2 Samuel Lesson 71

Absalom Defeated – 2 Samuel 17:23-19:8

 

Turn to 2 Samuel 17, picking up where we left of.  David did not know of Absalom’s revolt for the large section of Samuel, chapter 15-19 is the time when his son Absalom revolted and led a defection movement, took over Jerusalem, David was forced eastward.  David, at the time of 15 and 16 did not yet now whether his time of reign had yet finished.  In other words, he wasn’t sure of God’s will, but we found that by 17:22 David realized that God had answered his prayer in Psalm 3 and he relaxed all that night as the people drifted across the Jordan River.  David is on the east bank of Jordan; the forces of Absalom are moving eastward to try and entrap him, and he has moved over and he’s going to conduct a campaign from the east side of Jordan.  But he is now definitely assured that God will place him back on the throne, and it leads him to take a series of vital decisions. 

 

But tonight we’re going to see the same two scenes in David’s life that we have seen before.  On the one hand he is an excellent soldier, but when it comes to acting out as an administrator of the kingdom he fails miserably.  This flaw in his soul is still there.  Verse 23, “And when Ahithophel saw that his counsel was not followed,” Ahithophel was Bathsheba’s grandfather, he was one of David’s elder counselors that defected to Absalom, probably out of personal jealousy, but nevertheless Ahithophel gave Absalom tremendous advice.  And the advice is important for several reasons.  It shows you that at this point in Israel’s history, even though there were living prophets, there were no miraculous prophecies.  This is very important to understand.  You can go for long periods of time in the Old Testament and have no miracles.  Just because you have Nathan living as a real live prophet, there is no living prophecies going on at this point, very important.  Therefore, in a time of the silence of God, how do these people understand God’s will?  The answer is wisdom, that is the application of the Word of God to their experience.  That is how they discerned.   Ahithophel was a wise man, and he was the one who had skill in applying the Word of God to situations.  His advice was tremendous, but it was undermined by David’s espionage and sabotage in the form of Hushai. 

 

So, “he saddled his ass, and arose, and went home to his house, to his city, and put his household in order, and hanged himself, and died, and was buried in the sepulcher of his father.”  This is one of those rare times in the Old Testament where you have suicide, and since we are on the subject of suicide, let’s expand a moment here on the doctrinal footnote and deal with suicide.  Suicide Scripturally is no different from murder.  It is not the case that you can do with your life as you see fit, your life isn’t yours.  And when you take your life you are murdering yourself, and it falls under the same condemnation as murder.  Suicide is forbidden under all situations; there is no situation where suicide is authorized.  Suicide is never the will of God.  Why, then, do so many believers, particularly in our own generation, as the figures show more and more young people committing suicide, teenagers committing suicide.  And it’s obviously the response of the human soul to a doctrinally dry area, to a situation in life where there are no standards and no personal relationship. 

 

One area of suicide that you always want to be aware of, that suicide is, most of the time, a satanic suggestion.  We know this by John 8:44 where it says that Satan is a murderer.  Satan wants believers to kill themselves.  Too often you read cases of attempted suicide where the person will somehow survive and they tell you that a voice spoke to them and said take your life, or they’ll report some other spectacular thing that they had this dream and in the dream they were to commit suicide, and so on.  Suicide is murder and the satanic attack always comes at this point; when you are in the middle of despair and depression that is ripe ground for Satan to sow the thought of suicide in your mind.  Recognize it for what it is, suicide does not come from the Lord.  If the Lord wants to take you home He has some fantastically spectacular ways of doing it; you just let Him do that, but don’t cop out on life; it’s not only murder, it’s a cop out, and it’s a satanic urging, watch it for what it is.  Your mind is open at all times to satanic suggestions.  The Lord Jesus Christ’s mind was open to satanic suggestions and He didn’t have any sin nature, so much more our minds.  Suicide is totally anti-scriptural, and in verse 23 when Ahithophel commits suicide he is obviously out of fellowship, he is rebellion against God’s Word.

