The Love Commandment Updated; 2 John 5-6
There are two instruments by
which we live the Christian life. The first is the Word of God, the truth of
God’s Word, and the second is the Holy Spirit of God. The Word of God always
works in conjunction with the Spirit, and the Spirit of God always works
through the Word of God. They do not operate independent of one another. The
Scripture says that we are to walk by means of the Spirit, Galatians 5:16; we are to walk by means of the truth, 2 John 4. The
Holy Spirit illuminates our thinking to understand the Word, to apply the Word,
so that He can use it in our lives to produce spiritual growth and spiritual
fruit.
A key word in 2 John is the
word “commandment,” v. 5 NASB “Now I ask you, lady, not as though {I
were} writing to you a new commandment, but the one which we have had from the
beginning [of the church age], that we love one another.” This is specifically
impersonal love for other believers.
2 John 1:7 NASB “For
many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not acknowledge Jesus
Christ {as} coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist.” The
first word in the Greek is hoti [o(ti], a causal use, and should be translated “because.” Whenever we see
the word “because” we ought to notice that the author is giving us a reason for
something. Here he is giving us a reason for the command in verse 6, that we should walk by means of love. Why? Because there are deceivers. Notice there is a direct
contrast between deception and the concept of truth and love as articulated in
vv. 4-6. So vv. 7-11 gives us the core purpose for this epistle. He is warning
the congregation not to be taken in by certain teachers who are going
throughout Asia-Minor at this time claiming to have association with the
apostles (and they very well could have at an earlier date). In many cases they
were believers but have now changed the truth of the Word for a lie and are
distorting the teachings about who Jesus Christ is. These, he explains, are
those who do not admit [homologeo/o(mologew, the same word we have in 1 John 1:9] or acknowledge
Jesus Christ “coming [present participle] in the flesh. This is a deceiver and
the antichrist.”
2 John 1:8,
a warning. NASB “Watch yourselves, that you do not lose what we have accomplished,
but that you may receive a full reward.” In other words, if we get taken in by
deception then this will destroy our spiritual life and whatever spiritual
growth we had will be lost, and whatever rewards we might have already earned
will be lost. [9] “Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching
[doctrine] of Christ, does not have God…” That indicates the concept of having
Gods as a term for fellowship, as is the term “abide” which is used twice in
verse 9. “… the one who abides in the teaching, he has
both the Father and the Son.”
Christian fellowship is one
of the most abused terms in Christianity. What most people mean when they talk
about Christian fellowship is simply Christian social interaction. There is
nothing wrong with Christian social interaction but if there two Christians
having social interaction getting drunk, or gambling away their pay check down
at the cassino, that is not Christian fellowship. Just because two people are
Christians does not mean when they have great social interaction that that is
Christian fellowship; it is not. The difference between Christian social
interaction and true Christian fellowship is that Christian fellowship
has as its centre and focus the Word of God. The difference is that two
believers can be living on the basis of the sin nature and having a great time
of social interaction but it is not based on the Word of God and on doctrine
where both individuals are in fellowship with God. The issue is not fellowship with
man, the issue is fellowship with God. And if we are
not in fellowship with God we can’t be in fellowship with other believers. What
John emphasises in both 1st John and 2nd John is that you
can’t have fellowship with God unless you have true doctrine. If the doctrine
is false you can’t have fellowship with God, especially in the arena of your
understanding of the person and work of Jesus Christ. See I John 1:1-4. The
point is that without accurate doctrine related to the person and work of Jesus
Christ there can be no fellowship with God and there can be no Christian
fellowship. Fellowship is relationship but you can’t have a relationship if
there is false doctrine operating or if there is sin operating in the life. So
fellowship is based on two things: accuracy of doctrine at the fundamental
level about the person and work of Jesus Christ, as well as not having sin in
the life, or if there is then it is confessed and the believer instantly moves
forward.
The issue with these
deceivers is that they do not acknowledge that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.
This was a basic problem in false teaching in the early church. We must
understand that these deceivers were attacking the early church’s teaching on who Jesus Christ is in terms of His true humanity and true
deity.
- Attacks on the doctrine of Christology assault
one of four areas: a) the virgin birth. This is typical of Protestant
liberalism that submitted the Scriptures to the understanding of human
reason. This occurred in the 19th century and one of the first
things that they did was to attack the whole concept of the virgin birth;
b) there is an assault on the incarnation [to be in flesh, that Jesus
became true humanity] of Christ. In other words, this is an assault on the
person of Christ; c) there is an attack on the substitutionary atonement,
the work of Christ on the cross; d) there is an attack on His
resurrection, i.e. He didn’t really rise from the dead bodily.
- There are two basic assaults on His person. The
first is an attack on His deity, a rejection of His undiminished deity,
and the second is an attack on His humanity. The hypostatic union talks
about the union of two natures—undiminished deity and true, unfallen
humanity—and that these were united together in one person.
