Lesson 70
The Palestinian Covenant – 30:1-3 (29:21-29)
We are continuing with this section of Deuteronomy which sets forth a
Biblical invitation. This is important
to see because we have a fundamentalist position and apparently you are a
heretic if you disagree with it.
Therefore, I am a heretic because I don’t go along with the
fundamentalist tradition in the area of invitations; it is only a tradition, it
is not taught by the Word of God as you will see as we study this invitation of
Moses. This is a public invitation to a
nation to accept the Law. I want you to
notice the parts of the invitation that we’ve been going through. The invitation began at the beginning of
chapter 29 and it has certain parts to it.
The first part was in verses 1-9 and Moses gives the factual basis for
this decision. This is to be a national
decision by faith but faith has to have an object, and this business of getting
people emotionally worked up, singing hymns, etc. is fine except it cancels out
the mentality of the soul. A lot of
people have become so wrapped up with emotionalism, with traditionalism that
they have never seen the issue.
Notice that when Moses asked his generation to believe he doesn’t play a
few hymns and invite them forward. In
verses 1-9 Moses gives them facts, facts, facts, facts, Bible doctrine, more
Bible doctrine, more Bible doctrine because faith has to have an object; faith
always must have an object. Here is
where fundamentalists are funny about this because basically they’re doing
exactly what the liberals are doing.
They raise holy horror when a person doesn’t give an invitation and yet
isn’t it interesting that the liberal does exactly what the fundamentalist is
doing and that is he asks you to have faith without an object. That’s exactly what the fundamentalists are
doing except they fill in emotion, faith and emotional feeling. The liberal will say have faith in some
ideology, or some sweet sounding words or some liturgy or something, but
basically they do very much the same thing.
It’s very interesting to watch this and yet here you have a
fundamentalist and here you have a liberal and they always disagree, and yet
when it comes down to practice, they do precisely the same thing, ask people to
believe without an object.
The object of the faith in the Word of God is the Word of God and that’s
given in verses 1-9, but Moses says it’s not just believing the Bible, it is
believing the Bible because the Bible has been verified in history. And Moses appeals over and over again, verse
3-4, you have seen this, you are eyewitnesses, you have empirically perceived
the foundations of the Word of God and therefore you can believe. It’s not like you have a roulette wheel and
say there are 2,000 books in this library and I’ll spin the roulette wheel and
whoops, it just happens to land on the Bible so now I go out and blindly accept
everything that’s in the Bible. That’s not Christianity. Christianity says just a minute, the Bible is
what it is because of the God who stands behind it and the Bible is inerrant
and inspired and it is the Word of God because God Himself has written it,
through human authors but God Himself is the One that has written it. That is why we accept the Word of God, not
because it’s just a sweet book but because of the God who wrote it that stands
in back of it. If, for example, this is
impossible to imagine, but if, for example, God ceased to exist in the next
second, the Bible would be an absolutely worthless book. The Bible by itself would be a worthless book
if God ceased to exist. The fact that
the Bible is worthwhile in importance is because of the God who stands behind
it.
This is why in verses 1-9 Moses focuses on the words and the works of
God that verify it in history. You
remember when we went through that there are always two tests: one is in Deut.
13, the other is in Deut. 18. The one in
Deut. 13, the logical test, says is the Bible self-consistent, and the test of
Deut. 18, does the Bible check with experience or the empirical test. My claim is that you can’t know anything
that’s true unless you apply these tests.
One individual said to me, wait a minute, you say this thing verifies in
history and he says how do you know about history, how can you know that the
historical records aren’t wrong, how can you know this. I said ultimately you can’t know, you have to
check it out as well as you can, it’s a probabilistic sort of thing. You can’t absolutely be sure but if you take
the Biblical framework it gives you a reason suspect it’s right. But the point was this person said how can we
be sure the history isn’t wrong. I said
well suppose it isn’t wrong, then where does it leave you? It leaves you there by yourself, your bare
naked self standing there without any experience or any history, including your
own personal history; that’s a bad place to be in. The person said I guess so, come to think of
it. So after a while, talking to this
person, I found out he was reacting against the authority of the Word of God,
he didn’t like it because I got up here and said this is it and I didn’t give
1005 different options. That always
causes people to vibrate and that’s good.
I’ve found if you bear down hard and you get people to either hate you
or love you, they do something but they just don’t sit there and that’s good
because you produce an action. I’d a lot
rather have someone hate me and oppose what I believe than just passively sit
there and do nothing because it shows you’re they’re interacting; at least
they’re interacting. In the apostle’s
day they interacted, they picked up and threw rocks, but at least they were
interacting; there was a reaction produced.
Therefore we find that the Bible gives us sufficient reason to believe
and this is verses 1-9. And incidentally,
in witnessing and sharing Christ with a person there are two kinds of questions
that you will face. One kind of question
is the smoke-screen type of question, this is where you’re starting to share
the gospel and someone comes up with an objection and they say wait a minute,
and they bring in what about the hotten-tots, what about the people who haven’t
heard, what about somebody else, and they’ll bring up all these hot air
questions. Those are one set of
questions, but then there are genuine questions that people wonder about. Don’t be afraid to answer them, if you don’t
know the answer, don’t pretend you know, just say I don’t know, I’ll see if we
can find the answer. But don’t try to
put on a phony front when you don’t know an answer; just simply say I don’t
know the answer. You’re not required to
know everything about the Bible; you’re not required to explain every little
detail of Christianity to every single objection.
