Lesson 24

God is Faithful – 14:1-15

 

Tonight we begin a section of Joshua in the last part that runs from chapter 14-17.  This section deals with the distribution of the inheritance to three tribes, Judah, Ephraim and Manasseh.  All three of these tribes are special tribes and have special blessings and special roles to play in history.  So for at least two evenings we’ll be on this.  In chapter 14 we start with a five verse synopsis of the distribution.  I point this out because this is something that again and again you will see in your Hebrew Bible in the Old Testament and that is that your summary is always first; the details follow.  This explains, by the way, the structure of Genesis.  Genesis 1-2:4 is a summary of creation; Genesis 2:5 and following has to do with the details; there is no conflict between Genesis chapter 1 and Genesis chapter 2 if you understand Hebrew style. The only thing probably in American writings that comes closest to this style would be newspaper reporting where you have in the newspaper the reporter tries to get through in the first few sentences the major part of the story, to get your interest to read on down, and then he gradually fills you in with details.  It’s the same thing here, so in verses 1-5 we have this whole concept of summary. 

 

Let’s read verses 1-5.  “And these are the countries which the children of Israel inherited in the land of Canaan, which Eleazar, the priest, and Joshua, the son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel, distributed for inheritance to them. [2] By lot was their inheritance, as the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses, for the nine tribes, and for the half tribe. [3] For Moses had given the inheritance of two tribes and an half tribe on the other side of the Jordan; but unto the Levites he gave no inheritance among them. [4] For the children of Joseph were two tribes: Manasseh and Ephraim; therefore they gave no portion unto the Levites in the land, except cities to dwell in, with their pasture lands for their cattle and for their substance. [5] As the LORD commanded Moses, so the children of Israel did, and they divided the land.”

 

Now as we said last time in chapter 13 we come to a change; a change in outlook in the nation Israel.  Up until this time the nation Israel had a prophetic fore view that looked like this: Abrahamic Covenant given back in 2000 BC which would come to fruition in the occupation of the land of Canaan.  This whole land, as far as we can tell from Scripture, for example, if you turn to Deut. 7:22 it was prophesied at this point that conquest would be slow.  In Deut. 7:22-24 God predicts that as they conquer the land it will be done, not quickly but slowly.  We observe this because I want to go back to this principle that we find throughout prophecy in history that will help you in the prophetic conference in putting prophecy in its proper place.  So this is more or less to fill you in on Joshua and also to prepare you for next week. 

 

In Deut. 7:22-24 we read: “And the LORD thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little; you may not consume them at once, lest the beasts of the field increase upon thee.”  There’s God’s concern for ecology, even in the middle of holy war. [23] But the LORD thy God shall deliver them unto thee, and shall destroy them with a mighty destruction, until they be destroyed. [24] And He shall deliver their kings into thine hand, and thou shalt destroy their name from under heaven; there shall no man be able to stand before thee, until thou hast destroyed them.”  And obviously the prediction was that you have two steps; first you have the destruction of all of the nation and secondly you have the inheritance, in that order.  And this is the way the order seemed to appear prophetically up until the time we strike Joshua 13.

Turn to Joshua 13, we just refer you to something we covered last week but I want you to see that something has changed by the time Joshua has at least done what he’s don up to chapter 12.  In 13:2 God says, “This is the land that yet remains,” the concept of the land that yet remains is something new added to this prophetic picture.  The land that yet remains is plotted out to inheritance before it is destroyed.  All of these areas, area one, Philistia, area number two was the coastal strip, area number three was Syria; those three areas with the exception of Syria, are petitioned off and allotted to those who would claim it by inheritance.  Now here’s what’s happened; watch, a switch is happened.  Now here you begin to have the inheritance parceled out before the destruction.  This is a minor change, and it introduces one of the two principles of history that we’d like to point out before going further in Joshua. 

 

One great principle in history is the surprise principle.  This is due to the fact that though God is omniscient, we are not.  So God has revealed things to us; we never have the true complete prophetic picture.  In other words, God’s prophetic outline of history is not airtight; there’s flexibility within its prophecy for last minute changes.  So although the prophetic charts are correct in the sense that you have a long chart, you have the tribulation and the millennium and all of these things, you’ve seen these charts, they are good to visualize the picture the Bible gives, you must always remember that as God did in the past so God can do again.  And that is, there can be details that are not prophesied that crop up from time to time.

 

For example, if you turn in the New Testament, one of the major changes of the program of God occurred in Matt. 13. Up until this time Jesus had spoken of the fact that the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God was going to come in, it was imminent, if they would merely accept Him as King.  Now He is not being accepted as king; the nation turns their back on their Messiah and as a result Jesus introduces something new.  Here’s the way it looked in Jesus’ day; you have history going along, you have John the Baptist and then you have Jesus.  Jesus at this point offers the kingdom to the nation; I am your king, accept Me and the kingdom of God will come about.  But the nation turned their back on Messiah and at this point something new was introduced called the mystery, the mysteries of the kingdom of God.

