Age of Israel: Abrahamic Covenant, Mosaic Covenant
"How can a
young man cleanse his way by taking heed thereto according to Thy Word,"
Psalm 119:9. "Thy Word have I hid in my heart that I might not sin against
Thee," Psalm 119:11. "Thy Word is a lamp unto my feet and a light
unto my path," Psalm 119:105. "Jesus prayed to the Father, to
sanctify them in truth, Thy Word is truth," John 17:17. "For the
grass withers and the flower fades, but the Word of our God shall stand
forever," Isaiah 40:8.
Before we get
started this evening we will have a few moments of silent prayer. The purpose
for that is to give everyone the opportunity to make sure that they are in
right relationship with God and to join fellowship with Him. When we sin that
fellowship is broken and we are restored to fellowship when we confess our
sins, which simply means to admit or to acknowledge sin to God the Father in
silent prayer. At that instant we are forgiven of the sins we confess and then
we are cleansed from all unrighteousness so that we recover that we walk by the
Spirit that Paul mandates for us in Galatians 5:16. We will bow our heads
together and after a few moments of silent prayer then I will open in prayer.
Let's pray.
Father we are
thankful that we have this opportunity to come before You at Your throne of
grace in prayer because Jesus Christ opened the way. He is our great High
Priest. The veil that separated us from You has been rent asunder and we as
church age believers, members of the body of Christ, have direct access to Your
throne of grace. Now Father we come before You this evening recognizing our
need to understand You and to understand Your Word, understand Your plan for
history. And as we continue this study we pray that it might give us a greater
understanding and perspective of Scripture, how to read and understand
Scripture so that we can take what is directed to us and apply it to us and
understand what is there for implication and application and relate that as
well; and that we would be responsive to the challenge of all the principles
that we see in Your Word. We pray this in Christ's Name, Amen.
We are going to go
back a little bit this evening. I want to pick up a couple of more things from
the Abrahamic covenant, which we looked at last time. Remember we have
opportunity for Q&A for questions from anyone in the audience. I will stop
a few times for questions. Those who are watching via the live stream have the
opportunity. There is a link there on the website where you can write in your
question and they will immediately come into the congregation here and someone
will ask the question for you.
I want to go back a
minute to the Abrahamic covenant. Just by way of review, we are looking at the
biblical covenants. Biblical covenants are distinct from theological covenants.
In fact, this last week as I was studying there is actually a covenant in the
Scripture that is an eternal covenant and it is not on the list. I have found a
new covenant. It is kind of fun when something like that happens and it is interesting
how it fits into the scope of Scripture. The primary biblical covenants, the
ones that we usually talk about, are the ones in the chart on the screen. They
are the Gentile covenants. I believe these are the Creation covenants. I like
that term and the more I use it, the more I like it. Instead of Edenic and
Adamic; they sound a lot alike and people can get that confused. But it is the
original Creation covenant and it established when God creates man and woman,
male and female, in His image in Genesis 1:27-28. It establishes the framework
for and the purpose for the human race to rule over creation, to rule over the
fish in the sea and the birds of the air, the beast of the field. And of
course, this is the number one verse in Scripture that the environmentalists
hate more than anything else because they believe that the human race is just
part of something else a part of all of the rest of the evolutionary mess that
just happened by chance as opposed to something that is distinguished and set
over the rest of creation as the unique representative of God.
The Edenic covenant
of the Creation covenant had to be modified at the fall when Adam disobeyed and
ate the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. That brought sin
and spiritual death into the human race; therefore, there were new conditions
and consequences. I have reiterated this many times. There is a penalty. The
legislative penalty from God for sin was spiritual death. Their consequences to
spiritual death and the consequences that entered into creation; that is what
is outlined in Genesis 3. That becomes the foundation for the Adamic covenant;
the mandate basically remains the same: to multiply it, fill the earth, and to
subdue it. Man doesn't do that; he succumbs to evil and God brings a worldwide
judgment in Genesis 6-8, which is the worldwide Noahic Flood. God then
reestablishes His covenant with man, with Noah in Genesis 9. That is the Noahic
covenant, which is still in effect today.
There is failure on
the part of the human race though because at the Tower of Babel there is an
attempt for man to run his destiny according to his own purposes. That is where
we really begin to see the Bible begin to bring in the purpose for history.
There is going to be a shift that takes place there. God judges the nations by
giving them different languages and this breaks the human race up into
different subsets or different tribal groups, which eventually become nations.
At that point God is, Genesis 12, we saw last time is juxtapose to Genesis 11.
Genesis 11, the descendants of Ham through Nimrod attempted to make a name for
themselves. God calls out Abram in Genesis 12 and says, "I will make your
name great." That is the foundation for the Abrahamic covenant, which is
then broken down into three subsequent covenants or rather expanded into three
subsequent covenants: the Land covenant, the real estate covenant—the
promise of a specific piece of real estate, the Davidic covenant, the promise
of an eternal descendant on the throne of David, and then the New covenant. We
just worked through mostly the Abrahamic covenant already; and then tonight we
will get into the Mosaic covenant.
We broke the
panorama of human history down into four basic ages: the age of the Gentiles,
which will be subdivided into three dispensations: the dispensation of
Innocence, the dispensation of conscience, and the dispensation of human
government ending at the Tower of Babel. This then is the context for the call
of Abram and this begins a new age, a distinct age. We can't really grasp how
revolutionary the Abrahamic covenant is. Everything after this is different.
All of human history since Genesis 12:1 is determined by Genesis 12:1. God is
calling out a unique people and it is through this unique people that He will
bless everyone else. It is the destiny of those people that is at the
centerpiece of human history until it ends with the destruction of the current
heavens and earth and the new heavens and new earth. Then there is the cross,
which ends the age of Israel, then the beginning of the current church age, at
the day of Pentecost in AD 33. This actually ends with the Rapture. Then there is a
seven-year Tribulation, which is the last seven years of the age of Israel that
comes at the end of the church age or after the end of the church age, and then
we have the millennial kingdom established, the messianic kingdom that lasts
for a thousand years. That will conclude with the judgment bringing in eternity
future.
