The Messianic Dispensation
"Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your
own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him, and He will direct your
paths," Proverbs 3:5-6. "They that wait on the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall
mount up with wings as eagles, they shall run and not grow weary, they shall walk and not faint," Isaiah
40:31. "Fear thou not, for I am with
thee; be not dismayed, for I am thy God; I will strengthen thee; yea, I will
help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness," Isaiah 41:10. "Be anxious for nothing, but in
everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be
made known unto God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all comprehension,
shall defend your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus," Philippians
4:6-7. "Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee
because he trusteth in thee," Isaiah 26:3.
"The grass withers, the
flower fades, But the word of our God stands forever," Hebrews
4:12.
Before we get started
we'll have a few moments of silent prayers so we can make sure that we are in
fellowship and ready to study the Word, walking by the Spirit, walking in the
light, as the Scripture says; and as a result we will be able to go forward in
our spiritual life. So after a few moments of silent prayer I will pray. Just
before we pray, two things we need to be prayerful for: one is that I got some
news yesterday about George Meisinger that wasn't
good. George had to go to the hospital last night, so really be in prayer for
George and his family; and also, we need to be in prayer for Jim Birney. A
prayer request went out today that he has gangrene in one of his legs. The
doctor said just send him home and called hospice, so we need to be in prayer
for Jim and Nerice at this time. So please keep them
you your prayers. Let's go to the Lord in prayer.
Father, we come to You this evening very grateful that we have You to rely on.
That in prayer we can come before Your Throne of Grace and we can bring these requests
and petitions; and Father, we know that You hear us.
Father, we especially remember Jim and Nerice Birney.
We pray for them at this time. We pray for strength for both of them. We pray
that you might encourage them during this time from Your Word and be a true
comfort to them through the comfort which you comfort them they will be able to
comfort others. Father, we also pray for George Meisinger,
for his wife Sandy, for the doctors who are treating him; that You would give
them wisdom and Father, we continue to pray that he would be responsive to the
treatment; but if not, we pray that he will honor and glorify You during this
time of testing and time of illness. Father, we continue to pray for Chafer
Seminary. We also pray for Camp Areté
for some of the challenges they are facing as they pull things together during
the last month before camp begins. We pray that you will provide for their
needs. We are so thankful for the leadership that you have given them. Now Father, we pray for us as we focus on Your Word this
evening; that we might be strengthened and encouraged by it. And that we come
to understand Your plan, it gives us a better handle
on what You have revealed to us in Your Word that we may understand it and
interpret it correctly. We pray this in Christ's Name, Amen.
We are covering
dispensations:
God's Plan for the Ages. God has a plan and a purpose that He is working
out through the ages. As we look at God's plan for the ages we talked about
dispensation, defining it as an administration of God in human history; that in
successive periods of time God administers human history according to different
rules. Now when we think about a definition for dispensation, it focuses on this
concept of administration because the English word dispensation, as we studied,
translates the Greek word group based on OIKONOMOS, house law or OIKONOMIA, these words focus on the idea of
administering or being a good steward, responsibility. These are at the very
essence of what a dispensation is. Dispensationalism really isn't focused on
how many dispensations there are. But as we look at dispensations we realize
that there are ways to discern that God works through human history in
different ways. Obviously, the most clear distinction
is between the time before the cross and the time after the cross. So, if we
look at the period before the cross, we know that it looks forward to
salvation. There were promises and prophesies related to the coming of a Messiah
referred to by the term "the Seed of the woman" in Genesis 3:15; and
that term "the Seed" is a key term to watch as you move through the
Old Testament.
So we know there are
at least two broad distinctions; the period before the
cross, the period after the cross. When we look at the period before the cross
we see that it can also be divided into two broad periods. Two broad ways in
which God administered history:
1. After the giving
of the Mosaic Law at Mt. Sinai. He is now administering human history via a
steward, the Jewish people, and the standard is the Mosaic Law. Prior to Sinai
things were different. But when we look at the period prior to Sinai, we see
that there are a couple of distinctive events that take place.
a. First of all we have
the fall of man that occurs when Adam sins. So we have a clear distinction
between the period before the fall and the period after the fall. There is new
revelation given immediately after the fall in Genesis 3. And what we have seen
is that each of these shifts takes place when God gives some new revelation.