For example, take a physics student, when a physic student is up telling
about, say Einstein’s theory of relativity, he’s not called upon to go into
what about Dalton’s theory or somebody else’s theory over here, what about all
these different theories. He can’t
control all these things at one time in his mind unless he’s a super genius, so
he says I don’t know, I’ll have to check it out. So there’s nothing embarrassing about
admitting to a person who’s objecting to what you’re saying, “I don’t know but
I’ll check it out.” Nothing whatsoever,
don’t feel embarrassed because you don’t know something, just admit it and you
will communicate honesty to that individual.
In verses 1-9 we have the importance of the factual basis of faith. God
does not ask you to believe nothing; He asks you to believe in the facts after
you’ve considered them. Then verses 10-15 are a clarification of what it is
that they are to decide. That’s the
second thing in a bona fide Biblical
invitation, verses 10-15, and that is that the issue must be clear. What is it that you are believing? At the point of gospel hearing the issue is
do I or do I not accept God’s gracious solution to the sin problem in Jesus
Christ. That’s the issue. It’s not am I going to come to Lubbock Bible
Church or not; it is not whether I am going to be baptized or not; it is not
whether I’m going to give money to the church or do something else. That has nothing to do with the gospel. The gospel is one simple issue, do you or do
you not accept God’s solution to your problems as the only solution to your
problems; that’s it, and that’s where you focus and bear down hard in
evangelism. That issue, not inviting
people to church, that’s not the point.
So verses 10-15 give the clarification of the decision.
So the facts, it declares the issue, and then in verses 16-29 the
section we’re in now Moses is developing the implications of various
decisions. Here he develops the
implication of rejection. He says you’re
free, you are a responsible person, God is not treating you as a robot, He’s
not banging you over the head, He’s not going to twist your volition, you are
free to choose or to reject. The
responsibility of Moses ends here; the responsibility, as far as I’m concerned
as a pastor, my responsibility ends with the clear communication of the
Word. Your responsibility starts by
interacting, testing if what I say is true.
One of the questions I had not long ago was how can we be sure that it’s
not just your interpretation and not the Word of God. Friend, don’t accept my words as
authoritative, check it out. And how do
you test it? Check it out with the Word
of God. If it doesn’t agree, fine, but
you check it out. I’m not up here
expecting you to believe everything that drops out of my mouth; I expect you,
however, to give me a fair hearing and I expect you to take what you hear and
test it by the standard of the Word of God and see whether it checks out. That’s something else again, the authority is
in the Word, not in me. The authority is
the inerrant Word of God.
So we have then Moses explaining, well suppose we choose negative. We’re
free to choose, suppose we choose negatively, what is going to happen. And
Moses says his responsibility includes a proclamation of the issue and what is
going to happen if I reject the grace of God; what is going to happen if I say
no. So verses 16-29 we’re working with
now, what is going to happen if the nation says no. God says, particular in verse 19, He says…
consider the individual that’s listening there in the crowd, and they’re
listening to Moses preach and getting kind of tired because he’s gone on now
for 29 chapters, and now in verse 19, “And it come to pass, when he hears the
words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, ‘I shall have
peace, though I walk in the stubbornness of my heart,’” and that’s the end of
that quote, and the rest of it is the continuation of verse 18, this is what
the man says on the inside, he’s comforting himself in saying well I’m free to
reject.
Moses says that’s right, you are free to reject, however, the thing
that’s serious about Christianity is that it’s not just that you are free; you
are free, but you’d bear certain consequences of your actions. You’re free to choose positive or negative
but you’re not free to choose the results of the decision. It’s like you’re driving along and you come
to the fork in the road; you are free to go one way or the other way but you’re
not free to remake the road. You have
two already made roads ahead of those, you can’t change those, you can choose
either one or the other but you can’t fudge the road yourself. That’s the same
thing in the Bible. You are given the
right to choose but you are not given the right to determine the results of
your decision. So this is what Moses is spelling out; this person in verse 19
is free to say this, absolutely free to say it.
But it bears certain consequences, verse 20, “The LORD will not spare
him, but then the anger of the LORD and His jealousy shall smoke against that
man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and
the LORD shall blot out his name from under heaven.”
This is the seriousness of Christianity; it says you are free to choose
but you are not free to choose the results of your decisions. You can choose to be miserable; Christians
can choose to be miserable. A Christian
on negative volition is the hardest kind of person to live with, they are
miserable, they make everyone else miserable, and they are doubly miserable because
an unbeliever go along in comfort, he’s used to negative volition, but a
Christian has the Holy Spirit indwelling and the Holy Spirit just won’t let him
be comfortable in negative volition.
I’ve been impressed in recent weeks as I’ve studied certain issues to
see how many times in history bad ideas have been introduced by
Christians. It is amazing. It seems like every major apostasy has come
out of out of fellowship Christians.
It’s amazing the spiritual pollution that Christians are responsible
for. Think, for example, of
Solomon. Here’s a believer out of
fellowship, we have evidences that are starting to show up in historical
research that Solomon stands behind early Greek philosophy. If that is true and in the next generation or
so it’s proved that this is really the root of western philosophy, look what
kind of a horrifying chain of events came from one very brilliant believer but
one very carnal believer. Today philosophy is the greatest enemy Christianity
has. We have certain things happening in
this town that started because one Christian fellow was out of fellowship. We have Christians that get involved with
certain tongues group that are spreading around satanic doctrines. Who’s spreading it around? Out of fellowship
Christians. Do you see how dangerous out
of fellowship Christians are; they’re dangerous to everyone around them; very
dangerous people, out of fellowship Christians.
