Fundamentalists: Inerrancy and Infallibility of
Scripture – Part 2. Jude 3
Contending for the faith doesn’t
mean to contend contentiously, it means to strive to accomplish a task. One
great illustration of this from church history comes from Athanasius.
He was born in 296 AD in
Athanasius really understood the issues to this, and this became
quite a theological controversy that threatened to divine the church in this
new “Christian” Roman empire after
In 325 the Council met and
they approved the Athanasian position, but this did not end the controversy. So
After
The doctrine of inspiration:
what the Bible says about itself, how the Bible was given to us in the process
of its origin in the mind of God and how it is revealed in and through fallen
human beings from the Old testament to the New Testament by means of God the
Holy Spirit so that what was written down originally by the writer of Scripture
was without error in everything that it addressed—without claiming that it was
a biology text book, a geography text book, a history text book, but when it
touches on these matters it is accurate and without error.
We start with this
assumption, in which case we come to the Word of God and if we see an apparent
conflict or what we think is a conflict we say, ‘I don’t understand enough,
this is the Word of God, so there is a resolution to this conflict, I just don’t
know what it is. I don’t know enough about the original circumstances, the
situation, the vocabulary, but I am going to presume that there is no conflict;
I just don’t know enough to be able to give an answer. Those who come from a
position of cynicism or scepticism who do not believe presuppositionally
that God can reveal Himself supernaturally to man—it is called a bias or
presupposition of anti-supernaturalism—so that from the starting point, without
ever looking at any evidence, they are looking at texts of Scripture and saying
it can’t by definition be inerrant because that can’t happen, God can’t control
things in that way. So they have a small view of God and a very large view of
man. This small view of God always means that they blow man up to a capability
larger than he is, and they end up treating the books of the Bible as basically
just the products of human authorship without divine oversight or control. But
that is not what the Word of God claims for itself anywhere within the
Scripture.
The Bible presents itself as
the Word of God without error: “Thus saith the Lord.” It is that statement used
again and again and again in the Old Testament that gives us the confidence
that this is God’s Word, not man’s word about God. Those are essentially the
two positions. We either believe that this is the inerrant, infallible Word
that God revealed to us through human agents, or we believe that somehow this
is nothing more than human beings writing about their experiences with God. There
may be some variations between those two poles but they are basically the two
positions.
Definition of inspiration
The word “inspiration” is not
really the best word. Sometimes someone may speak of William Shakespeare as
being inspired as he wrote poetry or drama. We may think of someone who is a
brilliant architect, for example Christopher Wren, and say he must have been
inspired when he designed
Definition: We believe that
God the Holy Spirit so supernaturally directed the human writers of Scripture
that without waiving their human intelligence, vocabulary, individuality, literary
style, personality, personal feelings, or any other human factor, His complete
and coherent message to mankind was recorded with perfect accuracy in the
original languages of Scripture, the very words bearing the authority of divine
authorship.
2 Timothy
2 Timothy
When we look at the
definition and break it down we realise that it starts off with just the
statement that all Scripture is inspired or is breathed out by God. The term “God”
here is used in a generic sense that speaks of deity, and it would speak of the
entire Trinity; and indeed all members of the Trinity are involved in some way
in the process of giving Scripture. Remember Jesus is called the logos, the Word of God. John 1:1-3 cf.
John 1:14. God the Son is the physical logos
comparable to the written logos. But
it is specifically the responsibility of God the Holy Spirit in the process of
inspiration.
We see this in 2 Peter
This is like the example of Jude, that he
intended to write one thing but there is the compulsion, necessity put upon him
to write about something else. This is that unseen force of God the Holy Spirit
who is working upon the writers of Scripture. This tells us that there are two
authors of every passage of Scripture. There is the human author, but behind
him working in and through him is the divine author who is God the Holy Spirit.
This is the primary role of the Holy Spirit within the Trinity. He is to reveal
God’s plan to man.
The word “revelation” is central to what
we are talking about. It is a word that means to unveil, to disclose or to
uncover something that is previously unknown. There are different ways in which
we come to know things. We come to know things by observation, by contemplating
things that we do know and extrapolating conclusions from the things that we know,
moving in the direction of things we did not know through the use of logic
(rationalism or the use of reason), when we look at experience and sense
information (empiricism). But that is not the only way we come to know things.
