Introduction; John 20:30, 31 & John
1:1-4
John 20:30 NASB “Therefore
many other signs Jesus also performed in the presence of the disciples, which
are not written in this book;
There are seven signs
listed in the Gospel of John and this roughly will be the outline of the Gospel
1) He changes the water into wine at the bridal feast in
2) The healing of the official’s son in
3) He heals the cripple at the pool of
4) He feeds the five thousand near the
5) He walks on the water,
6) He heals a blind man, 9:1-7.
7) He resuscitates Lazarus from the dead, 11:1-45.
He says here that these
signs have been
written for a purpose: that you
might believe something. First of all, that Jesus is the Messiah. The
signs demonstrate something about Jesus of Nazareth: that he is not merely a
man but that he is who he claimed to be, the Messiah
promised in the Old testament, the Son of God. He is fully God, undiminished
deity united with true humanity in one person forever. That is what we call the
hypostatic union. Secondly, that believing we might have life through His name.
That is not merely eternal life, life without end, because even the unbeliever
has eternal life in a way. His soul never disintegrates, it never stops
existing; it continues to exist forever and ever in a place of eternal
punishment in the lake of fire.
We need to start by asking the question:
What is faith?
1) Definition: There are four different way people know
things, epistemology—how do you know what you know? a) Rationalism: the idea
that to come to know truth it all starts in the mind; b) Empiricism: this has
as its starting point the sense—seeing, hearing,
touching, smelling. The basic assumption is that you can trust the senses and
that the mind is basically empty and you have to start from sense data; c)
Mysticism: like rationalism, this starts in the mind, but its basic principle
is intuitive. Instead of being logical it is irrational: “I just know this is
true because it feels right.” In fact, logic is the enemy. The fancy name that
this has been given today is postmodernism; d) Faith: trust in someone or
something else, another authority. Faith is basically a non-meritorious system
of knowledge based on confidence in the authority and veracity of another.
Faith is also based on knowledge, it has as its object knowledge, and is
rational because it is reasonable, and it is logical. Therefore, if you are in
mysticism which operates on a, irrational modus operandi then that is going to
be at odds and antagonistic to any other system that operates on logic or
reason as a means of arriving at truth. The starting point is not the human
mind alone, not human senses, as Christians it is the revelation of God. So we
start with divine revelation and then we develop and understand it through the
use of our minds, our intellect, and we develop thoughts from it based upon the
right use of reason or logic. Perception by faith is always non-meritorious.
The faith itself has no merit, the person who exercises faith has not merit;
faith gains all of its merit from its object. Therefore what does faith mean?
Faith means to trust, to rely on, to have confidence in, to believe something
is true, to accept something to be true. Faith does
not mean to submit to, to invite Jesus into your heart, to feel; all of these
have to do with emotion or something that is not related to the basic meaning
of the word.
2) Etymology. There are several Greek words that are
important here. The first is pistis [pistij] which is sometimes used as an attribute. It is that
which causes trust or faith, reliability, or integrity, as in Titus 2:10; 2
Thessalonians 1:4. In the active sense it means faith, confidence, trust,
belief. It is used three different ways in the Bible. First of all, it refers
to saving faith, the faith or trust that an unbeliever expresses towards Jesus
Christ that moves him from being an unbeliever to a believer. Ephesians 2:8, 9,
“by grace through faith.” In the Greek it is dia [dia] plus the genitive which indicates means. If it had been dia plus the accusative case it would have been cause,
but it is not. So we are saved by grace through faith, it is the channel by
which God gives us salvation. Secondly, we have the faith-rest drill. This can
refer to mixing promises with faith. It refers, secondly, to the doctrines of
Scripture. We know certain principles and therefore can use doctrinal
rationales. There is also a passive meaning to faith in which it refers to what
is believed, and that is basically what we call Bible doctrine, the principles
that are extracted from the Scriptures. Galatians 1:23; 2 Peter 1:5; 1 Timothy 1:19. The verb pisteuo [pisteuw] which is used 98 times in the Gospel of John means
to believe, to trust something or someone, to express belief in some object.
Acts
3) Faith is a mental activity triggered by volition. A such, faith is not an emotion.
4) Faith is always directed toward an object which can be
expressed as a proposition. The proposition is that Jesus died on the cross as
a substitute for your sins, and if you believe in Him you will have eternal
life. A proposition is the expression of a thought which can be verified or
falsified.
5) Therefore you do not believe in a person or come to salvation
through a relationship with Jesus, but first, no matter who you are, you
believe the propositions in Scripture that inform you about Jesus and His
saving work on the cross. We are people of the Book. We believe that Scripture
is propositional revelation. We do not come to the Scriptures to have an
emotional or mystical encounter with God so that we go away feeling better. We
come to learn specific things that God has given to us, it is propositional in
nature. That means faith is rational, it has rational content to it, it is
based on knowledge.
6) Therefore faith is an activity of the mentality of the
soul which is directed toward a proposition. The Scripture, therefore, is the
object of faith for the unbeliever and the immature believer. For the mature
believer the doctrine that is extrapolated from Scripture is the object of
faith as he grows to maturity.