Not all new revelation is related to this. It is
revelation that is related to His administration of history. How He is
governing human history. So we clearly have the period before the fall and the
period after the fall.
b. We have the
period before the period before the giving of the Mosaic Law and after the
period of the Mosaic Law. But if we look at that period for the fall to the
Mosaic Law we also see that there is another major event that happens that
distinguishes how God administers history and that is the Noahic Flood. This
worldwide Flood that wipes out all of the human race except for eight people,
and if you work out the details on the populations, recognizing that people
lived to be 850-950 years of age. You would have had ten to fourteen
generations living concurrently rather than three or four. You would have a
world population at the time of the Noahic Flood of around three to five
billion people. So it is a very populated earth. Just imagine how many people
would be on the earth today if everybody that had been born since AD 1000 were still alive. It would be a
very crowded planet. So it was a very crowded planet, 2-5 billion people, and
God destroyed everyone except for Noah and his family, eight people survived.
c. There is another
event that obviously occurs between the Flood and the giving of the Law and
that is the event that takes place when God calls out Abraham and He shifts
from working through the entire human race to just working through Abraham and
his descendants, so when we look at this, and of course that is marked by the
giving of a new covenant. So what we see is a period in perfection in the
Garden that changes with sin and there is new revelation.
d. Then there is
another event that occurs at the Flood and then there is new revelation in the
Noahic covenant.
e. Then there is
another event that occurs when God calls Abraham and there is a new covenant
given. And then there is a new covenant given at Mt. Sinai, so each of these
indicates that God is changing things.
And so as in the
history of dispensationalism, as theologians began to work with this they
observed these distinctions and sort of different fathers you might say of
dispensationalism had different ways in which they set up these periods and
most people don't look at things like this, so I thought I would put this
little chart together. It actually comes out of Dr. Charles Ryrie's book on Dispensationalism.
We see four key individuals, theologians, Pierre Poiret,
whose dates are 1646 to 1719, so he primarily flourishes during the late 1600s,
the late 17th century. We have Isaac Watts, the noted hymnist, who wrote many,
many hymns including When I Survey the Wondrous Cross. We have James Hall Brooks, who is
a Presbyterian pastor in Saint Louis. He is influential on the last person on
the board, Cyrus Ingersom Scofield.
So we have these
four individuals and I just wanted to point out how they broke history down:
Poiret said that you have a period from the Creation to the
Deluge. So he doesn't see an obvious distinction we would all see in terms of
the fall. Then from the Deluge to Moses, The Flood, he doesn't break it with
Abraham; Moses to the Prophets, which is interesting; from the Prophets to
Christ, and then he just referred to the present period as Manhood and Old Age;
and then a future dispensation of the end times or millennial kingdom as the
renovation of all things. He doesn't have a clear set definition of what makes
a dispensation a dispensation. This is one of the earliest schemes for breaking
things down.
Isaac Watts came
along and he recognized a clear distinction that occurs at the fall called the
period before the fall, Innocency, the period after
the Adamical dispensation because Adam's obviously
the beginner, the founder, the father of that dispensation. Then he broke the
next dispensation down at Noah. So he is similar to the way we are breaking
things down. He sees the Abrahamic dispensation and then the Mosaical dispensation up to the cross and everything after
that is just the Christian dispensation. He was pre-millennial. He is just not
distinguishing that as a distinct dispensation.
Now there is
somebody I left out in the middle because I did not have room to put it all on
the slide, and that is John Nelson Darby. Darby is the founder, as it were, the first person to really systematize
dispensationalism. His dates are roughly early 1800s to about 1870s and he is
of Irish descent. He comes to England, gets educated, goes back as a lawyer,
and enters into the Anglican ministry. He is very disenchanted with the liberal
Anglican Church and goes through a bit of a crisis where he has got an injury.
He was laid up and he read through the Bible many times. As a result of that,
he came to his understanding that there are these distinctions in history. And
also, he came to a biblical understanding of the pre-tribulation rapture.
Then we have James
Hall Brooks, an American Presbyterian, and he sees a breakdown at Eden during
what Scofield will call Innocence; then a breakdown
in the antediluvian period, which we usually call Conscience now. He sees the
whole period from Noah to Moses just as the Patriarchal period. He doesn't see
a break with Abraham. Then he had the Mosaic period up to the coming of Christ.
Then the period from the time of Christ to the present he really divides into
two sections: A messianic age and the age of the Holy Spirit. Now the reason I
bring that in is because what I want to teach tonight is something that is not
standard for dispensationalism. The question is: isn't there something unique
and distinct about the time when Christ is on the earth, the period of the
Incarnation, the period when Jesus comes to offer the Kingdom as the Messiah?
And James Hall Brooks clearly saw there is a distinction in that period of
time. There is something that is different about those three plus years of
Jesus' ministry on the earth that is different from all the other
dispensations. So we want to ask the question: is it legitimate to establish
that as a separate dispensation?
Scofield has how seven dispensations. He doesn't identify the
tribulation in there at all—seven dispensations. Every now and then I
joke and make jokes about dispensations and the numbers seven and they always
fall flat. Ya'll don't know anything about dispensationalism. You've got seven
days of creation; you've got seven dispensations, you've got seven of this and
seven of that, everything is sevens or threes. They always look for these kinds
of patterns, so that is just something that they do. They are just sort of
locked into this number of seven dispensations. But even the Dallas Theological
Seminary Doctrinal Statement only recognizes or identifies three distinct
dispensations from Ephesians: the age before the cross, the age after the
cross, and the future age of he millennial kingdom. They are not being
definitive because dispensationalism is not determined by how many
dispensations there are. But I think that Scofield
really did focus on a criterion. Whey did we say that a certain period is
distinctively identified by an administration? What are those characteristics
that set that apart so that we can say this is a distinct administration of God
in human history?
