Hebrews Lesson
190 March
18, 2010
NKJ Psalm 119:9 How can a young man cleanse his way? By taking heed
according to Your word.
Open your Bibles to Exodus 11. I'll just review a
little bit for you where we have been in our study in Hebrews. On this first
chart we look at 3 of the 5 instances that the writer of Hebrews focuses on in
relationship to Moses’ life, how Moses is an example of faith to these Jewish
believers in Jesus Christ (these early messianic Christians in Israel), in
Judah who are under pressure and are about to give up and tempted to give up
their belief that Jesus is the Messiah and fade back into Judaism. So the writer of Hebrews is writing to
warn them of the terrible consequences that that will have.
What hits me as I read Hebrews is that we tend to
think that fellowship is relational and based upon sin. If you sin, you’re out
of fellowship. If you are staying without sinning, then you stay in fellowship.
But in that book and in Hebrews, the key issue is doctrinal consistency; that
in 1 John if you don't have the right view of the person of the Lord Jesus
Christ (that He appeared in a flesh and was qualified in His humanity to go
across the cross), then you’re out of fellowship. Fellowship is the first
doctrinal, then it's related to sin. So the sin in 1 John that gets you out of
fellowship is heresy. It is bad theology; it is a bad Christology. In Hebrews
the issue is just giving up on the fact that Jesus is the Messiah. So it starts
with a doctrinal belief that’s at the very core, which is a little bit
different from the way most of us the think about fellowship most of time.
With these examples Moses is an example of one who
persevered. If you think about the time line here, he's 40 years old when the
second event takes place. He recognizes his destiny to follow, to be identified
with the Israelites and to reject all that had been provided for him as an
Egyptian. So he leaves Egypt. You have event #2 and event #3 are very close to
one another in terms of the timeline.
Then the next event comes 40 years after that which is
the event related the Passover.
NKJ Hebrews
11:27 By faith he forsook Egypt,
Love the resounding nature of the King James there. Literally
it’s just “by faith he left Egypt.”
not fearing
As I pointed out in the exegesis, that’s a causal
participle because he was not afraid of the wrath of the king.
the wrath of the king; for he
endured as seeing Him who is invisible.
When you read Exodus it looks like he is afraid of the
wrath of the pharaoh, but this is showing that he had already made a decision
to leave prior to the event where the pharaoh was threatening him.
The basis for that is that he endured as one who saw
or one who sees Him who is invisible. His focus is on God. God is the motivator
of his spiritual life; not the details of life, not what he’s going to get out
of things, but the person of God, His person and His plan for Israel.
Then he spends 40 years in Midian before God appears
to him on Mt. Horeb or on Mt. Sinai in the burning bush.
Then God commissions him to go back to be the
deliverer. He's 80 years old. He packs up his wife and children, and he heads
back to Egypt.
Hebrews 11:28 focuses on the next event:
NKJ Hebrews
11:28 By faith he kept the Passover
I think this is one of those figures of speech in the
Scripture where the Passover really stands for the entire set of the 10 plagues
that came upon Egypt. The Passover, the plague of the death of the firstborn is
the greatest and most intense of the 10 plagues. The 10 plagues as we saw the
last time builds to this final great dramatic demonstration of God's power over
the firstborn of Egypt and the deliverance that God has for Israel where He
redeems them through this substitutionary sacrifice.
Hebrews 11:28 says:
and the sprinkling of blood, lest he
(Which would be God the Father)
who destroyed the firstborn should
touch them.
He keeps the Passover because he is trusting in God. Faith
always has an object so he is trusting in the promise of God which God gave to
him in the first part of the 11th chapter of Exodus.
Last time we went through the 10 plagues or 10
judgments that God brought upon Egypt which completely wiped out and devastated
their whole military industrial complex. Their economy was wasted. God destroyed
Egyptian society. He wiped out their religious basis but nevertheless it
rebuilds because the arrogance of the human soul in rebellion against God is
such that he is going to refuse to bow the knee to the creator and he is going
to worship the creature instead. I pointed out last time as we looked at these
10 plagues that each one of these plagues is related to one of the deities (one
or more deities) in the pantheon of the Egyptians.
