Freedom, Liberty, Political
vs. Spiritual Solution; Gal. 5:13
Galatians 5:13 NASB “For you were called to freedom,
brethren; only {do} not {turn} your freedom into an opportunity for the flesh,
but through love serve one another.”
Paul connects two crucial
concepts in this passage in a unique way. These concepts are freedom and love. True
love is a mental attitude, it is not an emotion. There is an emotional love but
that is not what the Scriptures are talking about and we ought not to base any
decisions we make in life upon emotion.
- The biblical concept of love, especially that
which is reflected by the Greek word agape
[a)gaph] is a mental attitude love. That means it is
essentially volitional, not emotional. Its focus is on what is best for
its object. That means we have to clearly define what the object of love
is.
- Liberally, whether we are talking about religious
liberalism of political liberalism,—at their core they buy into basic
assumptions about the nature of reality that are antithetical and
antagonistic to biblical Christianity— at their basic core they put their
focus on the wrong object. They put the focus on the national enemy, not
their neighbour, not their fellow countryman, not their children, not
their grandchildren. All of a sudden we get into a war, as in Vietnam, and
the political liberal begins to wail about the victims and how terrible it
is to kill the enemy, how we should go easy on them, and all of these nonsensical
things, forgetting the fact that we are protecting the freedoms of their
neighbours, their children and grandchildren, and future generations. They
shift the object of their love to the wrong object. The same thing happens
in criminality. Rather than putting their focus on love for the victim of
crime they put their focus and their pseudo love on the criminals
themselves. What they are basically saying is that man is perfectible,
that he is basically good, and they have rejected the Scriptural notion of
the total depravity of man, that we are all born sinners and inherently
evil.
- True love in a national context promotes justice
for the criminal, protects the victim of crime, defends the freedom of the
citizenry from incursions by government or foreign powers, and promotes personal
responsibility. It is always the tendency of government to seek to become
autonomous and to pull all of the power to itself and to overrun the
citizenry. True love defends freedom and promotes personal responsibility.
- The greatest freedom that we have in the USA is the right to bear arms, to own firearms, and
to possess forearms without government regulation or intrusion. The right
to bear arms is a fundamental principle of freedom. The Scripture
recognises this from a very early stage in the Old Testament but the
liberal and the person operating on a human viewpoint mindset rejects that
kind of thinking out of hand.
- Historically, arms control is designed to limit
freedom and to promote the tyranny of government. This goes all the way
back to what happened in 1 Samuel 13:19 NASB “Now no blacksmith could be found in all the land of Israel, for the Philistines said, ‘Otherwise
the Hebrews will make swords or spears’.”
- True freedom must be understood in terms of its
original root issue as defined in Scripture. That goes back to the concept
of spiritual freedom. The opposite of freedom is bondage. Man lost freedom
in the garden when he made a bad decision. That brings volition to the
forefront. Adam and his wife acquired a sin nature and were now in bondage
to that sin nature. That means they had no choice but to commit sin. Everything
they did flowed from the sin nature. All temporal bondage has its roots in
the fall of Adam. The more we get away from the spiritual solution the
more human society caves in to various forms of tyranny.
- In the garden of Eden
sin destroyed freedom. It began by destroying life. Adam had perfect and
unlimited freedom in the garden, he was going to live forever, he had
access to the tree of life and he was never going to die. Obviously the
first consequence of loss of freedom is to lose the ability to live
forever. Secondly, it created a cursed environment. Third, the problem is
primarily a spiritual problem, therefore the
solution must begin with a spiritual solution. If there is no spiritual
solution the political solution will never work. If there is no capacity
for freedom and an understanding of true responsibility then any attempt
to provide freedom will fall apart eventually. The further we get away
from biblical thinking the further we get away from thinking accurately. Spiritual
growth provides the capacity for freedom and once that is lost we begin to
see the freedoms erode in a culture and society. When the sin nature is
allowed to reign uncontrolled its slavery increases. It starts from the
sin nature but then when there is the aggregate of unrestrained sin natures,
especially among government officials and politicians and their
legislative agendas, it destroys the freedom of individual citizens. That
is why absolutes and values are integrated to develop any freedom within a
nation. If we do not have an understanding of absolutes and are operating
on moral absolutes we have already undercut the foundation of freedom in a
society. Bondage to sin destroys capacity for life, for happiness, and to
appreciate freedom. So the more the sin nature goes unrestrained in
society the more the capacity for life and happiness is destroyed and
people lose the whole concept of personal responsibility and
accountability. They are out for themselves and not for anyone else and this
goes right back to the angelic conflict. Unrestrained carnality is the
height of irresponsibility, and responsibility is the foundation for
freedom.