So we want to look
at that a little bit tonight. We have talked about the period of the Mosaic Law
as a dispensation, and then we talked about the covenants that were given
during that period that will not fulfilled until the Lord returns to establish
His kingdom. Now there are some questions I have left hanging that came in on
the New covenant because we will definitely be revisiting that when we get to
the time of the millennial kingdom and the characteristics of the millennial kingdom.
I think that they are best answered when we look at the characteristics of the
millennial kingdom. So I am putting that off until we cover the next couple of
dispensations. So we have the end of the Law but when does the Law end
according to Romans? Christ is the end of the Law. Is this at the cross or is
this at the incarnation?
One of the things we
have to remember in defining a dispensation is that when a new administration
of God begins, there are some things that are dominant before that continues,
and there are some things that change. Some things stay the same, but something
new is added, and it is the fact that something new gets added that is really
the significant thing. I have wrestled with this for years going back and forth
on understanding this. A couple of weeks ago I was sitting down for probably
the 20th time reading through Dr. Ryrie's book on Dispensationalism and what really struck
me is the point that he makes that what happens when there is an administrative
shift is that some things are the same, some things continue, but the critical
thing is some things new are added.
So the real question
it seems to me is that when we come to the life of Christ, is there something
new added, something new that is expected? What we see here are the basic
criteria that Scofield set up for determining when a
dispensation shifts.
1. The first thing
is really a person. Every section has a certain Scripture that it covers. There
is a person, some key person or corporate group like Israel that is the focal
point of that period of time. And of course, I think that we could say that
Christ is.
2. Secondly, in
terms of the name, is there something that distinguishes this in terms of just
nomenclature that we could use?
3. Third, is there
new revelation? Is there something new that is given? Now there is always new
revelation. When Isaiah comes along he is giving new revelation that wasn't
known to Samuel, or Elijah, or Elisa; when Ezekiel comes along he adds
something. There is always the progress of revelation during the Old Testament.
But what this is getting at is God revealing something new about how He is
administering human history; that is the key. Is there new information about
God is administering human history?
4. Part of this
involves a new responsibility. Is a new responsibility indicated? Is there
something that man is responsible for or the steward is responsible for that is
additional to what they were responsible for previously? So in the previous
dispensation you have the dispensation of the Law; is
there something new that the Jews would be responsible for in terms of this new
revelation?
5. The next thing
that Scofield identified is that each dispensation
seems to have a test of obedience in relation to the new revelation and the new
responsibilities. So can we identify a distinct test during the time of
Christ's ministry that goes beyond what was expected prior to the Incarnation?
6. And then, is there
a unique or distinct failure that takes place that is in relation to the new
revelation, the new responsibility and the test?
What we are trying
to do is to see if there are significant enough differences during this period
to indicate that God is administering history differently, or at least a
component of it because remember, let's go back in time. We are going to get
into our little timeless machine and we are going to zoom all the way back to
about 2050 BC. God has just brought judgment (about
a 100 years before) on the Tower of Babel and has scattered everybody by
changing up their languages. So as soon as you started
having the people speak 100 different languages it split everybody up into a
100 different groups and they began to all go off into their little sections
where they could only be with people who understood their language. So you had
everything split up and one group was part of the descendants of Shem, and you
had one group that are the descendants of Terah and
his son Abraham.
Now Abraham is
living down in the southern part of what is now Iraq in Ur of the Chaldees and
God appeared to him. He didn't appear to anybody else. There are other
believers in the world at this time. Job lived some time during this time. We
do not know where or when, but approximately the same time. It could have been
a little bit later; it could have been a little earlier. There is no mention in
the book of Job of anything distinctively Jewish; there is no mention of
anything in the book of Job related to Israel, related to the promised land,
related to Canaan, related to Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob, related the Law or
anything. So Job was probably the first book of the Old Testament written.
Interesting enough it identifies the angelic conflict in suffering and I think
that is for a purpose. That was the first thing God thought the people really
needed to understand was the issue of the angelic conflict and suffering.
So God is going to
speak to one person. Now there is probably a worldwide population by this time
of maybe close to a million. But the only person who knows God is going to do
something different is Abraham. He comes to Abraham and says I want you to
leave your home, your family, and I want to take you to a land that I promise
you and I am going to multiply your descendants and I am going to bless the
world through you. He is changing how He is going to work through history. It
changes in Genesis 12, but 99.9999% of the people in the world have no idea
that anything has changed. Everybody else is now a Gentile. Abraham is the
first Jew and everybody else is still operating under the previous
administration. They don't know that anything has changed. So you have Abraham,
and Abraham is probably about 60 years of age when he receives that call. By
the time he has Isaac he is close to 100 years old. He dies at 170 years. Isaac
has children. You have Abraham's children, Isaac's children, Jacob's children,
and you get down to about 1900-1850 BC and so you have had two or three hundred
years go by before you start having a multiplication of the Jewish people.