 

Now what are the mysteries of the kingdom of God?  What are these mysteries? The mysteries of the kingdom of God are things about the kingdom of God which have not yet been revealed until this point.  The kingdom of God is the same; the kingdom of God is unchanged, there’s no change in the basic program.  But there are details that have not yet been revealed that Jesus now chooses to dump on the believers of His time.  Therefore in 13:10, after he’s discussed in parables various things, the salt, the seed, etc. “And the disciples came, and they said unto Him, Why do you speak to them in parables?”  Jesus, all of a sudden, previously had been teaching very directly, very plainly, now He launches off into parabolic discourse.  Why?  [11] “He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.”  In other words, Jesus is saying that to you who have received Me as the King, you have the privilege of understanding further about this kingdom that I am offering.  But to those who have rejected “it is not yet given,” so therefore He turns His back on them through parabolic discourse. 

 

Now turn to 1 Peter 1:10 and you’ll see this principle and how prophecy always contains an element of surprise.  In the Old Testament the prophesies had been woven together.  Many of the elements were there but they were woven together in such a way that it wasn’t so clear that you could draw a prophetic [can’t understand word].  For example, the greatest believer in the Old Testament could never have drawn exactly a picture of future history.  He could give you a rough outline of it but not an exact picture of it and in 1 Pet. 1:10 we read, “Of which salvation the prophets have inquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you, [11] Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ who was n them did signify when he testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.”  Two things prophesied about Christ; the sufferings and the glory, in other words, two things that appeal to be mutually contradictory.  You can go back in Isaiah 9, the Mighty God, the Wonderful Counselor, etc. there’s the glory of Christ.  Go to Isaiah 53 and we have seen Him stricken, the Lord has laid upon Him the iniquity of us all, and there are the sufferings of Messiah.  The two together, how do you unweave them, and verses 10-11 says the men in the Old Testament had struggled with this problem, they had the pieces of prophecy but they weren’t always able to filter them all out in great detail. 

 

So verse 12, “Unto whom it was revealed that, not unto themselves but unto us they did minister the things which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Spirit….” Now in our day we have quantitatively a lot more prophecy than was available in the Old Testament.  Therefore, of course, we can draw a more specific picture.  But the thing to remember about this, and learn this from Joshua, is that though God predicts in the future what is going to happen there is always flexibility in the program.  And there’s a theological reason for this.  Do you know why?  It’s because of volition.  Suppose, for example the prophets of the Old Testament were really able to predict what would happen t Jesus Christ.  Suppose you were to ask Micah or Zechariah, some of the prophets of the Old Testament, let’s draw a prophecy chart, and so they would say okay, here’s how it’s going to be; John the Baptist is going to come here, Jesus is going to come here, He’s going to be rejected, He’s going to die on the cross, etc. there’ll be an interim age, and then Jesus will come again to set up the millennial kingdom.  There will be a whole interim period here due to Jesus’ rejection; here are the sufferings of Christ, there is the glory which shall follow.  But if this had been clear cut then Jesus, during this time period, could no way have bonafidely offered Himself and the kingdom to Israel. 

 

In other words, when Jesus of Nazareth the Kingdom is among you, I am your King, the Kingdom is about to come, it was a bona fide offer at that point.  It was an offer to their volition and they had the responsibility to accept it or to reject it.  But had this program been clear it would not and could not have been a bona fide offer since prophecy guaranteed that the nation to whom it was first revealed and offered would reject it.  You see this in the book of Acts, you see this again and again through Scripture, that God, as it were, gives enough prophetic details to show that He is the sovereign Lord of history and to show us various things to anticipate and expect, but not enough to draw a totally closed chart.  The chart is approximate.  And this has to be borne in mind as we see in this time of Joshua 14. 

 

We read, “And these are the countries which the children of Israel inherited in the land of Canaan, which Eleazar, the priest, and Joshua, the son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers of the tribes of the children of Israel, distributed for inheritance to them.”  The word “and these” refers to verse 32. Actually this sentence in the Hebrew began back in 13:22 even though there’s a chapter break, “These are the countries which Moses did distribute for inheritance…” and then in 14:1, “These are the” ones that Joshua distributed.  In other words, Joshua and Moses are connected and this introduces the second principle of history.  The one principle is that history is always an open system.  It is always open to surprises, but there is another principle corollary to this of history and that is there is a continuity of history and there’s a flow to it.  And here you see Joshua flowing in the line of Moses’ authority.

 

For example, verse 1 takes careful note to draw your attention to the fact that Eleazar, the priest is the one who does this along with Joshua.  Why is this noticed in there?  To show you the continuity principle.  Turn back to Num. 27:18, “And the LORD said unto Moses, Take thee Joshua, the son of Nun, a man in whom is the Sprit, and lay thine hand upon him.”  Now this is said forty or fifty years before the passage we’re studying tonight.  [19] “And set him before Eleazar, the priest, and before all the congregation, and give him a charge in their sight.”  Verse 21, “And he shall stand before Eleazar, the priest, who shall ask counsel for him after the judgment of Urim before the LORD; at his word shall they go out, and at his word they shall come in, both he, and all the children of Israel with him, even all the congregation.”  The point is here that when Moses dies and passes away there’s not going to be left a man who has direct access to God.  Therefore Joshua is going to have to approach God through the high priest who has the Urim and the Thummim. 

