Identifying Worldly Thinking in Our Own Souls and
Where it Came From. Jude 3
We want to look at how we can
develop a framework, a grid, a tool for evaluating how we think. We all grow up
in a culture, in a worldview. There are broad cultures, e.g. an American
culture vs. a European culture vs. a Chinese or Asian culture, and even within
those broader cultural spectrums there are sub-cultures. Even within those
sub-cultures there will be distinctions depending on whether or not groups are
Christian or not. So there are all these different views and we might think of
them as somebody putting on a set of glasses. Where do we get those glasses?
Those glasses were formed in our thinking through the influence of a variety of
things: the influence of our parents, peers, teachers, and media.
Today, even in Christian
homes, there is a huge impact upon our children through media and there is a
lot of debate among different groups as to how that should be handled. There
are those who want to completely shelter their children from the inputs of the
world so that they don’t have very much television. They home school or put them
in Christian schools where they attempt to try to isolate the children, and on
the positive side they are not just isolating them from the world, they are
trying to build that biblical worldview of Christian character so that as they
get older when they are introduced more and more to the culture around them
they have the skills and maturity to be able to deal with and interact with
that culture. Ideally when parents are doing this well what they are doing is
not completely isolating their children from the cultural stream but they are
picking and choosing when their children are exposed to certain trends in the
culture and then they help set the framework mentally ahead of time, use the
opportunity to teach children how they should think and interact with what they
are hearing so that there is an intellectual and spiritual protection and
defence built up so that when children hear the message of the world system
they will be able to put up a wall, a barrier, and filter it.
We have to always remember in
the Bible that there are two ways of looking at life. There is God’s viewpoint
and then there is the creature’s viewpoint—sometimes referred to as human
viewpoint or with the biblical term “worldly thinking,” or “cosmic thinking.”
Sometimes we may refer to it as satanic or demonic thinking. It all refers to
the same thing. There are numerous different aspects to this kind of thinking.
At the very core there are two aspects. One is autonomy, that the creature can
define or understand reality independently of God the creator and how He has
revealed that creation operates, and also antagonism. There is an antagonism, a
hostility to God’s Word. Those elements run through things, whether we are
talking about various religious systems, non-Christian religious systems,
philosophical systems such as secularism, humanism, existentialism, modernism,
postmodernism, Darwinism, Freudianism, etc. These are all different
manifestations of the basic fundamental principles of autonomy and antagonism
and they manifest differently in different cultures.
We need to understand that
because all of us have picked up ideas, it is if it is in the water that we
drink. Our children have them. This is why we see children today, young people
today, young people under the age of thirty, often react to different events
very differently from their parents. Some of that is because of the trends of
the day, and those trends are determined by intellectual influences. One
example is that often today those who have come up through school, come up
through college, university, constantly hear something like the free market has
failed, that capitalism has failed, that government is the solution to the
problem, and when they are in high school and university and taking economics
classes, political science classes, they constantly hear this drum-beat over
and over again. And if that is never countered and there is no alternative view
then they just pick it up. They don’t know any other way to think. So there
really needs to be a preparation.
Same thing with Darwinism.
Again and again they hear, not just in the science classroom but in sociology,
in social studies that the earth is billions of years old. They hear this over
and over and over again, and unless there is something there that is going to
say no, your wrong, I’m not buying into this, then there is no defence. There
has to be that grid that goes up there.
James
What we have to do is be able
to understand where this came from. Part of this is just being more cognisant
of the ideas that are out there and how it has impacted our culture. In the
The principle in Jude is that
we are to “contend earnestly for the faith,” a term which has to do with
fighting. It is an athletic term and it means that we are to strive for
something, to make it a priority; it means to be something that we intensely
struggle against on a day-today basis. There is the assumption in Scripture
that there is a set body of truth that is true, not just for you and me and the
next person, Americans and Europeans, but it true for all people at all times.
And we have to know that and defend it so that it is part of our makeup, our culture
and our understanding. That is the word pistis
[pistij] for faith, and it is the content of what we believe.
What we believe goes into our
thinking. First of all we evaluate our own thinking. Then we have the thinking
that is in the sub, sub sub-culture, the micro sub-culture of our family unit.