This chart I took out of the Bible Knowledge Commentary section on Exodus. That commentary was
written by John Hannah. This idea though is not unique to the Bible Knowledge Commentary. There are
numerous different commentators who have noted the parallels: why does God brings
these particular judgments? They are also, in a way, foreshadowing of the kind
of judgments in a much greater degree that will come during the tribulation
period. This becomes a watershed event in revelation in the history of Israel;
one that is referred to numerous times later in the Old Testament, and one that
is referred to numerous times by of the Lord in the gospels as well as in the
New Testament.
It is because the Exodus stands as a teaching event
for 2 key things. The first is
substitutionary redemption and that that is the Passover. When we think of
Passover, we should think of substitutionary redemption. A payment is
made.
It's interesting this last week; I was talking with
Igor about some different theological things especially in terms of translation
issues. I had met last week with an old friend of ministry Dr. Joe Wall who's
now the Director-Vice President for East West Ministries. His responsibility is
training and development of their staff. One of the books that they've been
trying to get into print to use with training pastors in the former Soviet
Union is a book written (the original title was Between Calvinism and Arminianism) by Gordon Olson. Gordon is
retired. I’m amazed he’s still alive he’s had so many heart problems over the
last ten years; it's just amazing. In fact he had a heart attack about a month
before that conference. That was in Philadelphia. I don’t know when it was,
2001 or 2000. Dan Ingram and I met down there and went to that conference. That
was the first time I had met Gordon although I hadn’t connected his name with
the manuscript. Somebody e-mailed me the manuscript of his book (big 400-page
book) where he really deals with a lot of issues related to the whole issue of
Calvinism versus Arminianism. He does a great job, a tremendous job in that
book. Then it was abridged a little bit, and it came out again as a paperback
called Getting the Gospel Right with
a foreword by Tim LeHaye. I thought it was kind of ironic because Tim LeHaye
tends to be a little lordship and Tim doesn’t like Calvinism. But he tends to
be lordship. I think it’s kind of an odd thing. But Dr. LeHaye wrote the
foreword to that book. It has been translated into Russian; but it hadn’t been
printed yet because he did not want to go to print until someone who understood
his theology who was a native Russian speaker could read it to double check it
to make sure that the translation was right.
Now y’all may not realize this but translation is not
easy. I always wondered about people who went out and took certain books and
translated them and they’d come back 5 years later and say, “We’ve got all
these books and all these things we translated into whatever the language is.” It's
hard. I mean the people doing the translating really have to have a firm grasp
of theology.
English has had at least 500 hundred years of
technical theological language development. Think about it. English was not a
well-spoken language in 1500. But
by 1620, it was firmly established. It happened because of the English Bible,
because of the translation of those early Bibles by Tindale and by Miles
Coverdale and the Geneva Bible that was translated into English. All that
culminated in of course that great work of English prose. And it really is. The
King James Bible – one day I’m going to do a study on this for everybody.
I've read 5 or 6 books on this in the last couple of years; and it is a remarkable
work of translation. Nobody spoke like that. They elevated. They didn't
translate the King James into the Koine of the day. But they elevated it into a
glorious masterpiece of literature that has so many different elements to it. But
it is written at the same time that Shakespeare's writing his plays. This is
the heyday of Victorian English when the English becomes established.
If you think about what happens during that period
with the Reformation still going on in the development and rise of Puritanism
and Puritan theology and all of the good senses and good things that brought to
the study the Scriptures and bringing the Scripture into the language of the
people that you have a development. All of this argumentation that’s going on
at a theological level; you have the foundation laid for a rich vocabulary in
English to accurately translate the Greek language into English. We have all of
these rich words have been developed.
We have the word atonement which is basically an
English invention based on the word at-one-ment which is where it came from. It
is coining a whole new word to represent the totality of what Christ did on the
cross. That word atonement which you find in any decent systematic theology is
going to have a number of chapters dealing with the nature of the atonement,
the extent of the atonement and dealing with a whole Old Testament teaching on
atonement. But in Russian there is only one word that’s used to translate
atonement, propitiation, redemption. All these different words, there is only
one word. There is a poverty in most languages when you try to translate over. They
don't have technical language there so if you're if you're reading a passage
that use the word redemption; in Russian it uses the same word it would use for
atonement or the same word it would use for cleansing or the same word it would
use for reconciliation or propitiation. And this gets very confusing.