 

I’ve done a lot of study on the Urim and Thummim and to this day I still don’t know they are.  The Urim and Thummim are mysterious words there that occur in the Bible for something that was carried on the breastplate of the high priest; the high priest had what looked like an undershirt on, if you want a very undignified term, it was a glorified undershirt.  And over this he had, again the only thing I can think of is something you’d have on a cold day you’d put your hands in it, a muff of some sort, but it hangs down from your neck.  The point is that you have this thing in the front where the priest reaches in, not to keep his hands warm but this is what it looked like.  Now inside this were these Urim and Thummim.  Some scholars believe that the Urim and Thummim were two rocks, one of which had one letter of the Hebrew alphabet, one has another, and one rock represented yes and the other represented no.  This is not divination because it had to be done only by the high priest Himself. 

 

So at a time when there came a problem of justice, there was a decision to be made, and it came to a problem with the lots of the land, then the high priest in a very eloquent ceremony would reach into this area and pull forth one of these stones, yes or no, and this is how they attained guidance.  Another theory says that on the breastplate of the high priest there were many stones and these stones lit up.  For example, Josephus says that up until 200 years before the time he wrote the high priest had an onyx stone on his right shoulder, and when they would go forth into battle or offer a good sacrifice this stone would glow.  But he said 200 years before I began my writings these stones no longer flashed, and evidently the priesthood had become corrupt.  So there was some­thing supernatural going on by which God was able to guide on a yes/no basis.  This is not prophecy; the prophets were verbal revelation, this is just a yes/no type revelation, and God would use this Urim and Thummim.  Apparently this is what Joshua would use to a lot the land.  But the point to remember about Numbers 27 is that Joshua is following exactly these instructions.

 

So when we come back to Joshua 14 you should see that there’s a continuity here, Joshua is submitting to the authority of Moses.  Why is it that we have these two principles of history, the continuity principle that says there is a flow to history, it’s a rational flow to history, not like Hegel; Hegel was a 19th century philosopher who said history moves by thesis, antithesis and synthesis, and it was kind of an irrational thing, so you had the absolute spirit that controls history and you have an irrational synthesis of historic progress.  Now this is exactly opposite to Christianity.  Christianity holds to no irrational synthesis, Christian holds to a rational progress throughout history.  It’s progress that operates this way, not thesis, antithesis, synthesis.  And many religions follow Hegel in this irrationalism; many of the eastern cults, such as Ba’hai, etc. follow the concept that God reveals in some sort of a synthetic progress down through time. 

 

However, the Bible says there is rational progress, that what Moses says here, these are Moses’ words, Joshua may add to them but Joshua can never contradict them logically.  You can always add but you cannot contradict so you have a rational synthesis.  This is, by the way, why we hold, as fundamentalists to the fact that there are no errors in the Bible; there are no contradictions in the Bible.  If there were contradictions in the Bible then that would be bona fide evidence that this book is not inspired by a rational God.  So if we’re going to hold that the universe is created rationally, then we have to hold that prophecy and all of these historical records are logically consistent with one another. 

 

Now why is it that we have the surprise principle: that’s the continuity principle, we have the surprise principle that we have seen here in Joshua.  Why is this?  This is because as humans, being finite, we do not have absolute truth in all its encompassing capacity. We don’t have infinite truth; we have partial truth but we do not have infinite truth.  Therefore we can never know everything, therefore our knowledge, even of revelation, is partial.  For example, on a theoretical basis it might be very possible that God has ten other attributes we don’t know of.  Today all we know of God’s attributes are those that He has given to us in Scripture.  But we have no guarantee that God does not have other attributes.  These may be the “secret things” of Deut. 29:29 that He has not yet revealed to us.  So you want to see this, this prophecy is always true, it’s consistent but it’s always partial.  It is never total.  You can never say here’s a whole picture of everything, I’ve got it all in one box because you can’t put God in a box.  God is infinite and you never can do this to Him. That’s why, for example, when I draw God’s so-called essence box, you never see me close it it’s always open on the top and on the right side.  And the reason for that is to show that God is infinite and you never can close Him off and say I totally understand.    Do you know what that would mean, by the way, if you said you could totally understand God? It would mean that you’re God; it would mean that you have infinite knowledge, so obviously we can never say that.

 

Now in Joshua 14 it says something in the last part of verse 1, “distribute the inheritance to them.”  Now we want to have some understanding about inheritance in the Bible, how this word is used and what it means and why all this nitpicking detail.  Throughout the next several chapters you are going to get into boundary lines, cities, and go up to the hill here, then you go over to the city here, and you wonder what is going on with all this detail.  Well this has to do with the importance of an inheritance.  The first thing about an inheritance to realize is that all of what you are going to read in these chapters are specific fulfillments of prophecy.  In other words, what these are are real estate records that vindicate God is faithful.  When God said He was going to promise “I will bring you into the land,” it wasn’t vague; it wasn’t something pie in the sky by and by, or off in the wild blue yonder some place and some mystical solution.  It was actual literal fulfillment in space time history.  So that what you have is a set of real estate records.  So if you want to think of this as detail, boring, just think of it, these are real estate records, just like you’d go down t the country courthouse and you would pull out property things, you’d find your lot, Lot # 289 of the subsection of such and such.  That is less important than this book; this book is the real estate record for all the twelve tribes. 