1. To Abraham
personally: we looked at the Abrahamic covenant last time. We looked at the key
passages in Genesis 12, Genesis 15, and Genesis 17; went through all the
different stipulations in parts of it. I wanted to come back this time and
break down the provisions in terms of three components. There are certain
promises that are addressed to Abraham personally; there are certain components
that are addressed to Israel, to his descendants, to the seed personally; and
then there are certain promises that are made to the Gentiles as a result of
the Abrahamic covenant. So what are the promises that were made to Abraham? God
says/promised:
a. He is going to be
the father of a great nation; many kings will come forth from him later, but
the great nation that is mentioned is Israel, the Jewish people.
b. He himself will
possess the land. God says, I will give this land to you. The problem with that
is that Abraham never possessed the land; in fact, he only purchased one
small piece of real estate located down near Hebron, which is the cave of
Machpelah, where he buried Sarah and where he is buried. Isaac, Jacob and their
wives are also buried there as well.
c. Other nations
will come from him. These would be the Arab peoples that are descendants from
Ishmael, via his relationship with Hagar; and then through Esau, his grandson,
the twin of Isaac. What makes Jewish people Jewish is not that they are
descendants from Abraham or Abraham or Isaac, but that they are descendants
through the line of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. That is what distinguishes them
from all of the other descendants of Abraham.
d. Kings will arise
from him. Kings to the various other nations are descendants through him. You
have the descendants through his descendant Lot, the Medianites; you also have
the Moabites and you have the Arab nations.
e. Certain personal
blessings.
f. He himself was to
be (it is a mandate) a blessing to those around him.
g. His name would be
great among men. It is not because Abraham was great or promoted himself, but
because God promoted him. No one is really promoted unless God promotes you.
2. To the seed of
Israel: the next category is promises to the Seed Israel.
For Israel He
promised:
a. The nation will
be great and distinct above all nations. Most of you have seen that Israel has
the vast number of awards and accomplishments by the Jewish people. The number
of Jewish Nobel Prize actors, actresses, and musicians excel above all other
people. For a small group of people that consist of no more than about 14
million people, they have the lion's share of percentage of the awards and
accomplishments in the human race.
b. They are destined
to be innumerable. It's not that God can't number them but it is a statement of
hyperbole that their number would be like the stars in the sky or the sands on
the seashore.
c. They are destined
to possess the land that God had given to them. To understand that we have to
understand it in terms of the literal sense when God gave the boundaries from
the river of Egypt to the river Euphrates to the Great Sea, the Mediterranean.
This would incorporate all the land today that makes up modern Israel as well
as Jordan, elements of Syria, probably Saudi Arabia, and parts of the Sinai
Peninsula. All of this is part of the land that God promised to Israel as an
"everlasting possession." That word "everlasting" is so
important because this is an "everlasting covenant."
d. And the seed of
Israel are promised ultimate victory over their enemies. This has not happened
yet in history. Just as the promise to Abraham that he would possess the land
has not happened yet in history, so too the ultimate blessing, the ultimate
glorification of Israel, their possession of the land has not yet happened in
history and their victory over their enemies. So that is yet to be fulfilled.
This is in the future.
3. To the Gentiles:
the third area is God's promise to the Gentiles.
That God would:
a. Blessing for
blessing; bless them if they blessed Israel.
b. Cursing for
cursing; judge them if they treated Israel lightly or with disrespect.
c. Be spiritual
blessings for the Gentiles through the seed of Abraham as stated in Galatians
3:8-9.
The apostle Paul
applies this singular word "seed" to the Lord Jesus Christ. The word
"seed" actually in Hebrew can be plural or singular, and so at times
the context indicates it has a plural sense or corporate sense and at other
times it has a singular sense. Paul took it that way to make his application in
relationship to Christ in Galatians 3:8-9.
So that summarizes
the provisions of the covenant. Now, another thing that is important to realize
here, is that whenever God makes a promise in the Scripture, He makes it to
either a person or a group of people. He made certain promises to Abraham. We
can't go back and read those promises given to Abraham and then claim them as
if God is bound by that promise for us because that is reading somebody else's
mail. That is looking at somebody else's contract. God did not promise that to
us. He promised that to Abraham or to the Jewish people. So we always have to
be careful. There are some principles that can be extrapolated at times. Often
a promise is made to Israel is merely a manifestation of a broader principle or
broader reality within the plan of God. But it is always one of the challenges
in interpretation to determine what is a promise that is historically
conditioned to a people or to a person and those that have a universal
application. And as I have said in the past, the Abrahamic covenant is made up
of three components:
1. A promise for the
"land"
2. A promise of
blessing in the "seed"
3. And a promise of
worldwide "blessing"
The Abrahamic
Covenant is confirmed many times in the remainder of Genesis as well as in the
rest of the Old Testament. God confirmed the covenant with Isaac in Genesis
26:2-5 and Genesis 26:24. That He would make the same covenant with Isaac that
He made with Abraham. In Genesis 26:3-4 He told Isaac to "sojourn" or
travel in the land "and I will be with you and bless you, for your
descendants I will give all these lands, and I will establish the oath which I
swore to your father Abraham. I will multiply your descendants as the stars of
heaven, and will give your descendants all these lands; and by your descendants
all the nations of the earth shall be blessed." It is a complete
reconfirmation and reiteration of the Abrahamic covenant to His son Isaac. So
God promises blessing to Isaac and to Isaac's seed. But these promises are not
merely to Isaac's seed but just like with Abraham, they are promises made to
Isaac himself that God would bless him.
