Clough John Lesson 37
Prophecy and the Holy Spirit – John 7:32-39
As we go through this particular section of John, exercise your faith to permit the Holy Spirit to give you some insight and avoid distractions; it’s a very difficult section of the text but one which is quite worthwhile when you see it. The reason why this particular passage is difficult is because as we’ve seen many times the Gospel of John is written with several layers of irony. That is, a word can be said and can be taken three or four different ways, all of which are true. And John has this particular finesse of putting something together like this; ultimately getting it of course from the Lord Jesus Christ. But in this passage we see this developed to an art. In fact, probably there’s only one or two other passages we’ve dealt with so far that come up to a par with this one in intricateness. We said last time that Jesus Christ was in the temple on the time of the Feast of Tabernacles. In the terminology of the Jews for Jesus this, what you’re watching here is the tactics of confrontation. Jesus is confronting the mob and some are rejecting, most are rejecting and some are accepting and it’s causing a division among the people, a division which will ultimately result in Christ’s death.
Tonight there’s two sections of Scripture, one beginning in verse 32 and extending to verse 36, terminating at verse 36 and then a second section beginning at verse 37 and continuing to verse 44. We won’t finish all the second section but we will finish the first section and part way into that second section. Now the first section continues with the kind of conversations we’ve observed so far. These are conversations not about what Jesus taught, they’re conversations about people’s reactions to what He taught. So far in John 7 we haven’t had one discourse yet about the content of what Christ was teaching. We have only the haranguing back and forth between Christ and the mob.
And now in John
In verse 32 we have the
escalation of confrontation between Christ and the authorities. The Pharisees are hearing that the people are
murmuring. What are they murmuring? They are murmuring what we studied last time
in verses 29-31, a radically divided group of people. There is no peace; there is no harmony in
this group of people. Faced with the
Word of God there’s disharmony, there’s discord, there’s division. There is not harmony when the Word of God is
taught, there will always be division.
So since this Gospel, John, was written very late, and in fact was
written during the time of the early Church we want to look at it from that
perspective. This will help you perceive
some things about this passage. On a
time line the Lord Jesus Christ has died, He’s risen from the dead, the Holy
Spirit has come. And depending on your
chronology it could be anywhere between 30 and 33 AD. And the Gospel of John was written way late,
say around 80 to 90 AD. So you’ve got a
time gap and by the time this passage was written, and by the time this passage
was circulated to believers the Church had already been formed and so you have
people looking back from the vantage point of the early Church history. So think of this when you think of the Gospel
of John. It is written through the eyes
of the early Church.
The other Gospels, the
Church was kind of just getting started but in this Gospel the Church had already
begun to operate and as the Church began to operate there would be
confrontations similar to this, in the synagogues all throughout the eastern
“The Pharisees and the chief priests sent officers to take Him.” Notice the two classes, Pharisees and chief priests. Pharisees represented one party, chief priests the other party; the chief priests were the Sadducees. The Sadducees and the Pharisees had two completely different theologies at many, many points. They were two completely different groups; two groups that never agreed upon anything except that we must get rid of the Lord Jesus Christ. On that they did agree. And so they sent officers out to arrest Christ. Christ is now teaching in the middle of the Feast of Tabernacles, He’s surrounded by thousands of people in that great temple arena. There’s a mob in there, thousands and thousands of people, and Christ, suddenly in the middle of the Feast, He’s there. So far He infiltrated the Feast unknown to the authorities. He sneaked in to the temple but now the time for sneaking has stopped; now the time for teaching the Word of God has begun, and now Christ is no longer taking protection on His physical body, now He risks physical violence to teach the Word of God. When the officers are sent out and dispatched into the crowd, apparently from what we can gather in this passage they didn’t have a flat order to arrest Him, they were more or less sent out to see if a situation might arise that could be twisted into an arrest type crime.
So when Christ sees that the priests are
circulating in the audience, He notices the agents, Christ is omniscient,
Christ knows what they’re there for, the people who appear to be interested in
the Word of God but really aren’t, He knows why they’re there. And when He sees them slowly infiltrate and
come up close to where He’s teaching, He says this: “Yet a little while,” and notice John 7:33
begins, “Then,” but in the Greek it doesn’t begin with “then,” it begins with
this particle, oun, which is a
logical particle, “therefore.” It
relates verse 33 to what precedes verse 33, and so therefore we have this
statement, “Yet a little while am I with you, and
then I go unto Him that sent Me.” That
was said particularly to the police who were coming, just because they were
there Christ said this. He said, “In a
little while I am with you, and then I go unto Him that sent Me.” Now here’s where irony begins and here’s
where it demands your attention to the text because in several places we even
have a double irony. We have two ironies
going at the same time. Now at this
point Christ has already said something and those of you are looking at your
Greek texts will notice what He has said.
