Clough John Lesson 33

Dwelling in Christ – John 6:41-59

 

Before we continue we’ll take a few minutes to go through some memory work on John.  Last time we introduced the concept of association of the absurd, the illogical, exaggeration and so on, applying the system of Jerry Lucas to the Gospel of John.  Actually his system applies to himself, we’re just simplifying for our congregational use.  On Wednesday nights we worked with Matthew; on Sunday nights we’re working with John and we’re developing certain keys that we use; with John the key letter which we’ll define later on is F and for each chapter designate the numbers, and for each number we have a phonetic counterpart, T or D [can’t understand word] and N for two.  So last time we came up with the word F and T, so we got the word “foot,” then we made a logical association between foot and the word which is the subject of chapter 1.  And we thought of a foot with words all over it.  Then, the second part of chapter 1, which concerns John the Baptist baptizing, one way of doing that is think of a foot baptizing people, and it works out real well because there are five disciples that appear and you can think of the toes dropping off and floating downstream after Christ.  And so you’ve got the five disciples linked with John’s ministry.  So that should remind you that whenever you see foot that you’ve got John 1 in mind, and when you think of John the Baptist now you’ll locate in Scripture exactly where he is, you can also cite now where the disciples first meet Jesus Christ. 

 

John 2 deals with an F, and an N and so we get the word “fan.”  And fan becomes the key word, it’s concrete and you can easily visualize and we associate fan with two topics in chapter 2; the two topics in chapter 2 are the wedding that goes on there and the cleaning of the temple.  And so it’s not too hard in copying and following Lucas, something the more ridiculous you make it the easier it is, so you imagine a bride and a groom that are fans.  And they’re getting married in back of a volcano, so you can think of Cana, the wedding feast of Cana, and there is the fan so there’s your key picture for John chapter 2.  Don’t bother to take notes on it, that’s the whole point, so you won’t have to take notes.  Then the cleansing of the temple, the cross will always be picturing Christ, He’s using a fan to clean out the temple.  So this connects John chapter 2, and when you think of the cleansing of the temple you should remember where it is located now.  When you think of the wedding feast of Cana you know where it’s located.  Later on when you get more of these chapters down, or if you don’t like this system use your own, but when you get this down a lot then you can start following the trends of the Gospel. 

 

I’ve never been much for memorizing individual verses of Scripture because my observation of what happens after while is that you lose the big picture of what’s going on.  It’s fine if you want to but I don’t think that’s the key point; the point is the overall argument and the reason why I think I’m right is because the Gospels themselves are written to be memorized by systems that they had current in that day.  For example, some time if you want to see one of the memory systems that they used using exactly the key system, Psalm 119.  Psalm 119 is written deliberately to be memorized by a key system; in that case they were using the Hebrew words, you can’t use it in English because when we translate it we kill their system.  But in the original language if you wanted to memorize Psalm 119 in the Hebrew each section begins with a Hebrew letter of the alphabet and so you start off with Alef, that’s the first letter of the alphabet and all the verses in the first section begin with Alef.  Then you go down with Bet, and then Gimel, and Dalet and all the Hebrew words, and this was written to be memorized systematically.  We also find Jesus Sermon on the Mount was written to be memorized, not in verse by verse form but in overall idea.  So if you want to play games use your sanctified or unsanctified imagination, then go ahead, but however you do it, get started learning to think your way through the Gospel.  My introduction to this system was because I’ve observed people who are in pain, people who are dying and they are unable to listen to tapes, they’re unable to take in the Word of God, they’re unable to read their own notes and therefore in that kind of a situation it’s only the Word of God that you have in your heart that counts.  And if it isn’t there then you have no means of sustaining yourself in time of pressure. 

 

Let’s look at John 6:40 where we left off last time.  John 6 is one of the two great chapters in the Bible on politics.  John 6 is against democracy and 1 Samuel 8 is against totalitarianism.  Both chapters are balancing one another.  John 6 is written to attack the autonomous spirit involved in democratic ideas, democratic ideas as we are talking about them refer to the sufficiency of man to legislate, that man has within his limited ability together in society enough data, enough knowledge, enough insight to come up with standards of right and wrong and so on, that all truth is relative to the group, and we deny that.  That is an axiom of human viewpoint democracy and it’s against God’s Word.  No Christian can really a true democrat in the Greek sense of the word because you can’t be a democrat in the Greek sense of the word and also believe in the Word of God at the same time.  So John 6 undermines that and when the chapter begins Jesus Christ is at the height of His popularity.  He’s never more popular numerically in the nation Israel than at the beginning of John 6.  By the time Jesus Christ finishes John 6 and finishes this discourse He is the most unpopular person in Israel.  Now why did Jesus Christ apparently torpedo a mass movement, a popular movement?  Because the movement was based on superficial attraction and therefore He got rid of superficial people.

