Clough Proverbs Lesson 68

DI #2: Proverbs on Women

 

We want to go back and recall once again what the divine institutions are and their structure.  The reason is that whenever man mixes these institutions, tries to take from one and put into the other, he winds up in difficulty and suffering.  Things that properly belong to the first one, such as labor, money, things of economic principles, cannot be run as part of the state because God hasn’t designed the universe to run that way.  Interventionism is taking divine institution number four and making it the lord over all the others, and that is the tendency today, that Bible-believing and biblically informed Christians can’t agree here.  We have to say no, this is wrong, and as Christian citizens we vote against it; we oppose this movement, to take the fourth divine institution and let it dictate to all the others.  The fourth divine institution has a legitimate domain but it has to be respected.

 

I noticed one of the white cards that was handed in: What biblical principles apply in Watergate?  I’m not going to say much on that except for the point there is one principle that very, very few commentators have pointed out, and I think I’ll point it out just because there’s a parallel with the office of pastor, and that is that the office of President demands certain confidentiality.  And barring the problem of wrong doing, I’m setting that aside for a moment, the point is that the President should not have to tell people what’s on tapes, he should not have to be subpoenaed and his conversations are not public property any more than mine are.  To function as a pastor I have to counsel; I know of crimes that have been conducted inside the city limits of Lubbock and I know who did them and I know when they were done, but no court in the land is ever going to find out from me because that is part of the confidentiality of my office, which I will defend against any court, anywhere.  No court, because they operate in the fourth divine institution can come over and violate the laws of the Church; the Church is another institutions that operates by its own laws.  Therefore, as pastor I have the right to confidentiality and it’s just the sine quo non of being a pastor.  I couldn’t be a pastor without confidentiality.  And the President of the United States can’t be president if he doesn’t have confidentiality.  Can you imagine negotiating with someone knowing all the while that the tapes were going to become public property?  It’d destroy all negotiations.  So apart from the problem of wrong doing there is the problem of confidentiality and it’s legitimate. 

 

The second divine institution that we’re studying today we have the third part of the biblical position of the structure of this and to review that for a moment let’s go back and look at the role of the man and the role of the woman in this institution.  And then beginning this morning we’ll apply these principles as we seek to read the Proverbs verse by verse and do certain passages that have to do with this. 

 

The first principle that has to do with man is that the man must begin by submitting to God’s Word.  So the man starts actually by submission, the principle of submission to God’s authority, that the man must submit to God’s authority in this sphere.  He has no choice, and he cannot become a respectable male functioning properly in the second divine institution apart from submission to the Word of God.  There are no options.  Either he does or he doesn’t, but there are no neutral grounds.  Every man in marriage must submit to God’s Word or he must resolve totally against it.  There’s no parcel, there’s no half way point, there are no neutral areas; it is either an emphatic submission or deliberate rebellion, one or the other, no in between.  So the man is involved in submission.

 

The second part of a man’s role, we learned, was that he must learn to fulfill his calling with his wife, not in spite of her.  Going back to the principle that the wife is the ‘ezer, e-z-e-r, the ‘ezer principle or the helper principle.  She is a helper to him because of his calling.  God gave Adam the calling, then after that made Eve as his ‘ezer.  Now Eve can’t function if Adam had another calling than the one God gave him.  How did Adam know that Eve was his ‘ezer?  It was not only because she was a person, apart and distinguished from the animals in the creation story, it was also because this particular woman was the perfect ‘ezer in his calling.  So the second role of the man is that he has to learn how to work through his ‘ezer to his calling and not set up an either/or.  This is a case where the woman is the means, not to be used in the bad sense of the word, but the woman is the ‘ezer and without her the Bible says man can’t fill his calling.  The one (?) exception to this is the spiritual gift of celibacy which is rare indeed, and is only used in widespread areas in times of extreme physical emergency in the Church, but apart from those time it is the normal operating procedure that every man has somewhere his ‘ezer and she’s either functioning or not functioning but he cannot fulfill his calling the way he should apart from his right woman.

 

The third point on the role of the man is that he has to learn to love her with knowledge.  That’s 1 Peter 3, you must learn to “dwell with them according to knowledge.”  Notice it is a learning process, it involves time, it involves mistakes, it involves years of learning to dwell according to knowledge.  And it’s something that has to be worked at, it does not come automatically.  Effort is required, under God’s grace, yes, but effort nevertheless, to learn and to dwell according to knowledge.  All right, those are the three principles we studied two weeks ago, to dwell with knowledge. 

 

Now we come to the principles of the woman that we discussed last week.  Her first principle is identical to the man’s, submit to God’s Word.  She cannot function as she should function unless she submits to God’s Word.  As another illustration of this turn to Genesis 3 for a moment and watch how Eve does not submit to God’s Word.  Genesis 3:1, the pitch that the serpent makes is an attack upon God’s Word and Eve falls for it.  And the way Eve goes is the way many, many today go.  Notice the attack first, the last part of verse 1, Satan “said unto the woman, Yea, has God said, You shall not eat of every tree of the garden?”  The implication is in the question maybe God didn’t really mean what He said.  Maybe God’s Word doesn’t really mean what it says.  Maybe God’s Word has some sinister motivation in mind.  You don’t have to take it seriously, you can put it off until tomorrow Eve, why not just disobey it today and worry about the consequences tomorrow; God’s Word doesn’t have the (?) to be obeyed. 