Look at the statement
very carefully in verse 33 and verse 34.
In verse 34 “You will seek Me, and shall not find Me, and where I am,
there you cannot come.” Now when you see
in the English “I am, in the Greek you have a construction ego eimi, I AM, and that is the title of God in the Old
Testament. And wherever you see ego eimi in John it has that ironic
effect. Christ says “I AM” and it can be
taken two ways and both are correct. “I
am here,” that’s one way of taking it; that’s a superficial way of taking
it. But when Christ says ego eimi He is also saying what God in
the burning bush said to Moses when Moses asked: and God, what is Your name
that I should tell these people when I go back to
So now Christ is saying
something; “A little while I am with you, and then I go to Him who sent
Me.” Now all up through this discourse
up to the present moment, “Him that sent Me” has been a title for the
Father. It’s a title for the Father
here, but there’s a reason why Jesus brings this out. “Him that sent Me” is Jesus’ authority. Remember every time that the crowd has
challenged Jesus’ authority, because Jesus doesn’t teach like the other rabbis,
the other rabbis will quote this man, quote that man, give you 24 footnotes why
something is true. Jesus when He teaches
says this is true because the Father has said it’s true, period. The Father is the final authority. So what He
does is say I am going to be with the final authority that you people despise,
that you people reject. It’s a challenge
to them. Conceivably there might be some
people who listen to the Lord when He says “I am going to the One who sent Me,
that is the One who is the final authority that you people reject,” and that
person could at that time said I’m interested in that, who is this One who has
sent you that is Your final authority, or, there could have been, No, we don’t
want to hear that, here He is bringing up the One who sent Me again. Let’s not think about “the One who sent Me,”
after all, to think about the One who sent Jesus is to think about absolute
truth and final truth and we don’t want that in our system; we want man’s
truth, relative truth and we will do everything we can to turn our face from
“Him who sent Me.”
So in verse 34 Jesus
develops the irony, “You shall seek Me then” he says, and by the way notice
before we leave verse 33 what the connection is between that and the
police. Why does He bring this up when
the police start showing up in the mob?
Because Jesus recognizes that the animosity of the rulers shown by
dispatching the police into the mob that day will eventually culminate in His
death and His removal from the scene, and it reminds Him, as the police
infiltrate, this thing is going to someday redound to My own crucifixion and
when that happens I leave. And so that’s
why the connection there in verse 33, I have a little while with you,
intimating that this little thing is going to go on just so much and then I’m
taking off, leaving you.
In John
Now the irony continues
and increases in John 7:35, “Then said the Jews among themselves,” and here you
have, they thought an intended word of sarcasm, “Then said the Jews among
themselves, Where is He going to go that we’re not going to be able to find
Him. Will he go unto the dispersed among
the heathen, and teach the heathen?” Now
verse 35 is sarcasm; verse 35 is saying where is it that any Jew couldn’t dirty
his feet; why, a good Jew wouldn’t dirty his feet going out into the dispersion
and mixing with Gentiles, the low class rejected race. So when they say Jesus is going to go some
place where we cannot come they completely reverse it. Instead of saying we cannot come because of
what Jesus meant, you cannot come where I because you don’t have righteousness;
it’s required. The Jews turn it around,
well, where He’s going we cannot come because we have too much
righteousness. But they’re trapped by
their own words because in verse 34 it says, “Where I am you are now not able
to come.” And the Jews understand that
where they cannot come must be some place that conflicts with them ethically,
they think in a reverse direction, that is the pollution of the Gentiles is
some place where they can’t get dirty.
But what Christ means is exactly reverse, the place where they can’t
come is because they’re dirty and when they look at this and they hear His
words, “I go to Him that sent Me,” that is back to God Himself, they put
forward He must be going to the Gentiles.
Now keep in mind the
date of the Gospel; the date of this Gospel, 80-90 AD and what had happened in
80-90 AD to the gospel of Christ. Where
in 80-90 AD was the gospel of Christ being preached? Was it not being preached throughout the last
part of the book of Acts to where? To
the Gentiles. And looking at the book of
Acts very carefully, how was the gospel usually preached to the Gentiles?
Wasn’t it because the apostles went where?