Isaac had two sons,
Esau and Jacob, and God chose Jacob. That doesn't mean that Jacob was saved and
Esau wasn't. The selection wasn't for eternal destiny in heaven. The selection
was for the plan of God on the earth. So this is not an example of the doctrine
of soteriological election, which is how many people misread the passage. It is
an example of God selecting different groups, different people for certain
destinies in history, and He did that with Jacob. He reiterated the promise to
Jacob in Genesis 28:13-15, where God said to Jacob, "I am the LORD, the God of your father Abraham and the
God of Isaac; the land on which you lie, I will give it to you and to your
descendants." "To your seed"; that is that same word. We have
words like that which have a corporate sense. They may be singular in function.
They may be used singular or they may be used as a plural. The noun
"deer" can be singular or plural. We have the same kind of thing in
English. The word "seed" is the same way and here it has the idea of
"descendants" plural. Genesis 28:14-15, "Your descendants shall
also be like the dust of the earth, and you shall spread out to the west and to
the east and to the north and to the south; and in you and in your descendants
shall all the families of the earth be blessed." And then God said,
"And behold, I am with you, and will keep you wherever you go, and will
bring you back to this land."
So with those words Esau
was excluded from the covenant line and the covenant is confirmed only with
Jacob. Neither Abraham nor Isaac owned land. They just had the cave of
Machpelah. Now this is important because of what happens at an interchange with
Jesus later on in the Gospels. It has to do with the doctrine of resurrection.
Jesus got into a conversation and debate with the Pharisees and Sadducees. Now
the Pharisees did believe in resurrection; the Sadducees did not believe in
resurrection. So the Sadducees came to Jesus one day. Matthew 22:23, "On
that day some Sadducees (who say there is no resurrection) came to Him and
questioned Him." Now they are going to come up with a hypothetical
question. It is always a problem; I don't like it when people say, well just
hypothetically speaking. Because those kinds
of things usually don't happen in reality, they just happen hypothetically. But
they come up and they say, Matthew 22:24, "Teacher, Moses said, 'If a man
dies, having no children, his brother as next of kin shall marry his wife (this
was known as Levirate Marriage in order to preserve the inheritance within the
family or within the clan) and raise up an offspring to his brother.' "
Matthew 22:25-30, " 'Now there
were seven brothers with us; and the first marries and dies, and having no
offspring he left his wife to his brother, so also the second and the third,
down to the seventh.' " So here is the story, this woman marries one
brother and he dies. Then she marries the other brother and it is not long
before he dies. Then she marries a third brother and it is not long before he
dies. And when they get through with this all seven have died mysteriously and
last of all the woman dies. Their (Sadducees') question
is in the resurrection whose wife of the seven shall she be? It seems to
me the question would be, are they convening a grand jury yet? (Laughter…) So the question they ask (note the
Sadducees don't believe in resurrection), "whose wife of the seven shall
they be?" "But Jesus answered." He is so sophisticated. He doesn't
answer their question, He says, "You are mistaken." He just
challenges them – you guys don't even believe in resurrection. How can
you be even asking this question? You don't understand the Scriptures and the
power of God "for in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in
marriage, but are like angels in heaven."
The issue here is
that this passage is often taken as well, those sons of God mentioned in
Genesis 6 that cohabited with the daughters of men can't really be angels
because this passage says that angels can't have sex; they cannot take on human
bodies and have sexual relations. Is that what that passage (Genesis 22:30)
says? No, that passage says that they don't marry. There is not an institution
of marriage in heaven. Now that implies that there is not a sexual procreation
among the angels. I would agree with that, but that doesn't mean that angels
that have immaterial bodies don't have the ability to transform themselves into
creatures with material bodies that emulate the functions of the human body
materially. When the two angels that accompanied the Preincarnate Lord Jesus
Christ to Abraham in Genesis 17, they were tired, they rested, they ate, they
drank, they slept; all those things. They transformed themselves into human bodies
that had corporeal bodily functions for all practical purposes. So that would
not be an argument against. That is what I call a rational argument that has no
foundation in the text that is used to try to debunk the text that has firm
lexical theological exegetical basis in at least three different books of the
Bible, Genesis 6, 1 Peter 3, and Jude as well.
Jesus is not making
an overall statement about some fact of some other situation. He is just saying
that there is not marriage in heaven, so it doesn't really matter what the
circumstances were on the earth. But then He says, Matthew 22:31-33, "But
regarding the resurrection of the dead, have you not read that which was spoken
to you by God, saying, 'I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the
God of Jacob'." He is emphasizing the present tense of the verb. Sometimes
you wonder why I emphasize verb tense or grammatical minutia in the text. Well
we get this from the Scripture. There are several times Jesus built His whole
argument just on a tense of the verb. Paul built his argument (Galatians
3:8-9), the one we just mentioned in Genesis when he said when the Abrahamic
covenant refers to "seed". It is a singular and not plural, and that
referred to the Lord Jesus Christ. He was building his whole argument on an
exegetical point that the noun was a singular and not a plural in the verse
from which he quoted it. So the Lord is doing the same thing here. He said God
said, "I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob."
He said that when Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were already dead in the ground. So
if there is no resurrection then God would have said I was the God of Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob. By putting it in the present tense, the Lord is indicating that they are
still alive in their intermediate existence and He is currently the God of the
living. That is His point at the end of the verse. Jesus said, " 'He is
not the God of the dead but of the living.' And when the multitudes heard this,
they were astonished at His teaching." So He just flipped the argument
back on them completely.
So the point there
is that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob never realized the fulfillment of the
promises of the Abrahamic covenant during their lifetime. So that implies that
there must be a resurrection in the future during which God will fulfill His
promise to them and the Abrahamic covenant will come to complete fulfillment
and at some future time. So as we wrapped up, I pointed out the aspects of the
status:
G. Status:
1. That it is a
permanent, unconditional covenant; it is still in effect.