 

And then in verse 2, “the woman said [unto the serpent], We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden, [3] But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.”  Eve is misquoting, God never said that.  In Genesis 2:17 God said you just don’t eat, He didn’t say anything about touching it.  So already Eve misunderstands, she has an incomplete knowledge of God’s Word.  Verse 4, “And the serpent said unto the woman,” outright total and complete denial, “You shall not surely die.”  Satan has come to Eve as he comes to us, always can be identified by an outright total flagrant denial of God’s Word. 

 

Don’t misconstrue this, however, Satan is not going to come to you with drums beating, with sinister music playing in the background, in a red jumpsuit.  Satan is going to come to you camouflaged and the only way you can recognize his attack is to know what the Word says before the attack comes.  So if that’s the case, then how do you recognize a satanic attack?  By thought and impulses that come to you that are totally and completely antithetical to God’s Word.  And how are you going to recognize them?  You can’t, unless you know God’s Word.  And this is why Christians are vulnerable and we are going to see this in the passages before us, how highly vulnerable we are, and I hope by the time we finish this morning you’re going to have a deeper appreciation for the fact that right this morning, right at this hour, the only reason that all of us are not deluded by Satan is because of a certain type of ministry of Jesus Christ. 

 

So the first principle of the woman is submission, not to her husband here, this is submission to God’s Word, that God’s Word becomes the ultimate authority.  Couples who have problems in marriage ultimately have problems because principle number one is not being fulfilled.  All other problems of the second and third principles can be learned and can be dealt with, but most problems, I’ll say this, all serious problems in marriage stem from the first principle, not the second and third.  The second and third can be worked out if you agree on the first.  Can the filling of the Holy Spirit in the man fight against the filling of the Holy Spirit in the woman?  Can Christ fight against Christ?  Nonsense!  Therefore, if there is a serious problem it is because of the first principle.  We might as well name marital problems for what they are; they are nothing more than duo carnality.  And that’s exactly what they are; they are rebellion against God’s Word from start to finish.  And until the rebellion is dealt with by the filling of the Holy Spirit, nothing can happen. 

 

As a counselor I’m helpless, I can only point to the principle that if you’re not going to submit to the authority, the Word of God, there’s nothing… nothing that can be done.  The thing that overarches both parties is the absolute authoritative Word and those of you who are having trouble in your marriage, go back to the Word.  Don’t stand there and argue with one another, well he said, she said, I say and all the rest of it.  Who cares what you and I say; the issue is what does the Word of God say?  The next time, let me suggest a little procedure, the next time you go at it hot and heavy have some sort of a prearranged signal where you can kind of cool it for two to three minutes, call a truce, wave a white handkerchief or something, somebody do something to cool it, and then go and open the Word of God and sit down at a table with the Word of God between you, and then continue the discussion in that environment and see if it makes a difference.

 

So we have the first principle of the woman, submission.  The second principle corresponds to the man’s second principle and as the man has to learn how to work out his calling for his ‘ezer, so the woman has to learn to submit to the husband’s management.  And that has to be learned; she has got to learn how to submit to her husband’s management.  And his management is not going to be infallible.  But we showed last week there’s a text and since we’re here let’s review, Genesis 3:16, “unto the woman God said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children;” and this refers to physiological changes in the woman’s body, all the way from menstrual cycles on down to childbirth.  That’s all involved as a result of the fall.  That’s what this is talking about if you take a literal Genesis.  If you don’t take a literal Genesis then just don’t bother to listen at all.  But we believe in a literal Genesis and therefore there are biochemical changes in the human body and this sets off all sorts of moods and everything else. 

 

So the woman has this affliction, but her chief affliction is not physical, it’s psychological and that’s indicated in the last part of verse 16 where it says, “and thy desire shall be to your husband, but he shall rule over you,” there should be a “but” in there, there’s a conflict.  In other words, she wants her husband very much but there’s something in her that rebels, really, against his authority.  So women have an ambiguity in their soul that has been brought about by the fall, and it’s something you have to learn to work with.  On the one hand they want their husbands, but on the other hand they don’t want his authority.  Democracy went out in marriage at the fall; at the fall God ordained that the man has the final say and therefore, chafing as this may be, that’s the way God wants it done.  So the second thing that the woman has to do is she has to learn how to submit to the man’s managing authority, and it’s a learning process, she isn’t going to learn overnight, men.

 

The third principle corresponds to the third principle for the man.  As the man has to learn to live with knowledge, the woman has to learn the details of her submission.  We gave you Proverbs 31 to indicate certain areas, to show you indeed that the Old Testament woman was not some sort of a doormat, she had tremendous responsibility, tremendous responsibility!  But it was always underneath the authority of her husband. 