There are only 70 that go down to Egypt and they are
not all Jews. That includes all the servants and anybody else that tagged along
with them when Jacob and his sons went down with Joseph in Egypt.
XV. Messianic Age.
F. Messianic
dispensation, nobody else in the world knows what is going on. That is my
point. When God starts to work with Jesus, Jesus shows up in fulfillment of Old
Testament prophesy with a ministry that is focused on the house of Israel and
the house of Judah. The rest of the world doesn't know that something new is
happening. The rest of the world doesn't know that the promised Messiah is now
on the earth and has entered into human history; but just because the rest of
the world doesn't know this, that is not new in how God changes dispensations.
It starts with one person with whom God has given new revelation and that shows
how things change.
I think there is a precedent
for this. In terms of looking at this as a dispensation there is a key person
and that key person is the Lord Jesus Christ. He is the Messiah. He is the
focal point of history in the fullness of time, Galatians 4:4 says that Christ
was born of a woman. This has been the focal point since Genesis 3 in
preparation for human history the provision of a Messiah. There is a name that
we could give to this dispensation, the messianic age, because Jesus is
offering Himself as the Messiah. So this is a key dispensational term; that
this is the age of the Messiah.
When we look at the
term Messiah it comes from the Hebrew word mashiach. In the
English it is just a transliteration, which means The Anointed One or Appointed
One. The Greek counterpart to that is the noun CHRISTOS; it means the exact same thing, Anointed
or Appointed One. There were a lot of people who were anointed or appointed to
different things, but this becomes the primary term that is used to refer to
the seed of the woman, the one who will be the Son of David, the one who is called
the Son of Man in Daniel 7. That this is the one who God is going to bring into
the world to save us from sin. Used in a number of passages in the Old Testament.
Psalm 2:2 talks about
the kings of the earth that will gather against God; this happens in the
future. They will gather against the LORD and against His mashiach, against His Anointed in
Psalm 2:2.
Daniel 9:25 also is
a prophesy related to the coming of the Messiah and gives us bit of a timetable
I won't go into, but he says, that you can know when the Messiah is going to
come because the time of a future command to restore and build Jerusalem until
Messiah the Prince is going to be a certain amount of time. So here you have a
reference to using the term mashiach to refer to the Promised One.
Daniel 9:26 says, after the 62 weeks Messiah shall be cut off. So here
it is again a term related to the promised One Who will provide salvation for
our sins.
Person: Lord Jesus
Christ. Name: Luke 2:25-30
Luke 2:25, this is
when Jesus is brought by Mary and Joseph into Jerusalem in order to present Him
at eight days at the temple. And we read that "there was a man in
Jerusalem whose name was Simeon; and this man was righteous and devout, looking
for the consolation of Israel." He is looking and expecting the Messiah.
Why? How can he pinpoint it like that? Well he understood Daniel. There was a
great messianic expectation because there were many who understood the
timetable given in Daniel 9.
Luke 2:26, and
further, "it had been revealed to him through personal revelation by the
Holy Spirit that he would not" die until He saw the LORD'S mashiach, the LORD'S CHRISTOS, the LORD'S Anointed One. So it clearly identifies
the One that he is looking for as the mashiach. So I think a lot of times in the
Gospels, if we translate Christ as mashiach we catch a better under
understanding of its connection to the Old Testament.
Luke 2:27-30, so the
Holy Spirit leads him, "he came in the Spirit into the temple; and when
the parents brought in the child Jesus, to carry out for Him the custom of the
Law, then he took Him into his arms, and blessed God, and said "Now LORD, You are letting Your servant to depart
in peace, according to Your Word; for my eyes have seen Your salvation."
Now Jesus' name is Yeshua, which means "Salvation." So what Simeon
would have said in Hebrew was, "my eyes have seen Your Yeshua."
So he is using Jesus' given name as he says this, and it goes on to say,
"which You prepared before the face of all peoples, A LIGHT TO BRING REVELATION TO THE
GENTILES, and the glory of
Your people Israel, Luke 2:31-32
So he is recognizing
that the Messiah has come. So what this does is it indicates to us that there
is a new revelation given, which is Jesus, and a new responsibility given here
which is to identify and accept the Messiah, which if you did like Simeon, but
the majority did not.
New revelation: I
want to go back to the new revelation. I want to look at these passages that we
have related to this new revelation in Matthew 3:2 and Matthew 4:17. In
Matthew 3:2 we see
that a new message is given, a new revelation is given. John the Baptist shows
up, and what does he say? "Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at
hand." Until John the Baptist said that no one had said that. That is a
totally new message. The message to this point is that Messiah is coming
sometime in the future. The kingdom is coming sometime in the future. The
Messiah is coming sometime in the future. Now all of a sudden John the Baptist
comes on board and says the Messiah is here. "Repent," heaven is
near; it is at hand! It is almost ready! So that is a definite shift in the
message. Jesus is the One that comes along and says the same thing as well when
He begins His ministry.
