 and August
goes directly to the government. For
six to seven months out of the year you are a slave of the United States
government; not one penny you make during the first seven months of the year is
yours. Now it really is, but they’re
taking it from you.
Now
just think what you could do if they only took 10% or 12%, let’s say just the
amount of money you made from January to the middle of February was all that
went into taxes; just think how much more cash you would have, just think what
you could do with all that. That’s
freedom. You could invest it, you could
provide a secure future for yourself, you could build a business, you could do
all kinds of things. That’s why God
points out that taxation is related to freedom and the underlying issue is a
spiritual capacity for freedom. And if
you’re not living on the basis of doctrine then you’re destroying your capacity
for freedom and once you do that you will advocate personal responsibility and
you will give it to the government. So
when we quit living in the light of spiritual freedom based on doctrine our days
of freedom are numbered.
Point
number three; unbelievers and believers in carnality live in soul slavery and
soul slavery leads to economic, military and political slavery. Unbelievers and believers in carnality live
in soul slavery, that’s Romans 6.
Romans 6, almost the entire chapter is talking about the fact that as a
believer you have been freed from the dominion of sin but every time you give
in to the sin nature you are saying okay, I’m going to put myself back in
slavery to the sin nature. So unbelievers
are born in soul slavery, and believers in carnality put themselves back in a
status of slavery to the sin nature and that eventually leads to economic,
military and political slavery.
Point
number four; when the majority of the people in a nation live in soul slavery
it will not be long before the nation lives in political slavery. And that’s exactly what Israel
experienced. When a majority of the
people live in soul slavery they no longer have capacity for freedom, they can
no longer understand what the issues are, they are no longer willing to accept
personal responsibility for their lives and the more they live in soul slavery
the more they will expect someone else to take care of them and the eventual
result is that they will end up giving more and more power to a central authority. You see, that’s the argument of Judges, is
there’s no central authority at the beginning of Judges and this whole period
ends up in economic, military and political disaster and collapse and the
people demand a king in 1 Samuel 8 and God gives them a king because they have
rejected doctrine the only thing that’s going to bring political stability is a
strong central government. So there’s a
political thesis here and that is the absence of doctrine leads to the
necessity of strong central government; the less doctrine there is the less
capacity for freedom there is, the more you need to have a strong central
authority in order to control things because once you get away from doctrine,
people get away from accepting personal responsibility for their lives and when
people no longer have a capacity or understand the importance of personal
responsibility for their decisions, then anarchy will result unless a strong
government steps in.
Point
number five, if your spiritual life isn’t built on Biblical truth, on doctrine
dominating the soul then it is absorbed in paganism. There are only two options, according to James 3:13-15, you’re
either thinking in terms of worldliness, cosmic thinking, you’re thinking like
an unbeliever, which is demonic thought, or you’re thinking according to God’s
thinking, according to doctrine. It’s
either human viewpoint or divine viewpoint and when you’re out of fellowship,
even if it’s similar to divine viewpoint because it comes from the sin nature
it’s human good and it’s ultimately destructive. So if your spiritual life isn’t built on Biblical truth where
doctrine is dominating the soul and the filling of the Holy Spirit then it is
absorbed in paganism and if it is in paganism you are already a slave mentally
and government policies, programs and political parties can’t ever free you or
give you security. So when you go to
the polls in November don’t think that’s going to solve the problem. It might put a Band-Aid on things, it might
not; if we’re under divine judgment then whatever you do won’t matter, and
always remember that leaders reflect the core values of a nation and we usually
get exactly what we deserve. And if we
are under divine judgment then it doesn’t matter how we vote because the
leaders we put into place are so corrupt, their mentality is the mentality of
slaves themselves because they are in carnality and so they will vote policies
and plans that are consistent with their slave mentality and the culture just
goes into further and further decline.