 

Now today we’re going to deal with some proverbs.  Turn first to Proverbs 11:16; with the background of these six principles lets see what the book of Proverbs teaches.  All through the proverbs today deal basically with the woman.  But all three reflect principles for the man.  Now that’s going to be the way it is throughout Proverbs.  Proverbs does not pick on the women, so let me head off at the pass anyone who comes up with that.  Proverbs is written to men, therefore it primarily talks to men about women.  But the principles taught about the women have a reflection back on the man, so we’ll try to be fair to both sides. 

 

Proverbs 11:16, “A gracious woman retains honor, and strong men retain riches.”  Now by itself it doesn’t seem to teach much but let’s look at it.  In the Hebrew it is “the woman has grace,” or graciousness would be the best way, “the woman of graciousness.”  Now we have a problem immediately with the word “graciousness” because fundamentally that word means outward appearance.  But if you’ll hold the place here and turn to Proverbs 31:30 you’ll see a problem with the word “graciousness.”  We concluded last time on this and here’s that word so we’ve got a problem because the word seems to be good in the passage we have before us but in Proverbs 31:30 the word seems to be bad and it’s the same Hebrew word.  If you look at Proverbs 31:30 it says, “Favor is deceitful, and beauty is vain, a woman that fears the LORD, she’s the one that’s going to be praised.”  Now “favor is deceitful, and beauty is vain,” the word “beauty” is “graciousness.”  Now here Proverbs claims that graciousness is just vanity, and yet on the other hand the passage before us says no, graciousness is really something.  Do we have a contradiction in God’s Word?  No, the word primarily means outward appearance.  Grace is that which pleases and so the word graciousness means a woman of pleasing appearance.  So fundamentally it does carry an outward physical connotation and that physical connotation is what verse 30 means here. 

 

But now what are we going to do with Proverbs 11:16, “a woman of pleasing appearance,” it’s going to have to mean, obviously, not the pleasing outward appearance but her inner life.  And so the first part of verse 16 is “the woman of graciousness,” referring to her inner life, the woman with that pleasing character, she does not… it doesn’t say “retain,” it means attain, it means to grab hold of, it means to win, it means even to merit, she merits honor, she gains honor, she grasps honor, and the word “honor” means testimony, reputation.  So this says that there’s a certain character or quality about women and where this quality is true of a woman she attains this honor. 

 

Now Peter amplifies it, turn to 1 Peter 3:1, the woman is to use this as her device or tool, this is one of the most formidable, this is according to God’s Word, the most formidable weapon and tool in the female arsenal.  And yet very few women use it; yet God’s Word inevitably goes back to this, every passage from Genesis all the way over into the pastoral epistles, this thing occurs over and over and over and over again.  This is not just isolated passages I’m showing you, in other words.  “Likewise ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands that, if any obey not the word,” that is they’re non-Christians, this is a believing wife and an unbelieving husband, “they may without the word be won by the behavior of the wives.”  Now it’s interesting and you’ll see it again and again in Proverbs.  Every time something bad is emphasized about a woman the word “mouth” occurs in the verse.  And every time something good is emphasized about the woman, usually the word “hands” or behavior is emphasized.  You check that some time when you’re reading God’s Word.  And here you have something bad said, what immediately comes?  The mouth, the word, “that they may without the mouth be won with a behavior pattern.” 

 

1 Peter 3:2, “While they behold,” “they” are the unbelieving husbands, “while they behold,” the word means to study, to look at carefully, “your chaste” not conversations in the King James, but “behavior patterns coupled with fear.”  Now the fear isn’t a fear of humans, that fear, and that’s one of the big points in verse 2, is the fear mentioned there is respect for the authority of the Word of God.  So the thing that the man sees in the woman’s soul is the fact that she is submitting to God’s absolute Word.  That is where the woman gets her strength.  She’s not as strong as the man but she becomes stronger than the man by submitting to God’s Word.

 

1 Peter 3:3, “Whose adorning, let it not be the outward adorning of braiding of the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel.”  Now some old New England fundies got hold of verse 3 one time and they said therefore no woman, if she is really spiritual, ought to wear makeup; no woman if she really is spiritual ought to approve her appearance.  And so Christian women in New England for years and years, in fact in some fundamental circles they’re still that way, look like the worst things that God ever carted out; besides looking as though they combed their hair with a fan it looks like they are doing their worst to put on an appearance that will embarrass the Lord Jesus Christ.  They go out of their way socializing in it in the name of this verse.  Now there’s one very simple rule of interpretation that teaches you this can’t be the interpretation of verse 2, because if they are not to put on the adorning of the hair and the wearing of gold they ought not to wear clothes either because the last phrase says “putting on or apparel.”  And I haven’t yet seen the New England fundamentalist woman follow that verse quite so literally.  Obviously then it means that the woman is not to put the emphasis there and we’ll see that again and again.