7) Faith has no merit in itself. It is not faith that
saves. You can’t just have faith; faith must always have an object. All the
merit lies in the object of faith, not in faith itself. What matters is what
you believe.
8) Faith, then, as an intellectual activity of the soul
excludes emotion, irrationalism and mysticism. That doesn’t mean that as you
believe what Christ did for you that that may not have an emotional response of
happiness and joy and relief, but faith itself, the activity of believing for
salvation excludes emotion. When these are made part of faith they destroy
faith.
9) Faith is rational and logical, in conformity with the
ultimate person of the universe.
10) All the faith in the world secures nothing but
condemnation from the integrity of God. It is the object of faith that makes
the difference. When our faith is in Jesus Christ that makes the difference; He
is the object of faith.
11) The tiniest bit of faith in Christ secures eternal
salvation.
12) Faith is not something you do, it is not the cause of
our salvation; it is the channel by which we appropriate what God has done for
us.
Application
1) There is no biblical distinction between head and heart
belief. Heart in the Bible refers to the mentality of the soul.
2) Saving faith is
not a different kind of faith but a faith with a saving object.
3) Salvation is not based on a personal relationship with
Christ—Judas had that, James had that, and all the brothers and sisters had
that—it is based on the acceptance of the true proposition that Jesus Christ
died on the cross for you.
The outline of the Gospel is very simple. It
begins with the prologue in the first eighteen verses which emphasises the
eternal logos of God and how the logos, the Word, became flesh or
incarnate. So 1:1-18 is the introduction of the eternal logos of God incarnate;
1:19-12:50, the seven signs that testify that Jesus is the Messiah; chapters
13-20, the greatest sign: the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ;
chapter 21 is the epilogue: the final statements related to Jesus as the
Messiah.
John 1:1 NASB
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was
God.” The simplicity of this is almost deceptive because John writes in such a
way that the smallest child can find something of value by studying the Gospel
of John and the most erudite thinker can have his thinking challenged
profoundly by what this writer says. So there is something here for everyone.
No matter how much you study it you will never plumb the depths of what is
here. This is the most incredible writing that you will ever find. He doesn’t
have the complexity of a Paul but in his simplicity he is profound.
“In the beginning” is the
phrase en arche [e)n a)rxh]. En is the
preposition; arche is the word
meaning first principles, beginning, foremost, sometimes it is translated
“principalities” in some of the passages that talk about the angels, but it
basically has the meaning of primacy. En is the preposition which
means “in” here. In the English it is translated with the definite article: “In
the beginning.” There is no definite
article in the Greek. In English if you want something indefinite you leave out
the article; if you want something definite then you put the article in there.
But in Greek the absence of the definite article does not necessarily make the
word definite. There are three options here: a) the noun is indefinite, which
would be “in a beginning”; b) the noun is inherently definite or that the
preposition itself takes the place of the definite article, in which case the
noun would be definite and it would be translated “in the beginning”; c) the absence of the definite article would be to
emphasize the quality of the noun. Often the definite article is left out in
the Greek, not to make it indefinite, but to emphasize the essence or the
quality of a thing. This is very important in the last phrase here, “and the
Word was God.” In the original there is no definite article in front of God.
The so-called Jehovah’s Witnesses translate that in their
Kiddell’s Theological Dictionary of the New Testament: “In its
temporal significance arche
denotes beginning in the exact sense, i.e. the place in a temporal sequence at
which something new which is also finite commences.” That’s the definite idea:
the exact sense. What he is saying is this word is inherently definite. It
doesn’t need an article to be definite. Secondly, we need to0 observe that
whenever this noun occurs with the preposition in the New Testament the article
is always absent. It is used about 50 times and about forty of those times it
is used with the preposition, either
Accurate translation: “In
the beginning.” The beginning of what? You have a
point of time: eternity ends and time commences. It is the beginning of
creation when God first created the universe. To the Jew who read this en arche would immediately bring to his
mind the very first phrase in his Greek Old Testament. By the time that John is
writing very few Jews could read Hebrew. They read their Septuagint [LXX] which was
the Greek translation made in the 2nd and 3rd century BC of the Hebrew
Old Testament. The very first phrase of “In the beginning God created the
heavens and the earth,” was translated into Greek en arche. So when a Jew saw this phrase the first thing he was
going to think about was Genesis 1:1. At that point in time when God created
the universe—that is the verb from the imperfect active indicative of eimi [e)imi]—the Word already was in existence. In the beginning
when everything began the logos [Logoj] was already continually existing in eternity past.
The point is, the eternity of Jesus Christ is present
in the Gospel of John from the very first clause. Eternal life is part of deity
and only God can have eternal life. So from the very beginning the apostle John
is making us understand that Jesus Christ is God.
To the Greek this phrase
would have had even greater significance. In Greek philosophy the phrase arche stood for first principles. It was
used in cosmic physics. It denoted the original material from which everything
in the universe evolved (the concept of evolution did not start with