We have cases in the Old Testament, out of fellowship Christians. Moses gets out of fellowship and almost blows
it, so it is a very dangerous thing of getting out of fellowship.
In verse 23 Moses warns them nationally, this so far has been written to
individuals. This, so far has been
written to individuals that get out of fellowship, but he says an individual
getting out of fellowship, it’s like a root, here’s your ground and this root
grows up and pretty soon you have a whole plant that’s developed and then this
seed starts other plants going, etc. and you spread this thing around;
carnality spreads, it’s contagious. So
one Christian out of fellowship gets a lot of others out of fellowship. If you’ve ever been in a congregational
meeting of some church and somebody will spout off something out of fellowship
and bam, about 60% of the congregation gets out of fellowship right there and 1
John 1:9 is forgotten for the rest of the meeting. That’s how church business is conducted and
people wonder what’s gone wrong with the church. It’s very easy what’s wrong with the
church. So carnality is contagious and
Moses says eventually this thing is going to become nationwide, and in verse 23
this is what God is going to do.
Last time we showed how God will physically intervene in history, like
He did in Sodom and Gomorrah. We traced verse 23 archeologically; we traced it
through the prophets and showed you how again and again Sodom and Gomorrah had
a literal physical explosion in the south end of the Dead Sea. The Dead Sea looks like this at the south
end, there’s a little bit of land that comes out here and the Dead Sea goes
down to 1200 feet here, south of that it goes to 50 feet, and archeologists
believe that this small plain, where those five cities, the pentapolis of
Genesis 14, are buried. They were buried
because God judged Sodom and Gomorrah because these cities had gone on a
maximum of negative volition toward the Word of God and when that happens, God
says there comes a limit, we don’t know, don’t ask me what that magic limit is,
but there’s a limit in history to negative volition in any given nation. We may be close to the limit in the United
States but God has His limit and He says unbelief can develop and mature up to
a limit, but when that unbelief gets to the point where it permeates the whole
culture, so that they young children that are growing up don’t have a fair
chance to hear the Word of God, when that happens, then for the sake of the
next generation God destroys that nation.
This is a rule in history and it began back in Sodom and Gomorrah. And God is saying in verse 23 is saying back
to Israel, this rule holds especially for you, literal physical
catastrophe.
And please remember that these catastrophes in the Bible are meant to be
literal, not allegorical. It’s very
interesting that we have certain people that always like to read Isaiah and
they read in Isaiah how it’s going to be, you’re like Sodom and Gomorrah, and
all the nation is left desolate and they say oh, that’s just poetic license.
What right do you have to say that’s poetic license? Isaiah is speaking of a literal, physical
catastrophe, an earthquake described in Zech. 14 that occurred in the time of
Uzziah the king, a literal thing that destroyed physically many, many cities in
the nation Israel, and he said see Israel, God’s Word is coming true. That’s what Moses said back in verse 23 and
now it’s upon us. And Isaiah used that
as a platform of preaching the Word in his generation.
Now verse 24 and following, he continues the dramatic dialogue to show
the results of negative volition toward God.
[Verse 24, “Even all nations shall say,” this is Moses’ way of depicting
what’s going to happen, he draws a picture for you in his sermon and he says
look, this is the way it is, imagine the rubble, just like an atom bomb dropped
on Hiroshima and you remember the pictures of the rubble, just rubble for
miles. Well imagine the rubble and here
are two groups of people standing around looking down at the bricks and the
slime and the broken bodies in the streets, and this is what they are saying,
Moses says, “Wherefore hath the LORD done this unto this land? What means the
heat of this great anger?”
Verse [25, “Then men shall say, Because they have forsaken the covenant
of the LORD God of their fathers, which He made with them when He brought them
forth out of the land of Egypt,” this covenant is the Mosaic Covenant, and I
want you to notice something in verse 25, a principle about the working of God,
a principle that is never violated, no matter how you choose, God is going to
be glorified. Notice that these nations
here in verse 24-25 are looking at judgment.
What has happened? It’s a fore
view of the time the nation Israel will go on negative volition toward God’s
Word and they will result in judgment and they are looking at the debris of a
physical catastrophe upon the nation.
And when they look upon this, who gets the glory? What do they say here, “the LORD God of their
fathers,” they broke His covenant. So
who in the end always gets the glory? Who
in the end always gets the last word?
The Lord! Who in hell itself gets
the glory? The Lord! The Lord gets the glory, “every knee shall
bow,” every knee will bow to Jesus Christ in eternity. That’s not teaching universal salvation;
that’s teaching the fact that every person in hell and in heaven will bow their
knee to Jesus Christ. Some will bow
voluntarily out of the spirit of worship because they’re believers; others will
be forced to bow and that is what is going to make the Lake of Fire the Lake of
Fire, that men will be forced to worship Him whom they have totally and
completely rejected and they will be forced to bow down before the throne.
I was talking with some missionaries who had come back from Africa and
one of them was telling me about an incident that happened, this missionary
came back to this country and he had been involved with various demonic
activities in Africa and he came back to the United States on furlough one time
and when he got back here he said, isn’t it interesting, I see more demonic
activity in the United States than I ever did in Africa, so he quite the
mission field and came back here and started Christian counseling, a bigger
mission field here than there was in Africa.