 

Verse 24, “Then David came to Mahanaim.”  Now this place is very interesting, we’ve watched how Ahithophel gave a good principle of war, the principle of pursuit.  Now David is using another principle of war the principle of concentration of force.  He has a much smaller army than Absalom, at least potentially.  So he goes to this place and sets up a command post.  And along up this wadi he has command post.  Now why does David set up his command post east of Jordan at this place?  Well, several things: one, at this place he has a massive amount of logistics available to him, so military it’s a sound decision because you want to fight your battle as close to the supply lines as possible so you won’t stretch your lines out.  The next reason why David militarily picked this place was the fact that it gives you a place to retreat.  There’s mountains back here and you can’t be cut off, so this was very, very sound strategy on David’s part.  On the other hand, his opponent had to come across Jordan and stretch his lines of supply.  This produced the battle on David’s ground, and that fundamentally is the whole point in this kind of combat situation.  You always want to pick the ground on which the battle is fought, don’t let the enemy fight it on his ground.  So, to draw Absalom across. 

 

This is why in verse 24 immediately you read the tactic was successful, “And Absalom passed over the Jordan, he and all the men of Israel with him.”  In other words it was a war to bring him across.  Now you see what’s happened, is that when Absalom brings his army across, look what he’s got in back of him.  He’s got a river, his retreat is cut off, and an army that’s being scattered is going to have a tremendous job trying to cross the Jordan River.  So he has got Absalom coming over, he backs up and backs up and backs up and let’s Absalom come closer and closer.  Absalom brings all his forces across Jordan and now David has him just where he wants him.  And in the route that follows you’ll see that this is very, very wise strategy.  If you back an army into a corner and they can’t retreat, it generally causes panic in the ranks. We’ll see how that works. 

 

Verse 25, “And Absalom made Amasa captain of the host instead of Joab, which Amasa was a man’s son, whose name was Ithra, an Israelite, who went in to Abigail, the daughter of Nahash, sister to Zeruiah, Joab’s mother.”  Now this is a big long complicated genealogy, and because the Hebrew text in verse in verse 15 is ambiguous, the only thing we can say for sure is that it’s put in by the Holy Spirit to show you there was a reason for personal antagonism between Amasa and Joab.   [26] “So Israel and Absalom encamped in the land of Gilead.”  Now they’re setting up their ranks here, just on the east bank.  Now David has them exactly where he wants them.  Verse 17 is a parenthesis that shows the wisdom of why David picked his command post where he did, “And it came to pass, when David was come to Manahaim, that Shobi, the son of Nahash or Rabbah, of the children of Ammon, and Machir, the son of Ammiel of Lodebar, and Barzillai, the Gileadite of Rogelim, [28] Brought beds, and basins, and earthen vessels, and wheat, and barley, and flour, and parched grain, and beans, and lentils, and parched pulse, [29] And honey, and butter, and sheep, and cheese of cows, for David, and for all the people who were with him to eat; for they said, The people are hungry, and weary, and thirsty in the wilderness.” 

 

Now if you’ll look at that list, you know, for example, the kind of cheese which the Arabs use today, all of those items in verses 28-29 are non-perishable, and it shows you that whoever is doing the supplying has a tremendous amount of wisdom about supplying an army in battle.  And the list is given to draw attention to the fact of the skill of the logistics.  It’s telling you in essence that David is well stocked; he is close to his supply lines, he has exactly the supplies that he needs.  This is just a common way that the text has of showing you, see the blessing of God on David; he goes and he’s blessed over there and who’s doing the blessing?  That’s the amazing thing in verse 27, all those people in verse 27 aren’t Jews.  So here you have David out of the land and he’s being deluged with just exactly what he needs out of the hands of the Gentiles.  God is blessing him.  But, God, although He blesses David, is not going to deliver David by a miracle.  Don’t get too miracle conscious; miracles by definition are infrequent, or they wouldn’t be miracles.  In most cases God does not deliver David by a miracle, He delivers David through His normal creation laws.