So Igor and I were talking about some of the problems
related to that, and it looks like he's going to be able to work things out
with Gordon Olson to double check this theological work. You really have to be
adept in the target language and you have to have a good understanding of
theological nuance to do that kind of translating.
Otherwise, and we’ve run into this problem. I remember
ten years ago when we were in Kazakhstan we had a man who was translated for a number
of different the English-speaking pastors and professors who had come over to
speak for some other seminary. So Jim Myers had hired him to translate for us. This
guy was butchering what we were saying so much. But at the end of the second
day Jim called up his main translator in Kiev, Margaret, and flew Margaret to
Almaty to do the translation because this guy had never had anybody talk about
all these different kinds of words as I’m explaining to you, like propitiation,
redemption and expiation. He was just stumbling all over the place because he
had never had another English speaking teacher come in and talk about these
kinds of things which is kind of a sad commentary. But it shows the challenges
that we have with translation.
So when we get into talking about the Exodus event, the
picture here is just of that; it is substitutionary atonement. And it's such a
great rich picture with the death of the Passover lamb that it amazes me that
in the early church they had divorced themselves from the Jewish backgrounds in
the early second century after the Bar Kokhba Revolt in 135 the Gentile
Christians pretty much ostracized the Jewish Christians and they begin to
interpret the Old Testament and New Testament totally within a Greek sort of
background. They lost the meaning (the significance) of a lot of Old Testament
passages. It wasn't until the Reformation (and earlier than the Reformation)
almost a thousand years before certain things were recovered. When Anselm first
clearly articulated substitutionary atonement about 1000 AD that could've been
done 500, 600, 700 years earlier if they had just really understood the Old
Testament sacrificial system. But by divorcing themselves from the Jewish
backgrounds, which is part of an anti-Semitism that leaked in, they lost this
whole concept of substitutionary atonement.
The Passover represents substitutionary atonement and
the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which begins with the Day of Passover, is the
first day of the weeklong of the feast of Unleavened Bread speaks of separation,
which is exactly what is happening in the Passover event as God is separating
His people from Egypt. And it's a picture of the believer being separated from
the world and then the event where they go through the Red Sea and Moses parts
the Red Sea is identification with Moses in his faith. It is a picture, a
foreshadowing, of the baptism by the Holy Spirit as Paul points out in 1
Corinthians 10.
These events are really important because God gives us
these little snapshots to help us to understand these more abstract doctrines
that we get into in the New Testament referred to as substitutionary atonement,
referred to as the separation of the believer from the world, consecration. It’s
related to the whole doctrine of sanctification as well is the concept of the
baptism of the Holy Spirit.
So verse 28 focuses on Moses keeping the Passover. So
let's look at the description of this in Exodus 11 and 12.
NKJ Exodus 11:1 And the LORD said to Moses,
The first 3 verses focus on God giving initial
instructions to Moses. In the first verse, for the first time indicates the
limits on the plagues. Up to this point Moses doesn't know how many they're
going to be. They just keep coming, and he has no idea when they are going to
end and when the pharaoh will finally release the Israelites.
"I will bring yet one more plague on Pharaoh and on Egypt.
Afterward he will let you go from here. When he lets you go, he will surely drive you out of here altogether.
In other words, God gives a promise here that this is
it, and when this occurs pharaoh will finally completely tell you to leave. Then
He gives Moses instructions on what he should tell the people.
NKJ Exodus 11:2 "Speak now in the hearing of the people, and let
every man ask from his neighbor and every woman from her neighbor, articles of
silver and articles of gold."
For 430 years they've been slaves in Egypt. Now
they're getting their payday. They're not stealing the money. They're asking
for their Egyptian masters to give them whatever they have, and the people do
it. That's the thrust of verse 3.
NKJ Exodus 11:3 And the LORD gave the people favor in the sight of the
Egyptians.
The Egyptians were glad to do it, in other words. The
word there for favor indicates grace and the Egyptians were glad to do it and
the reason is because of Moses.
The next sentence says:
Moreover the man Moses was very great in the land of Egypt, in
the sight of Pharaoh's servants and in the sight of the people.
There is a motivation now not only to avoid further
judgments, but also because of Moses. And the Egyptians who had always hated
the Semites and had a strong anti-Semitic prejudice willingly give to the Jews
all that they have that is valuable.