 

Now to show you the value of this turn to Lev. 25:23, here you see why it is necessary to go into all these details.  Now you can be thankful I am not going to go into all the details of the nitty-gritty of the real estate records.  All I’m trying to show you is why the details are there. If you’re gung-ho real estate person you can go ahead and read them yourself, but I want to give you just the principles of why they’re there.  In Lev. 25:23, “The land shall not be sold forever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with Me.”  And God is saying here that He has title to this land, it can neither be bought nor can it be sold.  The records, then, of Joshua become very crucial.  These are the records that are going to be used to execute this strange little custom that we’re going to read here in a few verses.  Verse 24, “And in all the land of your possession ye shall grant a redemption for the land. [25] If thy brother hath become poor, and hath sold away some of his possession, and if any of his kin come to redeem it, then shall he redeem that which his brother sold. [26] And if the man have none to redeem it, and he himself be able to redeem it, [27] Then let him count the years of the sale thereof, and restore the overpayment unto the man to whom he sold it, that he may return unto his possession.  [28] But if he be not able to restore it to him, then that which is sold shall remain in the hand of him that has bought it until the year of jubilee: and in the jubilee it shall go out, and he shall return unto his possession.”

 

Now let’s summarize what it says here.  This is one of the most phenomenal systems of economics and welfare that has ever been conceived in the history of man.  If you want a perfect system of economic and social justice, you have but to look in the Law of Moses.  Here was such a masterful system that no person would ever go hungry, but there would never be indolence on the welfare rolls building up and building up and building up as we have in our society.  Here’s how they did it.  Every man, by virtue of his family owned part of that land.  This is why this inheritance becomes very crucial in Joshua.  He actually owned part of that land because he was the son of a father of a father who lived at the time that you’re reading about in Joshua.  When those people came into that land, the fathers of this generation, in Joshua 14, 15, 16, and 17 were the men that assumed title to this land. 

 

Now what God said was that if those men, or their sons or their grandsons, or their great-grandsons, on down in history, lost control of that land through bad business deals, etc. that at the 50th year this land would revert back to the family who originally had title to it.  So for example, if this land had been used on a collateral for a loan, and the loan fell through and somebody seized this land to pay for that loan, the land ultimately would have to go back to that person who originally had title to it in this book of Joshua.  Thus you can see Joshua becomes crucial because this process, of the Jubilee year, can’t operate unless you have an infallible real estate record of who owned what.  So therefore we have all of these details in the book of Joshua.  In other words, this is the basis to make this thing go.

 

I want you to notice something which was typical of their system, not just this particular mechanic but in all areas of welfare.  They had ways of providing for those people who would become poor through loss of loved ones, through husbands dying, through catastrophes in the family, financial reversals, etc.  They had ways of providing food for these people and providing a start again. And the way God seemed to work in the welfare system of the Old Testament was that if a person had become financially insolvent and had essentially got down to the point where he had no assets whatever, there would be enough food in each city so that he would never have to go hungry.  One-third of the national budget went to provide food for those who could not afford it.  It was 33% of the national budget that went to welfare.  But, 66% of the national budget went to Bible teaching and missionary activity.  So that gives you an idea of the ratio of this thing, how it worked out.  So every third year, every township, say for example you’d have a city and they’d tithe; well, every third year they’d take that tithe, which would be food content, it’s not money, it’s actual food, and they would store it locally in the towns.  What for?  For people who would be on welfare, people who needed food, people who would starve otherwise would eat from this storehouse. So you had a means of providing for those who could not provide for themselves.  But, this happened only once every third year so that you would not have a constant buildup of this. 

 

And the land thing that we see in Lev. 25 worked such that if a person was really lazy and they wanted to take advantage of the welfare system there’s no real way they could do it because they’d have to wait 49 years to get that land back.  So this acted as a deterrent to making foolish sorts of things and so on.  So there was built into… I developed this in the Deuteronomy series in far more detail, but there are built in measures so that you have welfare for those who need it, but you have built-in corrective devices so that you never get this welfare problem that we’ve got in this country of everybody and his uncle on the welfare roles.  How does this start?  It starts because of poor design.  God has the perfect design and yet no nation, with the exception of the early Americans to this continent, have ever tried to design a welfare system based on the Bible.  Not one nation, and yet here you have principles for the most fantastic workable system in history, but no nation, to my knowledge, has ever tried to take these principles and build up a system in this area. 

 

Let’s go back to Joshua; by now you should be acquainted with why this book is important and this section and why all these real estate things are important for they form the basis for making this welfare system work. 

 

The other thing that we want to remember about this inheritance is that as this is a fulfillment of prophecy it proves the supernaturalness of the Bible.  Fulfilled prophecy is one of the great evidences that the Bible is a supernatural book because the only way to explain these supernatural prophecies and their fulfillment is one of two ways; you can try to explain it by chance.  Suppose you’re sitting there and you say I don’t want to accept the supernaturalness of the Bible.  You have two ways you can get around it, or try to.  I would suggest you can try chance and say well, I can calculate the chances of this prophecy coming true simply on the basis of randomness.  But if you do that and take the time to do it mathematically you’ll see that it’s almost infinitesimally small. 