 

But, 1 Peter 3:4, “let it be the hidden man of the heart,” all this sounds like oh yeah, that’s what the Bible says but it doesn’t work in practice.  Let me tell you something; the only places where men are being won to Christ in homes is where this is being put to practice and I have never seen a man led to Christ apart from this in a marriage.  So don’t come up with this in a rejecting (?), it most certainly does, it’s the only thing you’ve got to work.  “…the hidden man of the heart in that which is not corruptible, the meek and quiet spirit,” notice the word “meek,” that’s another one of these key words that links up with the word “fear” in verse 2.  What is a meek person?  One who assumes their place on the chain of command, one who assumes their place, neither higher nor lower, neither inferior nor superior, “meekness” means just take your place in God’s plan.  “…meek and quiet, which in the sight of God is of great price.  [5]  After this manner also in old time holy women trusted in God,” see there’s the word again, like fear, “adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands.”  So there is the powerful tool, and the point is that her testimony reveals her fear of the Lord. 

 

Now that basically is the simple very day test that can be applied: can somebody look at your life and see that if they look long enough and watch over a consistent time period they’re going to see the fact that the Word of God is the ultimate authority in your life, and that’s the test.  Is that happening or isn’t it?  If it is fine, if it isn’t you’ve got some changes to make. 

 

Let’s go back to Proverbs 11:16.  That is the (?) thinking woman, “the woman of pleasing appearance grabs honor.”  To show how potent a tool this is, this is an antithetical proverb which means the first part of the proverb contrasts with the second part of the proverb and the second part of the proverb says, “strong man” but the word in the Hebrew for strong means terrifyingly strong, it is a word that isolates the strongest kind of man, “the strongest man grabs,” it’s the same verb as the first part of verse 16, “grabs riches,” and the point is a contest.  Here is a, we’ll put (weak) in parenthesis woman; to the outward appearances she seems weak.  Here’s the strong, this is the absolute strong man; here is the contrast, it’s antithetical parallelism.  Now what is it that the strong man gets?  Riches.  Riches are external; riches don’t involve changing the souls of people, so your strongest man gets things, yes, he gets riches, but he can’t reach inside the soul and change them.  But the women, the woman with this, she gets honor and you can’t get honor unless you change people’s attitudes toward you.  So the woman, though she appears very, very weak, particularly in this proverb, wins when it comes to doing battle with the strong man.  The strong man can’t get hold of what she gets hold of when she functions biblically, 1 Peter 3.  So the woman then comes out on top, she has the most powerful tool.  And very, very few Christian women in these situations know how to use it or even know of it.  So Proverbs 11:16 is one Old Testament version of 1 Peter 3.

 

All right, we come to another principle, Proverbs 11:22.  We should have a little drawing that we had here one Wednesday night, some of the girls gave one of the fellows a birthday party and drew a picture of a pig and put a ring through its nose.  But in verse 22 we have a very sarcastic rendition of the woman’s beauty.  “As a jewel of gold in a pig’s nose, so is a fair woman who is without discretion.”  Now let’s go through this a moment, it’s an “as,” although it’s understood it’s not directly stated, this means it’s comparative, this is not an antithetic proverb like the previous verse.  This is a comparative proverb which means therefore the same principle operates at the beginning that operates at the second part.  “The jewel of gold” means the most valuable thing.  They picked out, to illustrate the principle and to make it clear, “the jewel of gold” is expensive.  This is the most expensive form of jewelry. 

 

So they took something that is very, very expensive and very much sought after, “The jewel of gold in a pig’s nose,” now the pig throughout Scripture is always a picture of unbelief.  It’s always a picture of unbelief.  The Jews, for example, in the Old Testament they didn’t eat ham, that’s not by accident.  True, in that day you had the problem of trichinosis and an omniscient God was giving them medical help, but there’s a deeper reason why they didn’t have ham.  The ham was set aside; the pig was set aside in history as a type of the unbeliever.  And so the point that he’s making is take the animal that would be lowest down on the Hebrew totem pole, the pig, and put in his nose the thing that would be the most sought after as far as attractiveness.  So that creates the tension between an expensive piece of jewelry and the greatest thing versus the worst thing. 

 

Now let’s see how the principle comes over in the man and the woman here.  “A fair woman” the word “fair” is the Hebrew word for beautiful, it means physically beautiful at this point.  It’s not talking about inner beauty, it’s talking about outer beauty, “A physically attractive woman which is without discretion,” now that has to be adjusted to let’s adjust it.  It doesn’t mean “without discretion,” as though she’s never learned it.  This word comes from a Hebrew word to turn away from.  Now that changes the whole thing.  The woman pictured here is a believer who has rebelled against God’s Word.  It is a believer who has rejected, whose gone on negative volition, who has turned away from which we’ll call “discretion” or “conscience,” she has turned away from her conscience, some other criterion is her life, her life follows, something other than her conscience. 