In a home where there is only one parent that is going to be a different kind
of sub-culture than a home where there are two parents. In a home where parents
are truly committed to the truth of God’s Word and are training children that
culture is going to be different from another culture. And so we have that
culture where we have to root out these worldly, demonic ideas. Then the next
area is the church and the next is outside of that but we usually don’t get too
much opportunity to get too involved in the broader cultural level.
We have also talked about the
fact that 2 Corinthians 10:5, 6 emphasises that we are to be engaged in casting
down arguments. That means we have to know what the arguments are. We have to
know what the other guy’s position is; we have to know what the views are out
there. You can’t cast down an argument if you don’t know what it is. “… casting
down arguments in every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of
God.” Why? In order to bring “every thought captive to the
obedience of Christ.” Not most thoughts, not some thoughts but every thought.
This applies to every one of those thoughts that you have, every opinion, every
belief, every value, has to be taken out and exposed to the light of God’s Word
and then you have tom either remove it or reinforce it from the truth.
We start with inside of
ourselves. Jesus lays down this principle in Matthew 7:3-5 NASB “Why
do you look at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the
log that is in your own eye?
There are four ways that
people come to know truth, four ways that humans have articulated that we come
to know truth. The first three are limited because they are all based on human
thought systems, on the human mind, and they are all putting their faith
completely and totally in human ability to decipher and interpret things intellectually
or experientially. And yet many times we know less than one one-millionth of
one per cent, and yet we think that because we know that we can project
everything else. These views are rationalism, empiricism, and mysticism. The
first two are grounded on an independent use of logic and reason. There is
nothing wrong with logic and reason but we have to determine whether it is
reason and logic operating independently of God’s Word or dependently upon
God’s Word. Then in mysticism logic is rejected. Mysticism just goes with inner
impressions, inner ideas. Everybody has these and it is very easy for a lot of
Christians who somehow want to identify some thought that comes into their mind
as directly from the Holy Spirit. But unbelievers have those kinds of things
too.
We have so much that happens
inside of our thinking. The human mind is such an incredible computer that is
processing billions and billions of pieces of data all the time, whether we are
a believer or an unbeliever. And every now and then it just spits this stuff
out and it rises to our consciousness. It is believed that many times the Holy
Spirit is behind that but not always. Sometimes it is just the process of our
own thought mechanisms and sometimes we can’t really identify the difference
between the normal thought processes and the time when God the Holy Spirit has
just slipped that out there for us to pay attention to. Some people go way too
far and every time something like this happens it was God the Holy Spirit who
did it. How do we know? That is the question. What are the clear, objective,
discerning criteria for determining whether a thought or an idea that came into
our mind is from God the Holy Spirit or not? We have to be very careful with
that and that we don’t cross a line there into some sort of new revelation.
God the Holy Spirit works way
back behind the scenes. He is influencing us, but we don’t know and we can’t
identify when it is directly the Holy Spirit or indirectly the Holy Spirit; we
just know that He does that. So people who run around and always have to say
Jesus did this or the Holy Spirit told me this; how do they know? This is not
to say that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are not involved indirectly in some of
these things but the issue is: how do you know? Mysticism leads to an autonomy
in the human mind that glorifies our inner impressions, ideas, thought flashes,
insights, and raises that to the same level of authority as revelation of the
Word of God.
In contrast to these three we
have revelation. Sometimes writers call this authority, and that is what it is.
Authority is in a person outside of our mind. Rationalism, empiricism and
mysticism all take place inside the head, but this takes place outside. Some
external authority tells us what is true. This operates in a limited way all
the time. When we have a young child and start teaching them the alphabet and
to read they just listen to us and base their belief on what we say. They
aren’t using their experience or their reason to go to that; they are just
basing it on an external authority. That is what the Christian does when
trusting the Bible. We believe God is omniscient and knows all things. He has
revealed Himself to us and so we use that authoritative revelation to help us
interpret the data, the details, and the experiences of our life. Always
remember this. You evaluate your experience by the Word of God. So when you go
to the hospital and have an out of body experience and want to assign some
spiritual value to it because it just seemed so real to you, and you think you
went to heaven and want to come back and tell everybody about it, you have to
remember that the apostle Paul went to heaven and God said he couldn’t tell
anybody about it. So are you raising yourself to a level above the apostle
Paul? How do you know? The answers we hear are irrational. But that is where we
are in our culture today because reason or rationalism has debunked Scripture;
empiricism has debunked Scripture. They are not right but they have debunked Scripture.