 

Now let’s see how it works, chapter 18.  David does things here, though he knows it is God’s will, he is using the faith technique, and you remember what we said about the faith technique, it has two sides, it has a resting side and it has a doing side.  The doing is not doing the works of merit but it has activity.  There is a rest in those things that you can’t do yourself.  There is also, however, activity.  Now David is resting, we saw him in Psalm 3 as he rested all that night when his people came across Jordan; there was his faith-rest.  Now here is his faith-doing.  He is applying military wisdom to his situation.  It starts out with a census.

 

18:1, “And David numbered the people who were with him,” now why did he number the people? Because he was forming an army and it’s a listing, he’s listing the people who were with him.  You see, he had to number the people because he had women, children, had a whole bunch of people, and the word “number” like the book of Numbers was to get out all males 21 or over.  Israel had one of the finest systems of military training, which we ought to have and don’t.  Israel had universal military training.  This is universal military training, which means every male is trained to kill.  And that is part of his job.  Then after every male has the training, sword drills and spear drills, then out of that they pick the ones they want for their army.  See what that does, the army goes through and picks the strong ones, and all the weak ones are eliminated off the site and you have the best people in your army.  And that is the principle that Israel always used.  You don’t have the dregs in your army, you have the best people in your army, the men who are the most skillful killers in their society should be in the military. 

 

So David is numbering, that means he is picking the best for his army.  And then he sets up a command structure, “and set captains of thousands and captains of hundreds over them.”  Notice that David is operating according to normal military principles.  He’s not expecting God to do this for him, even though he knows he will be successful.  You see the sovereignty and the volition involved.  God sovereignly says David will get that throne back; but God sovereignty includes a series of acts of volition to get there to that goal; the goal is the throne but David must do these things, no miraculous intervention. 

 

Verse 2, “And David sent forth a third part of the people under the hand of Joab; and a third part under the hand of Abishai the son of Zeruiah, Joab's brother, and a third part under the hand of Ittai the Gittite.”  Now these third parts have a bearing, for those of you who are familiar with Homeric literature, in Homer’s Iliad they have the triumvirate, in fact the Romans have this too.  And it was a peculiar way they had of structuring the military in Greece and in Rome.  And it shows you that this was all over the ancient world because in David’s time he used the triumvirate system of command, there would always be three commanders, of equal rank leading his army.  Now why they did this we don’t know, except history tells us not just Israel did this.  He gives the three people, and then the king shows his tremendous bravery.  Remember, he is an old man now.  “And the king said unto the people, I will surely go forth with you myself also.  And in the Hebrew to emphasize the certainty, “I will go forth” the verb is repeated twice.  It is repeated in the imperfect and then the infinitive absolute is tacked on, which intensifies the mood of the verb.  It is the mood of decision; David decides he is going to go forth, taking on that infinitive absolute makes it David is going to go forth, he is absolutely convinced that he must go forth to lead his people.

Verse 3, “But the people answered, Thou shalt not go forth: for if we flee away, they will not care for us; neither if half of us die, will they care for us: but now thou art worth ten thousand of us: therefore now it is better that thou succour us out of the city.”  Now there are certain things in this verse you want to notice.  One is the tremendous loyalty of the people, you see the people love David.  Absalom, the human viewpoint politician, never commands the love, he commands a lot of people, but they’re all misfits, malcontents and they all got a gimmick, and when the going gets rough they won’t stick with Absalom.  David, on the other hand, because of his doctrinal character, always attracts people of like mind.  So he has people that are stable with him. We’re going to see later on in the story the people that are with him are actually smarter than he is at a certain point; ten thousand of us, they say, and we recognize by that that the issue in this revolution is not an issue of army versus army, it is an issue of team versus team.  You’ll see that appear several times in the text.  Ahithophel’s advice, you saw last time was based on assumption that the real issue of battle wasn’t the people, the real issue was who is going to get killed first, David or Absalom.  One or two of these contenders for the throne must be eliminated, regardless of everything else.  The issue is the competing kings, and the people too recognize this. 