Now to appreciate what’s happening we have to go back to the soul for a moment, let’s look at it, how it’s built up and why this is happening.  Here’s the body, God breathes in a spirit and the result is the soul.  Now the soul has the mind and the mind and the conscience must operate.  The conscience is where all the standards of God’s Word are kept.  This is where every time the Holy Spirit opens your eyes to see something from the Word of God, whether you apply it then or not, you have that lodged away in your conscience.  Now look what happens, a very interesting principle, you can come to church, you can come to Bible class, you can hear the Word of God on tape and say to yourself well, that’s good and someday I might apply it, or golly, that’s a pretty interesting principle, I might get around to doing that someday. 

 

Now look what’s happened; five minutes before you heard that and understood that, it wouldn’t have been a sin for you, but now it is.  Hearing the Word of God is a damning procedure.  Now the Reformers always pointed that out, Luther and Calvin, they always pointed that out, hearing the Word of God can be a very damning thing to your soul if you don’t intend to submit to it because you can’t hear and be neutral; volition is never neutral, it’s one way or the other and you cannot decide, well tomorrow I’ll do it.  Huh-un, we do it now or we rebel.  And so this woman has taken in the Word of God; her conscience is loaded with the standards from the Word of God.  Her mind has submitted to those standards.  Over and over when she was thinking something she’d now is this right or is this wrong?  And all she had was the Word of God circulating in her conscience to go by, that was her frame of reference, that was her standard.  Now her mind always looked and always submitted to this. 

 

As a result, her emotions followed her mind.  Now it’s a fundamental principle, not just of God’s Word, but it’s a fundamental principle about the way all of you are made.  Do you realize that the nearest, that part of your nervous system that has to do with your emotions is on the involuntary side; you can’t change your emotions, you can’t sit there and say I’m going to feel different, I’m going to feel different, I’m going to feel different, there’s no way you can do that because your emotions are plugged into the wrong circuit.  The circuit that controls your emotions is involuntary, not voluntary.  So your feelings and your emotions can’t directly be changed by you at all. 

 

Now here is where a lot of believers have failed completely.  You are led by your emotions.  You sit and you wait until you feel something; well you’ll be waiting a long time until you feel something because feelings follow action, not precede it.  You see, the involuntary side of your nervous system, let’s illustrate it for a moment.  One of the involuntary sides of your nervous system controls your breathing.  Now you can sit here and try to artificially increase your breathing; do you know what’s going to happen after about three minutes?  You’re going to hyperventilate and you’ll be touching your toes.  You can’t do that.  How can you, though, increase your rate of breathing?  Run up and down the aisle, don’t do it now but you can run up and down the aisle and that will improve the rate of respiration.  Now why is it, did you change your respiration by willing to change it?  No, you changed your respiration by doing something to change it. 

 

Now take the same principle over into the area of spirituality; in the Word of God you know what the Word says; you know what you ought to do.  Your conscience bears witness that this is what you ought to do.  So you come to a situation in life, for example, it may be that you come to a situation in life and you see that in your marriage you’ve got a mess and you know from Matthew 5 and Matthew 18 that you ought to initiate the process of reconciliation, you ought to, that’s what conscience says, that’s what the Word of God says.  The Word of God says whoever remembers the falling out first has the moral obligation to initiate the reconciliation.  But you know what always happens?  Sure you do; well, I’ll wait till they come crawling to me.  Don’t be so poker faced.  That’s what happens.  Pride, and so you get this haughty feeling, well I’m not going to do it, I don’t feel led of the Lord.  And we use pious words, doesn’t that sound so nice, “I don’t feel led of the Lord.”  Now isn’t that sweet.  What that means is that you’ve looked in your heart and you don’t find emotions that really quite send you in that direction.  Your wife or your husband may be in the other room and your emotions don’t want to go out there right now.  Now here’s where you can apply something.  Your emotions aren’t ever going to want you out there; the only way your emotions line up is if you say now look, I don’t care what my emotions say, the Word says this and therefore, right left, right left, right left through the door.  And you’ll find when that happens that the emotions do gradually come into line, after you make that a habit pattern.  The emotions are there.  But what had to happen?  The emotions had to be trained by you obeying the Word of God. 

 

Now it’s as simple as that.  Don’t sit around waiting for the emotions to lead you because you feel led of the Lord.  Listen, many is the day when I walk into my office and have about 5 or 6 hours of translation before I can even start exegesis, and I don’t feel like looking about a thousand Hebrew words, and I don’t feel like checking the syntax out, and I don’t feel like checking in the systematic theologies to see whether this lines up with Old Testament theology or not.  I don’t feel like it but I know what God’s word tells me I have to do as pastor so I do it.  Now with young people, that’s a lesson you’d better learn and you’d better learn it quick, and some of you I can tell right now you haven’t learned it because of your attitude toward you studies.  You come to a situation on the campus, you come to a situation in your life that you don’t feel like it and you get your own way.  You can hide this from your parents, oh yeah, I studied today.  Yeah, sure you did.  And you’re just thinking you’re pulling the wool over your parent’s eyes; you’re not pulling the wool over your parent’s eyes; you may be for a while but you are cheating yourself out of learning one of the greatest lessons you can learn and that is to train your emotions into line with your conscience. 