- Among Christians in the early and medieval church
(Christian in a general sense) the deity of Christ was never in doubt.
They may not have known how to express it correctly but generally speaking
there was not a problem with the full deity of Christ until about the time
of the Reformation with the beginning of Unitarianism. It is not until
Unitarianism in the 19th century and modern liberalism that
there were so-called Christians rejecting the deity of Christ in toto. That is not to say that there weren’t problems
with the deity of Christ, e.g. adoptionism, but
they still understood Christ as God in some sense.
- Among non-Christians and some sects the attack
was really on the humanity of Christ. This was clearly seen in a group
known as the Docetists. This is taken from the
Greek word dokeo [dokew] which has the idea of appearance—that Jesus
just appeared to be a man. They were attacking His true humanity.
- What are some of the problems with this? A less
than fully divine Jesus can’t provide salvation. First of all, He would
lack perfect righteousness. 2 Corinthians 5:21 NASB “He made Him who knew no sin {to
be} sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in
Him.” So the righteousness that is imputed to us at salvation is God’s
righteousness. If Jesus Christ is not God then we can’t acquire through
imputation the perfect righteousness God demands in order to be saved.
Second, a fully divine Jesus is infinite, even though His humanity is
finite and His deity is infinite, and therefore whatever the person of
Christ does has infinite value. Therefore He is able to pay the penalty
for all sins for all mankind. The third reason Jesus must be fully divine
is that He is the mediator between God and man (1 Timothy 2:5), and a
mediator must partake of both sides of the conflict. He must be fully God
and truly human in order to be a mediator. So Jesus must be fully divine,
otherwise He can’t provide perfect righteousness, His sacrifice won’t have
infinite value, and He can’t be a mediator.
- Jesus must be fully human in order to: a) be a
substitute for mankind. In order to substitute for someone like must
substitute for like. As God He could not substitute for man; He had to
become true humanity; the penalty had to be paid by a human being; b) to
be a mediator; c) to be Israel’s Messiah; d) to fulfil Old Testament
prophecy where He would be a descendant of Abraham, the seed of Abraham.
Genesis 12:1-3; 15; e) He had to be in the tribe of Judah, a descendant of
David; f) in order to fulfil the Davidic covenant. In order to be the son
of David and heir to the Davidic kingship he had to be true humanity, 2
Samuel 7:8-16; Psalm 89:20-37; g) in order to fulfil the office of
prophet. Jesus is prophet, priest and king. The aspect of the Davidic
covenant fulfils the kingship. To fulfil the office of prophet He had to
be a man; h) to fulfil the office of priest, to be our high priest, 1
Peter 2:9. A priest represents man before God and in order to represent
man before God Jesus Christ had to be true humanity, Hebrews 7:4, 5, 14, 28;
i) in order to pioneer the spiritual life for
the church age believer, a spiritual life based on the filling ministry of
God the Holy Spirit. In order to handle temptation He relied upon the Holy
Spirit because He was demonstrating the spiritual life for the church age,
how believers can handle temptation through the problem-solving devices,
relying upon the filling of the Holy Spirit and walking by means of the
Spirit.
- Conclusion: Therefore the attack on the
incarnation which was experienced in the early church, that Jesus Christ
did not some in the flesh, undermines both salvation and sanctification.
This is why John is making such a crucial issue out of those who were not
acknowledging Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh.
- The virgin birth, then, is the basis for the
incarnation and the humanity of Christ. It is therefore the basis for
understanding the person of Christ. Isaiah 7:14 predicted this and is quoted in Matthew 1:23 by Gabriel when he announces to Mary that she is
going to become pregnant as a virgin. NASB “BEHOLD, THE VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD AND SHALL
BEAR A SON, AND THEY SHALL CALL HIS NAME IMMANUEL,” which translated means, “GOD WITH US.”
Luke 1:27 confirms this: NASB “to a virgin
engaged to a man whose name was Joseph, of the descendants of David; and
the virgin’s name was Mary.” Mary gives birth to the humanity of Jesus
Christ but He is preincarnate and His deity is
eternal.
- In His humanity Jesus grew. Luke 2:52 NASB “And Jesus kept increasing in
wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and
men.” Jesus grew and developed in His mentality, “in wisdom.” He learned
like every other baby learned. In His deity he knew everything but in His
humanity he still went through the growth process.
- There is tremendous evidence of His humanity in
the Gospels. He suffers physical pain on the cross; He grows weary and
physically tired; He thirsted; He was hungry; he had physical pleasure; He
rested; He died physically and He was resurrected physically.
- He has titles that indicate His humanity. He is
called the Son of Man; He is called the man Christ Jesus; He is called the
son of David, indicating His Davidic inheritance; He is called a man of
sorrows. Furthermore, we are told that His body was composed of flesh and
blood, Hebrews 2:14; 1 John 4:2, 3.