Fragmented Souls, Fragmented Churches;
James 4:1-3
As our study of James chapter
three has come to a conclusion we saw that in the last paragraph, verses 13-18,
that James juxtaposed two ways of thinking. One was wisdom, the other is call in
the Bible foolishness. Wisdom is what we have called divine viewpoint thinking,
also spiritual thinking, truth or Bible doctrine. On
the other hand, foolishness is often akin to legalism, we call it human
viewpoint thinking. It is called the thinking of the natural man, earthly and
demonic because it is false doctrine. In one sense all human viewpoint
thinking s demonic. Why would we say that? Not necessarily because it has its
source in demonic thinking.
In eternity past God created
the angels in one instant of time. When they were created they were all created
absolutely perfect with perfect righteousness. There was no sin found in any of
the angels. God is perfect, He can create nothing less than perfection, so all
of the angels came forth perfect; but they all had volition. The
could choose for or against God. The highest of all the angels is called
Lucifer, and Lucifer decided that he wanted to be like God. He wanted to have
all the worship that God received and so he uttered five statements which all
begin with the verb “I will,” listed in Isaiah chapter
fourteen and culminating in the statement “I will be like the most high.” This
is nothing less than arrogance, and arrogance is the root of all sin. It is the
creature thinking that he can define reality apart from the creator. And so all
human viewpoint wisdom—ideas, thoughts, values that are contrary, and even
though at points may be parallel to divine viewpoint thinking—is completely
opposed to divine viewpoint. The ideological base for spiritual freedom,
freedom as expressed in the Bible in the Mosaic law,
is radically opposed to the kind of freedom that has developed from human
viewpoint systems of thought. So even though there may appear to be at a
certain level a certain symmetry and a certain similarity
because they fit within a complete mosaic of thought that is opposed one to
another they are different. Human viewpoint thinking is demonic because it is
parallel to the kind of reasoning and thinking which characterized Lucifer’s
initial sin, the fall of Lucifer, and the thinking that envelops all of his
reasoning. That is why there is complete antagonism between human viewpoint
thinking and divine viewpoint thinking and the wisdom of Scripture.
So a parent’s job is to teach
and instruct his children how to think about life biblically. Now here is the
challenge to parents. You can’t teach your kids how to think biblically unless
you learn how to think biblically. And you are not going to learn how to think
biblically unless that is a priority in your life—how to look at life from a
biblical perspective. The Bible addresses everything; it says something about
everything and we must learn how to utilize what the Scripture teaches.
We began last time in the
introduction with then fact that we are involved in warfare. Parents are
involved in warfare, and the warfare is for the thinking of each one of us and
what is going to control that. What we have to do as a parent—and really, any
believer has to think this way—is to develop a military frame of reference to
our life. We are constantly being propagandised by the enemy to think a certain
way. The issue is: What are we letting into the minds of our kids? We are
teaching them to erect a biblical viewpoint, a biblical frame of reference, a grid to analyse and think about everything. So we need to
think of everything that comes into the house as part of this propaganda that
Satan is putting out into the world.
2 Corinthians 10:3 NASB
“For though we walk in the flesh [physical body], we do not war according to
the flesh [sin nature],
What is the source of
power in the spiritual life? It is twofold: the filling of God the Holy Spirit
and the Word of God. These are the power sources of the spiritual life, along
with the ten stress-busters. The Word of God is absolute truth in every area
that it touches. It is designed to revolutionise out thinking according to
reality. Truth is just another way of talking about reality; reality, though,
as God created it and God defined it, not as we think it is on the basis of our
experience. So that means that we have to understand what God says about the
nature of everything in life.
When David came out
against Goliath he didn’t look at the situation militarily, he looked at it
theologically. How do we know that? Because of David’s
response. “For who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should
taunt the armies of the living God?” Why emphasize “uncircumcised”? The reason
Goliath is uncircumcised is because the Jews are circumcised. What did
circumcision mean? It means that they had a promise from God in the Abrahamic covenant to this piece of real estate. So David
was saying that Goliath had no legitimate basis in the plan of God to be out
there challenging
Paul says when we get involved
in battles as believers, what are we tearing down? We are tearing down speculations, lofty ideas,
and we are taking captive every thought to the obedience of Christ. So the
spiritual life is thinking. Romans 12:2 NASB “And do not be
conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind
[renovate our thinking], so that you may prove what the will of God is, that
which is good and acceptable and perfect.”
James 4:1 NASB “What
is the source of quarrels and conflicts among you? Is not the source your
pleasures that wage war in your members?” This begins in the Greek with the
interrogative adverb POTHEN [poqen]
which asks the question: What is the source? This is going to focus their
attention on why is there so many personal problems in
the congregation? This isn’t just dealing with then fact that there are power
plays going on in the congregation, people siding with one pastor or another
pastor or one Sunday school teacher against another; this involves even
marriages, conflicts in marriages.