 

The second thing that you can do, as the liberals do with this chapter, and say well, the prophecy back there that the descendants of Abraham would get this land is just made up, so this is really the starting point in the Bible, Joshua, and everything that you read this side of Joshua is just made up, it’s a foundation that is made up to give it a platform or something underneath it.  This is where all your modern commentaries and most of the graduates of most seminaries today hold to this view, that Abraham and the early chapters of Genesis are just fabrication. 

Now before we go any further I want to take the word “inheritance” and come over to the New Testament to show you that we have an inheritance as believers and ours is apportioned to us by Christ as this was apportioned to Israel by Joshua.  The first stop will be Hebrews 9:15, the inheritance of the New Testament Christian so you will see that you to have an inheritance that is eternal.  This is you, now the other part is Israel, you’re not part of Israel, the principle applies but you are in the Church Age, so for you, in Heb. 9:15 it says, “And for this cause He [Jesus Christ] is the mediator of the New Testament,” or the New Covenant, “that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament” or covenant, “ they who are called might receive the promise of etrnal inheritance.”  In other words, Jesus Christ has died to bring about the possibility of inheritance.  What can you think of happened in Joshua by way of analogy?  The conquest of the land.  Joshua had to conquer the land in order for the tribes to be able to inherit it.  Jesus Christ had to actually go to the cross and die and rise again from the dead in order for you to be able to inherit your eternal inheritance, so both are analogous in that somebody had to do the ground work, and until that ground work was done your inheritance was untouchable.

 

Go to 1 Pet. 1:4, this is the only kind of inheritance that Christians should worry about.  If you have money and you have a lot of funds, the thing to do is give it away while you’re alive, give it to your children or whoever you want to give it to while you’re alive; the last thing to do with it is endow a religious institution; the liberals in this country have made their money and they have taken over religious organization after religious organization because nitwit Christian endowed these with millions of dollars and if those Christians had never endowed the liberalism would never have existed in this nation because liberals cannot get people to support them.  They are parasites and they live off endowed institutions. We saw this in New England.  In New England you had independent congregational churches in every town and they made a mistake.  Those churches were the common property of the town and early in the late 1600s and early 1700s and even later than that the Unitarians came into New England and they began to vote and as soon as they would get a 51% vote against the Congregationalists in every town they put through a petition and we lost hundreds of churches in New England.  This is why to this day evangelicalism is in a dark corner of the world in New England.  When the power blackout happened two or three years ago that was typological oaf the spiritual blackout because that area of the country was destroyed, basically, by this system.  We had people who would endowed Harvard University with millions and millions of dollars, and that institution was set up by godly men to teach men the classics, not just the Bible but the classics, so they would have a true education within the divine viewpoint framework, a true unified liberal education.  And that institution went down and there was no way they could stop it because the attorney general of the State of Massachusetts ruled the dead hand cannot control property in the next generation, no matter what your will is; no will is strong enough to protect property.  So lesson, if you have property, get rid of it while you’re alive because it’ll probably wind up in the hand of some liberal after you’re dead.

 

1 Peter 1:4, this is the inheritance to be concerned with, our inheritance “To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you.”  Key words: first “incorruptible: this means it is not subject to death therefore it cannot be part of the old creation.  You have two parts of the universe.  You have one part which is the new universe consisting right now of Jesus Christ, plus the spirit of regenerate Christians and nothing else.  The old universe is under the condemnation of Gen. 2, death.  So therefore, if this inheritance is incorruptible it can’t be part of the old universe, it must be part of this new universe down here.  So that’s what Peter speaks of.  It is “undefiled,” and this means… in the Greek it means free from stain.  It means that it is untouchable by the pollution of this world.  So if you happen to have friends in Los Angeles tell them that at least this inheritance is free from pollution.  And that “fadeth not away” means wear not out; in other words, this thing is not going to wear out, it’s going to be eternal.  So there are some more descriptive words for our inheritance.

 

Now go to Col. 3:24 for another verse on the inheritance of a Christian.  In Colossians 3:24 we read, “Knowing that of the LORD ye will receive the reward of the inheritance; for ye serve the Lord Christ.”  And here again we have the inheritance of the believer and here the inheritance is tied with reward; if you’re sharp enough to see the vocabulary here you’re going to see there’s a seemingly contradiction because in an inheritance you don’t do anything to gain an inheritance but you do do something to gain a reward.  And this introduces the two aspects of the Christian life, sovereignty and free will.  God sovereignly says I give you this inheritance but it turns out in history that inheritance you have earned by your Christian activity.  So that by the time you get down there to phase three you actually have earned this inheritance, not in the sense of salvation by works or anything like that but it’s credited to your account.  This is what it means “will receive the reward of the inheritance.” 