 

Now this woman described here is one who has not done this; she has deliberately not done this; this is a woman who has turned away in verse 22, she has turned away from this as a method of her life so now when her conscience says something her mind says I don’t feel like doing it.  And so her mind says no, I don’t feel like it.  Now look what happens; which becomes authoritative, mind or conscience now?  Mind becomes authoritative, there’s only one problem, God didn’t intend your soul to function that way and when your mind has authority over your conscience your mind is a very weak leader and as a result, here is your emotions, and your emotions know that your mind is a very weak leader, and so the first thing you know your mind revolts against you conscience and you emotions revolt against your mind and you’re one big mess.  And you have depression and you have exultation and you have everything else.  And the first thing you  know you’ll be on the drugs or something else to make up for it, blaming your mother, blaming your father, blaming your home, blaming something else, always something but it couldn’t possibly ever, ever, ever be  you.  And that is the role of the woman who has turned away, as a process in her life she’s turned this way.

 

Now let’s see what happens to her character.  The beautiful woman, she still has physical beauty on the outside, she is very, very attractive physically, but she has left discretion, she has left it.  She knew it once and she’s turned away from it and now she has nothing on the inside.  Now let’s line up the two halves of the verse and see the parallel principle.  Here’s the jewelry, so you’ve got the jewelry, [tape turns] … the make up is on to lose your attention to something in back of the makeup.  That’s the point.  Now the body, according to the Jewish Old Testament belief is only there to lead your attention into the soul.  And this gives you right in a nutshell, very quickly the whole Hebrew concept of beauty.  The whole Old Testament time, the New Testament for that matter, looks upon the body as the means for getting beyond it to the soul.  And that’s why love in the Scriptures, in the second divine institution, doesn’t stop with the body, it would be abnormal, considered from the Old Testament point of view it’s abnormal, any more than you would stop with the jewelry on somebody.  You see someone that’s very attractive and forever and ever you just stop right with the jewelry, right with the makeup, you don’t get to know them any more than that.  Now isn’t that abnormal? 

 

All right, same thing here, it’s abnormal to stop with the body, you go on from the body to the soul, that’s the point.  And that’s why it’s such a ridiculous analogy that’s pointed out here.  They say look at the pig, can you imagine a pig going around with jewelry saying look it, look at me, look at me, look at me.  What, there’s nothing there to look at.  Why put a sign pointing to something when there’s nothing there at the end of the arrow?  All right, then why have a most beautiful woman, a fantastic body, and it points to nothing, one big mess underneath.  That is just as bad as a pig going around wearing the most expensive jewelry.  In other words, you would say, wouldn’t you, looking at this, that the jewelry is wasted on the pig?  All right, then, the Old Testament person would say the figurative beauty of that woman is wasted on her, she’s got nothing behind it and it’s one big waste.  So single girls, that’s the Scriptural viewpoint. 

 

Let’s look at another verse, Proverbs 22:14, now we don’t prove the Word of God by this but I think we can confirm it.  Older men and women, you know your partner for many, many years, think back to how you saw them when you first saw them.  Now when you first saw your partner, when you first saw them you could remember what they looked like physically; that occupied your attention.  But if you really stop and think of it, right now, apart from looking at them, their physical form is not uppermost in your mind.  And the reason is that you’re built the way the Bible says you’re built.  And these function; whether you want to or not you’re functioning this way because your soul is built to know another soul and if you think of your partner right now you basically are thinking of their soul, not of how they look.

 

Proverbs 22:14, this brings in one further dimension in the equation.  This is devoted to the stability of the second divine institution, “The mouth of the strange woman,” see the word “mouth” again; every time something’s wrong with the woman the noun “mouth” appears, “The mouth of the strange woman is a deep pit, and he that is abhorred by the LORD is going to fall in it.”  Now there’s humor involved in this but let’s go through the details.  First, who is “the strange woman?”  “Strange” is zarah, zarah usually in the Bible means a non-Israelite or a Gentile woman; racially it means a Gentile woman.  So what is this talking about; is this prejudice of the Jews against the Gentiles?  Is that what this verse teaches, racial prejudice?  No, Proverbs is a wisdom book and the word zarah used to mean racial, racially different, but by the time we begin to have the wisdom literature, which is 1000 BC, there had been further developments in this word.  And the word has now come to mean a character difference.

 

I’ll prove it to you; turn to Psalm 54:3; zarah does not mean racial difference.  Those of you in the 1 Samuel series you recognize the heading, you remember it was the Ziphites came, this was in the desert, but the Ziphites were Jews, they were part of the tribe of Judah, they weren’t Gentiles, they were Jews.  But what does it say in verse 3, “strangers are risen up against me,” that’s zarah, now see how David is using zarah, he’s not using zarah for Gentiles racially different; he’s using it for Jews that act like Gentiles.  So the word zarah then means a character difference, just like we’d say so and so doesn’t act like a Christian, whether they’re born again or not, and here, whether they’re born Jews or not born Jews, the point is they don’t act like Jews ought to.  Now turn back to Proverbs and let’s look at this woman.