And I agree with him, bring back our missionaries, we need them
here. But he was telling me one incident
that he remembered out there of how the witch doctor in this tribe was leading
these natives, etc. obviously it was a demonic situation where he was demon
possessed, and he got involved with a situation where there were some
Christians in the village, about 15 or so of them and down the road a piece
there was another village. The
Christians had quite a healthy group of believers, young believers, didn’t have
much of the Word of God but down in this village was this witch doctor and this
witch doctor thought he was going to cause some trouble. The same thing in the book of Acts, you have
these people that are demon possessed, they love to bring people into captivity
to themselves and run their lives. And
this witch doctor couldn’t stand to have these people liberated so he was going
to send some of his troops up and mess them up. So they came up there and they
led a demon possessed person, the head of this column, surrounded by these men,
and picked out this woman who was demon possessed, and then they lined up on
both sides of her, a line of these warriors, and they marched her right into
that village and the objective was to see if they could get more people playing
around with demons by bringing this demon possessed person in the village.
So the Christians didn’t know anything about it so all they did was they
set up a roadblock and they began to pray.
They didn’t know anything, they didn’t know what to do but they just
prayed. And they asked the Lord to
protect them and to stop this procession.
And they no sooner got to within about 50 feet of this situation and
this woman all of a sudden started screaming and going into a convulsion and
she wouldn’t go, and these warriors started beating her up and said get going,
get going, and she couldn’t because in front of her, evidently invisible to
both the warriors and to the Christians an angel or some tall white figure
standing there blocking her path. She
saw that and it really created some problems.
But he was pointing out the fact that in this situation you find these
demonic powers very active but you find the Lord always answers the prayers of
protection to the believer. So it’s a
very interesting illustration that this man pointed out and I think this is
another illustration of the fact that God always gets the glory.
Jesus Christ is always going to get the glory and here in verses 24-25
Jesus Christ is getting the glory, “LORD” refers to the preincarnate Christ,
here we find God Himself as a result of His divine plan always gets glory. When we are disciplined He gets the glory,
when we are blessed He gets the glory.
Verse 26, “For they went and served other gods, and worshiped them, gods
whom they knew not, and whom H had not given unto them.” We have a lot in this verse about history,
about rejection and about judgment.
“They went and served other gods” tells you basically the reason the
nation Israel went down. They broke the
first commandment in verse 26, and it was an announcement that this first
commandment is always broken before the others.
It’s very interesting, when you think of the Ten Commandments,
logically, you can’t break any one of the Ten Commandments without breaking the
first one. The first one, logically,
always goes first, so here in verse 26 “they worshiped other gods” is the root
source and sin of Israel. They worshiped
them, but then there are two phrases in verse 26 that you should fasten upon
because this tells you a lot about these gods.
The first thing about these gods is that they were not known, now isn’t
this amazing. Remember I said that the Bible asks you to trust in God on the
basis of facts. I’ve said again and
again how the Gospels call you to faith in Jesus Christ, not as an emotional
appeal but consider the facts… consider the facts. Consider the facts of the life of Jesus
Christ and what’s your response. What’s
your response to the facts? And when you
study the facts you come to know Him.
Believing in God and responding to Him is like responding to any other
person. How do you know another
person? How would you know any other
person with whom you have a personal relationship? Just think for a moment. The only way you can know another person is
to know their character. How are you
going to know their character? By the
way they reveal themselves. How do they
reveal themselves? Another person reveals
himself to you two ways; through what he says to you and through what he does
in front of you. Those are the two ways
you can read a person’s character.
Now if that’s the way to read a person’s character it means that before
you can have any kind of a personal relationship with them, you must know them
as people. One of the questions I got
this morning was about premarital sex, what’s wrong with it, expecting me to
give the usual pat answer and say it’s a no-no.
I said it’s negative but not because it’s a no-no; the reason is that
the Word of God tells you get hurt seriously by messing around and furthermore,
the Word of God tells you cannot fall in love with a person in this fashion,
it’s not a form of testing to find out whether you know them because nothing
about the person is revealed in sex. In
order to have a love relationship you’ve got to respond to the person’s
character and that character can only be revealed by words and works. And people who play around promiscuously are
cutting themselves off from the revelation of the character in the one whom
they supposedly love. The more they fool
around in promiscuity the more they cut themselves off from knowing the person
as a person. They get to know a response
but they don’t know the person; they’ve done exactly opposite to what they want
to do. It’s ironic but they’ve done
exactly the wrong thing because in so doing they’ve cut out the revelation of
the character. You can only know a
person through the words a person says to you and what the person does in
history.
In a nutshell, this is why I believe in God. People ask me sometimes to defend your belief
in God, how do you know God? I know Him
just like I know anybody else, I know by what He tells me in the Word of God,
testing it out for consistency and I know Him by what He has done in history,
the resurrection, the cross, etc. It’s a
very simple answer why I believe in God; it’s irrefutable basically,
irrefutable. If you refute my system of
knowing God I can refute your system of knowing anybody and then where are we?
We’re left hanging in the air with nothing.
So it’s either nothing or it’s God.
So we know people by what they say and what they do.
In verse 26, it’s very interesting, but these are “gods whom they knew
not.” Do you know why they knew them
not? Because they couldn’t know them,
there were no gods there, they were empty idols. Those gods couldn’t make themselves known to
the people because there was no god there; there was just a stone statue
there. A stone statue can’t reveal
himself by words or by works. Therefore
it’s saying, isn’t this funny, isn’t this hilarious, these people that rejected
God who had spoken to them and done things for them, and then they turn around
and worship these gods who can’t speak and can’t do anything. Isn’t that ridiculous! God gives you enough data and enough facts to
trust Him; these stone statues give you absolutely nothing, in fact Isaiah gets
very sarcastic; some of these prophets in the Old Testament are really a riot
to read because they’re so sarcastic.