 

In John 6:41 we have the Jews reaction to the first statements He made.  His statements were that you come to Me because My Father has designed history to be this way and you can’t come to Me unless it’s by My Father’s will.  So it’s a strong, strong, strong statement of God’s sovereignty.  And it’s cast in deliberately powerful language and you will see just how powerful it gets because it gets more powerful as we go on through the chapter.  Jesus Christ is as dogmatic, as offensive, as bigoted, as He possibly can be to this democratic crowd and He loses them, and He wants to because the sooner you get rid of people like this the better off you are.  In verse 41, “The Jews then murmured at Him, because He said, I am the bread which came down from heaven,” or who came down from heaven.  Now whenever you see the phase, “the Jews” in the Apostle John’s work he’s not being anti-Semitic because he’s a Jew himself.  He is writing out of the background of later church history and  he uses the word “Jew” to refer to those Jews who are on negative volition, those who have rejected the Messiah.  It was just a label, not an anti-Semitic title.  It is simply titling those Jews who failed to respond to the gospel.  “The Jews murmured at him,” the word “murmur” is exactly the same kind of word that is used in the incident in the manna in the wilderness, because there’s a parallel, remember, between what happens here in John 6 and what happens in the wilderness after the Exodus when God fed the people with manna.  In one case God fed the people from heaven to supply their physical needs; in the other case Jesus Christ multiplied the loaves and the fishes to supply people’s physical needs.  There’s a parallel, Jesus Christ and Jehovah; Christ on the hill, Jehovah in the Old Testament.  The further parallel in this chapter in John 6 between Jesus and Jehovah concerned Christ walking on the water.  Jesus Christ walked on the water as God, as Jehovah, mimicking Jehovah’s ministry of Psalm 29.

Now we come to the murmuring and the Jews respond to Christ exactly the way they responded to Jehovah… exactly the way they responded to Jehovah in the Old Testament.  So there’s an emphasis on continuity; in the one sense Jehovah is the same as Jesus, in the other sense the rebellious people of the Old Testament are the same as the rebellious people of the New Testament.  There’s a continuity flowing in both directions.  Now after they murmur they murmured because Christ said I am the bread that came down from heaven and beginning at this point they show what is always true of human viewpoint.  Human viewpoint is always weakest where it thinks it’s the strongest.  And this crowd, the basic problem they have is they want Jesus to fit into their mold.  They have their plan based on human viewpoint premise, they have their idea of what the kingdom ought to be like and Jesus, come hell or high water, is going to fit into their plan, they think.  And Jesus Christ is NOT going to fit in their plan, in fact He says you’re going to fit in mine or you’re going to be thrown out.  So it’s a contest of agenda.  Who’s agenda is going to prevail.  The agenda of the mob or the agenda of Christ; one or the other but they both cannot prevail.  So as they murmured because Christ said I am the bread who came down from heaven, meaning I am the one who has authority over you, they didn’t like to hear that.  And so they think they’ve got a refutable fact, they think they’ve got something to go back to that completely and totally negate the claims of Christ.  As so often happens, people who are anti-Biblical in their thinking always go back to one or two points and it’s precisely those one or two points where they are weakest.

 

Now watch what they do, they say in John 6:42, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that He saith, I came down from heaven?”  We know better than that Jesus, don’t put on the air, we know your father and your mother.  Now how ironic, do they know His father and His mother?  Are they really acquainted with the circumstances of His birth?  And do they really know that Joseph of Nazareth is not His father?  Do they really know that God the Father is His Father.  Do they really know that the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary?  Obviously they don’t.  And so here at the point where they think their argument is the strongest they are completely out to lunch.  And there’s some thing else that’s very arrogant about their attitude in verse 42 and it’s very typical of people that come from small towns.  People who come from larger towns also have their arrogance; people who come from New York City, for example, think the universe rotates around New York City. 