We will see in this
list in terms of the last point that the sign of the Abrahamic covenant is
circumcision. Circumcision, therefore, is still mandatory if you are Jewish
because the covenant with Abraham is still in effect. The circumcision is not
for salvation. The problem that you have in Galatians with the Judaizers was
that they were taking circumcision from the Mosaic Law and making it mandatory
for salvation or for sanctification. But what the Abrahamic covenant does is
make it a sign of the Abrahamic covenant, which is eternal and everlasting. And
so, if you are Jewish there is still that mandate, even if you become a
believer and you are in the church age. You are still racially and ethically Jewish
and a descendant of Abraham; therefore, that covenant, because that is still in
effect, would still apply to a church age believer who is ethnically Jewish.
Just because you become a believer doesn't mean you are no longer ethnically
Jewish. It just means your Jewish status doesn't have something to do with your
relationship to God.
Galatians 3:28,
where we have the verse that says that in Christ there is no longer Jew nor
Greek, male nor female, bond or slave. Let's take something a little more obvious.
You're a man; you trust in Christ as your Savior; are you still a male? Yes,
you are still a male; but it is not an issue in terms of your relationship with
God. In the Old Testament if you were a male it was significant because you
could have closer access to God in the temple. If you were a woman you
couldn't. You couldn't get as close to God as a man could. If you were not
Jewish you could not come into the temple; so that kept you from being close to
God. So being Jewish in the Old Testament meant that if you were a Jewish male
and you were free, you could have access as close as you could get to God
without going into the Holy of Holies where only the High Priest could go. So
the point that I am making is that I think we have often misunderstood passages
like this. Just because your Jewishness doesn't impact your relationship with
God and your spiritual status doesn't mean that it is still not significant in
relation to the Abrahamic covenant. That is why Paul had Timothy circumcised as
we have studied in our study in Acts.
2. The New Testament
does not change the unconditional nature of this covenant, which I clearly
stated in Galatians 3:6-18. That is Paul's argument there; that the Abrahamic
covenant is still in effect.
3. Paul's argument
is that whatever the purpose of the Mosaic covenant it could not nullify or set
aside the previous unconditional covenant.
Now that is
important in Galatians 3. Paul is saying that the Mosaic Covenant was of a
temporary nature. It was of a lesser quality. It could not supersede or replace
a previous covenant. I'll come back to that in a minute, but we are talking
about the Abrahamic covenant being unconditional. It cannot be replaced by a
temporary covenant.
Now this last week I
got a question that came to me and I was asked the following question from
somebody who was reading in Hebrews 8 and they
read verse 13, Hebrews 8:13. This is a problem that happens if you don't
contextualize what you are reading in the Scripture. You don't understand it in
terms of its surrounding verses. Hebrews 8:13 says, in that He said, that is
God speaking to Jeremiah in the passage just quoted, Jeremiah 31:31-34. In that
He says, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is
becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away."
Now the way this
person read that when they read "He has made the first obsolete" was
to think the covenant was the Abrahamic covenant. That is easy to do and it is
understandable if you haven't worked your way through the context of Hebrews
7-8 where the writer of Hebrews is only dealing with two covenants, the
temporary Mosaic covenant and then its replacement, the New covenant. That
becomes clear because in Hebrews 7 he is talking about how the priesthood of
Aaron, which is established by the Mosaic covenant, is inferior to the High
Priesthood of the Lord Jesus Christ, which allows the Lord Jesus Christ to
establish a superior covenant, which is the New covenant, which is the topic in
Hebrews 8. So, it is just a point that a temporary covenant does not nullify
the Abrahamic covenant. The Abrahamic covenant is still in effect.
4. "Seed":
we see the emphasis on the word "seed" that it is an everlasting
seed.
5. That this
covenant begins the dispensation of patriarchs or promise, which is what I
looked at the last time.
Just a quick review;
I went through this last time but I wanted to just hit it again.
A. Scripture: Genesis
12:1-Exodus 18-27 for the dispensation of the patriarchs, new administration,
new revelation; all the features are here. Genesis 12:1 gives the new
revelation and this extends to Exodus 18:27 before God gives the law.
B. Central person:
Abraham. God makes the covenant with Abraham. God binds Himself alone.
C. Name: two names
are used by dispensationalists:
Patriarchs: which
recognizes the role of the three patriarchs: Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Promise: which
emphasizes the promise made to Abraham, Romans 4:1-20; Galatians 3:15-19;
Hebrews 6:13-15; Hebrews 11:9.
D. Responsibility:
there is a responsibility given.
Now this is
important. I am going to really emphasize this when I hit this dispensation and
the next one. It is what distinguishes them is going to be new revelation,
which is what is given in the Abrahamic covenant. The new revelation will
define a "new responsibility." And here the responsibility is to the
Abrahamic covenant; to keep the seed isolated, to separate from the surrounding
pagan cultures. And then that will lead to a test to see if they will do that
and remain separate from the Canaanites, Genesis 24:3; Genesis 28:1 compared to
Genesis 28:6-9.
F. Failure: there is
failure, which is their intermarriage with the Canaanites and assimilation with
the culture around them.
G. Divine judgment:
this leads to divine judgment where Jacob and his sons are removed from the
land. The land is a picture. It is literally the place of blessing. God takes
them out. He says you are really disobedient; you are just messing up by the
numbers. I am taking you out for your own benefit, to protect you, where you
are going to grow in a different environment and then I can bring you back
where there will be an opportunity to grow and mature because your numbers will
be great.
H. Grace: But even
in that we see God's grace in the midst of judgment. He preserves the nation
ethnically and spiritually and they prosper even in the midst of slavery.