Then we have
passages like John 1:14 "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us,
and we beheld His glory, the glory of the only begotten of the Father, full of
grace and truth." What we see here is a totally new revelation of God; not
just a new message, but a new message that is embodied
in a person. He is the fullest expression of deity. He dwelt among us and we
beheld His glory. Not the glory that is indicated like on the Mount of
Transfiguration because the first miracle demonstrated His glory when He
changed the water into wine. So John has a different view of the glory of God
and it is expressive of His character. John goes on to say in John 1:18,
"No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God Who is in the
bosom of the Father, He has declared Him. The Greek word for "declared"
here is the word you've heard many times in its English form; it is the Greek
word, EXEGETO, where we get our word EXEGESIS. He has "explained" the
Father. It is only through the Lord that we understand the Father. He is the
Incarnation of God so that by watching Him we can come to understand the
Father. So we clearly have a new revelation given in this dispensation.
We have this new
responsibility then to identify and accept the Messiah. He is making a
Messianic claim and we have to understand that, so this becomes the test to
accept Jesus as the Messiah, Matthew 16:15-17. Test: To accept the Jesus as
Messiah.
But if you look at
Matthew 16, this is the context where Jesus has asked the disciples, well who
do people say that I am? Matthew 16: 13, Jesus came to them in Caesarea
Philippi and said, "Who do people say that the Son of Man is?" The
Son of Man was a clearly understood Messianic title. [14] And they said,
"Some say
John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; but still others, Jeremiah… [15] He said
to them, "But who do you say that I am?" That is the key thing. [16]
Then Simon Peter answered, "You are the Messiah." He said, "You
are the Christ." You are the Messiah, "The Son of the living
God." He has accurately understood Who Jesus is. So this is the test.
The new revelation
is that Jesus is the Messiah; Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah. The new
responsibility is to identify and accept Him as Messiah. The test is to accept Him as the Messiah
and to follow Him.
Failure: Now there
is a failure that comes along that the Jews, both in terms of the leadership
and the masses, rejected Him. There were still tens of thousands that accepted
Him as the Messiah, but not the majority and not the leadership
which represented the nation. Now you may like it or not like it, but
every decision that our president and congress makes is your decision. We have
a representative government and the decisions they make are your decisions. The
votes that your congressman makes in congress are your vote. If you don't like
it, throw him out; get somebody else. But if you don't get somebody else he is
still representing your district and his votes are your vote whether we like it
or not; that is what representative means. The leaders represented the people;
they rejected Him.
John 1:10-12 talks
about the fact that Jesus came into His own and His own received Him not. They
did not accept him as the Messiah. Then the key passage to look at is in
Matthew 12. This is when everything changes. Up until we get to Matthew 12
there is an increasing hostility and antagonism between Jesus and the religious
leadership, and it all boils over when we get to Matthew 12.
Matthew 12:14
"But the Pharisees went out and plotted against Him." He has just
performed a couple of miracles on the Sabbath, violating their traditions,
violating their law, and then when they challenge Him on that He shows that He
is more consistent with the Law than they are and He is grace oriented. They
don't even want Him to heal on the Sabbath. And so the response of Jesus: Matthew 12:15 is that He "withdrew
from there," but the multitudes follow Him, and He continues to heal on
the Sabbath. And this is all evidence. It is described in the next few verses,
which show that He is fulfilling the prophesies of the Old Testament as the
Messiah.
Matthew 12:22-24, He
heals a demon-possessed man. He cast out the demon and everyone is amazed and they
say: Can this be the son of David? Is this the Messiah? And this is really
irritating the Pharisees at this time. And so when they heard this they said
man doesn't cast out demons except by Beelzebul the
ruler of the demons. Beelzebub was just another term they use to describe
Satan. It was just another sort of a nickname for Satan. That he is the one
that cast out the demons; that Jesus uses Satan to cast out the demons. And
Jesus knew their thoughts, in His omniscience. His deity is in function not to
solve a problem in His life. He still used His divine attributes in areas to
demonstrate that He was who He claimed to be. He doesn't use His divine
attributes to solve the problems in His life. That is one of the most important
things to understand about the Incarnation. Jesus is fully human and in His
humanity He faces all the problems by handling them on the basis of the Word of
God and the Spirit of God just like we do. That is why He is an example to
follow. If He is handling His problems on the basis of His divine omnipotence,
we can't do that. There is no example to follow. But that doesn't mean that He
disregards or never uses His deity. Some people have gotten that idea. He uses
His deity to change the water into wine. He is showing them that He is the
God-Man. And there are other times when He clearly accesses His omnipotence and
His omniscience, because it doesn't have anything to do with solving His own
personal problems in terms of His own individual spiritual life.