- The exodus event is the paradigm for
understanding political freedom. Before the Jews were freed politically from
Egypt they had to go through a spiritual event which
is exemplified in the entire Passover meal. That is why the Passover comes
before the exodus. But the people of the exodus generation rejected the
provision of God and were constantly fighting against God and did not
submit in humility to the authority of God, so they had no capacity to
appreciate their new freedom. They constantly wanted to go back to the
bondage of Egypt and submit to the slavery of Egypt. They couldn’t handle freedom. They wanted the
security of slavery rather than the uncertainty of freedom, because in
true freedom they might make the wrong decision and might have to suffer
the consequences. When we don’t want to suffer the consequences then we
just want somebody else to take care of us. That will destroy life and the
soul of the nation. When there is no capacity fro freedom you will
exchange freedom for security and personal responsibility for bondage; you
want somebody else to make all the decisions for you and to solve all the
problems for you and you don’t want to go forward in success. The more you
limit the ability to fail—degree of failure, the consequences of failure—the
more you will limit the opportunities for success. The problem is sin and
that man is inherently evil, and the only solution is the redemption
solution at the cross. But at the very core of liberalism is the idea that
man is inherently good and that society is basically perfectible. That is
divorcement from reality and from there on there is going to be a conflict.
That is why the more our society drifts away from the biblical stands and
principles of establishment absolutes and it becomes more steeped in moral
relativism, and we don’t hold everyone, whoever they are, accountable to
the same law then we have slipped into pure moral relativism. The more
society drifts apart in these two directions—believers with absolutes on
the one hand and unbelievers and carnal believers and moral relativism on
the other hand—the more society is polarised and the closer we come to an
implosion in the culture and we see the effects of divine discipline and
the complete loss of freedom and tyranny.
- a) Total depravity must be restrained in the
populace and in the leadership of a nation. Every person is totally
depraved. That does not mean that every person is as bad as they could be,
it means that in the totality of their makeup every aspect of their being is
equally affected by Adam’s original sin. This restraint is done through
law. b) Freedom is earned and preserved through moral courage. If you do
not have the courage to fight for your freedoms then you do not deserve to
have those freedoms. c) Freedoms are based on absolutes and absolutes
ultimately are based on doctrine in the soul. That means that is there is
no doctrine in the soul you lose your understanding of absolutes and once
you do that it destroys freedom. Remember, Bible doctrine defines reality.
Rationalism and empiricism are inadequate to ultimately define reality. d)
The loss of biblical absolutes destroy values and
virtue. And remember, true love is virtue dependent. If there is no virtue
in the soul then love is worthless. e) Virtue and values provide capacity
for freedom. When you lose virtue and value freedom is destroyed. f) The
only solution to the problem is a spiritual solution. It is not through
crusader arrogance, going out and trying to whitewash the devil’s world
through political solutions, marches, and all the other things that go
along with that; it is through people being converted through the
proclamation of the gospel and then believers advancing to spiritual
maturity. The only solution that lasts is the spiritual solution because
the spiritual solution alone provides the capacity for understanding
freedom and personal responsibility, which are necessary for the
foundation of freedom. g) We live on the brink of national destruction
because we have drifted off course as a nation from our doctrinal roots.