Where is the first place the apostles went when they moved into a new
Gentile city? They went to the dispersed
among the heathen, to the Jews in the Diaspora.
They went to the Diaspora and then from that synagogue locally they
branched out and evangelized that particular Gentile city. So in verse 35 the mob thinks they’re being
sarcastic, but in effect, very unintentionally they have, from their own lips,
proclaimed the entire book of Acts. From
their own lips unintentionally they have prophesied, they have prophesied the
exact methodology that would be used in the coming decades to spread the gospel
of Christ.
Here is an illustration
of that principle you find often in Scripture, God uses the wrath of men to
praise Him. The crowd sang it with a spirit of hostility and apostasy, and even
in their apostasy they can’t help but prophesy what God is going to do. And the irony is even further because why is
it that God must turn to the Gentiles?
Because precisely the attitude that sent the police into the temple
room, wasn’t it? Precisely because the
leadership of the nation had rejected Chrsit, that was precisely the reason why
then Jesus had to go to the Gentiles and the Diaspora among the Gentiles. So not only do we have the crowd in verse 35
prophesying the exact methodology in the book of Acts but we have them
admitting that that’s going to be the next step of history, much to their
consternation because of their very attitude that Christ has exposed.
And then John even
develops the irony further in verse 36. What
manner of saying is this that He said, Ye shall seek Me, and shall not find Me:
and where I am, thither ye cannot come?”
What kind of iron is this? Now
usually in John’s Gospel, when John has people, reports people repeating what
Jesus says he never quotes, he usually just says they said thus and such, and
that’s the way John’s style of writing usually conveys it. But John interrupts his usual style of
writing to report a very interesting thing; this day, on this afternoon when
Jesus said something and the crowd repeated it, John doesn’t report them as
they said Jesus said this. He reports
that they said what Jesus said verbatim and what was one of the words that they
said verbatim? “Where I am,” the crowd confessed the deity of Christ by their
very question. Here the crowd in utter
rebellion against the Word of God prophesies the strategy of Acts and even out
from their own lips admit, because they admit that they heard those words from
Christ’s lips, He did say, “Where I am you cannot come.” And here John is giving us testimony, he’s
saying to us in so many words, he says don’t you see how blind these people
are, the Son of God standing a few feet in front of their face, He says words,
they say the same words back to Him and they have no more idea what He’s saying
than if they’d been 100 miles away from Him.
They’re so stupid, so blind to the gospel that they repeat the gospel
and don’t even believe it. This is the
theme of the iron of John.
Now John’s theme has
been the light and the darkness and what John wants to do is edify and
encourage Christians who are having trouble in the Church Age. What he’s trying to do is comfort you when
you come across loved ones in your family or unbelievers you care very much for
and it seems like you teach them the Word, you teach them the Word, you teach
them the Word, they know the Word, they’ve heard it, they can repeat it back to
you and nothing happens. John is saying
to us don’t worry, that’s normal; see the crowd, see that same thing happened
when Jesus taught, they repeated His very confession of deity from their own
lips and while they the sound was coming between their lips they had no inkling
what they were really saying. He says
that’s the irony of sin; you can be there, it can stare you in front of your face
and yet you don’t see it. That’s what
John is describing as blindness… blindness, so so deep; blindness.
Now that ends that
section, the dealings with the mob and now for the first time in this day of
confrontation we have the first teaching that John gives us of Christ. Up to this point it’s just been a discussion,
a jousting between Jesus and the mob.
Now we have one of Christ’s lectures.
And in John
To start turn to
Leviticus 23, we’ll get some background from the Old Testament, then we’ll come
to the slides and you can actually see what was happening. It’s much easier to understand the impact of
what Christ has just done if you share some of this Jewish background as to
what was happening. Leviticus 23:33,
here’s the establishment of the Feast of Tabernacles, also known as Succoth,
and this is the way the modern Jews refer to the Feast of Tabernacles. He probably wouldn’t know what you mean if
you said to him the Feast of Tabernacles but he would know what you meant if
you talked about Succoth. This is the
autumnal festival; it’s established in Leviticus
And it goes on to
describe, Leviticus 23:39, “In the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when ye
have gathered in the fruit of the land,” notice this, it is a fall harvest
festival, “when you have gathered in the fruit of the land, ye shall keep a
feast unto the LORD seven days. On the
first day shall be a Shabbat,” or “Sabbath, and on the eight day shall be a
Sabbath. [40] And ye shall take on the
first the boughs of goodly trees, branches of palm trees, and the boughs of
thick trees, and willows of the brook; and ye shall rejoice before the LORD
your God seven days. [41] And ye shall
keep it a feast unto the LORD seven days in the year. It shall be a statute forever in your
generations: ye shall celebrate it in the seventh month. [42] Ye shall dwell in booths seven days;”
the booths of verse 42 are made from the branches of verse 40, “Ye shall dwell
in booths seven days; all that are Israelites born shall dwell in booths.”