 

And so in verse 4 they convince David, “[And the king said unto them,] What seems you best I will do. And the king stood by the gate side, and all the people came out by hundreds and by thousands.”  The word “hundreds” and “thousands”  means a military formation, they’re coming out of the command post east of Jordan, they’re marching toward the Jordan River, and here’s the city with the gate; David stands by the gate as they pass in review, and unit by unit they march through the gate, and the “hundreds” and “thousands” are these units as they go by.  This is the army on parade.  And David greets them as they go by; you see, they go by in groups, we don’t know how big they were, we’ll just say A group, B group and C group, and as each group goes by David yells an order to them, verse 5, “And the king commanded Joab and Abishai and Ittai,” and he yells it publicly because in the text we have a note, and the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament particularly will always do this for you, He’ll put these little notes in the story you’ll know and you’ll be set up for what’s going to happen. So this note is important to understand something is going to happen later.  He yelled, “Deal gently for my sake with the young man, even with Absalom. And all the people heard when the king gave all the captains charge concerning Absalom.”  And he commands each of these three men, “and all the people heard,” notice that note, “all the people heard when the king gave all the captains,” that means all three of the commanders of A group, B group, C group, they all were there and they heard David orally give that order. 

 

Now the order, what did it say?  “Deal gently,” now we’ve got to define that a little bit; the Hebrew word occurs several places in Scripture, so let’s get a flavor for this word so we can understand what he’s really after here.  Turn to Genesis 33:14, here’s one occurrence of this word, Jacob is asking permission of Esau to move through a large area of land.  So look what he says, “Let my lord, I pray thee, pass over before his servant: and I will lead on softly….”  Now it doesn’t mean he’s going tippy-toe so that can’t be the meaning of the word.   Well then what is the meaning; let’s read further because he defines it; he says, “lead on softly, according as the cattle that go before me and the children be able to endure until I come unto my lord in Seir.”  And the idea is that as he does this, he is restricting his motion to the endurance of his people, he’s saying look, I can’t rush this thing, we’ve got to gradually. So here the word has the word of gradualness, but beyond that it means gradualness because of some sort of restriction, some sort of limited condition. 

 

Let’s look at another place, 1 Kings 21:27, a little different context, it shows you something else about this word.  Again it’s translated “softly” but it can’t be that, Ahab has been confronted by Elijah and at this point he submits to the authority of God’s Word.  “And it came to pass, when Ahab heard those words, that he tore his clothes, and put sackcloth upon his flesh, and fasted, and lay in sackcloth, and went softly.”  Again it doesn’t mean operation tippy-toe; it means something else, and that something else is given in verse 28-29, “And the word of the LORD came to Elijah, the Tishbite, saying, [29] Seest thou how Ahab humbles himself before me?  Because he humbles himself before me, I will not bring the evil in his days…”   So what does the word mean there?  It means that Ahab limits himself to the condition of God’s Word, so again it’s a limiting of one’s behavior pattern. 

 

Finally, Isaiah 8:6, this gives you a real good physical picture of what this adverb means.  “Forasmuch as this people refuse the waters of Shiloah, that go softly,” now obviously he’s not talking about the water going softly, “and rejoice in Rezin and Remaliah’s son, [7] Now therefore, behold, the Lord brings up upon them the waters of the river, strong and many, even the king of Assyria, and all his glory; and he shall come up over all its channels, and go over all its banks.” So what does the word mean there?  It means a river that respects the boundaries, it doesn’t overflow.  So you see what it means, it doesn’t mean “softly,” what it means is to conform to restrictions.

 

Now turning back to 2 Samuel, when he says “deal gently with Absalom” what he is saying is that when you are in combat, I want you to always limit your combat, tie one hand behind your back and fight, sort of like the United States, somebody in the state department must have been reading 2 Samuel because ever since World War II we have fought our wars that way, gently, with one hand behind our back.  Now this is an illustration of that same philosophy and mental attitude. 