The woman, obviously then, is one that is not living by the law, she is not one that manifests her character of spirituality in the Old Testament dispensation.  She could therefore be what?  She could be an unbeliever or she could be a deeply carnal believer, one or the other; those are the two possibilities for the zarah, the strange woman, “and by her mouth,” we commented on that, now we move to the pit.  What does the word “pit” mean, “The mouth of a strange woman is a pit.”  Now this word is a very puzzling word because sometimes, and most of the time it means a literal pit; it’s the picture is somebody is falling into a pit.  Or you could take a very light view of the verse and say yeah, I can understand the word “pit” that way, what happens is she gives him a line and he falls for it, so he’s falling into a pit. 

 

That could be, but there’s a deeper meaning for this word “pit” and it’s found in Lamentations 3:20, this is unfortunately not well translated in the King James at verse 20.  In the book of Lamentations which is a book written when the nation Israel collapsed, when they went into the fifth step of discipline in 586 BC Jeremiah stood outside and watched his nation go into captivity under Nebuchadnezzar.  Lamentations is written and to this day in Israel the Jewish people chant this book before the Wailing Wall.  It’s the book of lamentations, because they weep and they wail, and they put themselves back into the time of Jeremiah and the prophets, the temple has been destroyed, the temple has been destroyed, the temple has been destroyed, I weep for my people.  And so it’s a book of depression.  And in verse 20, “My soul has them still in remembrance,” literally it means “they think down on my soul,” it’s just a way of saying depressed, I am depressed.  Now if that’s the verb which means they depressed me, then what do you suppose the noun means taken from the verb?  It means depression.

 

Now having found that let’s come back and interpret the word “pit” of Proverbs 22:14, “The mouth of the strange woman,” the carnal believer or unbeliever, “is a deep depression.”  It means not only does the man get hurt, in the sense that he does certain things that lead to unfortunate results, but it’s more than that, it’s the fact that in his soul he suffers from mental depression.  That’s what happens; he falls into depression, he falls into tremendous mental agony and depression, besides the physical things.  So there’s more to it than just the physical.

 

Now the key to verse 14 is found in the last clause and with that we have a very, very startling concept of spirituality.  When we finish Proverbs we’re going to spend some time on reviewing basic doctrines for a little bit and we’ll bring this principle up which I haven’t taught before.  “He that is abhorred of the LORD shall fall therein.”  Now I’m glad that’s in the Bible because I’ve ran across this in experience.  And it’s interesting to watch what happens.  The idea is this; here you have a believer going on, they get out of fellowship.  They are on negative volition, they’re out of fellowship.  They stay out of fellowship, compound carnality sets in, they spend some more time out of fellowship, as a result there’s a darkening of their soul so they can’t perceive certain things.  Their soul is filled with human viewpoint which means they can’t believe any more, they can’t even believe the things they once believed any more, so there’s doubt.  Now as a result of this compound carnality, these people now become victims of new sins, sins that they are helpless to face. 

 

Let’s look at the word “abhor.”  “He that is abhorred of the LORD,” that is a participle, it means his basic character, it means that he has been in compound carnality for some time.  He has rejected God’s mercy, He has rejected God’s grace, He has put away the Word of God, in practice though probably not in theory, in practice he has, and therefore he is under the wrath of God.  God is angry; the word “abhor” is simply the word that means that God is angry; God has turned away from him.  We’ll see that very graphically in Saul.  “He that is abhorred,” he who has offended God, God is angry with him, it’s that one who’s going to fall into the pit.  Now what does that imply about the man with whom God is not angry?  Doesn’t the verse imply that there’s a certain protection in a tight relationship with the Lord.  This verse seems to indicate by contrast that if a man were walking with the Lord, were walking in fellowship, were mature, that he would not fall into many traps which he would if he were not in fellowship. 

 

Now that’s exactly the teaching of this verse and I want to conclude today by taking you to two startling passages in the New Testament.  One is in Matthew 6:13 of all places, the Lord’s prayer.  The principle is: does a believer that’s way out of it become liable and a victim of a whole new set of besetting sins that he never had any problem with before?  Matthew 6:13, a request that is made in the Lord’s prayer that you’ve prayed over and over and over and over, “Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil,” why is that necessary?  Why is that necessary to pray that?  Doesn’t God automatically deliver us from evil?  And the word “evil” is singular, it means the evil one; it means Satan, Satan’s in view in the Lord’s prayer.  “Lead us not into temptation, but Lord, keep us from the evil one.” 