People say, Oh I just have to have some evidence other than the Bible to know
that it is true.
We go back to Luke chapter
sixteen where we have the story about Lazarus and the rich man. When the beggar
dies he is carried by the angels (v.22) to Abraham’s bosom. This is what
happens when we die. The angels escort us the
Then the rich man says, (v. 27) “Then I
beg you, father, that you send him to my father’s house—[28] for I have five
brothers—in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to
this place of torment.” Of course, he is thinking that they are going to believe
somebody who has been raised from the dead because of the miracle. [29] “But
Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.’” What
could be more authoritative than Moses and the Prophets? Someone’s experience?
No, the experience of talking to someone raised from the dead is not your
authority; the ultimate authority is the Word of God. Everything else is much
less, insignificant. If people don’t believe the authority of the Word of God
then they’ll never believe that somebody has actually been raised from the
dead. [31] “But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the
Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’”
So what is more important? What is the
ultimate authority? It is what the Word of God says. The Word of God judges
your experience. No matter how real that experience may be you have to go to
the Word of God and let the Word of God tell you what that experience really
is, because your mind, your heart is evil and wicked and deceptive above all
things, Jeremiah says, who can know it?
Immanuel Kant points out the problem. You
can’t get to a clear argument for objective knowledge so you come back to
subjectivism; all you know is what you see. How many times have we heard people
say this: Well that’s just your experience. All you can know is what your
experience tells you. You can’t know things as they are objectively. This is
scepticism. People can’t live as sceptics. When it gets really tough and
somebody is about to murder you or you are in the trench of warfare, you cry
out to God. The most committed atheist will. They suppress the truth but it is
always wanting to pop out in different ways. In existentialism you have to find
meaning somewhere because God created you to have meaning. In existentialism
you just validate your meaning by doing something.
All of this basically traces out the
history of thought from the early 1700s through the 19th century.
Then primarily in the 19th century we have postmodernism. The
previous was called modernism. After modernism becomes bankrupt and can’t
really give answers anymore all it does is produce the horrors of World War I,
the Great Depression, and World War II; we have to turn to something else to
find hope and meaning.
We have seen some postmodern basics. Truth
is created, not discovered. Reason, rationality and science ate cultural
biases, those who trust reason and things based on reason—science, western
civilisation, education, the US Constitution, etc.—are just biases from
European cultural conditioning, and this cultural conditioning is designed to
keep power in the hands of the social elite.
In biblical Christianity man is created in
the image of God. He is not an accident, there is design and purpose. Man is
both a physical and a spiritual being. In modernism human are purely material
machine, the universe is purely physical, nothing exists beyond our senses. In
postmodernism they really don’t address this. They are suspicious of any
dogmatic assertion. You can’t know truth. That is the basic problem with
postmodernism: there is no set universal truth. In terms of free will biblical
Christianity says that it is diminished by sin but human beings are still
morally responsible. Modernism says that man is completely independent and
autonomous and self-governing. They can choose their own direction. In
postmodernism we are products of our own culture; we only imagine that we are
self-governing. We are basically predetermined by our culture. That is the
determinative factor. That is why we have multiculturalism. In biblical
Christianity reason is necessary but not sole and ultimate basis for
understanding reality. It discovers some truth but revelation is also needed.
In modernism rationalism and empiricism become the only basis for discovering truth.
It completely rejects the possibility of external revelation. And postmodernism
denies objective reason. Reason doesn’t get you there, it is impossible;
neither does experience. Rationalism for them is just a myth; you just go with
something that is irrationalism.
In terms of the view of progress biblical
Christianity says mankind isn’t progressing toward anything. Technological
advances are positive but there is no utopia to be brought in because
inherently we live in a fallen world. In modernism there is belief in a utopic
possibility. Man is getting better and better every day in every way. Science
and reason are the paths to perfection. Science and reason brought us the
atomic bomb so maybe it is not so good and maybe it won’t get us anywhere, therefore
it is bankrupt. And postmodernism comes along and denies the objectivity of
reason, rationalism is just a myth, and we can only get to any kind of utopia
if we just believe whatever we want to believe.