Verse 6, “So the people went out into the field against Israel: and the battle was in the wood of Ephraim;” scholars are not clear as to where this wood is; we can make some deductions about it.  One is that apparently it’s on the east side over here, and it’s not a forest in the sense that we think of a forest, tall pine trees and so on, that kind of thing, but it’s an overgrown area, and there’s lots of ravines and crevasses in here,  and they’re all overgrown so it is very treacherous territory.  Now watch it, David has this in mind, he drew Absalom’s forces over and then apparently what he did, he took his three groups and pinned them inside this forest.  So they couldn’t go across the river, they couldn’t go east, they couldn’t go north and they couldn’t go south.  He just moved his units in and he trapped them all in the forest of Ephraim, and the disaster then followed.

 

Verse 7, “Where the people of Israel were slain before the servants of David, and there was there a great slaughter that day of twenty thousand men.”  You think of that and compare the number of causalities we suffered from Vietnam.  This is 20,000 in one day.  It shows you the slaughter.  Verse 8, “For the battle was there scattered over the face of all the countryside,” literally, “and the wood” or the forest of Ephraim, “devoured more people that day than the sword devoured.”  Now how can a forest devour people.  The point is, these people were falling into the crevasses and killing themselves; they would run, thinking the ground was all covered, and suddenly find themselves falling down into these ditches and ravines.  You see, it was very, very treacherous ground.  This is the background for Absalom’s entrapment.  Now he himself is going to suffer in the forest of Ephraim.

 

Verse 9, “And Absalom met the servants of David. And Absalom rode upon a mule, and the mule went under the thick boughs of a great oak, and his head caught hold of the oak, and he was taken up between the heaven and the earth; and the mule that was under him went away.”  Obviously this puts him in a highly vulnerable position.  Verse 10, “And a certain man saw it, and told Joab, and said, Behold, I saw Absalom hanged in an oak.”  Now he’s not hanging here just by his head, obviously, or he’d be dead; he is actually holding on. We can deduce this because he’s still alive when they show up; he’s holding on, he’s got his head trapped in here.  It’s very appropriate because you see, he was such a proud king, so proud that God says okay, you like to stick your nose up in the air, fine, catch it in an oak.  So he was sitting here, caught in an oak trying to hold himself up because if he let go with his hands he would hang himself, his neck would break.  So he’s holding up in this position, and this soldier sees him. 

 

And in verse 11 we have a very interesting interplay.  “And Joab said unto the man that told him, And, behold, thou saw him, and why didst thou not smite him there to the ground? and I would have given thee ten shekels of silver, and a buckle for your sword [girdle].”  That would have been my personal award to you for eliminating that so and so.  [12] “And the man said unto Joab, Though I should receive a thousand shekels of silver in mine hand,” notice they paid in silver, not paper dollars, “yet would I not put forth mine hand against the king’s son: for in our hearing the king charged thee and Abishai and Ittai, saying, Beware that none touch the young man Absalom.”  So here we have a breakdown in the orders, and this is one case when disobedience to a superior, this is one case in the Bible where God commends it; it was a jackass order.  And this kind of order did not have to be followed.  This soldier was a legalist, he followed the order, but he didn’t get the context of the order.  Joab understands why that order was given.  He has been with David and he understands this guy David has a maudlin sentimentality over his son. 

Just to review for a moment, turn back to 13:39, remember what happened when Amnon was dealt with, how in verse 29, when Amnon had been killed by Absalom, notice what verse 39 says: Absalom killed Amnon, Amnon was David’s first son, these four sons, Amnon was his firstborn so David put all his eggs in one basket, surely Amnon is going to be the crown prince and the king. As I said before, just because you’re Christians and you know that Solomon is going to be the seed of 2 Samuel 7, don’t read that back into the text, because at this point in history, though the prophecy had been given, it wasn’t tacked on to any one of David’s sons.  Theoretically at this point Amnon could have been the king. So don’t read your understanding back before this actually happened.  Just pretend you don’t know that Solomon’s the king; it’s anybody’s guess at this point which son is going to be king.  So it says it kept “King David from going forth unto Absalom; for he was comforted concerning Amnon,” remember he mourned and mourned and mourned and mourned and he lost the chance to deal effectively with Absalom. Well, now he’s doing the same thing. 