NKJ Exodus 11:4 Then Moses said, "Thus says the LORD:
This is what he's going to say to the people and to
pharaoh.
'About midnight I will go out into
the midst of Egypt;
Now it doesn't say midnight tonight, midnight
tomorrow, or midnight next week; so there's a vagueness here to give pharaoh
time to I think about it as to how he will respond.
NKJ Exodus 11:5 'and all the firstborn in the land of Egypt shall die,
Now this is important because the eldest had the right
of primogeniture. He is the heir. He received the double portion of the inheritance.
He is the one who was to carry on the family name especially among the aristocracy
and among the royalty. It is the firstborn that got the greatest education. So
if the firstborn is wiped out, you're basically destroying the intellectual capital
of the next generation. You’re wiping out that generation that had received the
best education available in Egypt.
It's not only that but as the firstborn of pharaoh,
his son was considered to be divine as the pharaoh was considered to be divine
because he would then be the one to take the throne when the current pharaoh died
(when his father died). This is a direct attack by God on the whole concept of
the deity of the pharaoh.
from the firstborn of Pharaoh who
sits on his throne, even to the firstborn of the female servant who is behind the handmill, and all the
firstborn of the animals.
Now some of you who are tracking with me and remember
what we covered the last time are going to say. “Well, wait a minute. Wait a
minute. I thought all the animals were dead.”
And it sort of sounds that way and I wanted to go back
and address this. Last time when we look at the fifth plague the comment was
made in verse 6.
NKJ Exodus 9:6 So the LORD did this thing on the next day, and all
the livestock of Egypt died; but of the livestock of the children of Israel,
not one died.
Now if all the livestock of Egypt died (which is what
9:6 says), then how can the firstborn of the animals die in chapter 11? I
thought they all died back in chapter 9. It seem that way, doesn’t it? Then you
had the plague of hail, which had another problem. You have to look back at
chapter 9, verse 3.
Moses said:
NKJ Exodus 9:3 "behold, the hand of the LORD will be on your
cattle in the field, on the horses, on the donkeys, on the camels, on the oxen,
and on the sheep -- a very severe pestilence.
That key phrase is “in the field.” Those that were
sheltered in the barns (in the stables) were not affected; only those in the
field. This same phrase occurs in the seventh plague which is the plague of the
hail and says in verse 19 with the warning of the hail raining down in verse 18
says:
NKJ Exodus 9:19 "Therefore send now and gather your livestock and all that you have in the field, for
the hail shall come down on every man and every animal which is found in the
field and is not brought home; and they shall die." ' "
It appears that they had an opportunity to protect
some of their livestock by bringing it into the barns, bringing them into the
stables. But those that were left out in the pasture were the ones that
suffered judgment. They didn't wipe out all of their domestic stock in one
blow. But it did take out a large segment of them; but there's still a
tremendous amount left.
Now in verse 5 of chapter 11 the plague of the
firstborn is going to come on the humans as well as the animals. Verse 6 gives
the consequence of it.
NKJ Exodus 11:6 'Then there shall be a great cry throughout all the
land of Egypt, such as was not like it before,
In other words this is a one-of-a-kind of judgment.
nor shall be like it again.
Now that language is very similar to language that
Jesus uses in Matthew 24 to talk about the judgments at the last half of
tribulation period. Daniel used it
to refer to the judgments during the tribulation period. This foreshadows that.
It is the tribulation judgment worldwide and they are one of a kind.
So verse 8 goes on to say:
NKJ Exodus 11:8 "And all these your servants shall come down to
me and bow down to me, saying, 'Get out, and all the people who follow you!'
After that I will go out." Then he went out from Pharaoh in great anger.
In other words, Moses is saying that when this happens
all the servants of pharaoh will come to me, and they will they will beg us to
leave.
NKJ Exodus 11:9 But the LORD said to Moses, "Pharaoh will not
heed you, so that My wonders may be multiplied in the land of Egypt."
NKJ Exodus 11:10
So Moses and Aaron did all these
wonders before Pharaoh; and the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he did not
let the children of Israel go out of his land.
So the judgment is going to be enacted.
Now chapter 12 gives the escape clause for the
Israelites and that is the Passover. The Passover is that key event around
which I think all of the Old Testament acts because this Passover event is the
major picture of redemption and judgment in the Old Testament. Of course the
flood was in Genesis 6; but this is even more so and it is picked up as such in
the New Testament.