Key application for
us: Sometimes God is going to put us in really bad situations, but God knows
what He is doing and we may not understand it. It is a Romans 8:28 issue that
all things work together for good because we are in God's plan, because God
loves us and He is working things together for good. That doesn't mean all
things are good. Being a slave was not a good thing, but God used it toward His
ultimate purpose to build the Jewish nation and to prepare them to serve Him in
the land.
X. Then we come to
the Mosaic Covenant:
A. Scripture: Exodus
20:1-Deuteronomy 28:58; Exodus 20-40.
In the age of Israel
we come to the Mosaic covenant. Now the Mosaic covenant and any one of these
covenants is new revelation. What is one of the key elements that we know
indicates that we are moving into a new period of God's administration of
history? There is new revelation; there is new information given. God is going
to modify the way in which He is administering human history and administering
His people. So this is the Abrahamic covenant and in a broad sense it is
covered in Exodus 20:1 with the giving of the Ten Commandments, which are
basically the prelude to the Mosaic Law and extends through Deuteronomy 28:58.
Deuteronomy 29 deals with the Land covenant. But the covenant proper is really
the Law itself, the mandates in Exodus 20-40. There are additional ones in
Leviticus, of course, with the offerings and the laws related to the priesthood
and other ceremonial laws listed there.
B. Persons: involved
are God and Israel. God as party of the first part. Israel as party of the
second part.
God is entering into
this contract with Israel. I want you to see two passages. You should underline
these in your Bible because these are just absolutely central to understanding
God's plan and purposes for Israel and that is important for understanding
things that are said later on in the Bible. As we have gone through our study
of the Sermon on the Mount I have taken the view of the Sermon on the Mount
that is not a majority view at all. I don't know if there is a majority view.
There are a lot of views. But I have worked my way through it and had a lot of
stimulating discussion with different pastors and different individuals. One of
the things we have to understand is that Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount is
giving the divine interpretation of the Mosaic Law and righteousness. I mean
the kind of righteousness that God expects from those who are going to be
obedient to the Mosaic Law. Now is that righteousness that is expected from the
Mosaic Law an imputed righteousness which would relate to their justification?
Or is it an experiential righteousness?
Now one of the
important things to understand is that when God calls out Israel and redeems them
from Egypt, that is that redemption at the exodus that is analogous to
salvation. Does God redeem them before or after He gives them the Law? He
redeems them before He gives them the Law. He gives the Law to a redeemed
people, which means it is not about how to get redeemed, it is about how
redeemed people live. The whole purpose of the Law then is not related to
imputed righteousness, but it is related to experiential righteousness, how the
people in Israel should live. If they are obedient, God promises blessings to
them. In Deuteronomy 28 and in the first part of Leviticus 26 if they are not
obedient, if they are unrighteous, then God promises cursing and judgment. We
will look at that as we go through the age of Israel. So when God is calling
out Moses to go to Pharaoh, He says in Exodus 4:22, "Then you," that
is Moses, "shall say to Pharaoh, 'Thus says YHWH,' " the covenant God of Israel,
" 'Israel is My son, My firstborn.'" So is God looking at Israel
corporately as a nation as saved or unsaved? He looks at them as saved in this
passage.
Now the other verse
I want us to go to is found in Exodus 19 just before God gives them the Torah. Moses goes up to God on Mount Sinai.
They have had the exodus event. They are across the Red Sea. They have gone down
into the Sinai Peninsula and gone to Mt. Sinai. Moses went up to God and God
began to speak to them, and the people said they did not want to speak with
Him. They could not stand His voice. He blew out all the microphones we have on
our mp3 recorders and we really can't get this down, so Moses, go up there and
transcribe it. Exodus 19:3-6, "Moses went up to God and the LORD called to Him from the mountain and
says, 'Thus you shall say to the house of Jacob and tell the children of
Israel: You have seen what I did to the Egyptians and how I bore you on eagles
wings, and brought you to Myself.' " That is their redemption. "Now
therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you
shall be a special treasure to Me above all peoples, for all the earth is
Mine." Is He talking about justification or sanctification?
Sanctification. Is He talking about the redemption of Israel or is He talking
about how the redeemed people should live in order to realize the blessing of
God? He is talking about how a redeemed people should live. He says, "And
you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation." That is a
result of living in obedience. If they don't live in obedience then God is
going to put them under judgment.
So the issue here isn't
how to get saved or justified, but how a saved people live. Let's go back to
the Mosaic Law. First of all the Scripture is Exodus 20-40 primarily. The
persons are God and Israel. Let's talk about provisions.
C. Provisions:
1. There are actually
613 specific commandments. One of the reasons that in the second temple period,
possibly first temple period, that they used a pomegranate as a decorative item
on the robes of the high priest was that there are 613 seeds in a pomegranate.
So they selected that as a symbolic reminder of the Law. So there are 613
specific commandments in the Law.
2. There was
blessing for obeying it.
3. There was cursing
for disobeying it.
4. There are
substitutionary blood sacrifices for many sins—day of atonement (Leviticus
17:11). For other sins there was no sacrifice, but capital punishment instead.
5. The token of this
covenant is the Sabbath, not circumcision, that is the sign of the Abrahamic
covenant. The sign of the Mosaic covenant is Shavuot.
Somebody recently
asked me this question, where did this go that we don't worship on Sabbath
anymore? The reason is because of the Ten Commandments the only one that is not
reiterated in the New Testament is the commandment to rest on the seventh day.
After the resurrection of Christ the early Christians met on Sunday. Now when
did they meet on Sunday? They probably met at night. How many people got Sunday
off in the Roman Empire? None. In fact, this was a real problem for the Jews
when they went out into captivity because here you get the Jewish people who
are doing two really weird things: one is circumcision and that is a big. That
is talked about a lot in the ancient world. They were really weird because they
got circumcised. But then they didn't want to work one day a week. That was
unheard of in the ancient world. They want to take Saturday off? Who are these
people? And they are going to do what? They are going to go worship? Nobody
else did that. So these things really distinguished them and made them unique.