Why, what is the
meaning of this ceremony that goes on and on.
Leviticus
The Feast of the
Tabernacles in the autumn is after the harvest; it’s a picture of the harvest
of history. Down through history God’s
plan has harvested the believers and they are going into the prosperous future
kingdom and it was pictured by the farmers bringing their crops in and then
rejoicing at this thing. But it was more
than rejoicing at the past, it was also looking forward to the future. Turn to Zechariah 14:16, further information
on Succoth. Not only did it look back to
the fact that God had made provisions, not only was that true but it looked
forward. This is talking about the
millennial kingdom and the Succoth feast will be in operation then. “And it shall come to pass that every one
that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall go up from
year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep Succoth, [the
Feast of Tabernacles].” [17] And it
shall be that whoever will not come up of all the families of the earth unto
And so the second
feature of the Feast of Tabernacles was not only that it looked back to God’s
provision and thanked Him for the harvest of the past crop but it looked
forward to the new crop and it was in essence a thank you but it was a thank
you saying that we want rain for our next year’s crop. It was a prayer for the winter rains that
would come, wetting the soil and preparing it for the next crop. The point is that people who do not thank God
for past blessings are not going to get the blessings continued; that’s the
issue that was used in the Old Testament.
Prophetically what does this look at?
It looks at history and the beginning of the millennial kingdom. And the millennial kingdom will be a time of
great prosperity, prosperity pictured by the source of prosperity in an
agricultural economy, which is rain. So
the rain pictures God’s grace coming to the people.
Now as this developed
over the centuries the Jewish people had many things that they did, some which
are not discussed in the Word of God because they were developed in
detail. But it’s necessary that I read
to you some of the Mishnah, this is a book that describes the laws of the
Pharisees, written after the time of the New Testament but does portray what
was happening in New Testament times.
I’m going to read you a section about Succoth because it shows you that
they had a little feature here about this rain that developed and led to
something which I’ll show in a moment.
First, you remember in
Leviticus it talked about you will cut off those palm branches, the willow
trees, and you’ll make tabernacles from these.
This was called in the Mishnah, the lulav and they would wave it and
then they’d stick it around the altar or they’d make tabernacles out of this
lulav. Here are the directions that were
being followed in that day. “Oh where do
they shake the lulav, at the beginning and the end of the Psalm, O Give Thanks
unto the Lord.” Now that tells you
something else? What did I just
say? It didn’t Psalm 118, that’s what it
means; they didn’t have numbers on their Psalms. So how did they refer to Psalms? By the first verse of the Psalm. Many of you have sat through Easter sermons
and listened to the last words of Christ and in that place where Christ is
dying on the cross it says, “My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me.” And we
don’t read that right, we think that’s all Christ said; no He didn’t, He said
Psalm 22 and that’s just the author of the Gospel’s way of saying: And Christ
said Psalm 22. He didn’t have 22, the
number, so he just gave us verse 1 of Psalm 22, and hoped that we’d understand
that Christ said the whole Psalm, but most of us don’t understand that. But here in the Mishnah literature we see
it. “When do we shake the lulav? At the beginning and the end of the Psalm, O
Give Thanks unto the Lord,” which is Psalm 118, “and at the verse, Save now we
beseech Thee, O Lord,” which is Psalm 118:25, now keep in mind because Christ
is going to say something here and you’ve got to see what the mob is doing to
see what Christ is doing. The mob has
been, for four or five days, has been shaking the lulav, and when they shake
the lulav, what do they say? “Save now,
O Jehovah.” “Save now, O Jehovah.” And the context is the context of rain. And how is God going to supply their
needs? By supplying rain. That’s what it means to “save now O Lord,”
save our economy by giving us a good crop to come. “And then do this also at the verse, O Lord,
we beseech Thee, send now prosperity,” which the same point. And then it describes how they do it.