God begins a new calendar, verse 2.
NKJ Exodus 12:2 "This month shall
be your beginning of months; it shall
be the first month of the year to you.
So this is the month of Nisan in their religious
calendar. It’s the seventh month of the civil calendar. The Rosh Hashanah
occurs for us in our calendar around late September or early October. That
begins the civil calendar; but the religious calendar, the calendar related to
the observances related to the spiritual life of Israel begins in Nisan which
is roughly from the middle of March to the middle of April, that period in the
spring.
So the instructions are given. The first instruction
is that the congregation on the tenth of the month (very specific):
NKJ Exodus 12:3 "Speak to all the congregation of Israel, saying:
'On the tenth day of this month every
man shall take for himself a lamb, according to the house of his father, a lamb for a household.
The lamb is going to take care of the whole household.
That speaks to unlimited atonement that not everyone in the house may believe
or trust or understand what's going on with the Passover; but nevertheless that
one lamb would take care of everyone who was in the house. That’s unlimited
atonement. They would take a lamb and they would take it on the tenth day and
they were to examine the lamb for 4 days. It was not to be killed (sacrificed)
until the 14th.
NKJ Exodus 12:5 'Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male of the
first year.
Literally, a son of the first year; so it's about a
year old.
You may take it from the sheep or from the goats.
NKJ Exodus 12:6 'Now you shall keep it until the fourteenth day of the
same month. Then the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it
at twilight.
Or, “between the sunsets” is how it reads in the
Hebrew. There’s debate about exactly when that was to have taken place. But
these are all instructions for the initial observance of Passover. Things
change. I'm not sure really when some of the other elements came in, but this
has to do with the first (the very first) Passover. They would kill it probably
between the period of sunset and complete darkness. Then they would take the
blood from this lamb that was without spot or blemish; and they would put it on
the doorpost or the lintel of the houses where they eat it.
NKJ Exodus 12:7 'And they shall take some of the blood and put it on
the two doorposts and on the lintel of the houses where they eat it.
NKJ Exodus 12:8 'Then they shall eat the flesh on that night; roasted
in fire, with unleavened bread and with
bitter herbs they shall eat it.
The lamb foreshadows the work of the Lord Jesus Christ,
as Paul indicates in 1 Corinthians 5:7.
NKJ 1
Corinthians 5:7 Therefore
purge out the old leaven,
….uses all the symbolism here in applying this to the
life of the church there at Corinth.
that you may be a new lump, since you
truly are unleavened.
So it's a picture of the unleavened bread. So here's
the point.
For indeed Christ, our Passover, was
sacrificed for us
That’s his point. Jesus Christ is clearly identified
as our Passover, as the Passover Lamb. This is what John referred to ( John the
Baptist) in John 1:29 when he saw Jesus coming toward him.
NKJ John 1:29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him, and
said, "Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!
So when an Israelite would hear this, they're thinking
of that sacrificial lamb, their thinking of the Passover lamb and there's an
identification made in the New Testament that that lamb (that Passover lamb)
that was the spot or blemish was to depict the Lord Jesus Christ.
Peters says the same thing in 1 Peter 1:18-19. It
begins with a causal participle because:
NKJ 1 Peter 1:18
knowing that you were not redeemed
with corruptible things, like silver
or gold, from your aimless conduct received
by tradition from your fathers,
NKJ 1 Peter 1:19
but with the precious blood of
Christ,
Remember that phrase “blood of Christ” indicates His
death.
as of a lamb without blemish and
without spot.
The New Testament makes a direct claim that Jesus
Christ is the fulfillment of the picture from the Old Testament that that
Passover lamb was for portraying something about the person and the work of the
Lord Jesus Christ. The fact that it was without spot or blemish indicated the
impeccability or sinlessness of the Lord Jesus Christ (or the Messiah) that He
would be without sin.
The reason that the lamb is kept from the 10th
to the 14th is to examine it (to evaluate, to make sure) that it is
without spot or blemish. It was a time of examination and investigation.
Jesus entered into Jerusalem on the 10th
day of Nisan in 33AD. This is what we call Palm Sunday, although I don't think
it was on Sunday. He enters into Jerusalem on that day and then He is examined
until the Day of Preparation, which is when He is sacrificed. The Day of
Preparation would actually technically be the 13th because Passover
by the time of the life of Christ in Judea; the day began at dusk. So from dusk
to dusk you have you have your daytime.