 

And so Joab understands this, and he comes out in verse 14, the soldier goes on and gives this big long explanation he has to follow this order out, [13, “Otherwise I should have wrought falsehood against mine own life: for there is no matter hid from the king, and thou thyself wouldest have set thyself against me.]  And verse 14, “Then said Joab, I may not tarry thus with thee”  Now can’t you just see Joab saying that?  Literally what it reads is: I’m not going to waste my time with you, in other words, look, the guy is hanging over there in a tree, apparently this is real close, and several things in the text indicate that it’s not too far removed, probably within a hundred feet of where these guys are talking, because “….he took three darts in his hand,” now the darts didn’t become a military weapon until the captivity, so the darts that are used here are just pointed sticks, and what it shows apparently is that Joab doesn’t have his armor on right now, and he looks around, see, he’s mad, he’s got Absalom in the tree and he’s trying to find something that he can use so he just grabs three sticks, “and thrust them through the heart of Absalom, while he was yet alive in the midst of the oak.”  That demonstrates Joab’s attitude, and they go into his middle, probably mortally wound him, but he doesn’t’ die yet, so verse 15, along come the armor bearers, these are the men with Joab’s armor, and they go finish him off.  [15, “And ten young men that bare Joab’s armor compassed about and smote Absalom, and slew him.’] You can imagine what he looked like after ten people hacked at him with swords. 

 

Then a very significant thing happens in verse 16, “And Joab blew the trumpet,” now that’s the general order to break contact.  You say wait a minute, they’ve got the people on the run, why are they breaking contact now, doesn’t that violate the military principle of pursuit?  Yes it does, but this is another testimony, like the one I mentioned earlier in the text, the issue is king versus king, not army versus army.  Joab, now that Absalom is dead, he yells that the issue has been resolved so he says break contact, this is the end of the war, and he ends it right there, “and the people returned from pursuing after Israel: for Joab held back the people.”  Notice that, he had to restrain his army, he called them out of the woods.

 

Verse 1, “And they took Absalom, and cast him into a great pit in the wood, and laid a very great heap of stones upon him: and all Israel fled every one to his tent.” that’s the classical way of burying somebody you can’t stand.  This is the way Ai and they buried various people that were disobedient, Achan and others

Verse 18, “Now Absalom in his lifetime had taken and reared up for himself a pillar, which is in the king’s dale: for he said, I have no son to keep my name in remembrance: and he called the pillar after his own name: and it is called unto this day, Absalom’s place.”  The idea is that now the crown prince number two has been killed and no seed, so slowly as the book of  Samuel develops we have circumstance after circumstance destroy, destroy, it’s a mystery of who is going to survive for the throne.

 

And then finally an incident happens, and we want to conclude with this last incident, after the battle of Ephraim, because it shows David’s character once again.  Verse 19, “Then said Ahimaaz” remember he was one the espionage agents, “the son of Zadok, Let me now run, and bear the king tidings, how that the LORD hath avenged him of his enemies. [20] And Joab said unto him, Thou shalt not bear tidings this day, but thou shalt bear tidings another day: but this day thou shalt bear no tidings, because the king’s son is dead. [21] Then said Joab to Cushi,” and there’s a problem here, why are there two messengers?  It’s hard to tell, the only thing we can tell is apparently the first boy, who was the son of Zadok, was a man who would be caught, or at least Joab thought would be discriminated against for bringing bad news.  You see, the messenger of bad tidings in the ancient world was usually punished in some way because he was identified with what happened.  And this is his attempt to shield the son of Zadok from this behavior pattern.  So he picks a servant, “Cushi” means the negro, he had a negro servant, and he said, “Go tell the king what thou hast seen. And Cushi bowed himself unto Joab, and ran.”