Isaiah says ha-ha you Canaanites, here you sit worshiping your gods and
you know what, your gods are so stupid and so idiotic and so weak that your
craftsmen have to chain them to the wall to keep them from falling over, that’s
a brilliant form of worship Isaiah says.
This is the irony of apostasy, always, people will reject God, they have
all these deep intellectual arguments, oh, I have so much intellectual
difficulty with the gospel, and then they go off into something that is
absolutely ludicrous intellectually. So
here we have the same thing in verse 26.
They probably had intellectual difficulties with Yahweh, and yet they go
and worship some statue and they can’t even communicate with him.
But then there’s another phrase that’s even more important and that’s
the next one, “and whom he had not given unto them,” now this is a strange
thing because the subject of this clause is God and look at that clause again
and what is it saying? “Whom,” those are
the gods, “whom gods God had not given unto them.” Do you know what he’s
saying? He’s saying here you have God
above and this God assigns gods to these peoples, and you say that’s a peculiar
statement, why on earth is God, who doesn’t want men to worship anybody but Himself,
assigning gods to people to worship; it sounds like God’s defeating His own
purpose. Why is this going on? This is a peculiar way for God to be working
in history. And yet here’s the strange
thing about the Bible; it tells us that at one point in time, in Gen. 11, we
had the nations all one. When these nations were all one they all worshiped
evidently God from what they knew because they had come down from Noah. Noah survived with his family and came down from
Noah’s generation down to the generation of Babel. Turn to Gen. 11.
As I study the Bible more and more I come to have a greater and greater
appreciation for these early chapters of Genesis. You can’t build any doctrine of sex and
marriage apart from a literal rendition of Gen. 2 and 3. If you reject the literalness of Gen. 2-3 I
can prove to you that you have no doctrine whatever for marriage; none
whatever. If you reject Gen. 11 you have
no basis whatever for consideration of any political or social question under
the sun, not a basis, not a shred if you do not accept Gen. 11 literally. Some of these Christians that always like to
allegorize Gen. 1-11, I’m going to go out and buy some cheap paperback bibles
and then I’m going to take an Exacto blade and I’m going to cut off the first 11
chapters and then I’m going to hand it to them, here, this is a Bible you’d
obviously be more comfortable with, it starts at Gen. 12, and hand them to
these people that can’t stand Gen. 1-11.
In Genesis 11 we have the situation, verse 1 where “the whole earth was
of one language, and of one speech.”
Here we have the first United Nations building. The people in verse 2 go
to the east and they say in verse 3, let’s get together now and build this big
tall tower, we’re all brothers, the fatherhood of God and brotherhood of man,
we’re all going to get together. So you
have a movement toward world unity at this point. This is a very crucial point in history, and
this is why fundamentalism is opposed to world government, it’s not because we
just don’t like the color of the flag of the United Nations or something, we
don’t like the shape of Rockefeller Plaza or something else, that’s not the
point. The point is that in the
philosophy of history this was tried one time and failed miserably and brought
the world under the judgment of God and we don’t want it to happen again. That’s why we’re against one-world
government. Here in verse 4 they build
the first U.N. building, and they want the top to reach unto the heavens, an
amazing thing.
Verse 5, “And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower,” to
check in on this thing, and verse 6 is His analysis, “And the LORD said,
Behold, the people are one, and they have all one language; and this they begin
to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them.” So here we find the fact that God says look,
the whole human race is one, racially, linguistically, culturally; now here is
the danger: who is in charge of the world, basically? Satan, he’s the one that’s ruling. Now just suppose you have one-world government,
here’s the dilemma, of course one-world government has the potential of peace,
I don’t deny that. I don’t deny the
argument that you could end war if you had one-world government; I’m not
denying that but I’m saying look what you do?
You jump from the frying pan into the fire; you wind up with something
worse than you had before because now it’s true, you’ve got one-world
government, everything is one, but look who gets in charge of the
thing—Satan. He can manipulate, if you
put all your eggs in one basket and he has the basket, what do you do
then? You’ve no way to break out of the
thing. You are setting the whole world
up for a satanic takeover in a form which is absolutely horrifying and this is
why God says in verse 6, “this they begin to do, and now nothing will be
withheld from them, which they have imagined to do.” Do you see what He’s concerned with? Jesus Christ here is not being and old fogy,
He’s not saying I don’t like this and I’m jealous of it, He’s simply saying
this, that the human race is a race of sinful people; if you coagulate
everything into one-world government, what’s going to control? Satan’s going to rule to the sin nature of
man, you’re going to have one of the most horrible tyrannies of history. So God says what I’m going to do is fracture
this thing.
It’s all broken up into pieces, so we have all these pieces and they’re
all broken; this represents God’s fracturing of the tower of Babel, He breaks
it up linguistically and geographically, etc.