 

But in small towns, particularly in rural areas people develop a certain kind of arrogance where they think they know it all and nobody from the outside could possibly tell them anything because they know everything from the time of day on to E=MC2  and they’re in no need for any person on the outside to inform them on anything; they have everything under control and they have an autonomous and very proud attitude, a really arrogant attitude.  And this part of the country has a lot of this arrogance in a lot of the small towns around here.  And many of these small towns are very good and healthy in many ways because of the rural background and nearness to God but they are also unhealthy in various ways because of the various local arrogance that develops, the “I will do it myself” attitude, this independent attitude that I will do it regardless and I will now bow my knee to the authorities of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the authority of His Word or anybody else’s authority except my own. And of course with that kind of an attitude the gospel is never going to go far and for that reason you find a lot of the local areas here having very, very, very extremely poor Bible teaching because the pastors, some of whom I have talked with, say it’s impossible to teach these people anything because they know it all, they know more than the pastor. 

And certain denominations just trade off; it’s commonly known among certain denominations that if you want to get out of the rut just do a lousy job and get promoted to some place else where you can get out of here in 2 or 3 years.   And as a result in some of these areas you have a pastor come into the church every 2 or 3 years and the congregation has the attitude when he walks in, well we were here before you were and we’ll be here after you are and you can’t teach us anything.  And as I told one pastor of a small town close by Lubbock, I said the best thing you can do is stomp all over them, just go in there and preach the Word, make sure you’re in context and just let ‘em have it with both barrels; tell them they’re a bunch of ignoramuses that don’t know anything, idiots don’t know Genesis from Revelation, they don’t know grace from works, and just open up and you’ll get rid of the crowd that you don’t want around, just drive them off.  I told him it took me eight years to do it here and so that’s what you have to do as a pastor.  You have to develop your own style and people that don’t like it can leave; it’s one or the other, either the congregation leaves or the pastor leaves, and so if it’s a contest I’ll make sure I’m the one that stays.  And this is the whole principle that has to operate.  And because seminary students have never been taught this, they’ve been taught to kiss the feet of the board, they’ve been taught to yield their principles anytime to a local group of characters that think they know it all with the result that the Word of God is not being taught, and it’s a very sad situation as you begin to talk over this situation as you begin to talk over this situation with the pastors of some of these small churches; men who are trying their best to teach the Word of God, utterly unappreciated, utterly unhelped by the congregation, it’s atrocious, and those people are going to pay a price for it, they’re going to pay a serious price for it because they’re out of line. 

 

Well, it’s the same thing here, in verse 42 you have this local arrogance that develops; why, we’ve lived in this town all our lives, we know everything there is to know about this town.  And it’s precisely that arrogance that masks their negative volition because you see, the point is that they don’t know; the true Father of the Lord Jesus Christ is God the Father.  And therefore He can say “I come down from heaven” because I was virgin born by the Holy Spirit.  This undermines the principle.  This principle often carries over, this problem of arrogance into something like evolution. The people who are for evolution always are so certain of the uniformitarian principle. They are so certain that the present is the key to the past; they are so certain that the universe has always gone on the way it has gone on, it’s a matter of faith and it’s precisely that point that undermines the whole concept because the universe hasn’t always gone on with that and because their foundation is wrong their entire house is wrong. 

 

John 6:43, The Lord Jesus Christ has is and from this point on He gets tough.  I know of no other passage in God’s Word…there are two other places where Christ is as tough or tougher than this; one is John 8 and the other is Matthew 23 but you’re looking at probably the third most arrogant, in the divine sense of the word, collision with arrogance.  It just gets worse as it goes on.  So in verse 43 it says very meekly in the King James translation, “Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves.”  The proper translation is shut your mouth.  Yes, Jesus Christ said that; that is a dogmatic statement, keep your big mouth shut because I am about to teach you something and you can’t learn with your mouth open; you learn with your ears open, not your mouth open.  So this sets them in their place, and no teaching can occur until the students submit to the authority of the teacher.  So therefore Jesus Christ lets them have it in verse 43 and as He goes on He picks the most irritating way to communicate grace that He could possibly have done to a crowd of Jews.  I’m going to show you some of the vocabulary in this passage, it’s fantastic, deliberately designed to aggravate people.