John said Jesus died on the Day of Preparation. So the
14th begins at nightfall on Wednesday and Jesus is sacrificed on the
cross that afternoon on the Day of Preparation between 12 noon and 3 pm.
He is evaluated. When you read through the Gospel
accounts, between the period of His entry into Jerusalem until He is taken
(arrested) at the Last Supper, there is a time when He is constantly being
questioned and interrogated by the Pharisees, by the Sadducees, by the
Herodians. This is the examination of the Passover Lamb from God. He is being
evaluated to see if He in all that testing passes all that testing and
temptation that occurs demonstrating that He is qualified to go to the cross.
And He is the lamb. The lamb as I've said many times in our Revelation series
is used some 27 times as the favorite title that John uses of Jesus in
Revelation.
Revelation 13:8 is one of those passages.
NKJ Revelation
13:8 All who dwell on the earth will
worship him, whose names have not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb
slain from the foundation of the world.
…indicating that the plan of God was from the
beginning of creation to offer the Second Person of the Trinity as the
substitute for mankind. There is this evaluation period between the tenth in
the fourteenth.
Then there is specific description given about the
sacrifice. He is to be killed. The carcass is then to be roasted. They are to
take some of the blood and put it on the doorposts and on the lintel. The
lintel is the crosspiece at the top of the door. So if you have blood on each
doorpost and blood on the top and then you connect the dots, you have a cross. That
is the foreshadowing of the cross and the death of Christ.
NKJ Exodus 12:8 'Then they shall eat the flesh on that night; roasted
in fire, with unleavened bread and with
bitter herbs they shall eat it.
Eating is a picture of fellowship. It is also a
picture of accepting something into yourself. You are receiving it into
yourself and so it becomes a picture of faith. Anyone can eat; anyone can
believe. Eating is taking something and making it a part of yourself. Trusting
in Christ is depicted by eating. It is the same picture we have in the Lord
Table. When we eat the bread, drink the cup that is a depiction of faith that
we have accepted Christ; we were receiving Him into our life. So to eat the
flesh on that night with the unleavened bread … The bread (we learned from
later revelation) depicts the humanity of Christ. It is unleavened because
leaven depicts sin. So the bread is to be unleavened. There's no sin there
because the bread pictures Jesus Christ as the bread of life. They are to eat
it with bitter herbs. The bitter herbs depict the bitterness of the slavery
that they have had under Egyptian bondage. So the bitter herbs depict sin and
the solution to the sin is of course the substitutionary sacrifice of the Lord
Jesus Christ.
NKJ Exodus 12:9 'Do not eat it raw, nor boiled at all with water, but
roasted in fire -- its head with its legs and its entrails.
Why? Because it is judgment. There is a particular
kind of death that the Savior had to go through. He could not have died from
being hit over the head. He could not have died from just any kind of death. He
couldn't have just said, “Okay, I’m going to die for the sins of the world,”
and had a cardiac arrest. He had to die a violent penal death because it is
depicting the fact that He is the one being judged for our sins.
NKJ Exodus 12:10
'You shall let none of it remain
until morning, and what remains of it until morning you shall burn with fire.
Then they were instructed that after they ate it, they
would stand up eating that the first time because they were ready to leave. God
was going to release them from their bondage, and they were eating in
haste.
Later one of the questions in the Jewish Passover is
why did they eat standing up and we eat lying down. It is because the first
time they were being delivered from slavery, and now they can eat lying down
resting because they're resting in what God has already done. It’s a great
picture of the faith rest life of the believer that because Christ has done it
all. We have a sufficient Savior, a sufficient salvation, a sufficient Savior
and a sufficient Scripture we can rest in the provision of God.
Now that doesn't mean that life is always going to be
easy. It doesn’t mean that at all. God didn’t promise us a life without
adversity, but He promised us the resources to handle the adversity and to live
in and with the adversity without letting the adversity overwhelm us in
discouragement, depression, sadness and failure. That's one of the things that
people always have trouble with.
NKJ 1
Corinthians 10:13 No temptation
has overtaken you except such as is common to man; but God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted beyond what you
are able, but with the temptation will also make the way of escape,
Most people never hear the rest of the verse.