Matthew 12:25-31. So He says He knows their thoughts and
He says, "Every kingdom divided against itself." This would be the
kingdom of Satan. He is clearly identifying that the Pharisees are part of the
kingdom of Satan. Remember in John 10 He said you are of your father the devil.
So here he is saying "every kingdom divided
against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided
against itself will not stand. If Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against
himself; how then will his kingdom stand? And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they shall be your
judges. But if I cast out demons by the spirit of God, surely the kingdom of
God has come upon you." He is showing that this is the evidence. That the
kingdom is being offered in the presence and person of the Messiah who is
before you and "if I cast out these demons by the Spirit of God, then that
is evidence that the kingdom of God is in your presence". And then He says
after this little interchange, "Therefore, I say to you, every sin and
blasphemy will be forgiven men but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be
forgiven them".
Now this is an interesting
passage, Matthew 12:31. Probably half of you are confused about because this is
talking about an unforgiveable sin. But the first question we need to ask is
this talking about absolute unforgiveable sin. Is this a sin that Jesus didn't
pay for? Well there are too many passages that say Jesus paid for every sin.
Jesus isn't talking about a forgiveness in terms of
the absolute sense. If a person said one day Jesus cast out demons by Beelzebul, if that is non forgivable could that person
change his mind the next day and be saved? Sure; that is what Grace is. Grace means that Christ paid for all sin. We are
antagonistic like the apostle Paul and we murder Christians and we persecute
the body of Christ; is there still forgiveness? Yes there is in that absolute
sense.
But what Jesus is
talking about here is relative forgiveness. In other words, is there is a point
of no return where the Pharisees have rejected Him as Messiah. Is there a point
where Jesus is going to say, okay, you've rejected Me
and now it is solid? Now you are going to reap the consequences of your
rejection of Me as Messiah and there is going to be divine judgment now upon
the nation because I have come to My people, they have
firmly and finally rejected Me and judgment will come. That is what Jesus is
talking about here. He is talking about the fact that this is when this
hostility by the Pharisees finally comes to a head. They make their final and
absolute decision to reject Jesus as Messiah, and as a result of that Jesus is
saying that the punishment on the nation as a result will be inevitable. That
there will not be a relative forgiveness of the nation for this and it is set
in stone now. You have rejected me as Messiah. You will eventually go out under
the fifth cycle of discipline in AD 70.
It goes on to say in
Matthew 12:32 "Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be
forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be
forgiven him, either in this age or in the age to come."
When is the age to
come? If you are thinking the Millennium you are wrong. He is in the time
period of the age of the Law, the age of Israel. He is in His dispensation,
which is before the cross. The next age to come is the church age. The church
age comes after the cross, after Pentecost. It is in the early part of the
church age in AD 70 that Israel is destroyed as a nation
and Jerusalem is destroyed as a nation. This is talking about a temporal
judgment, not an eternal judgment. It is when Jesus says firmly that your
volition has set in stone now and you cannot be forgiven from this decision. In
other words, temporally you will come under divine judgment.
So this is what
happens and this is why this is so critical. From Matthew 13 on nobody ever
again says, "Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." Nobody
ever talks again about the kingdom of heaven being ready. Nobody offers them
the kingdom again until when? We just studied this in Acts. Until after the
ascension and then there is another offer. Now that offer if they had accepted
it would not have done away with the judgment that was coming. It would have
just compressed the ultimate fulfillment of the rest of prophesy.
They still would have been destroyed by the Romans. That
would have been part though of the destruction of Daniel's 70th Week and then
there would have been a restoration of the nation. It would have been
compressed. But they didn't repent; they didn't accept the kingdom offer in the
early part of the church age, and so we went on into the church age and we are
still waiting for the Lord to return at the rapture.
So this is what is
happening in terms of this as a dispensation. Now there is also a judgment as
part of our criteria. Judgment: Christ is judged at the cross. There is a
judgment. There are two judgments actually. 1. The judgment of Christ being
judged on the cross for the sins of the world. 2. There is the judgment of the nation
Israel that is announced and will come about because they rejected Jesus as the
Messiah. But nevertheless, whenever there is judgment there is also grace.
Grace: is the
ultimate provision of God's grace here in terms of salvation. He has sent the
2nd Person of the Trinity to die on the cross for our sins. He pays the penalties
Scripture says, for all sin, for every sin including the sin of the blasphemy
against the Holy Spirit. It is not unforgiveable in an absolute sense because
other Scripture clearly teaches Jesus died for all sin. He paid the penalty for
all sin so that all we have to do is trust in Him. There is eternal
forgiveness. There were many of those Pharisees who were part of that group
that rejected Him and later on in Acts 4-6 what do we fine? We find that many
Pharisees came to trust in Jesus as the Messiah. So this is not talking about
their personal destiny in Matthew 12. It is talking about how their decision as
the leadership of the nation sets the course inevitably to the destruction of
Jerusalem in AD 70.