There’s a second
section having to do with this, “What was [can’t understand words] of the
willow branch fulfilled.” Here’s a
description of where they got the willow branch and what they did with it for
the lulav. “There was a place below
Now I want to show you
a little background of how this willow branch thing works. [He shows slides.] There is a picture of the kind of tabernacle
that was made so get in mind the kind of thing that was built out of these
willow branches and palm trees and whatever else that they used; notice how
tall those things are; that’s the size, they weren’t just waving
Kleenexes. They had long high things, if
the branch was that long it would droop if you only supported it at the bottom,
and that’s how they formed the tabernacle.
In the Mishnah it said they went to a place west of Jerusalem; today the
main highway, all the way to the Israeli coast, Tel Aviv, has a sharp curve as
it comes down from the west side of Jerusalem and there is the village of Motza,
the village is still there. And that’s
the place; about four miles west of the present city of
Added to the Feast of
the lulav and the waving of the willows there came eventually into the
development, by the time of Christ, something new. And what this something new was the details
of the day. Now keep in mind Christ has
showed up in the middle of this; people have been going… this was a 24 hour a
day for seven days, nobody got any sleep, so you can imagine people were a
little pitchy toward the end. That’s the
background for John 8. Now at the beginning
of this thing, here’s what the days activities look like. The Jewish day starts at evening so at
evening they would go into the court of women and they would have a blast there
all night; I mean a wild party, they believed in enjoying themselves before the
Lord and they had a real knock down party, and this went on for seven
days. Now this is not to justify every
little immoral thing that comes along but my point is to show you that when
they worshipped their God they enjoyed it, they used real wine and they relaxed
and had a ball. God, Jehovah, was enjoyable to the Jews and they weren’t afraid
of saying so.
As this went on all
night, toward morning two priests would get up in the temple and here’s what they
would do: “While the greater part of the night was thus spent, singing, playing
and dancing, two priests stood high above the humming crowd at the upper gate
which led from the court of the Israelites down to the women’s court. In their hands they held trumpets and they
stood, listening for the first crowing of the cock. As soon as they heard the
cock crow,” and by the way, this ceremony is the background for Peter’s denial
of Christ later on, why that cock crowing there is given to Peter but we’ll bring
that up when we get to that point in the Gospel. At this point the sun is about to rise and
the two priests stand there with their trumpets and they’re listening for that
first cock crow. “As soon as they heard
the cock crow they lifted up their trumpets to their lips and they blew three
blasts; these sounds were a signal for the end of the night’s merriment. The crowd arrayed itself in the wake of the
priests to a descending procession to the well of Siloam. The procession which went out through the
eastern water gate moved slowly and was brought often to a standstill by
repeated trumpet blasts, and when they reached the water gate the people turned
back toward the west, faced the sanctuary and declared: Our fathers who were on
this place stood with their back toward the temple and their faces toward the
east and they prostrated themselves eastward to the sun; but as for us, our
eyes are turned to the Lord.” Now keep
that in mind, for seven days every morning when the crowd went out to get the
water they turned back to the temple and they said “for us, our eyes are turned
to the Lord.” This is the background for
what Jesus is going to say.
“Then the procession
moved on and when it reached Siloam the priest who was in charge of drawing the
water from the well filled his golden pitcher, which after the whole procession
returned the way it had come.” So they
went all the way down, you’ll see this in a moment, I’ve got the pictures and
the terrain, and they went all the way back.
And they poured water into one of two bowls that were placed by the
altar. So you visualize the priest, he leads the people down, hundreds and
hundreds of people in this procession, they go, the priest dips this golden
pitcher in the pool of Siloam and then he holds it up and they go in a
magnificent procession back up to the temple.
When the priest walks into the temple he takes the water in the bowl and
he pours it into one of the pitchers.
There’s one of these pitchers by the altar with a tube that goes down to
the earth, it’s called water libation, and then there was a second bowl, wine
libation. And so the priests would pour
wine in one of these bowls and it would drip down into the earth, and then he
poured a second one, water, into the first bowl and it would drip down into the
earth.
The Mishnah records a
few other details associated with this: “The water libation, seven days, what
was the manner of this? They used to
fill a golden flagon holding one and a
half pints with water,” a small amount, “when they reached the water gate,”
this is on the way back, “they blew on the shophar sustained and quavering and
another sustained blast.” Notice three
again. The priest, whose turn of duty it
was, went up the altar ramp, turned to the right, were the silver bowls. Rabbi
This is a map of the
city of
Then they’d come down
this plateau, the City of
Now I think we’re ready
to work with Jesus’ words. Let’s look at
the schedule for the day: all night we had the party; at the crack of dawn the
trumpets would sound and there would begin the water libation. The water libation was the going down to the
pool of Siloam in that long procession, coming back and then ceremoniously
pouring the water out onto the earth.