How did we get this way? It has to do with
a mindset. It sort of describes what some have called compartmentalisation in
the brain. Compartmentalisation is something we are sort of taught from the
worldview. As we have said, worldview is like a set of glasses, and those
glasses are put together by the culture around us.
We ought to restrict ourselves from the
influence of media, and the Internet has put all this influence of the media on
steroids. Kids are out there on Facebook, on many of the other social
networking apps and spending a huge amount of time texting and all these
things. That is not to say these things are wrong but there is a time and a
place for everything, and this is a huge distraction and it takes peer pressure
to a quantum leap further than it was when many of us were at that age.
Next, what we want to describe is just
basically what happened since 1900 with Immanuel Kant. He had this view of
reality that he split. The lower level is the area of the details of life—what
we see, what we experience, what we taste, touch feel; the areas of creation,
the created order, the physical order. So this is comprised of people and
observable phenomena, things, events, language; all of this is what is going on
down stairs in this house. Then upstairs there are universals, the moral ideas,
ethics, absolutes, the idea of God. And there is a stair case where we can go
upstairs and look at the broad universal absolutes, ideas, and those can help
us to understand and to organise the details of lief that are downstairs. And
there is movement. We can see what is upstairs; we can know it directly. As
Christians we believe that. We can know God and that God can speak to us, and
that there is communication between the universals and what is down below.
What happens with Immanuel Kant is that he
came along and said we can’t validate this on the basis of logic and reason
alone, we can’t validate this philosophically. All we can do is see what we
think we see. We don’t know what is on the other side because we have no direct
experience of it, we have no direct contact with it and so we don’t know if it
is there. We can’t really know if there are universals, we can only guess. So
after Immanuel Kant upstairs just becomes inaccessible.
The problem is, we live down stairs in a
world that now intellectually has no meaning, no God, and we are in existential
darkness and despair. This is where Frederick Nietzsche ends up. It is just
nihilism, there is no meaning in life, no value, there is just existential
darkness, we are all just products of some cosmic accidental spark that hit a
protoplasmic pool, and something happened and eventually it ends up being one
of us. But we are all just pure matter, there is no immaterial soul, no God, no
ultimate accountability, there is nothing. We are just trapped in this physical
existence so we just come up with all of our values being pragmatic, just
consensus. So one culture may have their consensus, another culture theirs, but
who is to say one culture is better than another culture? Who is to say that
the culture of New Yorkers is any better than the culture of the Aztecs in the
16th century? Who is to say there is anything wrong with
cannibalism? Who is to say there’s anything wrong with human sacrifice? Who
were those horrible European anyway to think they could come in and in that
culture. And so now we see history and politics and law all dumping on groups
that have come in an supplanted other groups and said that their ideas were
wrong. So the evil ones are now those who have been the conquerors, yet those
conquerors were coming in to one degree or another with generally Christian
ideas and it was when the Christian ideas came into the pagan barbarian
This impacts young people everywhere. The
results of certain surveys are that 66 per cent of young believe that no such
thing as absolute truth exists. We all know that there is an inherent
contradiction there because they say no absolute truth exists. Well that is an
absolute truth! But that inherent contradiction doesn’t matter because in the
very core of their being they bought into this idea that it doesn’t have to be
logical. In fact, logic hasn’t helped us any so who cares of it is logical?
This is the way it is. And so there is no such thing as absolute truth.
Sixty-six per cent of Americans believe there is no such thing as absolute
truth, 72 per cent of those between 18 and 25. This survey came out about ten
or twelve years ago so these 18 to 25-year-olds are now 28-35. So we are
talking about the under 40 generation here where 72 per cent don’t believe that
there are any absolutes whatsoever.
But 53 per cent of evangelicals—these are
people who think they are Christian and who claim to be Christian and the Bible
to be the ultimate authority in their life—believe that there are no absolutes
and not even Christ is an absolute. You might say that is contradictory. We
postmodernism is all about contradiction, it is irrationalism gone to seed.
This has led to several consequences. For
example, it has led to the collapse of the importance of religious belief. And
we see that in our secular culture. There has been this drastic divorce of the
secular from the spiritual. So we live in a world where many of our
intellectual elites, those who are extremely influential in policy—they don’t
even have elect roles, they in positions of think tanks, they operate behind
the scenes in media and control these things—don ‘t believe that there is
anything true about religious ideas.