 

John 6:44 starts it off.  “No man can come to Me, except the Father which hath sent Me drags him,” the word “draw” is drag, it is used in John 21 for dragging a fish net in from the sea.  It is used to drag something that gives resistance.  And what He is saying is you people not only can’t believe any time you please, even when you do believe it’s a result of My Father personally dragging you into the kingdom.  Now what a beautiful picture of grace, see, that’s grace!  The brats have to be dragged into the kingdom and yet in their arrogance they think well I can believe on the Lord any time I please, that’s my choice.   Not so according to this verse, because the word “come” in verse 44 if you compare with verse 35 is identical with “believe.”  Believe and come are used as synonyms in this passage, so translated what Jesus Christ is saying, no man can believe unless the Father drags him in like fishnet.  So far from the initiative coming from the people, we will choose the candidate, here the candidate has to force the people to Himself.  So He says, “No man,” notice He says “No man,” there’s no exceptions of this rule, none, no man can ever believe unless the Father drag him, “and I will raise him up at the last day,” showing that Jesus Christ completes the plan, “I will raise him up at the last day.”

 

Then he goes on, notice by the way this phrase, “I will raise him up.”  Look in verse 39, you’ll see, “I will raise him up at the last day.”  Look at verse 40, “I will raise him up at the last day.”  Look at verse 44, “I will raise him up at the last day.”  Look at verse 54, “I will raise him up at the last day.”  Why the emphasis of constantly raising him up on the last day and raising him on the last day?  It’s because Jesus Christ is saying to these people that I am going to take care of you physically, you are going to get your physical resurrection body, but the spiritual principles come first.  This is what the amills have never been able to understand.  You’re going to have a physical kingdom in history but that physical kingdom cannot come until the spiritual comes first; the spiritual always precedes the physical.  So right now at this era, during this Church Age, a covenant, people that are beneficiaries of the New Covenant are being called out as the royal family to rule that future kingdom.  But the family has to be trained, they have to be brought out into the open, they have to be tested, they have to understand Scripture and respond to Scripture by faith and then  the physical kingdom will come.  It’s the same principle here Christ says.  You believe in Me first and I’ll take care of the end point.  You take care of this first point.  So He cites both ends of His plan.

 

Now John 6:45, He backs His dogmatic statement of verse 44 up by saying, “As it has been written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God.”   Now if you’ll turn back to Isaiah 54:13 we’ll see where that was taken from.  This is a prediction of the millennial kingdom, and during the millennial kingdom, according to this prediction, you have the operation of the New Covenant.  Part of that New Covenant is universal spiritual training.  And so we find in verse 13, “All thy children shall be taught of the Lord.”  Who were the children?  The children are the believers who begin the millennium.  And they will all be taught of God.  Now to be taught means not only that God will do the teaching but that they will do the receiving.  So this verse, according to Christ’s own interpretation is saying that when the millennium begins, when the New Covenant comes into full effect, there will be every person in the population, 100% regeneration, and this means that it will be a basic responsiveness to the Word of God like the world has never seen.  It is going to be absolutely fantastic; you are going to have people who are engaged in every industry… now don’t think of the millennium as some reverting back to growing grapes in first century Palestine some place; I’m sure they’ll have vineyards but the point is they’ll have mechanized agriculture, and they’ll have a lot of industry, heavy industry.  And by the way, much to the chagrin of a lot of people there’s going to be big business in the millennium.  This is another little favorite song and dance that’s going on, that all our ills are due to big business.  Now if it wasn’t for big business you wouldn’t have half the food on the table you have.  It’s big business that has brought us the oil; it is big business that has brought us most of our food; it is big business that puts the clothes on your back; big business has done a lot of things; big business supports small business, and it’s big business that makes the country great.  It’s big business every time you pick up a telephone and use it.  Did you ever stop to think of it; that telephone be there and long lines wouldn’t be there and intercontinental communications wouldn’t be there without big business so don’t you knock big business.  Yea, there are some clods in big business but there are some clods in little business.  There’s nothing inherently wrong with big business; far more evil than big business is big government. 

 

We have, then, in the millennium a wonderful condition where you have big business, small business, there will be free enterprise, you will have produces; everybody will be a  producer, people will be responding to the Word of God; they will be subduing the earth, there won’t be social parasites living off of someone else’s tax money. There will always be people who are productive in every way.  The people who are the artists and the musicians will come out with some of the most brilliant creations the human race has ever seen. There will be an immense time, when humanity corporately will flourish, but it all starts spiritually; they shall all receive doctrinal teaching and they will bow their knee to it, that is they will pick it up, they’ll learn it, they’ll use it, and this is what makes the millennium great; there will be a universally responsive population.