These are two very colourful
words that James uses here—quarrels and conflicts. The first is POLEMOS [polemoj], the primary Greek word for warfare. He is using
this word in a figurative sense because what happens when people get crossways
and argumentative is that it erupts into full-blown warfare between two people,
and it happens in congregations. The word relates to being argumentative,
contentious, doing battle with one another. The second word is MACHE [maxh] and it refers to battles and by extension to
arguments, strife and disputes. These are very strong words because this is
exactly what happens. If you let problems between two people escalate before
long they are in court with their lawyers screaming at each other. This is what
happens in local congregations and it is just a tragedy to see how this
happens.
Sometimes it is important
for people to divide over certain things, especially doctrine. Jesus was
constantly throwing the hot potato of Bible doctrine at the Pharisees and He
caused a lot of antagonism and reaction, but it was truth that divides and
truth always will divide. This is different from what Paul is talking about in
Galatians 5:19ff where he gives the list of the deeds of the flesh: “Now the
deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality,
The sin nature is motivated
by a core of lust patterns that James is going to talk about in verse 2. The
lust patterns are going to trend in one of two directions. One direction is
toward asceticism and legalism. These are the people who define Christianity in
terms of dos and don’ts, you can’t do this, you can’t do that, you can’t dress
like this, you can’t go to that movie, if you do you are not really a
Christian. They confuse morality with spirituality. This is asceticism. I’m
going to give up certain things and that is going to impress God with how holy
I am. The other extreme which is just as bad is antinomianism. The word is
taken from two Greek words: ANTI=against; NOMOS=law. This is the idea that Christ has already paid
for all my sins and I have grace, they are already taken care of, so I can just
do whatever I want to. All the imperatives of Scripture don’t really mean that
because if God meant it that would be legalism.
In the late 19th
century there was a reaction to liberalism and there was the rise of what was
called prophecy conferences. Some of the major speakers were men such as Dwight
Moody, R.A. Torrey, Louis Sperry Chafer, C.I. Scofield, people like that. What happened was the people who believed the Bible separated from the
mainline denominations and started what became known as independent Bible
churches. They started Bible institutes like Moody Bible Institute and Biola and any number of others, and seminaries like Dallas
Theological Seminary. Then one of Chafer’s students, a man by the name of R.B. Thieme, Jr. came out of Dallas
Seminary and went down to pastor a church in Houston called Berachah
church. He began to really emphasize the importance of teaching which impacted
hundreds of thousands of people. They started having pastors’ conferences there
and it was the teaching of Pastor Thieme. This began
to have an impact on a number of pastors and churches. So they became known as
doctrinal churches.
In a missionary letter to
this church an “antinomian” question was raised about some churches which says that there are no commands for the Christian life: all
is grace and all is by faith, you don’t even have to confess your sins! The
premise is that if the Christian way of life is a grace way of life there can
be no commands, otherwise it isn’t grace. If the Christian attempts to keep any
commands in the New Testament he is no different from the Jews who tried to
keep the law. This teaching extends to every command, including those related
to the filling of the Holy Spirit and sanctification. In other words, there is
no command to keep with regard to adultery. Of course, if you are walking by
faith God won’t lead you into adultery but there is no prohibition against it
for the Christian living under grace. Furthermore, then there is the turn to
mysticism and the old analogical and allegorical approach to hermeneutics. For
example, Samson consorting with Delilah is a type of Christ bearing our sins on
the cross. The honey in the carcass of the lion killed by Samson represents the
church. Another: While all Scripture is inspired, not all Scripture is the Word
of God. Only the gospel is the Word of God, plus anything else that he (a
certain pastor) wants to lump into that category. He said that all of Proverbs
is human viewpoint and cannot be trusted to be true. It cannot be used for any spiritual
application, except for the last two chapters. He said that anything that came
before is the word of Solomon. He then proceeds to show how other wisdom
literature sounds so much like Proverbs that it must also be human viewpoint. (The
fact that Jesus quoted from Proverbs apparently doesn’t prove anything) He also
had some weird stuff about illumination from the Spirit. He said there is no learning
process, quote: “There is not a learning in the same
way as you learn anything else, it is a knowing brought about by God in our
souls. So when we got the gospel it was not something we figured out and then
said, ‘God, I’m going to hold you to it, you have to save me now because I
believe in Christ,’ no, He imparted the gospel to each and every one of us. You
didn’t learn the gospel through the Scriptures to be saved, it was imparted by
revelation.” This is pure mysticism.
We need to be aware of
this, not because it might touch some of us at one point or another but because
there are a number of people across the country now who are getting tapes from
that ministry and some of them have been more directly impacted by this, and
they need to hear and be warned of what is going on. Because of the fact that a
number of these congregations have been working together, having people in
their congregations going out on the mission field to Russia and Africa and South
East Asia people from these different congregations are trading tapes. So these
tapes are slowly moving their way through some of the doctrinal churches and
this is nothing but heresy.
So when you think about
the quarrels and conflicts that erupt in churches, some come from right
reasons. Doctrine divides; truth divides. Sometimes you have to take a stand.
But more often than not it comes from wrong reasons because it is motivated by
the lust pattern of the flesh.