 

I’ll read a passage from Rev. 14:13 where this same concept comes out.  “And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from henceforth.  Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labors, and their works do follow them.”  Now let’s read this again.  Here it says believers who are going to die, they’re going to go to heaven and be face to face with the Lord, but this verse says “their works do follow them.”  Now what does that mean?  It means, as I have said again and again, you create your own historical record to present to God.  You are a responsible creature, you can’t blame it on environment, somebody else, you can’t stand the person you live with, your husband, your wife, your child, your parents, some other situation, it’s always somebody else. God says you write your own historical record, you are a free responsible agent and you may have frustration after frustration but God says that those frustrations are not above the grace assets that He gives you to meet them.  So therefore there’s no excuse for Christians saying I couldn’t help it because of something else.  You are personally held responsible.  So this is another area.

 

Finally, one further passage in the New Testament on the Christian’s inheritance, Eph. 1:11.  I want you to see that we truly do have an inheritance, that is going to be as literal and going to be more glorious than the tribes are inheriting in the book of Joshua.  “In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will,” the thing to remember there is that this actually in the Greek it means we have been picked as an inheritance, but the idea will flow as you’ll see in a moment.  Predestination is brought in.  Why?  How is the inheritance allocated in the Old Testament?  It is allocated by God’s sovereign will, they had to consult the Urim and the Thummim; the tribes have no say what the exact nature of their inheritance is going to be;  So the exact nature of our inheritance is planned for us in predestination, verse 11.

 

Verse 12, “That we should be to the praise of His glory, who first trusted in Christ, [13] In whom also ye trusted, after ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation … the Holy Spirit of promise,” verse 14, “Who is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of His glory.”  Now this teaches something that’s tremendous about indwelling.  Verse 14 is saying that the indwelling Holy Spirit and the effects that He produces in your life are an earnest or foretaste of what this future inheritance is going to be like.  It’s a preview of coming attractions, in other words.  The indwelling Holy Spirit, the quality of life that He produces, the peace, the joy and the power, that we described in Romans 8, this is actually a foretaste of that which is exactly the same in eternity.  Now the word “earnest” in the Greek was used for down payment.  The down payment was that which ultimately would be paid, same concept, same thing.  So the blessings of the Spirit now in the present are actually part and parcel of that which is going to be showered in great, great magnitude in the future. 

 

So therefore it should be exciting to you to realize that walking in the power of the Spirit is actually a fore taste of heaven. As one man said, the Christian life should be lived as though we were transported to heaven and came back down again, and we are actually living on the momentum that we got while we were up in heaven.   So that you have this present connected to the future, a continuity.

 

One more verse in the New Testament, Heb. 4 and then we’ll finish up with Joshua 14:3, again we have this interesting contradiction that seems to appear in the text.  Remember we said the inheritance is something God sovereignly gives you, yet on the other hand it’s said to be a reward for your own volition.  Here you have the same thing in Heb. 4:3; it says “For we who have believed do enter into rest, as he said,” but then in 4:11 it says, “Let us labor, therefore, to enter into that rest.”  See in verse 3 you have the certainty that the Christian will enter into that final inheritance.  But in verse 11 it says you’ve got to labor to get into that inheritance.  Why?  It’s simple, the Christian is held responsible for carving out his historical record in history that is part and parcel of that which is future.  The Christian influences future destiny moment by moment because he has volition and he is responsible as a creature that has volition for that which is future.  So it’s connected; it is sovereignly guaranteed but it is brought about, not fatalistically but it is brought about by cause and effect, volition, volition, volition, volition.  Every time, for example, you walk in the power of the Spirit, you are building that future inheritance.

 

Now let’s come back to Joshua 14.  In verse 2 it says they did this “by lot.”  Now here’s the problem, you have the real estate, here’s the Sea of Galilee, you have area one, Philistia, you have the coastal strip, area two, and to the north you have area three.  Apart from these areas the rest of the land is now free, mostly, you have Jerusalem hung up here with the Jebusites, etc. but you have the land basically open to occupation at this point.  Now in verse 2 it says “By lot was their inheritance,” here’s the Urim and the Thummim, here’s where God is giving out these sections of land. For example, Judah is going to settle right in here.  Ephraim is going to settle right in here; in other words, there are going to be tracts of land laid out and it’s going to be under the sovereign control of God, the inheritance sovereignly given to them.

 

Then in verses 3-4 we have a minor explanation of a problem and that is the mathematics doesn’t seem to work out because if you take the nine and a half tribes, how do you get nine and a half from twelve.  Well, verses 3-4 explain this.  You have the Levites eliminated from the system; this leaves eleven tribes.  You have the Levites eliminated. Why? Because the Levites were people who were to be God’s own people.  After the Levites were eliminated you have Joseph.  So let’s take the Levites out, that leaves 11, one short.  Well how do you get twelve then, if you take two and a half away you get nine and a half from twelve, but if you take two and a half away from eleven you don’t get nine and a half.  So verses 3 and 4 explain it by saying that Joseph split, and we’re going to go into that next time, split into Manasseh and Ephraim and that’s why we have the math here. 