 

Now let’s go back and look at the context of John 6, Jesus takes this verse and uses it for His claim of verse 44.  He says that “No man can come unto Me unless the Father drag him, as it is written,” or He’s saying, right after verse 45, showing why He says it, “It is written,” “It has been written, that they shall all be taught of God.”  In other words, Jesus is arguing that in the future kingdom of God, whether it’s conceived of as in heaven or on earth, will be made up only of people who have responded to the Word of God.  No one else!  In other words, there will be no person who has gotten there by the democratic spirit.  They didn’t vote their way into the kingdom of God.  They didn’t get there by exercising their autonomous will. They got there because they bowed their knee in responsible decision to God’s authoritative Word.  And because every person that makes up that future population has made that decision in His heart, that’s the source of blessing. 

 

That’s why He concludes in verse 45 by saying, “Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto Me.”  So the principle Christ is making is that that New Covenant, the New Covenant promised by John the Baptist, the New Testament promised by the Old Testament prophets, this New Covenant is coming and we can draw a little door here and say only people going through that door are people who are on positive volition to the Word of God and therefore Jesus says since I am calling out the people for that future kingdom the only people on My platform are going to be people who submit to Scripture.  So He says I am not impressed by the numbers game.  I’m not impressed because I have 10,000 plus people at My feet on the hill on the other side of Galilee; I only want people who submit to Scripture and so He begins to set up barriers between Himself and the crowd.

Let me get the end of verse 45, “Every man that has heard, and has learned of the Father, is coming to Me,” notice in the process of time there are people being called out from the nation Israel.  Here’s a person on positive volition, here’s one who responds, here’s another one who responds and so on, and these people are responding to Christ and they’re coming to Christ, they’re believing.  Remember, “come” and “believe” are synonyms here. And then you have many, many other people here, the mob who far outnumbered the believers and they’re doing nothing.  There’s a separation that’s occurring.  Now once again, because of confusion let’s go back over the points on the doctrine of election.  What is this coming that is mentioned here and the dragging of verse 44; does this negate human volition?

 

Let’s go back to the first principle of the doctrine of election. Election rests upon the creation and fall concept.  You cannot understand election apart from this; Isaiah 55:8-9, “My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, saith the LORD.”  So since we are operating on two different systems we have to go back to origins and this means that God, not man, makes history.  This is creation and fall; God, not man, shapes history, so that when history is over, the shape it has will be due to God’s creation. For example, no matter how you handle it with all this maneuvering and fancy footwork that goes on to try to get around the problem there’s no way you can solve this problem.  Did God or didn’t He know that He would create people that would go to hell?  He obviously knew that people would go to hell; they freely chose to go to hell but they go to hell.  And so therefore God sovereignly chose to create people whom He knows will go to hell; deliberately He creates them.  Now why does He do this?  Because of His glory; it is not said in Scripture exactly why He does it but He does it, period, and therefore since He does it, therefore we have to go back to His prerogative as a Creator to make the kind of history He chooses to make. But because He is also just we know it’s going to be absolutely righteous.  Creatures who go to hell, by the way, go to hell because they reject His grace.

 

And then we have the fall and we understand from the fall that because we all are involved in Adam’s sin in some way, as Paul says in Romans 5, then none of us deserve salvation—none of us deserve salvation!  You don’t deserve it, I don’t deserve it, none of us deserve it.  None of us have anything to commend ourselves to God apart from the credits given to us through Jesus Christ.  On our own we are bankrupt.

 

The second point is that election is the basic promise behind all other promise…the basic promise. And Jesus Christ wants us to exalt in that, Luke 10:20, and the basic principle in Romans 8:28.  It is the promise that underscores all other promises.  When the disciples are rejoicing over answered prayer in the immediate past Christ says don’t’ rejoice over that, you rejoice that your names are written in the book of life, you rejoice over that; make it a point of rejoicing.  Now if a person did that today in some circles I’m sure you would be branded as arrogant and over-confident.  Yet Christ in Luke 10:20 demands that believers rejoice in their confident position.

 

The third point is that election means it’s 100% certain, nothing, no object of God’s election will ever wind up in a position for which it was not elected, Isaiah 42:12-13.  Election means 100% certainty; it will come to pass; it depends on God’s Word and God’s Word can’t fail.