Keep that picture in mind; all these pictures come together in Jesus’
words, so this is why it’s so hard to teach, there’s about a dozen different
pictures that He’s making use of here. Then after this was done they would go
down to Motza for the willow branches; that’s when that thing started. They’d have another procession; then they’d
come back from that procession and they would have sacrifices and teaching the
rest of the day until sundown. When
sundown came they’d start the cycle all over again, party, next morning trumpet
and so on.
Now let’s go to John 7:37, keep all that in mind and now watch what Jesus does. “In the last day, that great day of the feast,” this could be the seventh or the eighth, there’s a big debate on it, if it is the eighth day they did not have the water libation this particular day, but nevertheless, the mob, for seven days, at least, has gone through this ritual and has chanted, every time that water libation occurred they walked and they said our eyes are now turning upon the Lord; and every day when they waved the lulavs they said, “save now oh Lord, we beseech Thee.” And every day they would watch the priests gather the water from the pool of Siloam and pour it out on the earth, by the altar. Now on the last day, after the crowd has had seven days to experience the typology of the feast, Jesus Christ had been standing, it’s pluperfect, it’s a dramatic tense of the verb because John wants us to see Christ standing almost a little bit above the crowd. He had been standing there for some time looking out over the crowd. And then suddenly, we don’t know whether it was in the early morning or afternoon, probably in the afternoon when the teaching was finishing up, “Jesus stood and cried,” it’s the same word here that was used earlier, it’s the word to scream out, He says, “saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto Me, and drink.”
Now before we get into the details let’s remember certain things. Let’s remember that the Lord Jesus Christ has the audacity to do this with the police watching Him. Remember that’s the lead in, this whole thing is full of fear, and so now for the second time in the feast Jesus Christ screams out across the court so everybody in the court has that gone through this ritual for the last seven days hears these words, “If any man thirst, let him come unto Me and drink.” Now how would you take this, if for seven days you had been involved in that procession, all the way down to the pool of Siloam, all the way back, and the whole motif of the Feast of Tabernacles was the coming of rain, was the fact that the pouring out of the water had been connected with the prayer for rain. See, that water libation was not only thanks for the past but it was for the future. Here’s why: the farmers in that time understood, obviously, they observed their wells and they knew that when the rain came the water in the well increased. So when you had rain you also had a rising of the well water.
Now the water libation is a concrete way of praying for rain, which was the theme of the Feast of Tabernacles. And when the priest went up there and he poured the water I said that the water went down into a tube into the ground. Why was that? Because they were saying God, this is what we want; we want water in our wells so we’ll have water to grow our crops. The Jewish background of this is explained in this book about rabbinic teaching. “The heads of two competing schools, Rabbi Ishmael and Rabbi [sp?], who lived some decades after the destruction of the second temple, both agreed that the Feast of Tabernacles is the time when the amount of rain for the following year is being decided upon in heaven. Rabbi [sp?] said the Torah said pour out the water at the feast of water libation which is the period of rain, that the rains may be blessed for you.” Again, Rabbi Eliaser said, “When on the Feast of Tabernacles the water libations are carried out deep says to deep let thy waters spring forth, I hear the voice of two friends, the water and the wine poured on the altar.” So it’s a picture of the stimulation of blessing in the future; that’s the overall motif.
We’ve dealt with some of the details of that motif, and now Christ makes His announcement: “If any man thirst,” who would that be? It would be the person who was thirsting for the water not only for Himself but for his crops, “If any man thirst,” Jesus said, you “let him come unto Me.” Now how could Jesus be a good man and say this in the middle of the feast of water libation, when everything, when the crowd said our eyes are upon the Jehovah, when the water was poured out before Jehovah, so Jehovah could supply the rain. And Jesus gets up and makes a statement like this? “If any man thirst, let him come unto Me.” How could that have ever been made in a monotheistic society without the claim to deity? Obviously this is a claim to deity. This is one of those obvious places, it couldn’t be taken any way else but a claim of deity. Any Jew in the court would have understood what He was saying. “If any man thirst, let him come unto Me, and let him drink.” It’s a picture of belief on the Lord Jesus Christ.
Then He says, John 7:38, “He that believeth on Me,” that is after salvation now, status of a believer, “He that believes on Me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” Now here’s where we get a little complicated. First of all, nobody can agree on what the Scripture was; what is this Scripture that Jesus is talking about? Well, we’ve got to go back to a lot of Scripture and pick up some themes to tie this together. So far I’ve given you the ceremony that was going on at the time; that was the concrete thing the crowd was experiencing. Then suddenly this guy gets up and He shouts this across the whole court.