 

Verse 22, “Then said Ahimaaz the son of Zadok yet again to Joab, But howsoever, let me, I pray thee, also run after Cushi. And Joab said, Wherefore wilt thou run, my son, seeing that thou hast no tidings ready? [23] But howsoever, said he, let me run. And he said unto him, Run. Then Ahimaaz ran by the way of the plain, and overran Cushi.”  They both run, and in verse 24, “And David sat between the two gates:” he’s back at his command post watching what’s going to happen.  Now he knows that the news is going to come either by one or multiple messengers.  Tradition is that if it comes by one messenger, that’s the victory message; if it comes by many messengers, that’s the message of defeat.  See, if the army had been defeated it would be helter-skelter, everybody would be running and so many people would come.  But if only one messenger came, that would be the sign that it was an orderly communication process, the army was still in tact.  So he “sat between the two gates: and the watchman went up to the roof over the gate unto the wall, and lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold a man running alone.”

 

Verse 25, “And the watchman cried, and told the king. And the king said, If he be alone, there is tidings in his mouth,” in other words, tidings means good tidings of victory. “And he came apace, and drew near. [26] And the watchman saw another man running,” this is the negro who’s coming later, “and the watchman called unto the porter, and said, Behold another man running alone. And the king said, He also bringeth tidings.”  So now you see we have multiple runners, and this clues David, there’s something wrong.  There wouldn’t be two runners coming from a battle.  So now there’s this foreboding.

 

Verse 17, “And the watchman said,” and this is a good one, “Me thinketh the running of the foremost is like the running of Ahimaaz the son of Zadok. And the king said, He is a good man, and cometh with good tidings. [28] And Ahimaaz called, and said unto the king, All is well.” Now notice the diplomatic way he gets around David’s questions.  “And he fell down to the earth upon his face before the king, and said, Blessed be the LORD thy God, which hath delivered up the men that lifted up their hand against my lord the king. [29] And the king said, Is the young man Absalom safe?”  Notice the preoccupation, instead of rejoicing that his soldiers have defeated his enemies, he’s worried about his son again.  Is Absalom safe? “And Ahimaaz answered, When Joab sent the king’s servant, and me thy servant, I saw a great tumult, but I knew not what it was.”  So he gets around it but I don’t think he’s convinced David, because the king said you just stay here, I see another messenger coming.  [30] “And the king said unto him, Turn aside, and stand here. And he turned aside, and stood still. [31] And, behold, Cushi came; and Cushi said, Tidings, my lord the king: for the LORD hath avenged thee this day of all them that rose up against thee. [32] And the king said unto Cushi, Is the young man Absalom safe? And Cushi answered, The enemies of my lord the king, and all that rise against thee to do thee hurt, be as that young man is.”  So obviously announces that Absalom is killed and slaughtered.

 

And beginning with this last verse of chapter 18 and extending through 19:8a we have the conclusion of this episode.  It runs up through the first part of 19:8.  He starts to his lament. David goes into a tremendous lament, [33] “And the king was much moved, and went up to the chamber over the gate, and wept: and as he went, thus he said, O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom! would God I had died for thee, O Absalom, my son, my son!”  You can see the tremendous emotional reaction of David to the thing. 

 

Now at this point Joab, you know what his attitude was because he just picked up those three sticks and let him have it.  19:9, “And it was told Joab, Behold, the king weeps and mourns for Absalom.”  Now there’s a parenthesis in the text, it begins with verse 2 and ends at the end of verse 4, and this describes what Joab sees.  See, Joab gets the message, verse 1, verse 2, 3 and 4 report to you what’s on Joab’s mind.  Verse 5 then tells you what Joab did. 