Why does God break it up; here you have the beginning of many cultures
in the world. Now when this happens it’s
like putting holes in a ship. Remember
back in the days of the Titanic, when they first got the idea of putting holes
in a ship and they said what we’ll do is put holes in the ship so that if
there’s a whole in the bow, and there’s a hull, the hull fractures or
something, the whole boat won’t go down, what will happen is just one
compartment will flood, we can save the ship by confining the damage to one
compartment. That’s the same thing as
world government. God has fractured us
culturally, separated us linguistically, so if one area of the world goes on
negative volition, such as the Canaanites, that negative volition can be
contained and not spread its putrid-ness over all the rest of the human
race. So you confine it and then God can
cancel that out by some local war or something like that, or some
judgment. So world government has been
declared null and void as of Gen. 11 and any attempt today to bring unity under
man is a satanic attempt to undo the work of the Lord of Gen. 11. This is why no Christian… I don’t feel a
person can be a consistent and Christian and back world government. I think you’re fighting the Word of God; I
think you’re asking for judgment upon you, and I think you’re asking for the
destruction of your own nation because you are fighting God’s clear declared
will of history. And I say this even all
the young children are getting this jazz, United Nations Day, and oh what a
beautiful thing the United Nations is and all the rest of it. And if you are against the United Nations
what right wing extremist are you? What
right wing sewer did you come from? Well
the point is we didn’t come from any right wing sewer; we came from the Word of
God. You can all it right wing extremism
if you want to, I don’t care, you can
call me all the names you want to anyway but it’s the Word of God and the Word
of God says that there will be no world government, period.
So what happened here? Here is
where God evidently, as we will see later, assigned for each cultural piece a
set of gods; these people had all rejected.
Now under the principle of negative volition God says I judge you. What is one way God judges? Have you ever thought that God doesn’t have
to judge you directly? God can judge you
by allowing your sin nature to just take its normal course. God can judge a nation as He is our nation
today by letting the wheels of history roll.
He doesn’t have to supernaturally intervene; all He has to do is take
His restraining hands off and let the caldron boil over. That’s all He has to do, and that’s all He
does here. When He split these nations up we can deduce from the angelic
doctrine that there was a council of angels began to assume administration for
each one of these units of nations.
Among these council of angels were good angels and bad angels and then
you have these bad angels that began to have jurisdiction over them. We find this in ancient history, the Code of
Hammurabi, for example, supposedly given to Hammurabi by a god; we know it
wasn’t the Lord Jesus Christ that gave Hammurabi his code so by process of
elimination it must have been a bad angel.
So we have these codes given, actually supernaturally, in the ancient
history, but they are given through the medianship of angels whom the ancients
called gods. And the ancients began to
worship. If you look on the ceiling of
some buildings you see Hammurabi and then you see a picture, a personage of
this angel and the angel is giving this thing to Hammurabi. You can see this in archeology. So I don’t believe that this is mythology; I
believe that Hammurabi and these men actually did talk to gods and the gods
they talked to were not just idols, they were actual fallen angels that gave
these things to them.
My support for this is found in Deut. 4.
In Deut. 4:19 we have a section that I passed over quickly when I first
went over it that says the same thing as the verse in front of us. “And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven,
and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of
heaven, that you should be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the
LORD thy God has divided unto all nations under the whole heaven.” This expresses a judgmental decision on the
part of God at the point of the tower of Babel in which He said all right
people, if you want to go on negative signals, I’ll give you something to
worship, I’ll give you these gods. And
so He assigned gods to all these nations.
The Babylonians had their set, Egypt had their set, and all the nations
got a set of gods except one nation and that nation was Israel. And Israel was forbidden to worship any of
these gods because God Himself picked Israel out to work with. But when He fractured the unity of the race
and drove apart all these nations He gave them these gods.
Turn to Deut. 32:8, “When the Most High divided to the nations their
inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the
people according to the number of the children of Israel,” and there is a long
extra-Biblical tradition which I won’t comment on too much that retranslates
that last phrase when God separated the boundaries of the nations according to bena ha Elohim the sons of God, or the
angels. So there’s a tradition down
through history that God had a system, whether it was according to the sons of
Israel or the sons of God we’ll find that when we get to Deut. 32. But we had this administration of all the
nations under the angelic council, with one exception, and that was
Israel. Israel was directly administered
by God, through the angelic council, but the Lord Himself was the one that
picked it out.
What does this mean basically, turning back to Deut. 29? It means that we as a Gentile nation, as all
Gentile nations, are not God’s chosen people.
There is only one political entity on earth that is God’s chosen people
and that is Israel. No Gentile nation
can claim this because the Gentiles, as of the moment of the tower of Babel
judgment, have been put out of the program of God and have been turned over to
these angelic forces. This is why in
Daniel the angel has to go and fight with the king of Persia; it’s not a
literal human king he’s talking about, it’s an angelic king. So we find that for the political entities of
the Gentile nations over and above and working through them are these angelic
dominions of government that are controlling history. The Gentile nations are under the wrath of
God and they are expressed here when God says that you are not, Israel, to
worship them, because I haven’t given you them; I have given them however, to
the Gentile nations.
Verse 27, “And the anger of the LORD was kindled against this land, to
bring upon it all the curses that are written in this book; [28] And the LORD
rooted them out of their land in anger, and in wrath, [and in great
indignation, and cast them into another land, as it is this day.]” speaking of
the accomplishment of the five cycles of discipline. Remember from Lev. 26 that God had five degrees
of discipline. He said I’m going to
spank you once Israel and we’ll see what happens, and if you don’t behave then
I’ll spank you seven times more, and that was step two. And if that doesn’t work I’ll spank you seven
times more, that’s step three. If that
doesn’t work I’ll spank you seven times more and by the time the fourth
discipline would come the fourth degree of discipline, God said I will have
total military occupation over your nation, you won’t have any political
freedom left and by the time you get to the fifth cycle of discipline in Lev.
26 you have complete dispersion. That’s
the Diaspora. So you have these five
cycles of discipline or five degrees of discipline and when God says in verses
27-28, He’s saying when all of this has come to pass, when we’ve gotten out
there under the fifth degree of discipline.