“Good! God’s going to get me out of this and things
are going to change and life is going to be good. I’m going to get to escape
it.”
No the way to escape:
that you may be able to bear it.
What? That means you're going to stay in and under the
pressure. God’s not going to take it away. I was talking to a pastor earlier
today. He said, “That is the biggest trouble,” (and mentioned somebody I knew)
“that they have. What they hear no matter how much you tell them differently,
all they hear is that somehow God is going to change their circumstances.”
That verse doesn’t say God is going to change their
circumstances. It's going to change your mental attitude. When you're focused
on Christ, your mental attitude changes so you can handle the circumstances. But
God is not going to change your circumstances just because it's tough. It is
tough and that's what you have to learn to handle to grow and mature as a
believer.
They're ready to leave. They have dressed. They’ve
packed. They're ready to go.
NKJ Exodus 12:12
'For I will pass through the land of
Egypt on that night, and will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt,
both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment:
I am the LORD.
God strikes the firstborn: 2 years old, 7 years old,
14 years old, 25 years old. And the liberals have a terrible time with
this.
“How can you worship this God that kills babies and
kills children and kills teenagers just because they're firstborn?”
What they don't realize is number one every Egyptian
was told what the escape clause was that all you have to do is take the lamb
that is without spot or blemish, sacrifice it and put the blood on your
doorpost and the firstborn will not die. But they refused to accept God's
provision of deliverance for the 10th judgment.
The second thing they failed to note is that they blow
up this a false idea of love. They then impose that on God. It is such
arrogance. It's like you go out in your backyard have this little ant in the
ant bed and starts shaking his fist at you and say, “You know, you just don't
do anything right. I’m going to tell you how to do everything and how to take
care of this yard.” And that's exactly what it's like when you have of these
liberal theologians come along and say, “How can this be a loving God?” They
always focus on the person who is being punished. They never focus on the crime
itself and the fact that because God is righteous and just and love He must
execute justice among sinful rebellious creatures. And He gives them grace upon
grace upon grace upon grace, opportunity after opportunity to turn to God’s
solution. He not only tells them there's going to be judgment, but He gives
them a way out, every time. But they reject that. So now God is the one who's
going to bring the judgment upon them.
As we will continue to go through chapter 12, God says
in verse 13:
NKJ Exodus 12:13
'Now the blood shall be a sign for
you on the houses where you are. And
when I see the blood, I will pass over you; and the plague shall not be on you
to destroy you when I strike the land
of Egypt.
What happened this night was that there were thousands
of firstborn in the houses in Egypt that died; but none, not one in the house
of Israel. That’s the Doctrine of Separation and separation is based on
obedience to God's revelation.
NKJ Exodus 12:14
'So this day shall be to you a
memorial;
That’s the same language that we have with the Lord
Table. It is a memorial, something to remember.
and you shall keep it as a feast to
the LORD throughout your generations. You shall keep it as a feast by an
everlasting ordinance.
NKJ Exodus 12:15
'Seven days you shall eat unleavened
bread.
So the Passover is the first day of that week observance
of unleavened bread. That first day which is the day of Passover:
On the first day you shall remove
leaven from your houses. For whoever eats leavened bread from the first day
until the seventh day, that person shall be cut off from Israel.
It is not capital punishment, but they are kicked out.
They lose their citizenship. They are removed from the congregation because of
their disobedience to God. God obviously took that to be very important. Why? Because
it is depicting something about the Person of the Savior. You can't mess around
with what God has said in God’s description of these events.
NKJ Exodus 12:16
'On the first day there shall be a holy convocation, and
on the seventh day there shall be a holy convocation for you. No manner of work
shall be done on them; but that which
everyone must eat -- that only may be prepared by you.
NKJ Exodus 12:17
'So you shall observe the Feast of Unleavened Bread, for on
this same day I will have brought your armies out of the land of Egypt.
Therefore you shall observe this day throughout your generations as an
everlasting ordinance.
He goes on to describe some of the basics. Moses then
repeats the instructions for applying the blood.
NKJ Exodus 12:22
"And you shall take a bunch of
hyssop, dip it in the blood that is in the basin, and strike the lintel
and the two doorposts with the blood that is
in the basin. And none of you shall go out of the door of his house until
morning.