We come to know things because people also tell us things (revelation). Revelation
is not contradictory or antagonistic to empiricism or rationalism, yet that is
how the human viewpoint systems all work because instead of talking about
revelation as revelation they talk about faith. So then they say faith is one
thing and science is something else, and the juxtapose those. But the reality
is that empiricism, rationalism and revelation all presuppose faith—faith in
human ability, faith in some ultimate authority, whether it is the human mind
to understand and analyse and accept something as true, or maybe it is the
faith in the person who tells us something. Faith either has its object in man
and man’s ability—either rationalism or empiricism as well as in mysticism—or faith
the revelation of someone who tells us something, which is Scripture is God.
A perfect example of this is Adam and Eve
in the garden. There are many things that they could extrapolate and develop
through the use of logic as they studied the trees and the environment in the garden of Eden. But there is one thing they could only know
through revelation, and that was that if they ate from the fruit of the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil they would die. They couldn’t learn that through
empiricism, rationalism or mysticism; they could only learn that if God spoke
to them and told them. It was that one piece of information that was necessary to
correctly order and organise all of the other data that they learned through
rationalism or empiricism. Understanding revelation helps us, then, to properly
interpret the date that comes from rationalism and empiricism. So if we negate
revelation (which is what human viewpoint does) it really casts a person adrift
upon a sea of subjectivity, and if truth is discovered it is accidental.
Another facet of revelation is that it is
propositional. That term just means that it is stated in verbal sentences. It
is not through images, not through impressions; it is through sentence
structure, specific statements. There are various kinds of sentences. In logic
they are called propositions because they can be validated or invalidated; they
can be proved to be true or false. That is what we mean when we say that
revelation is propositional. It means that God’s Word is expressed through
normal sentences using human vocabulary to express concepts that can be
validated or invalidated, but they can clearly be understood through the use of
the intellect that God has given us. He has designed us with a mind that is on
His wave length so that He can communicate to us and we can respond to Him.
We learn from studying the Scripture that
the Holy Spirit is the author of both the Old Testament and the New Testament.
Passages such as 2 Samuel 23:2, 3; Mark 12:36; Acts 1:16; 28:25; 1
Thessalonians 4:2; 2 Thessalonians 3:6, 12, 14 are just some which emphasise
authorship of God the Holy Spirit. Also the Holy Spirit is the one who in the
church age helps us to understand the Word of God, but He doesn’t understand it
for us. He enables us but He we have to think about it, study it.
The human writers of Scripture came from a
wide variety of different backgrounds, various walks of life and different
cultures. We believe that from Adam to Moses different key people wrote down
certain things that were sources Moses used under the inspiration of the Holy
Spirit to pull together that part of the Pentateuch that he was not an
eyewitness to. Then there was Job who wrote at the same time and probably
earlier than Moses. Then there was Joseph who was a former slave and who rose
to be the right hand man of Pharaoh and was the chief administrator in the
Egyptian empire. There was Joshua who rose to the rank of general and human leader
of the armies of
Scripture tells us that the words are
inspired by God. Every single word is chosen by God the Holy Spirit. That means
we pay attention to why this synonym is used instead of that synonym. And it is
not just a stylistic difference but has something to do with what the Holy
Spirit is communicating. The forms of the words, the tenses, whether they are
plural or singular; all have a significance and we
need to meditate on the passage until we can understand that significance. There
are some things done that are stylistic in the original language. For example,
there are passages in the Gospels where one writer will include a definite
article with the proper name of a person. He will say, “The Joseph,” and “the
Mary.” In other passages it is just “Joseph” and “Mary.” We don’t really
believe there is any distinction between those two and there have been those
who have spent their lifetime studying the use or non-use of the article in
Greek and can’t answer that particular question.
It is a message to mankind. It is not written to angels, to animals, any of the creatures; it is addressed to the human race. And it is recorded with perfect accuracy in the original languages. This gets into another issue because we don’t have the original, a copy of the original, and we don’t have a copy of a copy of a copy of the original. But, especially when we look at the New Testament, we have hundreds if not thousands of copies. They are maybe not complete New Testaments but we also have quotations from the church fathers going back to the end of the first century. By comparing these we can see that the text really didn’t change. There is nothing to indicate that there was a change.