Then finally verse 29, Moses concludes his discussion of the negative
decision by saying, “The secret things belong unto the LORD our God; but those
things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children forever, that we
may do all the words of this law.” Now
the “secret things” here in context refer to the future councils of God. This refers to specifically, in context, to
how God is going to bring this about in history. In other words, Moses already told them look,
you play with fire you get burned; you mess around with Jehovah God and He’s
going to discipline you. But don’t ask
me now how He’s going to do it, I’m just telling you He’s going to do it. And when the time comes He’ll tell you
how. Who in the Bible finally gave them
the clue on how He was going to do it?
The prophets, you see the prophets exposed the hidden things of God and
when the time came for the judgment to occur God sent Isaiah and Jeremiah and
said this is how this is going to be phased into history.
Now we can apply verse 29 to our own life, to our own day and say this:
it is not true that the Bible gives me complete information about God. We’re not defending that. What we are saying is but what is given in
the Bible is absolutely true and can never be annulled by future
revelation. That’s the point. What I now know in the Bible is securely
valid for all eternity. You never need
fear some cult, some other religion coming in and saying oh, we just got a new
set of revelation that’s going to invalidate the Bible. That is not true. Never, never in the progress of revelation…
the next time probably God will open up the Canon again will be in the
Tribulation when you have the living prophets.
So you have live revelation there but we live in an age of silence since
70 AD or since about 100 AD there has been no revelation in history. You’ve had people that claim it, people that
start up cults, you’ve had people doing all these weird things but you had no
legitimate bona fide verbal
revelation from God since about 100 AD and the death of the Apostle John. When John died he was the last man who lived
in history to experience the process of divine revelation.
But the secret things which we do not yet know is fine, that belongs to
the Lord, but those things which are revealed belong to us for our
obedience. This verse should also stop
you from engaging in the sin of occultism where you desire future things that
God has not yet revealed. If God has not
revealed it in His Word, you have no business trying to seek it through some
spiritist, through some medium through some unauthorized area. God doesn’t play around. I throw that out as a warning, don’t tamper
with God and play games. You respect
what He has given to you in the Word and if it’s not in the Word you’re not
going to know, except through the illumination ministry of the Holy Spirit in
your life for small details. But as far
as major truths you will not find it if it’s not in the Word of God.
That’s the end in verse 29 of the negative thing and we have a few
remaining minutes so I want to deal with the first couple of verses in chapter
30 where Moses starts with the positive aspect.
He says I’ve shown you what’s going to happen if you go on negative
volition, now in 30:1ff here’s what’s going to happen if you go on positive
volition toward the Word. We have in
chapter 30 something that theologians call the Palestinian Covenant. The Palestinian Covenant is something that
theologians refer to as an expansion of the Abrahamic Covenant. The Abrahamic Covenant said three things
basically; it was found in Gen. 12, Gen. 15, etc. it gave them many things but
three basic ones. First it promised that
Israel would be a worldwide testimony to God.
Secondly it promised them real estate; they had eternal title to a set
of land. Then He promised them survival,
that they would survive in history; these three basic things.
As you go down through the Old Testament each of these three provisions
of that Abrahamic Covenant are expanded.
The first provision, the real estate provision is expanded here, by the
Palestinian Covenant. The Palestinian
Covenant is an amplification of the real estate clause of the Abrahamic
Covenant. It develops and expands it; it
is an extension of the Abrahamic Covenant.
The second thing is the survival clause of the Abrahamic Covenant is
expanded by the Davidic Covenant of 2 Sam. 7 when God promised survival through
the monarchy, etc. That’s the second
expansion of the Abrahamic Covenant. The
third expansion of the Abrahamic Covenant is found in the Jeremiah and the late
prophets and it’s called the New Covenant when Israel will be the source of worldwide
blessing to the world. But these three
later covenants you want to connect with the Abrahamic Covenant, they are just
expansions of it. And here we have the
expansion of the real estate clause of the Abrahamic Covenant.
Let’s look at verses 1-3 quickly, “and it shall come to pass, when all
these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set
before thee, and thou shalt return to your heart among all the nations, [call
them to mind]” now let me explain this phrase, “thou shalt return your heart,”
this means that you will cause the mentality of your soul to do an about
face. “Return” means that these people
who have picked up a human viewpoint situation in the mentality of their soul,
they’ve filled up with this chaos of human viewpoint, etc. that they’ve
absorbed in the culture, their minds will now turn from human viewpoint to
divine viewpoint. The times when this
occurred when, during the exile we had various prophets, Ezekiel was one,
Daniel was another one, later on Zechariah, and these men, while they were in
captivity, you might say post mortem, after the nation died in 586 BC these men
got together and said well now look, the nation went down, let’s see if we can
put together an analysis of history that will tell us why the nation
collapsed. That analysis is in your
Bible and it’s called the Book of Kings, 1 & 2 Kings represent the exilic
analysis of the nation to find out why it went down. So in 586 when the nation Israel went down,
after the blessings and cursings had fell upon it, for 70 years they sat in
captivity.
In 516 BC they came back into the land, but only some of them. This was a partial restoration. The same cycle was repeated in 70 AD, just
after the epistle to the Hebrews was written, the fifth cycle of discipline
came once again upon the nation when Titus destroyed Jerusalem. When Titus
destroyed Jerusalem you had a situation develop that the Jews went into the
Diaspora which they are still in, in spite of what the Zionists would say. As far as God is concerned the Jews are out
of the land and they will stay out of the land until Jesus Christ Himself calls
them back. This is the Diaspora; to date
the conditions of verse 1 and 2 have not been fulfilled by modern Israel,
therefore the return to the land is not the direct will of God. Now obviously God is working behind the
scenes to bring them back into the land to fulfill prophecy, but it’s not in
the sense of His direct over-riding will.