Volition: Then
finally what we see here is the volitional element that has to do with
accepting or rejecting Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah.
Angelic Conflict:
And it has implication for the angelic conflict because Satan's strategic
defeat occurs at the cross. He is still fighting. I think that strategically
the Third Reich was destroyed at Normandy but it still took almost a year
before they were tactically defeated. But strategically they could not recover
once the Allied Troops had secured a foothold on the Normandy peninsula. It
took another year though to clean everything up. There was still a lot of fight
left in them. And that is the case we have with Satan. He is strategically
defeated at the cross. He cannot recover from what Christ did on the cross, but
he is not going to give up. He has a lot of fight left in him and he's still
fighting and we are living in a period of an intensification of the angelic
conflict. But during the time when Christ was on the earth there is intensified
satanic opposition unlike any other time in history, even today. We don't have
the overt manifestations of demonism and satanic opposition that you did during
the time of Christ. And that is when you have all of this demon possession. And
if you have other questions about that I encourage you to get my book in the
back on Spiritual
Warfare where we go into some of these details a lot more.
But the reality is,
how many people were demon possessed in the Old Testament? None. Not one. How may people have a
problem with demon possession in the Epistles? None. You have problems with
demonic activity during the Gospels when Jesus is on the earth and you have
problems with demonic activity and possession in the early part of Acts and
after that there is no more mention of it. Not once in any of the epistles is
there any instruction from Paul or Peter or John on how to handle demon
possession. Not once. If, as the epistles claim, they are the sufficient
standard, the sufficient revelation for how to handle all the problems for how
a church age believer can handle every problem he faces in this life, there is
a deafening silence about the problem of demon possession or direct demonic
assault. There is something significant about that.
Now it warns about
indirect demonic activity and that the world system is the expression of demonic
thought and that Satan is our enemy, and that he is going about as a roaring
lion and seeking whom he may devour. But this isn't the same as what is
happening during the period of the Incarnation when Christ is on the earth.
That was a much greater manifestation that we saw during that period. So the
angelic conflict is intensified to an extreme level during the three and a half
years or so that Jesus is on the earth, and then things gradually die down and
we are in the church age with a slightly different dynamic
as we will see.
So this introduces
then the dispensation of grace. I am going to take a couple of minutes and go
through it because it is pretty quick and most of you will understand it.
G. The Dispensation
of Grace, Acts 2:1-Revelation 19:21
1. First of all, the key person is Paul.
Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles and Paul is the one who gives the greatest
level of information about the present church age.
2. Name: It is called the dispensation of
grace—John 1:17 that the Law was given through Moses; but grace and truth
came through the Lord Jesus Christ. And in this dispensation grace is now
displayed in a way distinct from earlier dispensations. There was grace from
the time of the fall, but there is something distinctive about the
manifestation of grace in this dispensation so that the Scriptures can say that
grace and truth came through the Lord Jesus Christ.
3. The responsibilities are to accept the
gift of righteousness, which God offers to all men through the Messiah at no
cost; we don't do anything to earn it or deserve it. It is freely given to us
by faith alone, Romans 5:15-18.
4. We see that there is a basic test and
that is will man accept the free gift of God's grace and will God accept God's
grace and sanctification. Those are the two issues. There is only one way to
heaven and there is only one way to grow in the grace and the knowledge of our
Lord Jesus Christ.
5. The failure is that most will reject
it in this dispensation. Most human beings since the time of Christ have
rejected the Gospel. They have either rejected the general
revelation of God in the heavens and turned to idolatry or if they have
heard the Gospel they have rejected it. The vast majority of human beings that
have lived the last 2000 years have never trusted Christ as Savior.
6. There will be a judgment that comes
after the rapture of the church on the human race, The Great Tribulation, known
as "the time of Jacob's trouble." This relates to the angelic
conflict because this is a time when God pulls out all the restraints from
Satan, the Restrainer is removed according to 2 Thessalonians 2 and Satan just
has a temper tantrum. And there is no period in human history that is worse
than that period. It is also the conclusion to the Age of Israel.
Next week we are
going to get into some really tremendous material because as we start talking
about the church age we have to go back to one of our favorite topics and that
is understanding interpretation and it is a lead in to understanding some
things that are a little more advanced with this dispensationalism then we will
get to in probably three or four weeks. But we have to understand some things
about the relationship of the OT to the NT and how the writers of the New Testament use the Old Testament.
Question: I too have
struggled with this timeframe, whether it is a separate dispensation or not. I
have always used Matthew 11:13 and Luke 16:16 as stating that only the message
changes, but not the administration. If this is a different dispensation, how
do we reckon, for instance, when Jesus heals the leper and tells him to show
himself to the priest and bring the gift that Moses commanded – clearly
being subjected to the Mosaic Law (Matthew 8:2-4)?