 

Verse 2, “And the victory that day was turned into mourning” or literally a funeral, “unto all the people: for the people heard say that day how the king was grieved for his son. [3] And the people gat them by stealth that day into the city, as people being ashamed steal away when they flee in battle. [4] But the king covered his face, and the king cried with a loud voice, O my son Absalom, O Absalom, my son, my son!”  The picture is that as David sat by the gate, the tradition was that as they came in the gate there would be a parade, group A, group B, group C, would march in formation through that gate and there would be a tremendous victory celebration.  And what does Joab see?  He comes in first as the victorious commander and he walks in there and he finds David falling apart, one of his sentimental moods, and all of his soldiers that he has lined up outside the city walls for a parade are standing out there at parade rest, ready to march in the city, and he hears this “O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom” bit.  And he’s got all his soldiers in formation out here.  So what does he do, they break formation is what happened here, and one by one they walk into the city.  And he has to break the whole parade, break everything down, and his soldiers walk in like they were a defeated army.  And this really burns Joab, because he was out there fighting with them.  So verse 5, 6 and 7 are one of the most tremendous exhortation in God’s Word about how to have the proper attitude toward your allies. 


[5] “And Joab came into the house to the king,” by this time David’s inside the house, “and said, Thou hast shamed this day the faces of all thy servants,” this is given with tremendous vigor, he’s pointing his finger at David, he’s mad, he’s angry.  This is one of those rare times in the Bible where a non-prophet addresses the king in this language.  Now usually a prophet will do this, but never somebody under the king; this is a rare moment in the history of the Old Testament.  And the fact that it is rare indicates its importance.  He says, “You have shamed this day the faces of all thy servants, which this day have saved thy life, and the lives of thy sons and of thy daughters, and the lives of thy wives, and the lives of thy concubines; [6] In that thou love thine enemies, and hate thy friends. For thou hast declared this day, that thou regards neither princes nor servants: for this day I perceive, that if Absalom had lived, and all we had died this day, then it had pleased thee well.”

 

Now we don’t have to go far in American history to see how we as a country have done verse 6 over and over and over again, always love the enemy and hate the people that are loyal.  The Hungarians, who gave their lives in the face of Russian tanks were just mowed down while we diddled around.  We love the Chinese communists more than the South Korean soldiers that were being slaughtered in the Korean War.  We love the North Vietnamese, we send aid to replace their hospitals, more than some of the Montenyards that fought so faithfully for the cause of freedom.  So we as a nation have done exactly what David is doing.  Love your enemies and hate your friends.

 

Now in verse 7 he gives David an order, because he sees his army falling apart and demoralized, and at this point, wonderful point in history, Joab, if you wanted to characterize Joab, he’s an impulsive man, but at this point the impulse is coupled with doctrine because Joab is the kind of guy that has to take action; he sees the army, he sees something David has become blind to, and that is that while David is preoccupied with his son, the whole kingdom of God is falling apart.  We’re going to see how much next week when we get in a little bit later section, how much the kingdom is already falling; the unity that was there is now slowly disintegrating, while David just seems obsessed with his son, his son, his son, the kingdom all around is disintegrating.  So Joab says, “Now therefore arise, go forth, and speak encouragingly [comfortably] unto thy servants: for I swear by the LORD, if thou go not forth, there will not tarry one with thee this night: and that will be worse unto thee than all the evil that befell thee from thy youth until now.”

 

Verse 8, “Then the king arose, and sat in the gate. And they told unto all the people, saying, Behold, the king doth sit in the gate. And all the people came before the king: for Israel had fled every man to his tent.”  In other words, they were inside the city, David sat on the place for parade review, and the army marched by him; they had their parade after all, but it was only after this [can’t understand word] from Joab.

 

Once again we see a principle that we can apply in our lives.  David preferred some immediate pleasure, some immediate thing that was good in itself, perfectly good in itself, to be concerned for his son, but he preferred that to God’s kingdom, and God does not tolerate that.  Shall we bow for prayer.