 

Now “the evil one” always wants to attack Christians.  And when Christians are in compound carnality they give Satan a legal base for doing so and God, in His sovereignty just kinds of backs off and backs off and backs off and lets Satan attack where Satan would not normally attack the person.  This is one of the tragedies of compound carnality, where the believer opens himself up to that assault; assaults that he can’t understand.  Why, I can’t even use seemingly any of the passages any more against these things, it doesn’t work, the Word of God doesn’t work any more.  Why does that happen?  It’s because he’s been abhorred of God and God said all right, you didn’t listen to My Word, you’ve rebelled over in this area, so now you’re going to suffer here, here, here and here, I’m just going to back off and I’m going to stop My stop my insurance policy, I’m going to terminate the insurance policy, so to speak, over a little area of your life.  So now you’re going to become liable to this kind of a thing.

 

Let’s see a more graphic illustration in Luke 22:31, this gives you the mechanics in a real life situation, how it all works.  This is repeated thousands and thousands and millions and millions of time in our lives.  Peter has a tendency and a very bad weakness in his soul to assert his authority over God’s authority.  Remember what his reaction was when Christ said I’m going on the cross?  No you’re not, I say you’re not.  Now think of the audacity of Peter saying this.  For all eternity God has decreed His Son would die on the cross; we come down to the eleventh hour, after God has worked century after century after century, after God has manipulated, so to speak, history to bring about the Roman Empire so the conditions are just right, Caiaphas is the high priest, the condition is just right there, the processes have all been fulfilled, conditions are just right there, everything’s just right, every bit of God’s sovereign omnipotence working down through history, and we come to the eleventh hour and Peter says I veto it God.  Now that, in perspective, is Peter’s sin.  It is a rebellion against God’s sovereign plan.  That’s why it’s so serious.  Jesus recognizes its serious and he makes the very interesting words, says He to Peter.

 

“And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan has desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat.  [32] But I have prayed for you, that thy faith fail not.  And when you art converted, strengthen the brethren.”  Well, what does that mean?  We don’t know all the details but the Lord Jesus Christ as God and man knew something, He knew that Peter, the man whom He really loved in the flesh, had a severe weakness in his soul, in fact, Peter had a trait of rebelliousness in his soul that had to be wiped out, and the Lord saw that.  In some way the Lord Jesus perceived this about Peter, and in His omniscience apparently the Lord Jesus Christ actually heard Satan come to the Father and say Father, I’ve got grounds in that man, let me have him.  Now look, this is a believer… this is a believer at this point, and Satan says Father, I’ve got grounds, let me have him.  And the Lord Jesus Christ witnessed this whole thing go on and He said, “But I have prayed,” the word, I have made intercession for you Peter, “and I have prayed,” notice, He hasn’t prayed that Satan not get Peter, notice that.  Satan is going to get Peter, but “I have prayed that your faith fail not” while he’s getting you.  While you suffer his attack, Satan is going to assault you Peter, but I’ve foreseen it, and I’ve prayed that as he comes and as he assaults you, your faith will not fail, that God the Father will provide sufficient mercy and grace to get you through the trial.  I’ve prayed for you. 

 

“And when you are converted,” that doesn’t mean he becomes a Christian, that means he confesses and he gets back in fellowship, “when you are converted,” then Peter, you can “strengthen the brethren.”  The idea being that right now Peter can’t strengthen anybody, he’s not prepared to do it, only after he’s converted, after he’s been through this shocking experience, only then will he be capable of strengthening the brethren.

 

Now that has a very interesting truth of application for us.  Let’s turn to Romans 8, a verse that you should all be familiar with but turn there in case you aren’t.  I want to leave you with this principle that we’ve discovered in Proverbs, in a totally different area, but it’s a principle that applies all over the board, that “he that is abhorred is going to fall into the pit,” and he who is on the outs with God is going to open himself up for satanic attacks that you can’t believe.  But, how is it then that our eternal security is kept.  Did you notice one of those things?  Did you notice one of the phrases that Jesus said, He said “Peter, I pray for you, that your faith fail not.”  What would happen if Peter’s faith “failed not”?  He couldn’t appropriate any grace, could he?  Could he ever use 1 John 1:9 if he didn’t believe it?  Therefore Jesus had to pray Peter, “I pray that your faith,” it’ll be hurt, you’re going to doubt, you’re going to get angry, you’re going to curse God for ever letting this happen in your life, but Peter, “I pray” and your faith is going to go down but it’s always going to be there so you have a minimum amount available so you can come back and appropriate grace. 

 

Now that is the result of something maybe you’re unconscious of as a believer; maybe you’ve been taught eternal security, you’ve never thought how are you kept eternally secure?  Don’t you realize that it’s not an automatic thing, it’s true justification is a once and for all thing, but eternal security is administered moment by moment in your life by a doctrine called the intercession of Jesus Christ.  That’s what Romans 8:34 is all about.  “It is Christ that died,” aorist tense, once and for all, it is Christ that died, yea, it is Christ that rose again, once and for all, that present tense “who is even at the right hand of the Father, and who is making,” now, present tense, over and over and over and over and over and over “intercession for us.”  What kind of prayers is Jesus making for you?  The same kind of prayers He made for Peter.  Satan has desired to have us, to sift us, to attack us in our weak points, and Christ is not praying that we be absolved from the trial, He’s just praying that our faith fail us not in the middle of it.