Where does this have a consequence? It has
a consequence when we are dealing with Islam, for example. In Islam they don’t
have the split between the sacred or the spiritual and the secular, everything
is about Allah and everything is about getting the world ready for Allah to
come and to cleanse the world and bring about the death of all the Christians
and all of the Jews. They take that extremely seriously. But secular atheists
in the west say that is just a myth, we don’t take that seriously. We are
blinded by secularism. We can’t honestly understand or appreciate where our
Islamic enemy is coming from and so we are going to miss many good decisions,
make many bad decisions, and maybe even some self-destructive decisions because
we can’t really comprehend the way they think. It means nothing to the secular
elites in our culture.
That leads to globalism. In globalism
everybody is equal, everybody is good. You can’t draw distinctions,
evaluations, judgments between some cultures being better than other cultures.
We are left just saying that the cannibals of one location are just as good and
just as beneficial to humanity as the intellectual elites. So this leads us
with a fragmentation and a complete polarisation in terms of our culture. We
have on the one side those who believe in absolutes and on the other side those
who don’t. That is not necessarily between Christian and non-Christian because
we still have large elements of our culture that may not be biblical, may not
be truly justified, but they have still been inculcated with a biblical
worldview and they think that way. They think in terms of external universals
and absolutes. Then on the other side there are those who don’t. And the space
between them becomes greater and greater as we go through time, and this has
led to why there are so many complaints about the fact that there is little
civil discourse in political debates. One of the reasons for that is because
the more polarised the culture becomes the more frustrated people become with
the other side, and the more hostile they become. So there is this extreme
break-up and fragmentation of our culture.
We can see this right now because of the
recent emphasis on homosexual, sodomite marriage and the legalisation of it and
the announcement of it by our President that he believes that is the right
thing. Notice how he said, “I think it is right as a Christian to treat all
these people well, they have been disenfranchised.” But wait a minute. What
Bible is he reading? Christianity gets it truth and its values from the Bible
and the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin and it is not to be legitimised
or validated by legal statute.
So we see this fragmentation that occurs
in the cultural wars and it is seen in the split still between north and south.
Notice that right before he made that announcement there was a vote in
What we are seeing here is that in
postmodernism meaning is created by a social group and its language. This is
why language becomes so important—the words that are used. With postmodernism,
therefore, it is impossible to know God or to know history or to know reason.
You can’t get it upstairs; there is a solid wall there so we just make things
up. Every culture makes up myths and legends about God, history and reason just
to promote their own agenda, just to promote their own ideas. They say you
can’t trust those people who go back to history and say we need to go back to
the Constitution. That was their reality in 1700s, what does that have to do
with us today? It’s a living document, who cares whether it is Constitutional
or not?
So with these people in postmodernism it
is impossible to communicate truth because at a core level they can’t quite
comprehend that. With no absolutes behind language according to them each
person is trapped and imprisoned by their own language, culture or group that
seeks to marginalise them.
Think about this. If you train your mind
as postmodernists have done through the influence of their culture and buying
into all of this to believe six impossible things every day, then when 30, 40,
50 years have gone by you can’t tell the difference between possibility and
impossibility anymore, and you are left thinking in a way that is so foreign to
someone who thinks in external absolutes that the two people may as well be talking
in completely different languages. They can’t understand a thing that the other
is saying because the foundation for meaning has been eradicated and
annihilated. That is where we are headed as a culture and it will only lead to
more hostility and more aggravation.
AS we have said, 53 per cent of
evangelicals don’t believe in absolute truth. And if the way you live indicates
what you believe, academically we may say we believe in absolute truth, but how
many of us experience the fact and catch ourselves at times thinking in terms
of a relative system simply because that is the heart-beat of our culture and
we have to stop ourselves. That is how we have been influenced. So we need to
contend for the faith. We need to be constantly be reminded that there is
absolute truth and listen to it, over and over and over again. We can’t just go
through life and think an hour of Bible study and instruction focusing our mind
on the truth is enough. We have to have proportion in all things but daily
there has to be something. We may not be able to listen to a tape for an hour a
day. Maybe there is only fifteen minutes on the way to work and on the way
home. Take it; grab it. Don’t just say you are going to listen to music because
what you are saying is: I am going to let the world influence me instead of the
Bible.
These are our options. So are we going to
contend for the faith in our own soul or not? That is the question.