Hyssop is always used in a context of purification,
the context of purification of cleansing. So they take the hyssop, dip it in
blood and put it on the lintel.
Then we get into the results of the plague in verses
29 and 30.
NKJ Exodus 12:30
So Pharaoh rose in the night, he,
all his servants, and all the Egyptians; and there was a great cry in Egypt,
for there was not a house where there was not one dead.
It shows in Egypt there was virtually 100%
disobedience even after 9 judgments. They still don't get it that it's going to
happen that when Moses said, “Thus saith the Lord,” God was going to bring it
about. That shows the hardness of the unbeliever, the hardness of the person
who is set against God. It's not about reason. This has got to be one of the
most irrational things that you can think of. But it has nothing to do with
reason. How in the world we think can someone who has witnessed the previous 9
plagues, and they hear what's going to happen, refuse to believe it's going to
happen? It's because they're rejecting God. It's not because they are stupid. It's
that they have made a prior decision to reject God and a biblical view of
reality. So we see that around us all the time. People again and again -
friends, family members - just don't have anything to do with Christianity, and
they reject it completely from the foundation all the way up. They don't want
to have anything to do at all with Christianity, and they never will.
But our job as believers is to constantly be kind,
constantly be giving them the gospel, looking for opportunities. We don't want
to absolutely drive them away by pestering them with the gospel, but looking
for and praying for those God-given opportunities we have, that God can create
certain situations that will make them teachable or give them an opportunity to
listen again.
Now when we get little further down into chapter 12,
we have the various regulations related to the Passover.
NKJ Exodus 12:43
And the LORD said to Moses and Aaron,
"This is the ordinance of the
Passover: No foreigner shall eat it.
It's not for Gentiles. It is only for Israel because
this is a picture of what He is doing for the nation as a whole in redeeming
them; the payment price to free them from bondage to Egypt, which is a picture
of our bondage to sin.
NKJ Exodus 12:44
"But every man's servant who is
bought for money, when you have circumcised him, then he may eat it.
In other words circumcision is a picture of being
loyal and identifying with the Abrahamic Covenant. That was the sign of the
Abraham Covenant. The Sabbath is a sign of the Mosaic Covenant. So it only
applied to a servant if that servant identifying himself with Israel and with
the Abrahamic Covenant. In contrast a sojourner (this would be someone who was
just traveling through Goshen or someone who just temporarily staying with
them):
NKJ Exodus 12:45
"A sojourner and a hired
servant shall not eat it.
…because they they're not identified with the
Abrahamic Covenant.
NKJ Exodus 12:46
"In one house it shall be
eaten; you shall not carry any of the flesh outside the house, nor shall you
break one of its bones.
So it’s to be eaten in the house with the family. Each
household had his own lamb. You couldn't transfer it. You can’t transfer your
faith to somebody else in the house. No lamb was to be broken because no bone
was going to be broken when Jesus was on the cross. That is the depiction
there.
NKJ Exodus 12:47
"All the congregation of Israel
shall keep it.
NKJ Exodus 12:48
"And when a stranger dwells
with you and wants to keep the
Passover to the LORD, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come
near and keep it; and he shall be as a native of the land. For no uncircumcised
person shall eat it.
This is how a Gentile would become identified with Israel
and become part of Israel. They would be a proselyte and enter into the
heritage of Abraham. There are several Gentiles such as Rahab and Ruth who
entered into Israel. Rahab was a Canaanite who entered at Jericho. Ruth was a
Moabitess. They are both in the lineage of the Lord Jesus Christ.
NKJ Exodus 12:49
"One law shall be for the
native-born and for the stranger who dwells among you."
So you have two different rules or regulations there.
Verse 50 summarizes it:
NKJ Exodus 12:50
Thus all the children of Israel did;
as the LORD commanded Moses and Aaron, so they did.
NKJ Exodus 12:51
And it came to pass, on that very
same day, that the LORD brought the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt
according to their armies.
So that brings us to the next verse, which is going to
emphasize the escape from Egypt, the deliverance itself as Moses parts the Red
Sea. Next time we will take a look at the issues related to their departure,
the Red Sea, their advance to Mount Sinai and the role that the parting of the
Red Sea plays in terms of being a picture of baptism according to 1 Corinthians
10:1-3.
Let’s bow our heads in closing prayer.