Point
number seven; when the remnant of believers in a nation is so reduced that
their invisible spiritual impact is negligible then that nation goes out under
divine discipline; that nation will collapse internally and they will usually
get overrun militarily or they will have to throw out whatever government they
had that gave them freedom and substitute for it a government of tyranny, a
strong government.
Before
I go any further, I want to give you a little framework for understanding how
to evaluate politicians and how to vote from a Biblical perspective. It’s not a matter of political party or
political theory; it’s a matter of Biblical truth and what you have to do is
pick somebody, whether it’s local government or national government, whose
policies and thinking most clearly aligns with Biblical reality. The first divine institution is human
responsibility. If we throw out human
responsibility and we go along with all kinds of patterns of irresponsibility
and victimology and everything else and it’s not really their fault, it’s
society’s fault or someone else’s fault and we need to solve the structures of
society and then people will straighten up, then you know that’s false because
that’s attacking divine institution number one. The second divine institution is marriage; Genesis 2:18. If they have policies that attack marriage,
such as having a system of taxation where a married couple pays more in taxes,
where two people married and working pay more in taxes than they would if they
were single, then that is an attack on marriage because it is better to be
unmarried than married.
I
had an accountant friend tell me many years ago how surprised I would be if I
knew how many people in churches who were sound Christians who were not legally
married because they had gotten divorced, he told me that there used to be a
deal out of New York that would take you out into international waters every
December 31st and on December 31st everyone would get
divorced at one minute to midnight because that affects their tax status for
the previous year. And then at one
minute after midnight they would have a mass marriage and everybody would get
married again. And thousands of people
did this every year for tax purposes.
And there are tens of thousands of Christians in this country who aren’t
legally married because they would have to pay so much more in taxes than if
they were single, so they just tell everybody they’re married, perhaps they
were legally married at one time and just quietly got a divorce and continued to
live together so they don’t have to pay thousands and thousands of extra
dollars in taxes. See, that destroys
the integrity of the family.
The
family is the third divine institution, Genesis 1:28; marriage and the family
are the context in which all education and spiritual values are transferred
from one generation to the next, and when that’s destroyed there’s no context
for growth any more or for stability in the nation. Then there’s the establishment of human government in Genesis 9:6
with the institution of capital punishment.
Now we all know that there are many times in life that the government
fails and government policies, though they are theoretically correct, they may
be applied in an unjust or injudicial manner.
That is true, I think today; I think it’s true that there needs to be a
hard look at how some things are going on in the judicial system in relation to
capital punishment. That does not mean
you do away with capital punishment, that means you fix the system. But don’t you think God, in His omniscience
knew in eternity past that men would screw it up? Nevertheless, He still gave man the responsibility; He didn’t
just suggest it, He authorized it and mandate it, so that means we have to do
it and try to do it in as just a manner as possible.
Then
the fifth divine institution is that of national distinctions in Genesis
11:7-9; this was some 200-300 years after the flood, after the establishment of
human government when man tried to unite against God at the tower of Babel and so
God created all the different languages so that man would have to divide up
into different groups. Now once you get
a politician or a political party or a nation that starts attacking these
divine institutions you know you’re in trouble. We can’t get into internationalism or globalism because that
violates divine institution number five.
When human government begins to break down and doesn’t protect freedom
any more, and forgets that their sole responsibility lies in two areas, and
that is to protect from enemies in the country, which means provide a good
police force, and protect from enemies outside the nation, which is a strong
military force. Then when they get into
other things then government is breaking down.
When they institute policies and laws that make it hard for families to
survive, where both parents have to work so they’re never there to take of the
kids or to teach the kids that’s an attack on the family. Marriage then breaks down because of the
pressure and you have a high divorce rate and when they institute all these
policies and then try to absolve people from the responsibility of taking care
of their own lives, then you have breakdown.
That’s Biblical. You violate
these institutions your nation will eventually collapse and you will go into
slavery.
We
haven’t finished with out study of Othniel so we will come back and wrap that
up next time.