That is related to being a holy people.
The Mosaic Law is
signified by the Sabbath. So the church met on Sunday. There is no mandate to
meet on the first day. It is what they did and usually in the evening is or
early in the morning. Question: The early Christians were Jewish, and they did
rest on Saturday. Yet the early Christians were Jewish. So they were switching
from Saturday to Sunday in their worship? Yes, they would meet on Sunday
morning. I think very early in Acts they would meet early in the morning. They
still had to work. If you are in Israel and you are Jewish they were still
following a lot of the Law because that was their ethnicity, their history,
their tradition, their background. They were not doing it for spiritual
reasons. They did it because that was the Law. So they would only meet on
Sunday morning or on Sunday night before work or after work. So that is when
they would meet and in the early, early church, probably in those first
chapters of Acts, they would meet early in the morning.
I am really glad
that we don't do that anymore even though I am a morning person. You'll notice,
I have never had a sunrise service. Even in my first church when they pressured
me. I'm not getting up at 4:30 in the morning to preach a sermon to sleepy
people at 5:30 a.m. I have never done that. What else? Well if they were still
resting on Saturday but then going to work on Sunday? Yes, they did not have a
five-day work week like we do. Why do we have a five-day work week? Or why do
we have a six-day work-week and have Sunday off? It is because of that
Judeo-Christian heritage. The idea of not working everyday is a sign of that.
Now one of the great points about this sabbatical law is that if you were to
work six days. What is that? Exodus 20:11. For God says for just as I created
work for six days and rest on the seventh. So you work for six days and you
work. It was a mandate. There are like three or four commands in the Sabbath
command and they are mandated to work six days a week. Many people miss that.
They just think they are being mandated to rest on Saturday, but they are
mandated to work six days a week and to rest on the seventh. Just as God did.
So the question is,
if those days, which are patterned after the days of creation, if the days of
creation weren't literal 24-hour days as we know them, then why can't you be
justified in saying, well you know those days were just literary figures. That
is a real popular teaching today. That is just a literary structure in Genesis
1. Genesis 1 is not to be understood as literal six 24-hour consecutive days
this is just a literary framework. But once again you get over into Exodus 20
and the mandate on the Sabbath if it is anything other than a literary
framework then any Jew can come along and say, "I can make a lot more
money if I don't have to take Saturday off. I am just going to work 24/7
because I don't have to stop because God didn't stop for a thousand years or
two thousand or ten thousand or one hundred thousand. Those days were just
ages. So I don't have to stop work until the 700,000th year and then I will
take 100,000. Well I won't live that long so I can work my whole life."
See it opens the door to actually a destruction of the language of that
command. It is meaningless unless the prototype is a literal 24-hour six
consecutive day creation week.
D. Purpose:
1. In relation to
Israel the purpose of the Mosaic Law was to distinguish Israel from all of the
people around them, Leviticus 11:42-44. The dietary laws were not given to make
them healthy.
You will read that
in books like the Maker's Diet. Health had nothing to do with this. Are there healthy
benefits? Possibly. But that does not have anything to do with it. Why do I say
that? Because in Acts 10 when God lowers the big table cloth with the big
banquet of tref food, unclean food for Peter, and He said, "Eat."
Nothing had changed other than the dispensation. Peter had not been instructed
on how to cook it better. You know, the shrimp, the lobster, all the other
scavenger food that was on that table cloth was still just as much a dietary
problem as it was before, but God declared it was all clean at that point. So
clean and unclean have nothing to do with diet. Always be careful of that
because I have read this in so many books. Somebody always wants to know if we
are going to live longer and healthier if we eat what Jesus ate. Well, you
can't get that out of the Bible without distorting the text.
2. In relation to
the Gentiles, now, the Scripture says that the Law had purposes in relation to
the Gentiles. Ephesians 2:11 states that the Law was a wall of partition that
kept the Gentiles away. It separated them.
You know we live in
a world where we want to include everybody. But God's mandates and God's Word
more often than not excludes people. The purpose for the Law was to keep the
Gentiles away from the covenants and away from the privileges and blessings of
the covenants according to Ephesians 2:11. The only way a Gentile could enter
into those privileges was if he took on the obligations of the Law for himself
and became a proselyte to Judaism.
3. In relation to
sin, according to Romans 7:7-8:4.
a. The Law was to
show what sin is. It was to give evidence of what sin is and how pervasive sin
is. In Romans 7:7ff, through the Law comes the knowledge of sin.
b. Second, it was to
cause us to sin more. You just tell some kid not to do something and the first
thing he wants to do is to do what he is told not to do. So by giving somebody
613 commandments, things not to do, then people just wanted to do it even more.
So it aggravated sin.
c. Third, in
relation to sin, the law was to show that a man can do nothing on his own to
please God. Then man really can't fulfill the Law a hundred percent. He can
fulfill parts of it, but not all of it. Parts of it all the time; all of it
some of the time. But you have got to do it all all of the time or you haven't
obeyed it.
d. Last, in relation
to sin, it leads us to the Messiah, recognizing that the Law cannot be a basis
for salvation.
e. Status
The Mosaic Law is no
longer in effect according to Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:15-19; Galatians 3:23-4:7;
Hebrews 7:11-12; Hebrews 7:18; Ephesians 2:11-15; 2 Corinthians 3:3-11.
E. Test: The test in
the Mosaic Law is to obey the whole Law and to accept Messiah as the Prophet,
Redeemer, the Seed of the woman according to Deuteronomy 18:15-19, the prophet
that will come that is greater than Moses. That is clearly a Messianic
prophecy. So they were to do the whole Law and they were to accept the Messiah
as the Prophet, Redeemer, Who would deliver them from their sins.
F. Failure:
1. But they failed.
They failed to keep the Law according to Romans 10:1-3.