Now what we want to do is tie exactly what
He said to the temple and to the believers.
Turn to Genesis
Now as the water went out across the face
of the earth what would it be used for?
It would be used to grow things.
And why would God be interested in growing things? To provide man something to eat, because
every herb had been given to man. So the
ultimate physical blessing is the river.
Now ask your self a question; where is this river coming from? It isn’t coming from the Garden of Eden, it’s
coming from
Now turn to Ezekiel 47:1, prophecy of the
millennial temple. Ezekiel’s vision of
the temple that will be established in the future, “Afterward, he brought me
again unto the door of the temple, and,” now look, “behold, waters issued out
from under the threshold of the house eastward,” now notice something. In the original creation you have the
Now turn to Revelation 22:1, the new heavens and the new earth. This is not the millennial temple now, this is the temple in the eternal state and here is where God sets up His eternal temple where we will be for all eternity. “He showed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.”
We have just studied three passages,
Genesis 2, Ezekiel 47, Revelation 22; in each passage you had a
Now we have one more passage to link all this background of “thus saith the Scripture.” You see what Jesus said, “as the Scripture has said,” you now get an idea of all the kinds of Scripture He had in mind. There’s one further Scripture which we must go back to, to make it complete. Isaiah 44:3, here we must complete our symbols, our imagery taken from Scripture. In Isaiah 44:3 water and the Holy Spirit are united. “For I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground; I will pour My Spirit upon thy seed, and My blessing upon thine offspring.” So you see in that passage the water and the Spirit connected.
Now let’s go back and finish Jesus’ saying; you’ve got the physical background, now we’ve given you the theological background; now let’s run through this and see if we get the impact of what He’s saying. He stands up in the court that day and He screams out, “If any man thirst, let him come to Me and drink,” and the imagery that we know He has on His mind is the gut imagery, the primary imagery of all imagery, going all the way back to Genesis 2 and all the way forward to Revelation 22, the imagery that the only thing that satisfies man is fellowship with God and being a creature sustained moment by moment by the Creator, sustained forever and ever and ever as it says in Revelation 22, and sustained because the waters flow from the center from where God is. So Jesus stood and He cried and He said that, and “He that believes of Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.”
Now we can pull together some but we still have a little problem here. So far from verse 37-38 we can say this: Jesus is here predicting the Church. He is predicting the beginning of a new temple, a temple that will satiate man’s inner spiritual thirstiness and He’s saying that where? Where does Jesus choose, what’s the location Jesus chooses to stand in and predict the building of a new temple? The temple. He’s there at the temple and precisely at that point Jesus chooses to make His announcement about the temple, just like He did in John 2, destroy this temple and in three days I’ll raise it up. They never understood, every time He’d get in that courtroom He’d make some remark about a temple and they never could get it together as to what temple it was He spoke of. Now we know that much from 37-38, but now we’ve got a problem in verse 38.
In what way can we take it that “he that believes, as the Scripture has said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” The Scripture we said is the temple motif; we know that believers, from Ephesians 2 are all in the temple, we’re [can’t understand word] for that temple, and the temple provides water for the entire creation; believes being part and parcel of the coming temple are put at the center of where God is. But it says out of the believer’s “belly shall flow rivers of living water.” This is a little bit of a problem because if you know Biblical psychology the word “belly” is never referred to conscience, and it doesn’t refer to mind; the belly always refers to your emotions. Now does this verse teach an emotional form of spirituality? We have to go back and control this word for obviously Jesus used it, He didn’t say out of his heart shall flow rivers of living water, but “out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.” Out of his emotional pattern?
Fortunately for us, as God the Holy Spirit always does, He provides us with a Scriptural control on our interpretation. That control is found in Psalm 40:8, a Psalm that applies to Christ Himself but the only other place where this word “belly” is used in the form of spirituality. Usually the word “belly” is used in a detrimental sense, it’s your belly, says Paul, your emotional pattern that keeps you away from the Word of God, but there is one passage in the Bible where belly is used positively to denote a form of spirituality. Psalm 40:8, it’s used of Christ, it says, “I delight to do Thy will, O my God; yea, Thy Law is within My belly,” in the original language. Now since we have poetic parallelism in verse 8 what does that verse mean? We don’t know what the last of verse 8 means, that’s the very question we’re trying to answer, what does it mean, “Thy Law is within My belly,” within My emotions. Well, it means what it means in the first part of verse 8, “I delight to do Thy will.”
