When Do Believers Not Sin?; 1 John 5:18b–21
The confession of Chalcedon
“Following the holy Fathers, we unanimously teach and
confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ: the same perfect in
divinity and perfect in humanity, the same truly God and truly man, composed of
rational soul and body; consubstantial with the Father as to his divinity and
consubstantial with us as to his humanity; "like us in all things but
sin." He was begotten from the Father before all ages as to his divinity
and in these last days, for us and for our salvation, was born as to his
humanity of the virgin Mary, … “
We
confess that one and the same Christ, Lord, and only-begotten Son, is to be
acknowledged in two natures without confusion, change, division, or separation.
The distinction between natures was never abolished by their union, but rather
the character proper to each of the two natures was preserved as they came
together in one person (prosopon) and one hypostasis.”
This is really an underlying issue in 1 John,
that if you don’t have this Christ as the focus of your attention in the
spiritual life then you don’t have a real spiritual life, because it is this
Jesus who is fully God and fully man who sets the precedent for the Christian
life.
1 John
1 John 3:8 NASB “the
one who practices [does] sin is of the devil.” The words “of the devil” is
simply a genitive of diabolos [diaboloj], and it is so typical to think that it means not
saved. Remember that John has just said that we can sin as a believer and it
just means we are not abiding. So when we sin we are not abiding but we are
acting like a child of the devil, we are being influenced by the Satanic world-system.
[9] “No one who is born of God practices [does] sin…” That is the phrase as in
1 John 5:18. Notice the parallel. In verse 6 the person who abides doesn’t sin,
in verse 9 the person who is born of God doesn’t sin. That must mean that in
John’s thinking at this point he is equating abiding with being born of God. He
is not using the term “being born of God” as a simple term for salvation but
for somebody who has been saved and is living in light of that new birth.
In verse 6 the person who
abides doesn’t sin “because His seed abides in him.” Notice in verse 6 the
person who abides doesn’t sin; in verse 9 the person born of God does not sin “because
His seed abides in him.” This takes us right back to the concept of abiding and
fellowship. “…and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.” This can’t be
talking about being a believer. It must be talking about the person who is
regenerate and what that regenerate nature is capable of. There is this new
nature created in the individual at salvation and that new nature can’t sin. If
we are abiding in Christ it is that new nature that is operational, and it can’t
sin. But as soon as we decide to walk according to the flesh then that new
nature is shut down and we sin. So John is reminding these believers that that
which is born of God, their new nature as a believer, doesn’t sin. He is not
saying they can’t sin, that they don’t get out of fellowship, but he is saying
that in their new nature they don’t sin.
1 John 5:18 NASB
“We know that no one who is born of God sins; but He who was born of God keeps
him, and the evil one does not touch him.” Here we have an interpretational
problem. The debate is, what does it mean that the one
who is born of God keeps himself. Where we see “but He who was born of God
keeps him” there is a textual problem. In the KJV and NKJV it is “keeps
himself” where as most of the modern translations has “keeps
him.” It should be “keeps himself.” Many scholars will
argue on the basis of context and on the basis of two or three Greek MSS that “he who
has been born of God,” because it shifts from a perfect tense to an aorist
tense, is no longer referring to the believer but is referring to Jesus Christ.
They would interpret that as “whoever is born of God doesn’t sin” but Jesus
Christ keeps the believer. That is a true doctrine, e.g. John 17:12; 1 Peter
1:5; Jude 24; Revelation 3:10. But the question is: Is that what this passage
is saying? The preferable view is that he who has been born of God keeps
himself. He keeps himself in fellowship, he keeps himself walking in the light,
he keeps himself walking by the Holy Spirit because he
continues to exercise positive volition.
Then we have the last clause:
“and the evil one does not touch him.” Notice that there are three clauses in
this verse. The first clause: “We know that no one who is born of God sins.” The
second clause: “but he who was born of God keeps himself.” Those two clauses
are linked by a contracting conjunction “but.” Then there is a third statement:
“and the evil one does not touch him.” That is connected to the first two
clauses by the word “and” which is a coordinating conjunction. The first two contrasted
clauses are talking about one thing; the last clause, “and the evil one does
not touch him,” is a second and independent idea equal in weight to the idea of
the first two clauses. The second idea is that the evil/wicked one does not
touch the believer. It is not saying the evil one does not touch the believer
who is in fellowship, it is saying the evil one does
not touch the believer. The word translated “touch” is hapto [a(ptw] which
literally means to touch, as in 1 Corinthians 7:1, but here it has a different
context. It is the same as Jesus touching the leper, touching the blind man,
and healing them. The word in and of itself is not a word that indicates anything
more than simple contact but context indicates what the contact is. The context
here related to the evil one, i.e. Satan, indicates harm. In other words, the
evil one is not allowed on the basis of this verse to touch or do harm to the
believer. That is a strong argument for why Christians cannot be demon
possessed.
So what this is saying is
that on the one hand whoever is born of God doesn’t sin because he is born of
God and has this new nature; he keeps himself. And because he has been born of
God and has this new nature Satan can’t touch him. So there is an emphasis here
on the eternal security of the believer and of the fact that there is only so
much that Satan can do in terms of the angelic conflict in his assault on
believers.
With the introduction of
Satan at the end of v. 18 it is a natural development to go into what John will
remind them of in the next verse: “We know that we are of God, and that the
whole world lies in {the power of} the evil one.” The whole world lies under
the control of the evil one, and this brings in the whole concept of the cosmic
system and worldliness which is a major theme in 1 John. E.g. 1 John
John says in v. 19 that we
are of God, and not simply because we are saved. Remember the contrast here is
between the believer who is operating as a believer in his nature and the
believer who is operating like a child of the devil. We know that we are of God
in terms of our new nature and in contrast the world is under the evil one,
i.e. Satan is the author of the cosmic system. So the believer who is abiding
in Christ, the believer who is walking in the light, cannot be operating on principles
of worldliness.