Answer: The Mosaic
Law is still in effect. Remember, when I defined this, specifically in light of
that passage, that some things continue and some things change. Now when you go
back to the Old Testament models, when you look at the pattern of the change
from the age of conscience before the flood and after the flood, there are only
a couple of things that change in terms of the Noahic covenant. You can now eat
meat and you have the delegation of judicial authority to take human life in
the case of execution, of murder. Those are basically the only things that
really change; everything else in terms of patriarchal sacrifice, the focus on
family and family worship, all of that stays the same going from the period
before the flood to after the flood. A couple of things change. So the Mosaic
Law is still operative. That is part of what stays the same;
that this is a distinct dispensation, but there are clearly new things. There
is a new revelation, a new expectation, a new responsibility, a new test. That is what makes it different. It is what is
new that is added not the fact that the Mosaic Law continues is not
significant. Other things have continued from one dispensation to another. I
think that will help him work through this.
Question: What about
the witch of Endor—she was not demon possessed?
Answer: No she was
not demon possessed. She utilized a demon. But you don't have demon possession
vocabulary used in the passage. In the passage it talks about a demonic voice
would come up from the ground; it is not coming out of her. So she is demon
influenced just like Saul. Saul in the passage saw that the demon comes upon him,
comes to him, but it doesn't ever use the Hebrew preposition for
"in". And when David comes and plays the harp to relieve Saul it
never says that the demon came out of him. It just left him alone.
Statement: He
wouldn't be demon possessed anyway. Response:
No. He would not have been. But I am just saying that that's the vocabulary
that you have in the New Testament passages on demon possession. They are all
related to a demon going into and out of: "he is cast out of,"
"he comes out of." There is that in-and-out vocabulary that is never
used of anyone in the Old Testament so you don't have that kind of language.
That was a good clarification.
Question: In Matthew
12:32 "Anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven in this
age or the age to come." He is addressing people who are under the Law? Response: Right. Continues: And the next age is the church
age, but further tonight you referred to the messianic age. Response: Excuse
me? Continues: You referred to the messianic
age. Many of us were taught about this period of time being the dispensation of
the hypostatic-union.
Response: Right,
right. Continues: Is that actually a
dispensation though?
Answer: Yes. I am using
a better term. I am using it because Jesus didn't come to say I am the
hypostatic union; Jesus came to say I am the Messiah. I think calling it the
messianic age focuses on what the biblical message is. The important thing
about this that I didn't stress yet, is that Jesus comes as the Messiah to
fulfill the messianic promises and prophesies and as we saw in Matthew 5:17-18.
He is saying that I have come to fulfill the Law. So He fulfills everything
before. It is like a hinge in history and everything before is fulfilled in
Jesus, but Jesus sets the precedent for the future Church Age by His walk by
the Spirit. So the precedent for the Christian life is not the Mosaic Law; the
precedent for the Christian life is not the Old Testament, it is the walk of
Christ because we are in Him. He is our High Priest. That is the key element
there that is what you are talking about with that messianic age. It becomes a
hinge dispensation. It fulfills everything before, but it sets the precedent
for everything that comes after.
Question: It is not
an age then? Answer: It is not an age like the age of the Gentiles or the age
of Israel. It is a dispensation in the age of Israel. You have the dispensation
of the patriarchs or promise. You have the dispensation of the Law and then you
have the Messianic dispensation, which is just covers three years. If you were
a Jew and you lived outside the land of Israel, you probably knew nothing about
anything changing because you did not hear that message. And that would not be
any different from somebody who was living in Western Europe or North Africa or
in Turkey, Asia Minor, when God calls out Abraham in Ur of the Chaldees.
Everything changes with Genesis 12:1, but the only person who knew it was
Abraham. So just because there is a change doesn't mean everybody in the world
has to know about it. Just the key person knows about it. Does that help? I am
trying to refine and clarify this a little bit more.
See this is wasn't
something new; that is why I bring James Hall Brooks into it. You had others
besides James Hall Brooks who thought that the time of the incarnation was a
distinct dispensation. What my issue is that Scofield
came a long and since Scofield nobody has thought
about these things anymore. In fact, I called up Mike Stallard
a couple of weeks ago and I said this would be a good topic for one of the
dispensational hermeneutic study group meetings because everybody just assumes
and nobody wants to rethink this framework that Scofield
left. They just won't accept that and go on. But I think that according to the
criteria that Scofield laid out, if you look at each
one of those categories, a very strong case can be made that this is a distinct
dispensation: new revelation, new responsibility, new message, everything is
there.
Father, thank You for this opportunity
just to reflect upon Your Word, to think about Your revelation, to try to
understand it and make some sense and see how You have worked in history and
how things change, but also how things continue. That above all things You have
operated toward mankind with grace and the principle of salvation has always
been by faith alone either in the promise of a coming Savior Who would redeem
us from sin or in the fulfillment of that promise looking to Jesus as the only
object of our faith; that by faith alone in Him alone we have eternal life.
Help us to think about these things that we studied tonight. In
Christ's Name, Amen.