 

I just take this time to point out this because I want you to see something that often times I’ve had college students come to me with a problem thrown out to them in the classroom and they don’t know enough of the word to catch it, but the insinuation is that the redactors or the editors as the liberal would teach them in the college classroom, the redactors were some sort of an idiot who didn’t think logically.  And they just kind of piled everything together in some little illogical hodge-podge.  If that’s the case, why do you have notices like this?  If these people didn’t think logically why did they take all this time to explain things like you have in verses 3-4?  It’s simple, they did think logically and it’s the liberal student who comes to the Bible that’s wrong in this area. 

 

Finally verse 5 of this introduction shows you that all of it was done according to Moses.  Verse 5 is going to summarize everything from chapter 14-22; it’s all wrapped up in verse 5.  Verse 5 is a summary verse; it is not chronologically going before verse 6.  Verse 5 summarizes everything. 

 

Now verse 6 and following, we have the story of Caleb.  Why is the story of Caleb put here first?  For two reasons, number one, Caleb was a man who had his own real estate picked out.  God had already promised Caleb something and Caleb said wait a minute, before we start having lots here I want mine and he had the right to do this.  But the second and more powerful reason for having the story of Caleb is because of this man’s mental attitude.  He had the mental attitude of perfect confidence in the will of God and we’re going to see this in a moment.  Verse 6, “Then the children of Judah came unto Joshua in Gilgal,” remember they’re back in Gilgal now, it’s the headquarters, “and Caleb, the son of Jephunneh,” now who he was is a problem in Scripture, his exact lineage, “Thou knowest the thing that the LORD said unto Moses, the man of God, concerning me and thee in Kadesh-barnea.” 

 

Now he’s referring to an event that happened in Num. 13 we don’t have time to go back to that but the Israelites were moving north into the land, they were going to start their southern penetration, they met the Amalekites around Kadesh-barnea and were repulsed.  The reason for this however was a spiritual one.  It was that the spies were sent into the land and they saw these Anakim.  Now the spies really saw giants; these guys would walk around and they were just utterly amazed and terrified at these men and they cam back looking at the whole thing in a naturalistic framework, except two.  One was Joshua and the other was Caleb.  By the way, Caleb in the Hebrew means dog; it’s a very unglorious name.  Joshua means salvation and this is dog.  Now why his parents ever called him dog I don’t know but poor Caleb had a very, very bad name; whether his mother called him here doggie, here doggie I don’t know but that’s what Caleb, it’s the Hebrew word for dog.  And yet this man, working out from under that name, actually as far as God is concerned it’s a very wonderful name because of what follows.

 

Verse 8, “Nevertheless my brethren who went up with me made the heart of the people melt; but I wholly followed the LORD my God.”  Now he’s not bragging there, this is an expression, which is a technical one, used in Scripture, “wholly followed” does not mean intensity of commitment.  “Wholly follow” means duration of commitment, it’s horizontal, not vertical.  “Wholly follow” means a Christian makes it to death in fellowship.  A Christian or a believer who does not wholly follow the Lord is a person who in his latter days, after a previously successful Christian life fades out.  Several examples of this are given in Scripture.  One man is Solomon; he is said to be a man who did not “wholly follow the Lord.”  And we can tell from Solomon’s life why; prosperous in the beginning, faded out at the end, sin unto death.  So what Caleb is saying here is that I wholly followed the Lord, I was obedient like Joshua was. 

 

Verse 9, “And Moses swore on that day,” this is at Kadesh-barnea, “Surely the land whereon my feet have trodden shall be thine inheritance,” now that actually is a quotation from Deut. 1:36 and I want you to see something about this man by the name of dog.  He was given that promise 45 years before he claimed it.  For 45 years he held onto to that promise and for 45 years while they were traipsing out in the wilderness and for 45 years all the way on up through the time of the conquest Caleb held onto that promise.  Now that’s something fantastic.  God gave him a promise and for 45 years it was crisis after crisis after crisis but he held onto that promise and he’s going to cash it in now, with great dividends.  He couldn’t apply it right away, like many promises you are going to learn you are not going to be able to apply right away but you hold on and I guarantee there’ll be a time come in your life when there will be an occasion where you’re going to need those promises, and you’re going to have a catastrophe come into your life or some pressure into your life and those promises are going to come in very handy.  And here Caleb, 45 years after that promise was given… think of it, in 45 years he couldn’t claim it once, but now it’s ready and he claims it.

 

So in verse 10, 11 and 12 you have a strong Hebrew word to emphasize now is the time; you see it in your English, verse 10, “And now, behold,” and you see it in the last part of verse 10, “and now, lo,”  and you see it at the beginning of verse 12, “now,” and this is a powerful Hebrew expression used so often in the Psalms, where the Psalmist is pessimistic and he has his troubles and his trials, and everything is black.  And then the Psalm is neatly cut in the Hebrew, you can see this, it’s usually involved with [can’t understand Hebrew word] and this Hebrew expression, “and now,” and there’s a complete switch in the Psalm, in the last part of the Psalm the Psalmist is thanking God in his life because God has answered his prayer.  In other words, this is a sharp transition in the Hebrew.  It’s a very sharp word.  So what he’s saying is that I’ve held this promise 45 years and now I’m cashing it in.  Now is the time. 