2. They failed to
obey the Prophets according to 2 Chronicles 36:14-16; Jeremiah 25:4. They
failed to obey the prophets.
3. They failed to
accept the Messiah when He came, John 1:11. His people did not receive Him.
G. Judgments. As a
result there are judgments. We will look at the details of this in just a
minute. There are five cycles or stages of judgment that God warned them they
would go through if they were disobedient.
H. Grace. But there
is still grace. In every dispensation there is judgment and there is grace.
1. In grace God gave
the sacrificial system for the restitution of the sinner. The primary purpose
of the sacrifices was not salvation, but so that the saved person could be
restored to fellowship and could worship the God of the covenant, the God who
inhabited the temple or the tabernacle.
a. The Day of
Atonement was given for the whole nation in Leviticus 23:26-32.
b. There was
individual sacrifice given for the people, Leviticus 1-5.
2. The Messiah
finally comes to Israel despite their sinfulness.
Now, I want to add a
section. I haven't taught through this before in quite as much detail as this.
Israel is viewed as a redeemed people. I think a lot of people have had trouble
with this. We've dealt with this in many, many different ways. We've dealt with
it in Revelation. We dealt with it in Hebrews. We are dealing with it in
Matthew to some degree, that the Scriptures view Israel corporately as well as
individual, as a collective whole as a nation as well as individual people. So
corporately they are viewed as redeemed people. We also dealt with this a lot
in Romans 9-11. Romans 9-11 is primarily dealing with Israel corporately and
not individually. In Exodus 4:31, notice that you have Exodus 4:31 and Exodus
14:31, so that you can remember those because the only difference is those ten
chapters later. Basically 4:31 in both of them.
After God sent Moses
to the people, and Moses announces his mission to the people, what is their response?
"The people believed", amen. "The people believed, and when they
heard that the LORD had visited the children of Israel and
that He had looked on their affliction, then they bowed their heads and
worshiped." They believed and then they worshiped. This is the response of
a saved people. Not one Jew died when God brought death to the firstborn in
Egypt. They all believed about the Passover Lamb and applied the blood. They
were all saved. Well, I can't say that they were all saved, but almost all of
them because you might have a household of fifteen people who have the blood
applied outside and there may be somebody inside who was there against their
will, but generally speaking they were all believers.
Then in Exodus 14:31
we read, "Thus Israel saw the great work which the LORD had done in Egypt; so the people feared
the LORD, and believed the LORD and His servant Moses." The use of the
word believed is significant throughout Exodus.
1. First of all it
is the hiphil form of the verb amen. The hiphil form is the causative form and it has the sense of
believe as the Theological
Wordbook of the Old Testament states it, "expresses genuine faith
throughout the Old Testament." This is one of the key words to express
faith.
2. Secondly, there
are six occurrences of the word "believe," the hiphil of amen in
Exodus 4:1; Exodus 4:5; Exodus 4:8 twice; Exodus 4:9; Exodus 4:31. Some of them
are "they did not believe" and "they believed" so there is
a contrast there; but it all "marks the faith of the people as a central
theme of the chapter." They believed what God told them and what Moses
told them God said.
3. The third
observation is that the genuineness of their faith is marked not only by their
initial worship, but also by their obedience in observing the Passover. They
worship in Exodus 4 but it is after that the tenth plague comes later. So they
initially believed, they worshiped and later they observed the Passover. They
have believed God just as Abraham believed God and it was accounted to him as
righteousness.
4. The fourth thing
is that the LORD promised them "salvation" from the Egyptians.
Now it could be argued by someone that the salvation that God promised was just
physical deliverance, but if you look at the rest of the context it is more
than that, other words are used. Their response to
the deliverance is again that they "believed," but here it is added
that they believed "in the LORD." So it is not just physical deliverance. They are
believing in Yahweh,
which indicates an entrance and relationship or trust with the LORD. So they are viewed as saved, Exodus
15:13; Exodus 14:30-31.
5. Fifth we
have the Song of Moses, which Miriam sings in Exodus 15 reciting the
deliverance by God, which again uses the same word "salvation,"
Exodus 15:2. It refers to their salvation, their being "redeemed,"
Exodus 15:13, and their being "purchased," Exodus 15:16. All of these
are terms that are richly related to the concept of salvation.
6. Other Old
Testament passages confirm that though they had sinned, God redeemed and
forgave them. Nehemiah 9:17; Psalm 78:38; Psalm 78:42; Psalm 99:8; Psalm 106:8;
Psalm 106:10; Isaiah 63:9.
7. And then
after they are delivered, redeemed from Egypt, then God gives them the Mosaic
covenant. This illustrates their redeemed status (see slide #28).
8. Their redeemed
status is affirmed in Hebrews 11:29; Hebrews 11:39.
9. Conclusion: The
Law was given to define how a redeemed people were to live. It describes the
experiential righteousness needed to remain in the land with God's blessing;
otherwise, they would be removed.
XI. Dispensation of
the Law.
A. Scripture: Exodus
19:1-Acts 1:26.
Now the reason we do
that is because that is when the church begins. Now what are we going to do
with the life of Christ? We will find that out when we get there. I will
explain that when we get there. Nobody outside of Israel knew what was going on
with Jesus. So it is one of those interesting little hinge type dispensations
that last for three years or a little over three years; something different is
happening in Israel, but if you are living in Turkey, in Italy, in Tarshish, in
Babylon or in India and you are Jewish, you don't have a clue what is going on
with Jesus of Nazareth in Israel, so everything continues the same for you. But
if you were living in Judea or Galilee, it was different. There was a new
message, a new test, new revelation, new responsibilities, and there is a
distinct failure.
E. Test: the test during
the age of the Law was to do the whole Law, to accept Messiah as the Prophet,
Deuteronomy 18:15-19.
F. Failure:
1. They failed to
keep the Law, Romans 10:1-3.