So now we have an interpretation of what
Jesus meant: out of the believer’s belly others shall be blessed, just as from
Said another way, the last part of us to be sanctified is our emotions. Now few people understand this truth, but in counseling you come across a situation, a person will walk in, well, I just don’t know… you mean the Word of God says I’ve got to do that. Yes, you have to do that. Well, I don’t like to do that. The Word of God doesn’t ask you for your opinion on whether you like to do that or not, it tells you you will do it. But I don’t like it; you will do it, period. Now in practice in your sanctification it will always be this way. You start off gritting your teeth and doing what God’s will says, with no enjoyment the first couple of times. Eventually your depraved emotions will come into line with your obedience to the Word of God and you will begin to enjoy what you’re doing. And then you have the sanctification enlarging out into the area of your emotions.
Now let’s look carefully at John
Now I said at the very beginning tonight to watch something about John and I told you two or three times to watch something about John. What is it that we’re supposed to watch about John? That John was written after the Church began; John was written to report Christ’s life in such a way to give encouragement to Christians and what was going on in John’s day in 80-90 AD but evangelism. Now if somebody inevitably walks up to you and says where in the Bible does it tell us to witness, quite frankly I think I’d be hard pressed to answer that. There’s the great commission that involves a lot more than just witnessing. And in all the hundreds of admonitions I the epistles isn’t it strange that there aren’t any admonitions to witness. There’s admonitions to love your wife, admonitions to the wife to submit to her husband, admonitions to raise your children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, admonitions for the employer to do his job as unto the Lord, but where are the admonitions to witness? They’re strangely lacking. Now we’ve got to come to the conclusion, obviously God is interested in us witnessing but why aren’t there any admonitions there? I think this verse tells us why and gives us a norm and a control on this whole problem of witnessing and evangelism.
What this verse is saying is that the rivers will flow out of the belly when the wells are full. The Feast of Tabernacles looked forward to a crop, when the wells would be filled and the rain would come, then you would have your crop. And so what Jesus is saying, when the Spirit comes and He does His ministry unto the point of sanctifying your emotions, then the rivers of living water will proceed out of and reach others. And so it’s not a question of an admonition in this epistle or that epistle; it’s a question of the fact that personal evangelism follows upon maturity and thus the Holy Spirit when He writes the Scripture is very careful not to keep beating us over the head, got to get out there and witness, got to get out there and witness, got t get out there and witness, got to get out there and witness. You don’t find that in the New Testament, yet you know the Holy Spirit is interested in witnessing because He’s given us the great commission. So the only way you can resolve it is to say this: when we do the admonitions given we love our wives, we submit to our husbands, we raise our children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, as employers and employees we adhere to the standards of the Word, when we are involved in doing those things then the belly will be filled to the point where it can overflow and then the people around will receive living waters.
John adds in John 7:39 what we’ve been
hinting at all through this, I wanted to show you that it proceeds logically
from this and John doesn’t just tack this on, “(But
this spoke He of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for
the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)”
Now let’s sum up what
we’ve seen; we’ve come a long ways tonight and a lot of this material I’ve
presented is going to come again and again until we finish all these
chapters. We’re going to meet it again
in chapter 8, we’re going to meet it again in chapter 9, so don’t think we’re
all done with those details. What have
we seen? We’ve seen the tremendous irony
of John, the crowd sitting there ridiculing Jesus, Ha, where are you going that
we can’t go, out in the garbage can with the Gentiles? Precisely, out in the garbage can of the
Gentiles because that’s the only place where God can go where He’s accepted
with all this righteousness here in
And then we say when
Jesus said to the crowd, “I AM” and the crowd says He said I AM, who is
it? The irony, they just said who He
was. And then in the middle of the water
libation right, after seven days of traipsing all over Jerusalem carrying
water, pouring it out, saying Lord, Jehovah, save us, give us rain that You’ll
supply all our needs, and walking out the door and saying our eyes are not turned
to You, Jehovah, with all that ceremony Jesus gets up and in essence says oh,
you’re pouring out water to Me, you want Me to bless you, you your eyes are not
turned to the east like your fathers but they are turned to the west and
looking at Me, well then come unto Me and drink, and then when you have you
will find that you are the source of blessing.
You see, this is why the theme of John’s Gospel is that “these are
written that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, and that believing you
might have life through His name.