 

The fourth principle about election is that it’s God’s totally free decision.  God does not have a standard in back of Himself, He’s not forced, coerced in any way, Romans 9:11-16.  God chooses to make what He wants to make the way He wants to make it.  He has chosen responsible history; within that responsible history creatures, by their own choice, wind up… but the whole overall shape of the whole big thing is God.  He has set it up that way; most people don’t like that responsibility but that’s what He’s given us.

 

The fifth principle is that we have a content to election that is shown in history.  The content of election equals use of the faith technique, etc.  In other words, it’s a loving relationship that you can see, you can see people coming to Christ and so on.  Election shows up as real choices, not robots.  When you see real choices happening there you’re observing election being revealed. 

 

In John 6:46 Christ departs from His talk just a little bit, just to clarify one thing and this further irritates the audience because He says, “Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.”   What He wants to do is make sure that no one misinterprets verse 45; in verse 45 He says every person will be taught by revelation but then in verse 46, but be careful, there are two kinds of revelation.  There are two kinds of knowledge.  There is what we call, and there are two technical words for this, immediate revelation and mediate revelation.  Let me explain the difference because Christ make the point here in these two verses.  In verse 46 He is claiming for Himself immediate revelation. 

 

In other words, He gets revelation direct from God; God the Father.  He doesn’t need any intermediary transfer system.  He gets it direct, it comes from within Him because He’s God.  I don’t use the word direct revelation because we use that for something else so I don’t want to get that term messed in here.  Immediate revelation, it comes from within His own character and being.  He says I see God all the time, it’s part of my immediate being.  He says all other people, believers, who are taught of God have it by mediate revelation, that is they are mediated through means of a teacher, the Son in the Trinity.  All revelation passes from the Father thru the Son to us, so all revelation we get is mediated by means of the Son; that’s the doctrine of the Trinity.  And of course you can see why this would irritate the people, He’s saying I am unique here, not only have you had to be dragged into the kingdom, you clods, but I am the One who is unique.  You see, if Christ wasn’t who He claimed to be, He’s a nut.  Nobody goes around making these kind of claims for themselves.  The next time you get around somebody says well I believe Jesus is a good man or something and it’s the appropriate time to do this, open up the Scripture and let them read some of these passages, just let them read this passage.  A good man saying something like this and not being who He claimed to be?  Ridiculous!

 

John 6:47, He starts out His last little thing very smoothly and quietly and then builds.  Notice the “Verily, verily,” that’s the signal that something really good is coming because He pauses to make sure everybody gets the point, He gives it in one simple sentence and then He’s going to amplify.  He says to make it clear, “Verily, Verily,” “Amen, amen,” I mean this so clear the decks and get everyone straightened out, that’s what it means; something important is happening, “I say unto you, He that believeth on Me hath everlasting life.”  Now He’s said that about four times before but apparently the crowd hasn’t gotten it because they’re still murmuring.  So He makes the dogmatic claim once again that it is only by trusting in Me that you have life for eternity.  This is one of the reasons He keeps saying I’ll raise you up at the last day, He says that’s what I mean, eternal life, life that will go on and include that future resurrection.  “The that believes on Me” has it.  So now He no longer uses the word “come,” He gets down to the word “believe.” 

Then in John 6:48 He begins to move and it’s this passage, from this point on that has been used, for example in Roman Catholicism it is used to justify why in mass the elements that are served become the body and blood of Christ and that when you’re taking mass you’re actually eating the body of Christ.  That teaching is based by Catholic theologians on this chapter, particularly these verses coming up.  And because this chapter is so very important I want to proceed slowly and show you one thing about this chapter if we don’t learn anything tonight, one thing beginning with this verse I want you to see.  This is talking about trust in Christ’s finished work, not communion service.  This is a discussion, not of communion nor of the elements of communion, but of Christ on His cross.  Communion is only for Christians but He is going to present in here that He is the bread of life for the world and that can’t be communion because communion by definition isn’t given to the world.  Communion is NOT the subject of this passage.  Now I will grant you that communion pictures some of this truth, yes.  But that’s a far different thing from saying that this is speaking of communion.  It’s not doing that.  This is speaking of the real thing behind communion. 