 

So, “And now, behold, the LORD has kept me alive, as he said, these forty and five years,” by the way, verse 10 is from where we find out how long it took Joshua to conquer the land.  Some of you mathematicians should be able to figure this out.  When was Joshua given the promise of verse 1?  He was given it two years after they went in.  Forty minus two is thirty-eight.  So from Kadesh-barnea to the time of the end of the wilderness wanderings are 38 years.  38 from 45 is 7, it took Joshua 7 years to get to this point.  This is how we know it took Joshua 7 years to conquer the land. 

 

Verse 11, “And yet I am as strong this day as I was in the day that Moses sent me,” look at this man, he’s 85, by the way if this seems unusual it is.  If you plot a graph from Biblical data, you can do this on semi-log paper or on regular block graph paper and you work up a chart of the age at death you’ll get a chart that looks like this.  Here’s the flood, after the flood we have two curves, both what we call exponential decay curves, one here, stopped at Eber and begins with Peleg, and this one starts what we call [can’t understand word] to a line here which is 70 years, which is the normal life span.  But at this point, we’re here at 1400 BC, this line is actually at 90 years, so the average life span of human beings at this time was 90 years.  You may find this hard to believe but this is the literal Biblical record and the exponential curve certainly proves this is not due to calendar switching; this is actually due to a bio-physical thing operating in the human system. 

 

So in verse 11 we have this statement made, even though he is 85, “I still am strong,” in the Hebrew it’s much more powerful than in the English.  You read this in the Hebrew word and the word “still” is prominent, and if I were to translate it literally from the Hebrew it would read this way: “STILL I am strong,” 45 years later, I have been holding this promise and I’m still strong, I’m still able to do this as I was when I was 40 years old.

 

In verse 12 he says, “Now, therefore, give me this mountain, of which the LORD spoke in that day; for you heard in that day how the Anakim were there, and that the cities were great and fortified; if so be the LORD will be with me, then I shall be able to drive them out, as the LORD said.”  And what he asks for, think of this, the first man given the land, 85 years old, and he picks the toughest area that he possibly can, because it was precisely that mountainous area around Hebron where the Anakim were, that scared the pants of these little namby-pamby spies that went in there, that were looking at things from the human viewpoint and the naturalistic framework and couldn’t take it.  So this 85 year old walks sin there, 45 years later, and says I’m taking it.  And so Caleb takes over and he actually drives these people out.  This is one of the phenomenal unsung heroes; you don’t read much about Caleb in history; he’s a man in the Old Testament much like Barnabas is in the new, a man who is tremendous in grace and yet the Holy Spirit did not see fit to give us all the details of his life.

 

Then finally in verses 13 and following Joshua gives this to him.  [“And Joshua blessed him, and gave unto Caleb, the son of Jephunneh, Hebron for an inheritance. [14] Hebron, therefore, became the inheritance of Caleb, the son of Jephunneh the Kenizzite, unto this day because he wholly followed the LORD God of Israel. [15] And the name of Hebron before was Kirjath-arba; which Arba was a great man among the Anakim.  And the land had rest from war.”]

 

There’s one point to remark about verse 11 before we close and that is the problem of a person who is a believer who gradually gets older and older in life and reaches old age.  The older a person is in Scripture, you get this Scriptural principle come forth, there’s a danger that happens, and this is why at the end of verse 11 it says I have “strength now, for war,” and then it’s amplified, “both to go out, and to come in.”  Why is that there?  Turn to Titus and we’ll see a Biblical principle about old age, something which as a pastor you have to constantly be aware of, you can see it operate in church history, men who were at one time strong Christians, and it’s very natural to sympathize with them, men who in their day stood up for the absolutes, who did battle when it had to be done, when they get older they forsake the battleground.  And so in Titus 2, Titus is a young pastor, going to the isle of Crete, was warned about older Christians.  Paul told Titus these various things, and in 2:1, “But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine.”  He’s telling him to warn these things about various groups within the local congregation.

In verse 2, “That the aged men [let them] be sober-minded, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in love, in patience.”  And translated the word “sober” is the Greek word meaning alert, mentally alert.  In other words, there’s a tendency in old age to relax, relax your guard, and frankly you can observe this in many, many religious institutions.  Who is it that continues to go back to the institution that they were brought up and raised in in childhood even though that same institution has become apostate?  It’s simply that because in their earlier days they’d never have done that, never would they have, but in their later days they don’t want to fight any more.  And the tendency and the natural temptation is to just do… I haven’t got many years let me live in peace. 

 

But that’s not divine viewpoint, if God has you breathing this morning, that means He has a plan for your life, and when He wants you to relax, he’s going to take you home to be with Him.  So as long as you are living, you have a battle to fight.  And in verse 2, that’s the principle he’s giving here, he says Titus, make sure that these aged men stay alert, and “grave” and “temperate” means… the word here basically means discipline, especially in the area of mental attitude.  And this is a model we find in Caleb; I am still ready for war.  And this should be the motto of every believer.  As long as you live be ready for war; when you’re not ready for war it’s time to be face to face with the Lord and He assigns that time and He’ll take you to be with Himself.