For example, verse 2, look at these of prerequisites, first, “the
blessing and the cursing, which I have set before thee,” and now when these
things come to pass, “and you shall return your heart,” that means turn back to
divine viewpoint, “when you’re among the nations to which the LORD thy God has
driven thee,” verse 2, “Then you will return unto the LORD thy God, and shall
obey His voice according to all that I command thee this day,” the “then” which
occurs in verse 3 should really be in the first verb in verse 1, you see where
it says “and it shall come to pass when all these things are come upon thee,
the blessing and the cursing, which I have set before thee,” that first “and”
is really the verb that sets off the predicted things that are going to happen,
after all these things have happened then the following set of actions will
occur. The first action is in verse 1,
and the first action in verse 1 is “you shall return your heart among the
nations,” so there will be repentance in the true Biblical sense of the Word; a
repentance which means a return to divine viewpoint. Has that happened to the worldwide Jews in
Diaspora? No.
Look at the next action, verse 2, You “will return unto the LORD thy
God,” here you have through reconsideration in the mentality of their soul they
now make a positive decision to return to the Lord, “and you will obey His
voice,” this is the third action, this is another action and this means
positive volition toward the Lord, the third action means obedience, they will
seek God’s will for their life, “according to all that I command thee this
day,” the Law will be the objective, “thou and thy children, with all thine
heart, and with all thy soul, [3] …the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity,”
notice who is doing it, not the Zionists, “the LORD thy God will turn thy
captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from
all the nations where the LORD thy God hath scattered thee.”
We know that a certain part of the nation Israel has to be in the land
for prophecy to be fulfilled but the point we’re making to you is that that is
the overruling will of God. The ones
that are back there today are not back there in obedience to the Word of
God. They are back there through just
the sovereign working of God in history.
But the return that is prophesied here is the same kind of return that
occurred in 516 BC when you had a genuine Biblical back to the revival movement
among the Jews in the Diaspora, they began to repent and then God called them
back. Who was it that called them? God called them back, He was the one that
verbally called them back. And so again
after the rapture of the Church and we go through the seven years of the
Tribulation Jesus Christ will call them back, it says He will whistle for them
and they’re going to come. But it’s
going to happen when there is first a fulfillment of the conditions of verses
1-3.
Please remember this because Christians that love Israel and I do, I’ve
been involved in Jewish evangelism, etc. but you want to be careful that you
don’t say that Zionism is the program of God in this age. That is not true; Zionism is a necessary
prerequisite for the Second Advent but Zionism is Satan’s attempt to anticipate
the movement of Jesus Christ in history.
If you want a confirmation of this you can get it from a very strange
source, because if you want confirmation of the satanic attempts of Zionism you
have but to listen to the Orthodox Jews in the city of Jerusalem. The hyper Orthodox Jews that look forward to
a literal Messiah refuse even to use the money of Israel today; they say this
is polluted; there is no bona fide
state of Israel until Messiah come again and they are absolutely right…
absolutely right! The modern state of
Israel is legitimate as far as the nations are concerned but it does not
represent the direct will of God in fulfillment of this prophecy. The nation will come back in unbelief but not
totally; the complete and total return of the nation occurs at the Second
Advent of Christ and that is the direct will of God because it’s by grace, it’s
not by politics and not by human money and things behind the scene.
I just want to clarify the record, when we are premillennial it doesn’t
mean that we say that everything the Jews do are automatically because they’re
Jews is the will of God. This is not a blanket
approval of everything the Jews of Israel do.
We just say this, that as far as Bible prophecy is concerned, the nation
Israel will win out, that we know, but we’re not saying that the winning out is
in the direct will of God. You say isn’t
this a paradox? Not at all, was it or
was it not God’s direct will for Jesus Christ to go to the cross? It wasn’t good for Jesus Christ but it was
His direct will. It was absolutely
certain that He would go to the cross, but you couldn’t say that well, when Jesus
offered the Kingdom in His day that it was a phony offer. Jesus came and He said I offer you the
Kingdom, it was a genuine offer, and yet it was absolutely certain they’d
reject it; absolutely certain, but Jesus went ahead and did it anyway. There are certain things that are sure to
happen in history that are not in the direct will of God and you have to be
careful and distinguish the issues here.
Verse 3, “The LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion
upon thee,” please notice that He can’t have compassion until the first set of
actions occur, and notice the sequence.
First, there is repentance, there is a consideration in the frontal lobe
of Bible doctrine; there’s a return to Bible doctrine first, before there’s an
outward behavioral change. We see this
principle again and again, Bible doctrine first, then a volitional decision,
then thirdly the outworking into the behavior.
You must follow that, you can’t slam, bang people over the head and
expect them to behave a certain way when they have human viewpoint. We have to, that’s the role of government, to
insure that people will behave a certain way, but my point is you can’t get
voluntary obedience to the law until you change the way people think. So here’s the same thing, God is not going to
do what He does in verse 3, having compassion upon them, pouring out His grace
upon them, until certain conditions are met and those conditions are return to
divine viewpoint and a positive choosing for divine viewpoint over and against
human viewpoint.
Next time we’ll finish chapter 30 and develop premillennialism and we
will develop the doctrine of inspiration from verses 11-14.