 

John 6:48, “I am that bread of life.”  Now what does He mean by saying “I am that bread of life.”  All right, what has been the theme of this chapter, go all the way back to the beginning of verse 4; remember this whole incident began on that hillside when Passover was approach.  What was Passover commemorative of?  Passover was commemorative of Exodus. What happened after God gave the people access out of Egypt.  They went into the wilderness and what did He do?  He trained them by means of the manna, the Hebrew word “what is it.”  He trained them by means of the manna to be dependent upon Him.  There’s a principle about food in the Bible.  Food is pictured time and time again as a tool, or it’s used as a tool to teach us orientation to grace.  Why is that?  At least three reasons.  Your ability to eat is totally non-meritorious.  It doesn’t depend on how good you, you can stuff your mouth regardless of how good you are.  So eating is a faculty that is given to you independently of your spiritual and moral and ethical merit; it is separated from that and because it’s separated God the Holy Spirit latches onto food and eating, or drinking, to illustrate the concept of trust and faith, because it doesn’t depend on something meritorious. 

 

Another thing about food and why it teaches orientation to grace is that it is continually needed.  And for this reason, since we continually need day by day God’s grace, it is becomes a picture of us feeding on His grace.  A third reason why food is used in Scripture is because it’s an absolute requirement of life.  You can’t do with out; the second reason is that it’s continuous in its need; the third reason is that it’s needed, absolutely needed.   So for these reasons food and the eating thereof are repeatedly used, and as you will now see, Christ picks up this common thing out of every day life and says now, you people want to get straightened out on what grace is, let Me run this by once more.  And so He starts.

 

“I am that bread of life,” why does He use “that” bread of life?  Because He’s referring back to the manna, not the manna as such but the truth that the manna was teaching. Why did God have these people go up and pick this goo off the front of the ground in front of their tent every morning?  And He never gave them more than that; people tried to store it up and they didn’t have freezers and it went bad.  It was a tremendously balanced food.  If somebody could figure out what the nutrition supplements were that God put in the manna you’d be infinitely wealthy.  But God had some way of feeding people with complete dietary provision in this manna, one substance.  All you had to have besides eating manna was water.  But what God was showing was that the people out in the middle of that wilderness had to be totally dependent upon the manna that came from heaven down; it was a graphic picture that we are down here receiving on a moment by moment by moment by moment basis.  All right, when He said “I am that bread of life,” he means I am the spiritual reality taught back in the days of the manna, when you fed on the manna you were feeding on Me.

 

Turn to 1 Corinthians 10:3-4 and you’ll see how Paul brings out this truth.  Not just John develops this but Paul develops the teaching also.  Notice in verse 3-4, same principle, same truth, Paul uses a few different words but the same idea.  They “did all eat the same spiritual food,” spiritual food Paul, I thought it was physical food.  No, says Paul, as they ate the physical food they were learning about the spiritual food, and so he says in verse 4, they “did all drink the same spiritual drink, for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ.”  So when Christ in John 6 makes the identification He’s saying you people don’t get the point.  The point about that whole deal with the manna was to make you learn orientation to grace.  And so now He says I am the object of all of that, now that I’m here you should have learned your lesson and we should get together, but we’re not getting together and it’s because you haven’t learned your lesson.  I’ve come on schedule but you haven’t learned the lesson of historical revelation very well.

 

So John 6:49 He sharpens their understanding and He says, “Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.”  So He wants to clarify the difference between the physical manna and the spiritual lesson.  [50] “This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.”  So He’s talking about something in the spiritual realm.   Now verse 51, “I am the living bread which came down from heaven,” now watch it because verse 51 is one of the evidences that this does not refer to communion, “I am the living bread which came down form heaven; if” third class, maybe someone will and maybe someone won’t, “if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world,” not just for believers.  So this is not referring to communion, it is referring to the cross.  Notice He says, “will live forever, and the bread I will give is my flesh,”  …[tape turns]

…literally, the brad I will give is My flesh” and I will give it for the life of the world.”

 

Now John 6:52, look at the reaction he’s got, “The Jews therefore strove among themselves,” this means they fought each other over this, they had a knockdown drag out discussion theologically, literally taken I mean, they were actually physically punching one another by the time this got started.   And I want you to notice Christ didn’t say now boys, you shouldn’t do that?  He just keeps right on irritating them some more.  By the time He finishes here He has mob action on His hands.  Now why does He do this?  You don’t find Jesus always doing this; don’t take this as normative every time He got up to speak.  At this point He’s doing it because He had to break up the democratic spirit.  He had to divide the crowd and He sure is doing it.  “… saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”  They’re taking it literally like the woman at the well, cannibalism. 