2. They failed to
obey the Prophets, 2 Chronicles 36:14-16; Jeremiah 25:4.
3. They failed to
accept the Messiah, John 1:11.
All of that is the
dispensation of the Law. Then we get to the five Judgments.
G. Judgments: Five
cycles of discipline:
1. First cycle of discipline;
these are all described in Leviticus 26:14-46 and Deuteronomy 28. The first
cycle of disciple described in Leviticus 26:14-17 says that if they are
disobedient God would bring:
a. Terror or fear
upon them. They are going to have anxiety attacks.
b. He is going to
bring disease upon them. It is not related to anything you can put in a
laboratory and measure. You can't measure the cause and effect relationship
between their failure spiritually and what happens medically. But God says
there is a relationship. That is because there is something above the physical
laws that is controlling things.
c. They are going to
have stolen crops, which is equivalent to failure of their economy. They are
going to lose the value of their money.
d. They would start
being defeated by their enemies.
2. In the second cycle
of discipline, Leviticus 26:18-20:
a. Pride: Their
pride of power is broken; their economy is destroyed.
b. Drought: There
will be a drought. In an agricultural environment this is a real tragedy.
Just think about all
these people that are living out in west Texas. There are a number of
communities in Texas right now that are within 45 days of running out of water.
There are a number of other communities in Texas that are within 90 days of
running out of water. Southern California is having a horrible drought. Now we
have had droughts before. When did we have a drought before the Dust Bowl?
Remember what happened before the Dust Bowl? The roaring 20s, great apostasy from
liberalism in that time. This isn't the same. It is similar. The five cycles of
discipline are for Israel, but there are similar patterns because God is not
going to allow unjust people to disobey Him in a flagrant manner. So there are
going to be similarities. But for Israel this is the second stage. There will
be drought. The heavens will be like iron, the earth like bronze, and this
means that it is going to be impossible to plant because the ground is so hard.
c. Bad harvest: they
will have a bad harvest and work hard but have no results.
3. We get to the
third cycle, Leviticus 26:21-22.
a. Plagues: there
will be plagues; so there is an increase in disease. You have disease in the
first stage and now it is going to be increased. Something painful is going to
take place.
b. Violence: there
is going to be an increase of violence from wild beasts. The curse is going to
be intensified.
I find it so
interesting that in the blessings sections God said I will take all the wild beasts
out of the land. I will remove them. If you are disobedient I will bring them
back. So what did we do in our worship of nature? We reintroduced the violent
species back in, the wolves, bears, mountain lions, and all of those kinds of
things out of our own arrogance. It is nothing more than idolatry.
4. The fourth cycle
of discipline, Leviticus 26:23-26:
a. Sword: the sword
will come, which means death by violence, violent death. God will bring
military invasion into the land.
b. Flight for refuge:
they will fly for refuge. They will gather together in their cities. They will
leave their homes and leave their farms. They will seek shelter from the
invaders.
c. Pestilence: there
will be pestilence. Disease intensifies and spreads. There is massive death
from all these people gathered together in the cities. The loss of sanitation.
d. Rationing: there
will be food rationing. Ten women with one oven means that there is not going to
be sufficient fuel in order to cook food. They will deliver bread by weight and
that also indicates food rationing.
5. Fifth cycle of
discipline, Leviticus 26:27; Deuteronomy 28:49-57.
a. Cannibalism:
there will be cannibalism.
I just read this the
other day in Josephus that there was a case as the armies of Titus were on the
verge of breaking through the walls of Jerusalem in AD 70. Josephus tells a story of a mother
who killed her baby and cooked it – cut the baby in half stored half of
it for the next day. Well there was a smell and some scavengers came banging on
the door wanting her food because they could smell that something was cooked.
And she said that she would share with them and they were just repulsed by it.
Word of this spread through the city. It is right out of Leviticus 26. It was a
great testimony. This was God's judgment. It revolted Titus and the Romans. It
was said that they wanted to destroy Jerusalem so that they would put an end to
this kind of misery among the people. Even the pagans couldn't believe that
they were killing their young in order to survive.
b. God promised
there would be a destruction of the religions, which were an abomination to
God. The idolatry would be destroyed.
c. Cities would be
destroyed.
d. Places of worship
would be destroyed, the sanctuaries, the temple.
e. Utter desolation
of the land.
f. People would be
driven out of the land that had been promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and
would be dispersed among the nations.
This is the fifth
cycle of discipline. It happened in 722 BC with the Assyrian invasion. It happened
in 586 BC with the Chaldean invasion. And it happened in AD 70 with the Roman invasion. Probably not
since 722 BC have there been as high a percentage of
worldwide Jews living in the land of Israel as we have today. That has
prophetic significance. I am not saying that it fulfills prophecy, but it has
prophetic significance. This is unique. It has never happened. You did not have
a return like that under Zerrubabel, Nehemiah, Ezra, none of them. It is
unique. Any questions before I close? Nothing.
Let's close in prayer.
Father, thank you for this opportunity to look at this this evening, to reflect
upon the Law, upon its purpose, and how You fulfilled Your promises both in
terms of blessing when Israel was obedient, but especially in terms of the
judgment as outlined in Leviticus 26, and how horrible and awful this was. Now
Father, we recognize that all this was to teach us something and to instruct us
and to prepare us for the coming of the Messiah and that as we look back in
history we see how You worked all of this together to bring about that proper
time, the fullness of time as Galatians 4:4 says of the arrival of the Messiah
Who would take away the sins of the world. And Father, we pray that we might be
challenged to the understanding of Your Word to go back and rethink how we
understand the Law in terms of its significance, its purpose, its audience, the
ones to whom it was given, Israel, and how that worked itself out. We can't
understand the rest of the Old Testament and much of the New Testament if we don't understand the Law correctly.
We pray this in Christ's Name, Amen.