 

John 6:53, “Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily,” so watch it, here comes another one, and He’s going to really do it up good this time, “I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh” no longer the body now, but “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, ye have no life in you.”  Now to  Jew who had always eaten kosher meat, from which the blood had to be drained and drained well, can you imagine how this went over.  You are not going to eat meat says Jesus, you’re going to eat it with the blood in it, that’s what’s going to happen.  So you can tell there’s quite a little antagonism going on between Jesus and the crowd at this point. 

 

Now He goes on and does it even one better in John 6:54 and this one’s completely missed in the translation.  “Whoso eats My flesh, and drinks My blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.”  Now this is really something because the word for “eat” here is a word which means to munch, it is not the word to eat as usually used in the text of Scripture and it means to enjoy something that you’re enjoying it out loud.  It is a word that has two connotations. First it has the connotation of… well, just kind of being a little gross, just letting everyone know that saliva is going around your mouth and food is too.  And the second connotation, the most important one is that you’re enjoying it like crazy.  You’re enjoying it!  So to say this to a group of orthodox Jews who had been raised on kosher meat, to say that you are going to eat blood meat and you are going to enjoy it, you can’t imagine anything more designed to irritate somebody than this. 

 

But He had to do this because people are that thick; we all are that thick potentially.  It takes somebody to irritate us, to hit us right between the ears before we are going to wake up grace and this is a principle of grace orientation because what this means is that you are going to love grace; you’re going to sit there and munch on it and it’s the picture of a believer, not literally eating Christ’s flesh but so enjoying what Christ gives it’s like constantly sitting and being a “grace muncher.”  That’s what it is, fantastic enjoyment of grace.  So Christ is demanding that we not only become oriented to grace but that we love it.  And you see, this is what makes… we still have people in our circles and I don’t know what it will take before they can relax in God’s grace.  And over and over again you see passages like this where Christ wants you to accept His grace and love it.  Now what an easier way of life, this way, than trying to desperately all the time come up with your own gimmick, your own little thing, this program, that program, this taboo, that taboo, or something else and not relaxing and trusting in grace.  But every single time we get into a truth like this you can see what happens, you can see it in this congregation, less so than most; most congregations just freeze up. 

 

I had fun talking to a pastor about the foreskins of Michel the other day and the dowry present and all the rest of 2 Samuel and he just about came unglued.  I said here’s the text, here’s my Hebrew text, here’s Kittel, and if you don’t understand the Hebrew word here’s BDB you can look it up for yourself, why don’t you check that passage out; how about checking out the place where Abner says I’ll be damned if I know, Sir, when Saul asked him some idiot question.  Here, check the word out, I didn’t make that up, just read the Hebrew, that’s what you’re supposed to do as pastor.  Oh I couldn’t teach that to my people.  What kind of people do you got that you can’t teach the Word of God to?  What group of clods do you have?  By the way we have some literary astute people in the congregation and they just told me this week that the word “clod” was used by John Milton for Adam and so now you see we’re on a firm scholarly base to call people clods. 

 

So John 6, back to munching in verse 54.  “Whoever munches eats and enjoys My flesh and enjoys drinking My blood, has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.”  I kind of wanted to get that point across several times.  Verse 5, “For My flesh is meat indeed, and My blood is drink indeed.  [56] He that eats My flesh, and drinks My blood, continues in Me, and I in him.”  The dwell is the word meno, it means to continue.  What He’s saying here is that when you eat, like the woman at the well when you drink, you drink of this well, woman, you drink of the water that I will give you and it will become in you a well of water forever and ever and ever, you’ll never have to come take a drink.  Remember the woman caught on and she said oh boy, give me a drink so that I never have to come here again.  The principle was once and for all, point action, continuing results, and the same thing is here.  “Eat,” says Jesus, “Eat of My flesh and drink My blood,” and you do it once and you will continue in Me forever and ever and ever and ever. That’s the principle, once and for action with continuing results.  [57, “As the living Father hath sent Me, and I live by the Father: so he that eats Me, even he shall live by Me.”]

 

John 6:58, “This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eats of this bread shall live for ever.”  He amplifies what He just said in verse 56-57.  Verse 59, “These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.”

 

Next week we’ll begin with what happened to the disciples; they couldn’t take it either and so He wound up having to straighten the disciples out on grace.

 

So as we finish this section, once again examine your own hearts to see whether this frosts you or melts you, one or the other and it will show you whether you’ve yet caught on to the grace principle.  With our heads bowed….